Connect with us


Instagram Head Addresses Concerns About App Amid Criticism From Kylie Jenner



Jenner, like many other users, is frustrated by the platform’s new focus on video content.

The KarJenners Vs. Instagram

Instagram head Adam Mosseri posted a video on Tuesday morning addressing recent criticisms lodged at the social media app, including from celebrities like Kylie Jenner and Kim Kardashian.

On Monday, both Jenner and Kardashian shared a post complaining about changes on the platform to their Instagram stories. 

“MAKE INSTAGRAM INSTAGRAM AGAIN,” the post read. “Stop trying to be TikTok, I just want to see cute photos of my friends. Sincerely, everyone.”

“PLEASE,” Jenner wrote in text alongside the image. Kardashian included a similar message in her story. 

Recently, Instagram has leaned more into video content, specifically reels, in an effort to compete with the short form videos that thrive on TikTok. Meta, Instagram and Facebook’s parent company, recently announced even more upcoming changes that would reshape the platforms to look more like the Bytedance-owned Gen Z app of choice, but many are not on board with those decisions. 

Mosseri defended the ongoing changes in his video, which was posted to Instagram and Twitter. While he did not name Jenner or Kardashian specifically, he said he has been listening to recent concerns and wanted to clarify a few of the new revisions to the app. 

He began by addressing full-screen feeds, a feature he said only a handful of Instagram users are experiencing as it is still an experimental test, and therefore is “not yet good.” He said it would only be rolled out to the rest of Instagram after the company feels confident in its development. 

Instagram’s Continued Emphasis on Video

Mosseri then moved on to address one of the primary concerns among social media users: the heavy switch to video.

“I want to be clear, we’re gonna continue to support photos. It’s part of our heritage,” Mosseri explained. “I love photos, I know a lot of you out there love photos too. That said, I need to be honest, I do believe that more and more of Instagram is going to become video over time. We see this even if we change nothing.” 

“So we’re gonna have to lean into that shift,” he continued. 

Mosseri also discussed recommendations on the app, which is content promoted to users from accounts they do not follow. 

“The idea is to help you discover new and interesting things on Instagram that you may not even know exist,” he said. 

However, he also noted that if users have no interest in the content being suggested to them, that means Instagram is failing. Still, he said the company will continue working with recommendations because he thinks it is the most effective way to grow the Instagram experience. He also believes it will boost the company’s goal of assisting small creators on the app.

In response to his message, many furthered their complaints about Instagram, often echoing the issues raised by Kardashian and Jenner. 

The Power of The Kardashian Family

The sisters are among the most-followed people on Instagram. Kardashian has 326 million followers, while Jenner is ahead of her with 361 million. The power the family wields over social media is immeasurable, and criticisms levied by them can have severe consequences. 

In 2018, Jenner tweeted that she no longer opens Snapchat. The following day, Snap’s stock tanked by over one billion dollars. 

It remains unclear how severe the fallout will be for Instagram following their complaints. Meta’s stock fell around 1.5% after the sisters posted about Instagram on Monday, and another 2% Tuesday morning. Those drops, however, were consistent with downward trends the company had been seeing over the last several days. 

Some speculate that the Kardashian family will not have the power to be as influential in impacting Instagram as they did Snapchat, largely because they rely on the platform to promote their brands. While some of the company’s recent changes may have complicated that process, tanking the company could be akin to biting the hand that feeds them. 

But Instagram is not at its most powerful, either. According to CNBC, Meta is set to release its earnings report this week, and analysts are expecting it will see its first year-over-year quarterly revenue decline. That puts the company in a vulnerable position that would likely require changes to the path going forward. If some of the most influential people on its platforms are already vocally opposed to those changes, the company is left in a tricky position. 

So far, neither Jenner nor Kardashian have addressed Mosseri’s response.

See what others are saying: (CNBC) (Bloomberg) (The Wall Street Journal)


Shane Dawson Says Cancellation Felt Planned By The Universe 



The YouTuber said that by being forced to take a digital break, he had a chance to step back and “see what the bigger purpose is.” 

Dawson Speaks Out

Two years after facing intense backlash online, YouTuber Shane Dawson said he found a positive side to being “canceled.”

In the summer of 2020, Dawson faced intense scrutiny after people resurfaced his old controversial videos where he wore blackface, made racist jokes, and said inappropriate remarks about children. He lost a slew of subscribers as a result and stepped away from YouTube for over a year following the scandal. 

Dawson has since returned to posting, sharing long-form content every few months on his channel to millions of viewers, though his audience is not nearly as large as it was before the backlash. He also started a podcast earlier this year. 

While speaking on Perez Hilton’s podcast this week, Dawson said his cancellation actually came at a time when he needed to rethink his life online. 

“I really think the universe and God, or whatever, really planned it this way because I was at a point before I got canceled where I didn’t wanna be around anymore,” Dawson said. “I was so burnt out.”

“Wait, you were so burnt out that you were depressed and suicidal?” Hilton followed up. “Just from overworking?”

“Well it wasn’t just from overworking,” Dawson added. “It was, well, I’m a workaholic.” 

Cancelation “Felt Very Designed”

Dawson went on to explain that being a workaholic opened the doors for other issues, like fearing he will lose his success, getting stressed about his online reputation, worrying about spending enough time  with family, and negative thoughts about his body image. As all this started to take a toll on him, he started therapy. Not long after, he started dealing with his 2020 controversies. 

“Oddly enough, two months after I started therapy, maybe even sooner, I got canceled,” Dawson said. “And it was like, ‘oh.’ That felt very designed to me, by something.”

“Because I was like, okay, she’s learning about everything, all my issues, all this, all that, and my biggest fear is being canceled again and it happened,” he continued. “So now I can see what the bigger purpose is.” 

Now he says he is grateful to be at a point where he is not constantly worried about making content and pleasing people. Dawson said that earlier in his career, his need to be liked was so severe that he would message people who said negative things about him online in an effort to change their minds. 

“It’s always that thing where like, I want people that hate me to like me. Which is toxic,” Dawson explained.  “Like a hater would say something, and I’ll DM them, this is something I’d do years ago, I’d DM them and talk to them and then, ‘oh, they like me now!’ It was dark.” 

See what others are saying: (Dexerto) (PopBuzz)

Continue Reading


Monica Lewinsky Asks Beyoncé to Change “Partition” Lyric Amid “Renaissance” Edits



The 2013 song includes the phrase “he Monica Lewinsky’d all on my gown.”

Monica Lewinsky’s Request

Monica Lewinsky suggested that Beyoncé remove a lyric from her 2013 song “Partition” that references the infamous scandal involving the former White House intern and then-President Bill Clinton.

The request came as Beyoncé’s representatives confirmed she would be removing an ableist lyric from a track off her latest album “Renaissance.” The song “Heated” used the word “spaz,” which many disability advocates have condemned as an offensive slur.

Earlier this year, Lizzo removed the same word from her song “Grrrls” after facing backlash. On Monday, a spokesperson for Beyoncé said that while the word was “not used intentionally in a harmful way,” it “will be replaced.”

Lewinsky shared that news Monday on Twitter and added, “uhmm, while we’re at it… #Partition.”

In “Partition,” the Grammy winner sings the phrase “he Monica Lewinsky’d all on my gown.”

Response From the Beyhive

The Beyhive was quick to call Lewinsky out for her plea, arguing that the song has been out for nearly a decade and she could have brought her complaint up sooner. Some said she was in no place to be upset with the lyric as she has the phrase “rap song muse” in her Twitter bio. 

Lewinsky issued replies to many of these complaints on Tuesday, saying this is not the first time she publicly addressed “Partition,” and the numerous other songs referencing her. Regarding her Twitter bio, she said she uses humor to cope with the public scandal. 

When people continued to accuse her of singling out Beyoncé when there are dozens of artists who have written similar lyrics, Lewinsky said, “when articles about the 125+ other artists changing lyrics to a song cross my TL, i promise i’ll do the same.”

Lewinsky’s request prompted frustration from people who felt that by changing the ableist lyric in “Heated,” Beyoncé inadvertently opened a door for people to pressure her into tweaking other songs. 

“Heated” is not the only track off of “Renaissance” that has had to return to the cutting room since the album’s release. Beyoncé also removed an interpolation of the Kelis song “Milkshake” after Kelis spoke out against its use and called it “theft.”

Neither Beyoncé nor her team has publicly responded to Lewinksy. In a tweet, Lewinsky said she had not privately reached out to the singer to sort the issue behind closed doors.

See what others are saying: (People) (Entertainment Weekly) (USA Today)

Continue Reading


Chris Rock Addresses Oscars Slap After Will Smith’s Apology Video



In his latest statement, Smith said his “behavior was unacceptable.”

Chris Rock Talks Oscars

Just hours after Will Smith posted an apology video regarding the infamous Oscars slap, Chris Rock addressed the incident during a show in Atlanta. 

“Everybody is trying to be a fucking victim. If everybody claims to be a victim, then nobody will hear the real victims,” Rock said during a Friday show, via People. “Even me getting smacked by Suge Smith … I went to work the next day, I got kids.” (Rock’s “Suge Smith” joke was likely a reference to Suge Knight, the CEO of Death Row Records who is currently in jail over a deadly hit and run.)

“Anyone who says words hurt has never been punched in the face,” the comedian reportedly continued.

Rock has been sprinkling remarks about the slap into some of his recent sets over the last couple of weeks. 

The controversy unfolded during the 94th Academy Awards when Rock was presenting the statue for Best Documentary. He made a quip about Smith’s wife, Jada Pinkett Smith.

Smith then walked onto the stage and slapped Rock. Upon returning to his seat, he shouted, “leave my wife’s name out your fucking mouth.” Less than one hour later, he won the Best Actor Oscar for his work in “King Richard.”

Within the following days, Smith issued an apology and resigned from the Academy. The organization also banned the actor from attending any of its events for the next decade. 

Will Smith Posts Apology

Smith has held a low profile since the Oscars, but made a return to the public eye on Friday by posting a YouTube video titled “It’s been a minute…” Smith claimed he has reached out to Rock, but the stand-up star said he is not ready to talk it out just yet. 

“I apologize to you,” Smith said in the video. “My behavior was unacceptable, and I’m here whenever you’re ready to talk.” 

“There is no part of me that thinks that was the right way to behave in that moment,” the “Fresh Prince of Bel Air” actor continued. “There is no part of me that thinks that is the optimal way to handle a feeling of disrespect or insults.”

Smith also apologized to Rock’s family, as well as his own, for dragging them into controversy and hurting them with his actions. 

Smith also clarified that Pinkett Smith had no influence over his decision to slap Rock on stage. 
“I made a choice on my own,” he said. “Jada had nothing to do with it.”

See what others are saying: (People) (Esquire) (Complex)

Continue Reading