Meg Thee Stallion Countersued By Label In Dispute Over “Something for Thee Hotties”
Following the countersuit, the musician slammed her label as a “joke.”
1501 Entertainment Countersues Megan Thee Stallion
Megan Thee Stallion is being countersued by her record label over what her contract officially defines as an “album.”
The case centers around “Something for Thee Hotties,” which Megan The Stallion, whose real name is Megan Pete, released last year. Pete filed a lawsuit last month seeking a declaratory judgment that the work counts as an album, arguing that 1501 Certified Entertainment was trying to hold her hostage in her contract by not considering it as such.
On Monday, 1501 filed a countersuit claiming that Pete “has repeatedly breached her contracts.” The label also asked for a judgment, urging the court to declare that “Something for Thee Hotties” fell short of Pete’s contractual album requirements.
According to multiple reports that reviewed the suit, 1501 argues that “Something for The Hotties” is not an album because it contains “freestyles available on YouTube and archival material from as far back as 2019.” The suit also reportedly claims that only 29 minutes of its run length consists of new recordings. Pete’s contract allegedly states that she “must include at least twelve new master recordings of her studio performances of previously-unreleased musical compositions” for album credit.
Pete, however, claims the record met all of her contractual obligations. In the February lawsuit, her lawyers accused 1501 of trying “to take further advantage of Pete at great expense and not in good faith.”
According to Pete, the only parameter for what defines an album under her contract is that the work needs to be at least 45-minutes long, criteria that “Something for Thee Hotties” meets. She also claimed that she took various steps to obtain clearance for the album, but 1501 waited over two months after its release to tell her it did not meet the “album” definition.
“Pete can only speculate as to the reasons why 1501 has taken this new position. But the intended result of its actions is clear,” her lawsuit states. “1501 wants to tie Pete down to release more albums under the Contract to the financial benefit of 1501.”
“This is inconsistent with the Contract terms, which are clear and unambiguous.”
Megan Thee Stallion Slams Label On Twitter
Pete criticized 1501’s countersuit in a series of tweets on Monday. She specifically called out the head of the label, Carl Crawford.
“First the man over my label said I don’t make him any money … now he counter suing trying to keep me on his label because he wants to make more money,” Pete wrote. “lol if I ain’t making you no money why not just drop me?”
In separate posts, she asked for her label to let her go and described the people running 1501 as “greedy ass men.”
“Free me from this joke ass label,” she continued.
Crawford took aim at Pete later that day on Instagram. He accused her of “playing the victim” and said she had not “paid for 1 show since 2019.”
“U can keep that bullshit ass mix tape and send over that straight drop whenever u ready,” he added.
He also posted a series of Instagram stories painting Pete as a liar.
“Carl I don’t wanna be signed to yo pill popping ass!” Pete later tweeted. “You talking abt I ain’t paid for a show and you sound slow.”
“Also, how can I owe you any of MY money out side of music when your team can’t even provide ACTUAL statements of what i owe… you also haven’t PAID ME since 2019,” she continued before saying she was taking a break from commenting on Twitter and would see her label “in court.”
See what others are saying: (BBC News) (Complex) (Rolling Stone)
Max to Agrees to “Properly” Credit Writers and Directors After Facing Backlash For Lumping Them in As “Creators”
The company said the credits were laid out incorrectly due to “an oversight in the technical transition from HBO Max to Max.”
After film and television writers slammed Max for crediting all writers, producers, and directors as general “creators” on its platform, the company said it will be adjusting its credits display.
“We agree that the talent behind the content on Max deserve their work to be properly recognized,” the streaming service said in a statement obtained by The Hollywood Reporter.
Max — the new rebrand of HBO Max that incorporates Discovery content — launched on Tuesday to much criticism. Amid glitches and app-switching confusion, the biggest backlash it faced was over the choice to lump creative roles into one credit section called “creators.” As one viral tweet noted, if a user were to select the film “Raging Bull,” the service’s display would not specifically credit Martin Scorsese as the director, rather, his name would be included at random with half a dozen other people, including writers and producers.
The decision was condemned by many in the industry who argued it minimizes writers and directors by not properly giving them credit where it is due. Especially amid the ongoing writers’ strike, and with directors and actors starting negotiations with studios, some took it as a slap in the face.
“The studios don’t want anyone to know our names,” writer Christina Strain tweeted. “It’s easier to pay us nothing if we’re faceless.”
“Another move from studios to diminish the role of writers, directors, actors and other craftspeople. Miss me wit this nonsense,” Jorge Rivera, the Vice-Chair of the Writers Guild’s Latinx Writers Committee, added.
In a statement, Directors Guild President Lesli Linka Glatter said that Warner Bros. Discovery’s choice to “collapse” these roles into one credit “while we are in negotiations with them is a grave insult to our members and our union.”
“The DGA will not stand for it,” Glatter continued.
WGA West President Meredith Stiehm claimed the move was “a credits violation,” as well as an insult “to the artists that make the films and TV shows that make their corporation billions.”
On Wednesday, Max said it would rework its crediting.
“We will correct the credits, which were altered due to an oversight in the technical transition from HBO Max to Max and we apologize for this mistake,” the platform said.
See what others are saying: (Gizmodo) (The Hollywood Reporter) (The Los Angeles Times)
A Quarter of Young British Men Support Andrew Tate’s Thoughts on Women
U.K. residents at large, however, do not view him favorably.
Even under house arrest in Romania, misogynist influencer Andrew Tate still holds substantial sway over young men.
According to data from YouGov that was obtained by The Independent, 26% of U.K. men between 18 and 29 years old who know of Tate agree with his views on women. That figure was largely the same for men between 30 and 39, as 28% agreed with Tate’s opinions on the subject.
Men in their 30s were slightly more likely to agree with Tate on his thoughts about masculinity. Three out of ten supported those views, compared to just a quarter of men 18 to 29.
Those statistics only include the thoughts of men who have heard of Tate, but per YouGov, most have. In the 18 to 29 group, 93% were familiar with him, and 86% of men in their 30s knew of him.
The U.K. at large was less aware of Tate, with just 63% of British adults having heard of him. Of that group, only 6% held a positive view of him.
Tate has faced substantial backlash for his sexist rhetoric over the years. In the past, he said that men should have “authority” over their wives or girlfriends, and that women should “bear some responsibility” for being raped. He was previously banned from Twitter over his extremist views on women but has since been allowed back on the platform.
He is currently being investigated in Romania for organized crime and human trafficking. He was arrested and held in custody in December but was released to house arrest earlier this year. No formal charges have been filed against him yet and he has maintained his innocence.
Tate currently boasts a Twitter following of 6.7 million. It has grown significantly since he was enveloped in legal controversy, and many of his supporters have demanded his release.
See what others are saying: (The Independent) (Glamour U.K.)
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Involved in “Near Catastrophic” Paparazzi Chase
“While being a public figure comes with a level of interest from the public, it should never come at the cost of anyone’s safety,” a spokesperson for the couple said.
“Aggressive” Paparazzi Chase Couple in New York
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle were involved in a “near catastrophic” paparazzi car chase Tuesday night in New York City, according to a spokesperson for the couple.
In a statement, the spokesperson described the photographers as “highly aggressive.”
“While being a public figure comes with a level of interest from the public, it should never come at the cost of anyone’s safety,” the statement added.
“This relentless pursuit, lasting over two hours, resulted in multiple near collisions involving other drivers on the road, pedestrians and two NYPD officers,” it continued.
Details of the incident are still emerging, but BBC News reported that there are claims the chase involved roughly six cars driving recklessly by running red lights, driving on the sidewalk, carrying out blocking moves, going backward on a one-way road, and taking pictures while driving.
The chase happened after Harry and Meghan were leaving the Women of Vision Awards with Meghan’s mother, Doria. They did not want photographers to learn where they were staying and attempted to avoid them in what turned into a 75-minute chase on a main road in Manhattan’s Upper East Side. They eventually ducked into a New York Police Department Precinct to hide out before getting into a different vehicle.
The NYPD released a statement confirming that they assisted in protecting the couple as “numerous photographers” hindered their transport. Officials said they made it to their destination and there were no collisions, injuries, or arrests.
The couple’s spokesperson is asking the public to not share or post footage of the incident.
“Dissemination of these images, given the ways in which they were obtained, encourages a highly intrusive practice that is dangerous to all in involved,” the spokesperson said.
Memories of Princess Diana
The chase evokes the brutal press hounding Harry’s mother, Princess Diana, was subjected to throughout her life. The paparazzi’s obsession with her ultimately resulted in her death in 1997, when she was killed in a car crash after being chased by photographers in Paris.
Since marrying Meghan and later bowing out of the Royal Family, Harry has made it explicitly clear that he fears those events could happen again. Meghan has been the subject of endless tabloid scrutiny, enduring racism and harassment from the press. Part of the reason they left the Royal Family was to keep their family protected from such attacks.
Mayor Eric Adams brought up Diana’s tragic passing while speaking about Tuesday night’s chase.
“I don’t think there’s many of us who don’t recall how [Harry’s] mom died,” Adams said while speaking to reporters. “And it would be horrific to lose an innocent bystander during a chase like this and something to have happened to them as well…I think that was a bit reckless and irresponsible.”
Adams also questioned whether or not he believes a chase could go on for two hours in a city as congested as New York, but noted that even a 10-minute chase would be dangerous. He said he will be briefed on the exact timeline and details later.