Evidence suggests the company may have minors employed at 400 other locations.
The Department of Labor (DOL) recently found that a leading contractor for sanitation allegedly employed 31 minors from ages 13 to 17 for overnight cleaning of slaughterhouses and meatpacking facilities.
Packers Sanitation Services, Inc. is under investigation for employing over 30 minors in three locations in the Midwest. The DOL claims the children were cleaning dangerous equipment with hazardous chemicals up to 6 or 7 days a week. Several of these children reported injuries, including chemical burns.
The DOL filed a complaint with the Federal District Court of Nebraska for a nationwide injunction on Packers. According to their complaint, evidence suggests that Packers may have kids working at 400 other locations across the country.
The court partially fulfilled the DOL’s request and ordered Packers to “immediately cease and refrain from employing oppressive child labor.”
The order also demanded Packers comply with the DOL’s investigation because the complaint included claims that Packers’ managers had been tampering with evidence – including obstructing interviews and attempting to hide or delete important documents, text messages, and incident reports.
According to the complaint, the purpose for the nationwide injunction request is the safety of the kids while the DOL investigates.
“While Wage and Hour is continuing to pour over records to identify such children, it is slow, painstaking work. Yet, the children working overnight on the kill floor of these slaughterhouses cannot wait,” it reads.
Packers denied the accusations. In a statement to NBC News, it said that it has “an absolute company-wide prohibition against the employment of anyone under the age of 18 and zero tolerance for any violation of that policy — period.”
Packers also said it was surprised by the complaint because it claims to be cooperating with the investigation by providing important documents and responses.
A hearing has been set for Nov. 26 to decide whether the order will be dissolved, extended, or modified.
See what others are saying: (New York Times) (NBC News) (CBS News)
Officers Charged After Detaining Woman in Car Hit by Train, Woman Faces Charges Too
The woman suffered nine broken ribs, a broken arm, a broken leg, a broken sternum, broken teeth, and several other injuries, her lawyer said.
Prosecutors Bring Charges
Less than two months after police in Colorado left a woman handcuffed in a patrol car parked on a railroad crossing as a freight train plowed through it, the severely injured woman has still been charged, according to a statement Monday.
In September, multiple law enforcement agencies responded to a road rage incident in Fort Lupton, where they arrested 20-year-old Yareni Rios-Gonzalez for allegedly brandishing a firearm at another driver. While they searched her vehicle, they placed her in a squad car that was parked on train tracks.
Despite being hospitalized for nearly two weeks after the incident, Rios-Gonzalez has been charged with felony menacing, the Weld County District Attorney’s Office said in a statement.
Her lawyer, Paul Wilkinson, told Reuters the news that she was being charged was disappointing and added that he will file a lawsuit against police for his client’s injuries and for violating her civil rights.
Two officers were also charged for their involvement in the incident. Officer Jordan Steinke, from the Fort Lupton Police Department, faces one count each of attempted manslaughter and second-degree assault, both felonies, as well as reckless endangerment, a misdemeanor. Sgt. Pablo Vazquez, from the Platteville Police Department, faces five counts of reckless endangerment, one count of obstructing a highway or other passageway, one count of careless driving, and one count of parking where prohibited, all misdemeanors.
Abandoned on the Tracks
A Platteville police officer reportedly stopped Rios-Gonzalez just past the railroad tracks and parked the patrol car on the crossing.
In body camera footage obtained by 9News, she can be heard screaming from inside the vehicle, trying to get their attention as the freight train barreled toward them.
At one point, the locomotive’s horn blares audibly in the distance, but the officers either fail to hear it or ignore it.
By the time the cops notice the incoming train, there are mere seconds until impact, and they scramble away leaving the woman trapped inside.
Vazquez can be heard saying he did not know he parked on the tracks and that he was unaware another officer had placed Rios-Gonzalez in his patrol car.
Rios-Gonzalez suffered nine broken ribs, a broken arm, a broken leg, a broken sternum, broken teeth, and several other injuries, according to Wilkinson.
See what others are saying: (Reuters) (CBS News) (The Colorado Sun)
Amazon Sends Tone-Deaf Message Warning Drivers of “Four-Legged Costumers” After Dog Attack Kills Driver
Outraged by the response, one person is organizing a “Nationwide No-Show” for Amazon.
After an Amazon delivery driver in Missouri was killed by an apparent dog attack, the company sent a message to its drivers warning about the company’s “four-legged customers.”
The Missouri driver was found dead on a customer’s front lawn on Monday after the attack. Amazon sent its message the following day.
“We want to help ensure you aren’t surprised by our four-legged customers when on route, so be sure to check the Amazon Delivery App for the paw print icon in the ‘Delivery Notes’ indicating you should ‘be aware of a dog at this stop.,'” the message said. “If we know Fido is nearby, we’ll add the paw print to give you a heads up. As always, contact the customer to help you with the pet, or ‘Driver Support’ in the Delivery App if you can’t reach the customer.”
It is not clear if Amazon released this statement in response to the incident the day before or if it was drafted earlier.
This is not the first time people have taken issue with tips provided by the online retail giant. Last year, the company came under fire for their high expectations of their drivers leading them to urinate in bottles rather than take time to find a bathroom.
One delivery driver said to Motherboard last year, “I can tell you that if I drove to find a restroom that I would be bringing back packages every night and that would eventually mean I would get infractions, which would lead to termination.”
Drivers have expressed concern that since there is no time to use the restroom, they will also not have time to wait for a customer to answer their messages and wrangle their dog.
The message was met with distaste online and even led one user to organize a “Nationwide No-Show” for Amazon delivery drivers on Monday, Oct. 31.
Libraries Urged to Work With Law Enforcement And Security After Threats
Some librarians have embraced the suggestion while others are hesitant to include police in their operations.
The American Library Association (ALA) on Tuesday encouraged libraries to partner with local security and law enforcement to create a plan of action amid a recent series of threats.
Libraries across the country are reeling after weeks of bomb and shooting threats. As of now, all threats have been proven to be hoaxes, but as they happened, each library responded differently to the threats, causing staff and patrons alike to show concern about the lack of procedure.
The ALA requested the FBI to investigate a possible connection in the recent threats to libraries in more than six different states. In the meantime, they have left it to the libraries to organize a system that works for them if they receive threats in the future. Lessa Pelayo-Lozada, the president of ALA suggested the libraries work with security and law enforcement.
“They have to work with their local security, with their local police, with their local protective units to be able to figure out what that process looks like for them and what the best practices are for the community that they’re living in,” Pelayo-Lozada said to Motherboard.
While the ALA does not have any specific guidance for libraries if they receive threats of violence, it does work with some security professionals like Dr. Steve Albrecht. Albrecht believes librarians should be trained in working with law enforcement and that several members of library staff should know how to respond to an incident.
“I’ve trained thousands of library employees over 22 years. I always recommend not closing based on these types of threats, because it just encourages more. The threat makers need to learn they can’t control libraries,” Albrecht tweeted in response to threats.
However, some libraries are hesitant to work with law enforcement. The Onondaga County Public Library in Syracuse has been scaling back armed security and police presence and instead using community engagement teams trained in de-escalation. According to their director Christian Zabriskie, the library system has a clear policy for handling violent threats that puts staff treatment first.
“We’re spending over half a million dollars a year on this and it’s worth it because we are seeing results,” Zabriskie said to Motherboard. “We have had a total of six incidents across 11 locations over three months, and we write up everything.”