Connect with us

U.S.

Alex Jones Takes a $965 Million Hit in Defamation Trial

Published

on

It’s unclear how much of the payout Jones can afford to fork over, but the plaintiffs’ attorneys intend to pursue their clients’ awards until every last dollar is received.


Tears Spill in the Courtroom

A Connecticut jury ordered far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones to pay $965 million to eight families of Sandy Hook victims and one first responder Wednesday.

It was the climax to the second of three defamation trials determining how much Jones should pay in damages for falsely claiming that the Sandy Hook shooting, which killed 26 people including 20 children, was staged by crisis actors.

The first trial concluded a month ago, deciding that he should pay two families nearly $50 million, and the third trial will commence later this year. So far, the total damages owed by Jones now surpass $1 billion.

A wave of relief swept over one side of the courtroom as the verdict was read, with plaintiffs crying and hugging their attorneys.

Robbie Parker, a plaintiff and father of six-year-old victim Emily Parker, told reporters he credits his lawyers with giving him “the strength to finally find my voice and to fight and to stand up to what had been happening to me for so long.”

During the trial, he had provided emotional testimony about the threats and harassment he received after Jones called him a crisis actor in front of millions of viewers. He said hateful messages flooded Emily’s Facebook memorial page the day after she was murdered, leading him to take it down weeks later.

Parker got $120 million from the jury.

Wednesday’s payout was in compensatory damages; Judge Barbara Bellis will next decide whether to award punitive damages as well, and if so, what amount. Connecticut law caps punitive damages at attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, according to CNN legal analyst Joey Jackson.

Norm Pattis, Jones’s attorney, vowed to appeal the verdict.

Could This Sink Jones’s Media Empire?

Jones was not present in the courtroom Wednesday, but he livestreamed himself reacting to the verdict and laughing.

He said there “ain’t no money” with which he can pay the damages, adding, “Do these people actually think they’re getting any money?”

During both defamation trials, he claimed to be in financial distress because of his deplatforming from mainstream social media platforms in 2018.

He testified in August that damages of just $2 million would destroy him financially. Although Jones’s real net worth is not publically known, economist Bernard Pettingill, Jr. estimated in court that it’s between $135 million and $270 million.

In his livestream Wednesday, Jones called the plaintiffs “ambulance chasers” and mocked the verdict.

Pattis gave a more measured reaction in a statement outside court.

“My heart goes out to the families, we live in divided times,” he said. “They’ve been weaponized and used for political purposes in this country, in my view, and today is a very, very, very dark day for freedom of speech.”

“The plaintiffs’ attorneys told reporters they will seek to get every last dollar Jones owes them, however long it takes.

Since facing legal trouble for his false remarks, Jones has gone back and forth, sometimes admitting that the shooting was real and other times saying he was right to ask questions and still isn’t certain what happened.

See what others are saying: (CNN) (The Washington Post) (The New York Times)

U.S.

White Supremacist Propaganda Reached Record High in 2022, ADL Finds

Published

on

 “We cannot sit idly by as these extremists pollute our communities with their hateful trash,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said.


White supremacist propaganda in the U.S. reached record levels in 2022, according to a report published Wednesday by the Anti-Defamation League’s Center of Extremism.

The ADL found over 6,700 cases of white supremacist propaganda in 2022, which marks a 38% jump from the nearly 4,900 cases the group found in 2021. It also represents the highest number of incidents ever recorded by the ADL. 

The propaganda tallied by the anti-hate organization includes the distribution of racist, antisemitic, and homophobic flyers, banners, graffiti, and more. This propaganda has spread substantially since 2018, when the ADL found just over 1,200 incidents. 

“There’s no question that white supremacists and antisemites are trying to terrorize and harass Americans with their propaganda,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement. “We cannot sit idly by as these extremists pollute our communities with their hateful trash.” 

The report found that there were at least 50 white supremacist groups behind the spread of propaganda in 2022, but 93% of it came from just three groups. One of those groups was also responsible for 43% of the white supremacist events that took place last year. 

White supremacist events saw a startling uptick of their own, with the ADL documenting at least 167, a 55% jump from 2021. 

Propaganda was found in every U.S. state except for Hawaii, and events were documented in 33 states, most heavily in Massachusetts, California, Ohio, and Florida.

“The sheer volume of white supremacist propaganda distributions we are documenting around the country is alarming and dangerous,” Oren Segal, Vice President of the ADL’s Center on Extremism said in a statement. “Hardly a day goes by without communities being targeted by these coordinated, hateful actions, which are designed to sow anxiety and create fear.”

“We need a whole-of-society approach to combat this activity, including elected officials, community leaders, and people of good faith coming together and condemning this activity forcefully,” Segal continued. 

See what others are saying: (Axios) (The Hill) (The New York Times)

Continue Reading

Business

Adidas Financial Woes Continue, Company on Track for First Annual Loss in Decades

Published

on

Adidas has labeled 2023 a “transition year” for the company. 


Yeezy Surplus 

Adidas’ split with musician Kanye West has left the company with financial problems due to surplus Yeezy products, putting the sportswear giant in the position to potentially suffer its first annual loss in over 30 years. 

Adidas dropped West last year after he made a series of antisemitic remarks on social media and other broadcasts. His Yeezy line was a staple for Adidas, and the surplus product is due, in part, to the brand’s own decision to continue production during the split.

According to CEO Bjorn Gulden, Adidas continued production of only the items already in the pipeline to prevent thousands of people from losing their jobs. However, that has led to the unfortunate overabundance of Yeezy sneakers and clothes. 

On Wednesday, Gulden said that selling the shoes and donating the proceeds makes more sense than giving them away due to the Yeezy resale market — which has reportedly shot up 30% since October.

“If we sell it, I promise that the people who have been hurt by this will also get something good out of this,” Gulden said in a statement to the press. 

However, Gulden also said that West is entitled to a portion of the proceeds of the sale of Yeezys per his royalty agreement.

The Numbers 

Adidas announced in February that, following its divergence from West, it is facing potential sales losses totaling around $1.2 billion and profit losses of around $500 million. 

If it decides to not sell any more Yeezy products, Adidas is facing a projected annual loss of over $700 million.

Outside of West, Adidas has taken several heavy profit blows recently. Its operating profit reportedly fell by 66% last year, a total of more than $700 million. It also pulled out of Russia after the country’s invasion of Ukraine last year, which cost Adidas nearly $60 million dollars. Additionally, China’s “Zero Covid” lockdowns last year caused in part a 36% drop in revenue for Adidas compared to years prior.

As a step towards a solution, Gulden announced that the company is slashing its dividends from 3.30 euros to 0.70 euro cents per share pending shareholder approval. 

Adidas has labeled 2023 a “transition year” for the company. 

“Adidas has all the ingredients to be successful. But we need to put our focus back on our core: product, consumers, retail partners, and athletes,” Gulden said. “I am convinced that over time we will make Adidas shine again. But we need some time.”

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNN)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Immigration Could Be A Solution to Nursing Home Labor Shortages

Published

on

98% of nursing homes in the United States are experiencing difficulty hiring staff. 


The Labor Crisis 

A recent National Bureau of Economic Research paper has offered up a solution to the nursing home labor shortage: immigration. 

According to a 2022 American Health Care Association survey, six in ten nursing homes are limiting new patients due to staffing issues. The survey also says that 87% of nursing homes have staffing shortages and 98% are experiencing difficulty hiring. 

The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) outlined in their paper that increased immigration could help solve the labor shortage in nursing homes. Immigrants make up 19% of nursing home workers.

With every 10% increase in female immigration, nursing assistant hours go up by 0.7% and registered nursing hours go up by 1.1% And with that same immigration increase, short-term hospitalizations of nursing home residents go down by 0.6%.

The Solution 

Additionally, the State Department issued 145% more EB-3 documents, which are employment-based visas, for healthcare workers in the 2022 fiscal year than in 2019, suggesting that more people are coming to the U.S. to work in health care. 

However, according to Skilled Nursing News, in August of 2022, the approval process from beginning to end for an RN can take between seven to nine months. 

Displeasure about immigration has exploded since Pres. Joe Biden took office in 2021. According to a Gallup study published in February, around 40% of American adults want to see immigration decrease. That is a steep jump from 19% in 2021, and it is the highest the figure has been since 2016.

However, more than half of Democrats still are satisfied with immigration and want to see it increased. But with a divided Congress, the likelihood of any substantial immigration change happening is pretty slim. 

See what others are saying: (Axios) (KHN) (Skilled Nursing News)

Continue Reading