The video was posted just after a judge declared Kim Kardashian legally single.
Kanye Posts “Eazy” Video
Kanye West is facing backlash after sharing a music video on Wednesday for his song “Eazy” that featured what appeared to be a claymation of comedian Pete Davidson getting kidnapped and buried.
Davidson began dating West’s ex-wife, Kim Kardashian, late last year. West made it clear he does not support the pairing in a series of social media posts where he slammed Davidson and expressed hopes to repair his relationship with Kardashian.
In the “Eazy” video, which West posted to Instagram, a claymation character that seemingly represents West takes a sack and places it over the head of a character who resembles Davidson. The West figure then drives away with Davidson, drags him, and buries him with just his head above the ground.
“God saved me from that crash, just so I could beat Pete Davidson’s ass,” West raps at one point in the song.
West is later seen planting flowers over Davidson’s head and cutting them off after they grow out of him. It closes with him driving away with a truckload of the flowers, which many believe resembles the truck of roses he gave to Kardashian for Valentine’s Day earlier this year.
“Everyone lived happily ever after… except Skete you know who… JK he’s fine,” an end card says in the final moments of the video. “Skete,” the nickname West gave to Davidson, was crossed out in the text.
Throughout the clip, the Kanye claymation holds a decapitated head with muddled facial features. Some believe it is meant to be Davidson’s head specifically, while others have just presumed it was any head. Regardless of the interpretation, many have found the imagery disturbing.
The video was posted just one hour after a judge declared Kardashian legally single. In court documents filed in February, she claimed that West’s public remarks and social media posts have caused her “emotional distress.”
Kanye West Faces Backlash
The content of the music video, along with its timing, prompted many to criticize West for harassing, abusing, and threatening Kardashian and Davidson. Some argued Kardashian should seek a restraining order.
“Kanye West divorced dad arc moved so quickly into illegal territory and is firmly there now,” streamer Hasan Piker wrote. “This is just disturbing as fuck. idk.”
While backlash mounted against West on Twitter, his fans stood by him in the comments of the video. Many used fire emojis to express they liked the piece, referred to West as the “GOAT,” and called for a presidential run in 2024. Others joked about “Skete.” The positive response from West fans has drawn its own ire online.
“The whole sick thing about the Kanye, Kim and Pete Davidson thing is that the world is watching a woman publicly be abused and finds it funny or normal,” one Twitter user disturbed by the situation response wrote.
“Pretty wild to watch Kanye publicly harass and basically stalk Kim via social media and still see piece of shit men call him a genius,” Internet personality and singer Andrea Russett added.
Others discussed the fact that West has publicly struggled with his mental health. While his battles have been the center of conversation in recent weeks, many began noting that Davidson has likewise suffered from mental health problems, arguing his well-being should also be taken into consideration.
“Quit saying Kanye’s behaviour is harmless, that he wouldn’t actually hurt Pete,” one person wrote. “He is continuously harassing and threatening a guy with BPD, depression & anxiety with a history of suicidal thoughts. THAT is harmful.”
“‘Kanye is sick’ ok, that’s not an excuse… Pete Davidson has BPD, so do I… we take meds, we try and control our shit,” another Twitter user added. “Being mentally unwell isn’t an excuse to act the way Kanye is acting right now.”
As of Thursday morning, neither Kardashian nor Davidson responded to the video. Kardashian has been posting about her business and philanthropic efforts on social media as usual.
See what others are saying: (Variety) (Rolling Stone) (People)
Andrew Tate to Remain in Romanian Detention After Losing Appeal
The controversial influencer, accused of sex trafficking and organized crime, has maintained his innocence.
A Romanian court on Wednesday upheld a judge’s decision to extend influencer Andrew Tate’s arrest another 30 days.
The judge initially tacked the extra time onto his detention on Jan. 20. According to BBC News, the judge cited “the capacity…of the defendants to exercise permanent psychological control over the victims, including by resorting to constant acts of violence”.
Tate appealed that decision alongside his brother and two others, all of whom were arrested as part of an ongoing sex trafficking and organized crime investigation. The court’s Wednesday decision rejected that appeal, meaning Tate and the other accused individuals will remain in custody until at least Feb. 27.
Investigators claim that Tate lured victims under the guise of a romantic relationship, only to place them under surveillance and force them to make pornographic content. Tate has denied the accusations.
“You know I’m innocent,” Tate said to reporters Wednesday morning while walking into the courtroom.
“Ask them for evidence and they will give you none,” he added while leaving court. “Because it doesn’t exist. You’ll find out the truth of this case soon.”
Tate’s Controversial Online Presence
Ever since December his arrest, Tate’s Twitter account has continued to post sometimes cryptic messages about the investigation into him.
“Would your life be fine without you?” he tweeted on Tuesday, one day before his appeal was rejected. “In Romania. They can steal your life without a trial. They do not need evidence, In this system, innocent men return to ruined lives. My life outside is fine. But for most men, 6 months detained and their whole life will crumble.”
Tate is a controversial online figure famous for spreading violent misogyny to his often young male followers. He has been banned by a number of social media platforms for his drastic remarks, including one where he said rape victims should “bear responsibility” for the assault they endured.
Tate and his brother recently added high-profile lawyer Tina Glandian to their defense team. Glandian has previously represented celebrities like Chris Brown, Jussie Smollett, and Kesha.
On Wednesday, she said there is a “lack of evidence against the Tate brothers.”
“So far the system has failed,” she said, via the Associated Press.
See what others are saying: (BBC News) (The Associated Press) (Rolling Stone)
QTCinderalla Vows to Sue Deepfake Website: “Constant Objectification” is “Exhausting”
The streamer said that anyone who chooses to view nonconsensual deepfake porn is “the problem.”
QTCinderella Plans Legal Action
Twitch streamer QTCinderalla said during a Monday stream that she is going to sue the maker of a website that hosts explicit deepfake images of herself and other content creators.
“I promise you, with every part of my fucking soul, I am going to sue you,” QTCinderella, whose real name is Blaire, said through tears.
Blaire went live after fellow streamer Atrioc accidentally revealed on Twitch that he had an open tab to a website that hosts deepfake porn. Graphic images of high-profile female streamers were visible his browser, and the website also includes deepfakes of more creators, including Blaire.
Atrioc apologized for accessing deepfake images on a website that promotes explicit content of his female streaming colleagues. He claimed that he got “morbidly curious” and “clicked something” after falling down an artificial intelligence rabbit hole online.
“It’s gross,” he said. “It’s gross and I’m sorry.”
In the past, Blaire has talked about having to pay services thousands of dollars to remove graphic deepfake content that has been posted without her consent. Despite those efforts, it is an issue she still has to deal with on a regular basis.
“Fuck the fucking Internet,” she said during her Monday stream. “Fuck the constant objectification and exploitation of women, it’s exhausting.”
“Fuck Atrioc for showing it to thousands of people,” she continued. “Fuck the people DMing me pictures of myself from that website.”
The Objectification of Female Streamers
Blaire said that it “should not be a part of [her] job” to constantly fight for this content to be removed from the Internet, nor should it be her job to deal with the onslaught of harassment that comes with the dissemination of these fabricated images.
“If you are able to look at women who are not selling themselves or benefiting off of being seen sexually — they’re not benefiting, they’re not selling it, they’re not platforming it themselves — if you are able to look at that, you are the problem,” she said. “You see women as an object.”
On Twitter, she explained that the repercussions of these deepfakes go far beyond exploitation and violation.
“The amount of body dysmorphia I’ve experienced since seeing those photos has ruined me,” she said.
She was far from the only person to call out how invasive it is to post or consume deepfake content of people who did not consent to being depicted in a sexual manner.
“Stop sexualizing people without their consent,” Pokimane, who is also among the female streamers featured on the site, said. “That’s it, that’s the tweet.”
“No one should have themselves be put on a deepfake porn website w/o their consent and it’s fucking disgusting at the men who are making light of this shit. fucking despicable,” another person wrote.
Britney Spears Asks For Privacy After Fans Called Cops to Conduct a Wellness Check on Her
Fans said they were concerned after the singer deleted her Instagram account.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was updated to include a statement from Britney Spears
Fans Call 911
Britney Spears said her fans “went a little too far” after some called the police to conduct a wellness check on her.
The fans, many fueled by online conspiracy theories, were concerned about Spears because she deleted her Instagram account. While this is something the singer has done multiple times in the past, her fans thought she had left secret signals in her last post suggesting she needed help.
Some even posted videos of them calling emergency services on TikTok, a platform that is full of conspiracy videos about Spears.
“I love and adore my fans but this time things went a little too far and my privacy was invaded,” Spears wrote in a statement on Thursday, citing “prank phone calls” that were made to police.
According to Spears, officers did not enter her home because once they got to her gate, they “quickly realized there was no issue and left immediately.”
“This felt like I was being gaslit and bullied once the incident made it to the news and being portrayed once again in a poor and unfair light by the media,” Spears continued. “During this time in my life, I truly hope the public and my fans who I care so much about can respect my privacy moving forward.”
On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Ventura County Sheriff’s Office confirmed to Page Six that the department “did get calls into our dispatch” but added there was no reason to believe that Spears was “in any kind of harm or any kind of danger.”
That spokesperson declined to say if officials contacted Spears or conducted a wellness check, citing privacy and public trust issues.
The Prominence of Britney Spears Conspiracies
Just over a year has passed since Spears was freed from a highly restrictive conservatorship that controlled her life and finances for 13 years. Throughout the conservatorship, fans tried to use the pop icon’s social media to pick up clues that she was secretly struggling. She did not publicly speak about the conservatorship until the summer of 2021.
Now that she has her freedom, fans are still reading heavily into her posts. Some believe there are hidden messages in her captions and in the gestures she does while dancing. Others think she is dead, missing, or hiding and that a body double is being used in her posts. Some are so concerned that they are coordinating a mass effort to pressure the Los Angeles Times into investigating Spears’ whereabouts and safety.
In the last several years, many have reflected on Spears’ early days in the spotlight and the cruel ways she was harassed and targeted by paparazzi, news outlets, and culture at large. Often the punchline to a joke throughout the 2000s, many now sympathize with Spears, who was forced to endure heavy public scrutiny at a young age. Documentaries like “Framing Britney Spears” prompted many to see Spears as a victim of abusive media tactics, not the “crazy” woman tabloids painted her to be.
Many are now concerned that fans are only going to subject Spears to a new onslaught of harassment by calling the police to her house. Even if the conspiracy theories are technically well-intentioned and often come from a place of concern, some believe they will jumpstart a media frenzy that could harm Spears’ mental well-being.