Rae says the mist is “clinically proven to protect skin from screen-emitted HEV blue light,” but experts have previously said such items are unnecessary.
Addison Rae Releases “Screen Break” Face Mist
Just months after severe backlash led to YouTuber Valkyrae canceling a skincare collection designed to protect against blue light, TikToker Addison Rae launched a similarly criticized product.
Rae’s new “Screen Break” face mist is part of her ITEM Beauty line. According to ITEM’s website, it is designed to “relieve tired, screen-drained skin with this hydrating boost of blue light protection.”
The product description adds that the spray is “clinically proven to protect skin from screen-emitted HEV blue light and daily pollution” so that users can keep their skin safe while they “scroll, swipe and stream.” It is available for $20 on both ITEM’s and Sephora’s websites.
Despite these claims, however, skincare professionals largely agree that there is no need for products that protect skin from screen-emitted blue light. Because of this, people have criticized Rae for releasing “Screen Break” under the guise that it helps a real issue.
While Rae has appeared in a handful of promotional social media posts since the end of January, backlash against the TikToker took off on Tuesday after Esports shared a video of her discussing the product. In it, she says the mist is helpful for hydrating and toning skin because the “blue light that comes from devices can actually cause skin fatigue.”
Skincare Experts Say Blue Light Products Are Unnecessary
Upon watching the video, many thought the mist sounded nearly identical to products in the RFLCT line Valkyrae announced in October. She said her skincare collection – which included moisturizers, lip balms, and eye masks – was “designed to protect skin from blue light pollution.”
Valkyrae was swiftly accused of promoting pseudoscience and canceled the line by November, pulling the RFLCT products from hundreds of stores. Dermatologists and other experts responded to the line by claiming the items in it were not useful.
“Even with a big-ass monitor, you would need days or months to get the same blue light as 15 minutes of sun,” Michelle Wong, a cosmetic chemist, explained in a TikTok. “And if you do want to protect against blue light from the sun, which honestly isn’t a big issue for most people, these products still probably won’t do much.”
Kathleen Suozzi, a dermatologist at Yale, told to The Washington Post that even a large amount of blue light would only affect a small subset of the population that is prone to pigment issues. She referenced a 2019 study where researchers exposed one side of a person’s face to blue light but shielded the other side of the face. They did this for eight hours a day five days in a row.
“They found that there was absolutely no difference in the side of the face that was exposed to blue light,” Suozzi said. “People who are not melasma-prone or pigment-prone are unlikely to have any even theoretical consequence from sitting in front of a screen for prolonged periods of time.”
Suozzi told the outlet that the impact of blue light on aging is hard to study and therefore unclear, but still called the products a “big waste of money.”
Internet Responds to Controversy
Since all this information about blue light skin products came out amid Valkyrae’s controversy, many mocked Rae for not learning from the YouTuber’s mistake.
“Reflct coming out in new variants im crying,” one person tweeted.
Others hope that Rae would get the same amount of backlash that Valkyrae received.
“This looks exactly like RFLCT except Rae left them so they found another Rae,” another person joked, referencing the similarity between the two content creators’ names. “This should be good”
Valkyrae responded to the ordeal herself, joking that she wanted to drop the “rae” from her name to avoid the association.
“IM REBRANDING TO JUST VALKY LOL HOW IS THIS REAL?!” she tweeted.
Rae has not publicly responded to the controversy. “Screen Break” is still available for purchase online. On ITEM’s website, there is one five-star review for it from an anonymous buyer. On Sephora, there are 97 reviews with a 4.9-star average. Many of those reviewers, however, noted that ITEM gifted them the mist.
See what others are saying: (TheGamer) (Dexerto) (Tubefilter)
Andrew Tate to Remain in Romanian Detention After Losing Appeal
The controversial influencer, accused of sex trafficking and organized crime, has maintained his innocence.
A Romanian court on Wednesday upheld a judge’s decision to extend influencer Andrew Tate’s arrest another 30 days.
The judge initially tacked the extra time onto his detention on Jan. 20. According to BBC News, the judge cited “the capacity…of the defendants to exercise permanent psychological control over the victims, including by resorting to constant acts of violence”.
Tate appealed that decision alongside his brother and two others, all of whom were arrested as part of an ongoing sex trafficking and organized crime investigation. The court’s Wednesday decision rejected that appeal, meaning Tate and the other accused individuals will remain in custody until at least Feb. 27.
Investigators claim that Tate lured victims under the guise of a romantic relationship, only to place them under surveillance and force them to make pornographic content. Tate has denied the accusations.
“You know I’m innocent,” Tate said to reporters Wednesday morning while walking into the courtroom.
“Ask them for evidence and they will give you none,” he added while leaving court. “Because it doesn’t exist. You’ll find out the truth of this case soon.”
Tate’s Controversial Online Presence
Ever since December his arrest, Tate’s Twitter account has continued to post sometimes cryptic messages about the investigation into him.
“Would your life be fine without you?” he tweeted on Tuesday, one day before his appeal was rejected. “In Romania. They can steal your life without a trial. They do not need evidence, In this system, innocent men return to ruined lives. My life outside is fine. But for most men, 6 months detained and their whole life will crumble.”
Tate is a controversial online figure famous for spreading violent misogyny to his often young male followers. He has been banned by a number of social media platforms for his drastic remarks, including one where he said rape victims should “bear responsibility” for the assault they endured.
Tate and his brother recently added high-profile lawyer Tina Glandian to their defense team. Glandian has previously represented celebrities like Chris Brown, Jussie Smollett, and Kesha.
On Wednesday, she said there is a “lack of evidence against the Tate brothers.”
“So far the system has failed,” she said, via the Associated Press.
See what others are saying: (BBC News) (The Associated Press) (Rolling Stone)
QTCinderalla Vows to Sue Deepfake Website: “Constant Objectification” is “Exhausting”
The streamer said that anyone who chooses to view nonconsensual deepfake porn is “the problem.”
QTCinderella Plans Legal Action
Twitch streamer QTCinderalla said during a Monday stream that she is going to sue the maker of a website that hosts explicit deepfake images of herself and other content creators.
“I promise you, with every part of my fucking soul, I am going to sue you,” QTCinderella, whose real name is Blaire, said through tears.
Blaire went live after fellow streamer Atrioc accidentally revealed on Twitch that he had an open tab to a website that hosts deepfake porn. Graphic images of high-profile female streamers were visible his browser, and the website also includes deepfakes of more creators, including Blaire.
Atrioc apologized for accessing deepfake images on a website that promotes explicit content of his female streaming colleagues. He claimed that he got “morbidly curious” and “clicked something” after falling down an artificial intelligence rabbit hole online.
“It’s gross,” he said. “It’s gross and I’m sorry.”
In the past, Blaire has talked about having to pay services thousands of dollars to remove graphic deepfake content that has been posted without her consent. Despite those efforts, it is an issue she still has to deal with on a regular basis.
“Fuck the fucking Internet,” she said during her Monday stream. “Fuck the constant objectification and exploitation of women, it’s exhausting.”
“Fuck Atrioc for showing it to thousands of people,” she continued. “Fuck the people DMing me pictures of myself from that website.”
The Objectification of Female Streamers
Blaire said that it “should not be a part of [her] job” to constantly fight for this content to be removed from the Internet, nor should it be her job to deal with the onslaught of harassment that comes with the dissemination of these fabricated images.
“If you are able to look at women who are not selling themselves or benefiting off of being seen sexually — they’re not benefiting, they’re not selling it, they’re not platforming it themselves — if you are able to look at that, you are the problem,” she said. “You see women as an object.”
On Twitter, she explained that the repercussions of these deepfakes go far beyond exploitation and violation.
“The amount of body dysmorphia I’ve experienced since seeing those photos has ruined me,” she said.
She was far from the only person to call out how invasive it is to post or consume deepfake content of people who did not consent to being depicted in a sexual manner.
“Stop sexualizing people without their consent,” Pokimane, who is also among the female streamers featured on the site, said. “That’s it, that’s the tweet.”
“No one should have themselves be put on a deepfake porn website w/o their consent and it’s fucking disgusting at the men who are making light of this shit. fucking despicable,” another person wrote.
Britney Spears Asks For Privacy After Fans Called Cops to Conduct a Wellness Check on Her
Fans said they were concerned after the singer deleted her Instagram account.
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was updated to include a statement from Britney Spears
Fans Call 911
Britney Spears said her fans “went a little too far” after some called the police to conduct a wellness check on her.
The fans, many fueled by online conspiracy theories, were concerned about Spears because she deleted her Instagram account. While this is something the singer has done multiple times in the past, her fans thought she had left secret signals in her last post suggesting she needed help.
Some even posted videos of them calling emergency services on TikTok, a platform that is full of conspiracy videos about Spears.
“I love and adore my fans but this time things went a little too far and my privacy was invaded,” Spears wrote in a statement on Thursday, citing “prank phone calls” that were made to police.
According to Spears, officers did not enter her home because once they got to her gate, they “quickly realized there was no issue and left immediately.”
“This felt like I was being gaslit and bullied once the incident made it to the news and being portrayed once again in a poor and unfair light by the media,” Spears continued. “During this time in my life, I truly hope the public and my fans who I care so much about can respect my privacy moving forward.”
On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Ventura County Sheriff’s Office confirmed to Page Six that the department “did get calls into our dispatch” but added there was no reason to believe that Spears was “in any kind of harm or any kind of danger.”
That spokesperson declined to say if officials contacted Spears or conducted a wellness check, citing privacy and public trust issues.
The Prominence of Britney Spears Conspiracies
Just over a year has passed since Spears was freed from a highly restrictive conservatorship that controlled her life and finances for 13 years. Throughout the conservatorship, fans tried to use the pop icon’s social media to pick up clues that she was secretly struggling. She did not publicly speak about the conservatorship until the summer of 2021.
Now that she has her freedom, fans are still reading heavily into her posts. Some believe there are hidden messages in her captions and in the gestures she does while dancing. Others think she is dead, missing, or hiding and that a body double is being used in her posts. Some are so concerned that they are coordinating a mass effort to pressure the Los Angeles Times into investigating Spears’ whereabouts and safety.
In the last several years, many have reflected on Spears’ early days in the spotlight and the cruel ways she was harassed and targeted by paparazzi, news outlets, and culture at large. Often the punchline to a joke throughout the 2000s, many now sympathize with Spears, who was forced to endure heavy public scrutiny at a young age. Documentaries like “Framing Britney Spears” prompted many to see Spears as a victim of abusive media tactics, not the “crazy” woman tabloids painted her to be.
Many are now concerned that fans are only going to subject Spears to a new onslaught of harassment by calling the police to her house. Even if the conspiracy theories are technically well-intentioned and often come from a place of concern, some believe they will jumpstart a media frenzy that could harm Spears’ mental well-being.