“It’s a bizarre line of logic that some hypothetical possibility down the line would hold back lifesaving medicine now,” the researcher who wrote a paper recently cited by Rogan told Forbes. “There are 600,000 Americans dead so far. The vast majority of those deaths are vaccine-preventable.“
Rogan Erroneously Cites Study
Contrary to what Joe Rogan said on Friday’s episode of his self-titled podcast, COVID-19 vaccinations are not likely to create a super-strain of the virus.
In the episode, which features Free Range American host Evan Hafer, Rogan cited a 2015 paper titled “Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens.”
Rogan then read a single line from the paper’s abstract, which states, “Vaccines that keep hosts alive but still allow transmission could thus allow very virulent strains to circulate in a population.”
“That situation where the vaccine just kind of protects you from serious damage — protects you from really being badly hospitalized or death — but doesn’t stop you from getting the virus, can possibly lead to more potent viruses,” Rogan concluded.
Scientifically, Rogan’s takeaway has absolutely no basis and only serves to highlight the danger that comes from cherry-picking studies from a field he has no background in or serious understanding of.
In fact, Andrew Read — the lead author of that 2015 paper who is also a biology professor at Pennsylvania State University — has since told Forbes, “We’re talking [about] a very different virus and very different vaccines.”
The studies that Read conducted and later published in 2015 involved Marek’s disease virus, a herpesvirus which affects poultry such as chickens.
“The details in biology really matter a lot,” Read told Forbes. “The chicken vaccines we worked with… definitely reduced disease, severity and death.”
However, unlike what has proven to be the case with top COVID vaccines, the chicken vaccine “didn’t stop transmission at all.” As Read noted, that’s the key difference between this paper and COVID-19.
“At the moment, the vast majority of the replication is happening in unvaccinated people,” he explained. “You can tell that because the majority of cases in the hospital are unvaccinated individuals.”
“That’s the majority of transmission. Every time a virus replicates, it can mutate. So the evolution is, right now, occurring in the body of people who are not vaccinated. Rogan is completely wrong trying to deduce anything else.”
Rogan Claims Breakthrough Cases Were Unforeseen
The argument that COVID vaccines could lead a super mutant isn’t the only false and potentially dangerous statement Rogan made on his podcast — and that’s still excluding his very extreme prediction regarding vaccine passports.
“This is a fact: just a couple of months ago, the idea of a breakthrough case was unheard of,” Rogan falsely stated. “Nobody heard of anybody catching COVID that had a vaccine, right? That was the whole idea; you get a vaccine, you don’t have to worry about it. But now we know, not only can you get it, but you can spread it.”
That statement is about as far from fact as it could be. It has been known since day one of COVID vaccine development that some people would still be able to catch and spread the virus. In fact, that aspect was even known prior to COVID with other vaccines because that is how vaccines work.
No vaccine is 100% effective, but the fact that two of the first COVID vaccines are over 90% effective is astonishing. At the beginning of the pandemic, scientists were simply hoping to be able to create an initial vaccine that was at least 50% effective, meaning that half of vaccinated people would still contract the virus. Even if that had been the case, Rogan’s transmissibility comments would still be inaccurate.
Though Read noted that it is possible a mutant springs up from the vaccinated population, mutants are much more likely to emerge and gain traction through the unvaccinated. In fact, that’s how the delta variant emerged.
“It’s a bizarre line of logic that some hypothetical possibility down the line would hold back lifesaving medicine now,” he told Forbes. “There are 600,000 Americans dead so far. The vast majority of those deaths are vaccine-preventable. There’s not a single scenario that would argue in favor of not using [vaccines] to save the next hundred thousand. Not one scenario.”
Read also explained that the current COVID vaccines aren’t the last we’ll ever see. Second- and third-generation COVID vaccines are currently being developed, in part because COVID will possibly become a seasonal virus much like the flu.
“There’s tons of things we can do in the future,” Read said. “Right now, we need to vaccinate as much as possible.”
See what others are saying: (Forbes) (The Hill) (New York Post)
Woman Who Accused Nicki Minaj’s Husband of Rape Details the Couple’s Alleged Efforts to Silence Her
In her first televised interview, Jennifer Hough opened up about the alleged 1994 rape, saying she’s “tired of being afraid.”
Jennifer Hough’s Accusations Against Nicki Minaj and Kenneth Petty
A woman who is suing rapper Nicki Minaj and her husband Kenneth Petty for allegedly pressuring her to recant claims that Petty raped her in 1994 spoke out about her case Wednesday on “The Real.”
Jennifer Hough said she and Petty were both 16 at the time of the alleged rape. She claims she was walking to school when Petty led her into a home at knifepoint before assaulting her. He was charged with first-degree rape and eventually pleaded guilty to attempted rape. According to The New York Times, he spent four and a half years in prison.
In August, she filed a lawsuit claiming that after Petty failed to register as a sex offender last year, Minaj and Petty began repeatedly harassing and intimidating her into taking back her claim. Hough said that Minaj personally called her and offered to fly her to LA to talk, but Hough declined, trying to explain to Minaj that the assault really happened.
Hough also said that both she and members of her family have been subject to calls and unsolicited visits from people she believes are associated with the couple. In some cases, those people allegedly offered hefty financial rewards if she recanted the rape claim. Hough said that at one point, an intermediary even had a prepared statement recanting the accusation and said she would receive $20,000 upon signing it.
According to The Times, which viewed the lawsuit, Hough “has not worked since May of 2020 due to severe depression, paranoia, constant moving, harassment and threats from the defendants and their associates. She is currently living in isolation out of fear of retaliation.”
Hough Speaks Out
Now, she is speaking out against the couple and the intimidation she has allegedly endured as a result of their actions.
“I’m tired of being afraid,” Hough said on “The Real.” “I feel like the actions that were taken in regards to this whole situation have put me in a different type of fear, at my age now, and it was wrong. And I don’t want to be afraid anymore.”
Hough went on to describe the alleged rape in detail, oftentimes getting emotional when recalling that day. When asked if the four and a half years Petty spent behind bars felt like “justice,” she said she had never thought about her case that way because she had spent so many years blaming herself.
“I just knew he did what he did and he went to jail and I had to leave my family,” she continued. “I had to leave my home. And I had to move away. So, yeah, I never really gave it much thought.”
Minaj has largely defended her husband, whom she married in 2019. She previously wrote on Instagram that Petty was 15 and in a relationship with Hough at the time of the alleged rape. Hough said Minaj’s statement was not true and forced her to relive her trauma.
“I just felt woman to woman, that was wrong of her because I don’t know you,” Hough added. “And you don’t know me to know that that statement you put out to the world to be true. You have 150-something million followers. They all believed it.”
Why Hough Is Telling Her Story
Hough said the alleged harassment from Minaj and Petty has added another level of stress to her life. She claimed she has been threatened for turning down their offers and standing her ground on her story.
“The last incident was when one of their associates put $20,000 on my lap and I still kept saying ‘no,’” she said. “The last message I received was that I should have taken that money because they’re going to take that money to put on my head.”
Hough said she is speaking out to let others know that this form of intimidation is wrong.
“What they did to me and my family wasn’t okay and it wasn’t right,” Hough said. “And it doesn’t matter how much money you have. It doesn’t matter what your status is. You can’t intimidate people to make things go better for you.”
“I want my daughters to know that as they grow, as they experience life as they come in contact with friends, family, strangers whatever, that they’ll have the strength to know that they have a voice, and they should use it. And don’t ever let anybody try to silence them.”
See what others are saying: (The Hollywood Reporter) (The Daily Beast) (People)
Disney Says Talent Deals Must Change Amid Pandemic as It Battles Scarlett Johansson Lawsuit
CEO Bob Chapek said talent is Disney’s “most important asset” and claimed the company is undergoing a “reset” regarding its contracts.
Bob Chapek Says Talent Contracts Are Going Through a Reset
Disney CEO Bob Chapek said Tuesday that going forward, talent contracts at the studio “will have to reflect the fact that the world is changing.”
His remarks come as Disney battles a lawsuit from actress Scarlett Johansson alleging breach of contract for her work on “Black Widow.” While making his claims at a virtual Goldman Sachs conference, Chapek did not mention Johansson by name, but he did directly address the issues Hollywood is facing when it comes to compensating talent amid the pandemic.
As COVID-19 halted filmgoing, many movies expected to be box office hits were instead released directly to streaming, while others were released in theaters and on streaming platforms the same day. These models are drastically different from the exclusive theatrical release that films and the stars in them have come to expect over the last several decades.
“We’re sort of putting a square peg in a round hole right now where we’ve got a deal conceived under a certain set of conditions, that actually results in a movie that is being released in a completely different set of conditions,” Chapek said during the conference via numerous reports. “So there’s a bit of a reset that’s going on right now, and ultimately we’ll think about that as we do our future talent deals and plan for that and make sure that that’s incorporated.”
“But right now, we’ve got sort of this middle position where we’re trying to do right by the talent,” he added. “I think the talent’s trying to do right by us, and we’re just sort of figuring out our way to bridge the gap.”
Chapek also referred to talent as Disney’s “most important asset” and said that historically, the company has had a “very symbiotic” relationship with its talent regarding the deals they strike together.
Scarlett Johansson Vs. Disney
That symbiotic relationship is now being put to the test by Johanssen, who hit Disney with a lawsuit in July over its decision to release her “Black Widow” standalone picture for a premium fee on Disney+ the same day it hit the big screen. The actress claims that her contract guaranteed an exclusive theatrical release for the film and that her salary was largely based on what it grossed at the box office. Because viewers had the option to purchase it for streaming at home, she claims she did not see “the full benefit” of her deal.
Disney claimed the lawsuit had no merit. It also released a scathing statement saying that Johansson’s legal effort showed a “callous disregard” for the harmful and prolonged effects of COVID-19, especially since she allegedly received $20 million upfront for “Black Widow.”
Disney is hoping to solve the matter via private arbitration. Johannson’s legal team wants to take the dispute to court.
So far, “Black Widow” has raked in $377 million worldwide. It broke pandemic box office records during its opening weekend but still has not made nearly as much as it likely would have prior to the pandemic.
As for whether or not the dual release strategy actually tanked the film’s earnings, that is hard to say. By comparison though, Marvel’s “Shang-Chi,” which was released exclusively in theaters, is already set to catch up to “Black Widow” at the box office. The film has been out for just under a month and has already made $306 million worldwide.
While many expected to see other A-list actors follow Johannson’s lead and likewise file lawsuits against studios who threw their titles on streaming, so far Disney has had seemingly no issue striking more deals with its talent. In the past several months, it has locked in sequels with stars like Emma Stone, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, and Emily Blunt.
See what others are saying: (The Wrap) (The Hollywood Reporter) (Los Angeles Times)
Alissa Violet Sues FaZe Clan Over Stock It Allegedly Owes Her
The social media star says she was promised stock in FaZe Clan as part of a previous settlement but has yet to receive her shares.
Alissa Violet Sues FaZe Clan
Social media influencer Alissa Marie Violet Butler, known online as Alissa Violet, is suing digital entertainment and esports collective FaZe Clan over stock she is allegedly owed.
According to a Monday report from The Washington Post, Butler’s case stems from a previous lawsuit that involved both her and FaZe Clan. The report says that in 2018, Butler transferred her shares in a media company she co-founded called Clout Gang to a different company called Hubrick Limited as part of an agreement with FaZe Clan. At the time, Hubrick and FaZe Clan were partnering to develop both businesses.
Per The Post, several other FaZe Clan members were part of a similar exchange where they transferred their FaZe Clan shares for Hubrick shares as well. The partnership between the two companies crumbled, however, leading to a legal frenzy. Butler, FaZe Clan, Clout Gang, and more ended up accusing Hubrick of fraud in a lawsuit. Hubrick tossed the allegation right back at them in a countersuit.
To resolve the matters, The Post says Butler and FaZe Clan “entered into an oral agreement to settle the lawsuits with Hubrick,” which involved Butler giving up her Hubrick stock and dropping her claims against the company. In return, she would then receive FaZe Clan common stock.
Butler says that despite holding up her end of the bargain, she has still not received stock in FaZe Clan.
Responses to Lawsuit
Butler has over 10 million followers on Instagram and another 3.7 million subscribers on YouTube. She has had a career in modeling and picked up a handful of acting credits in television shows and music videos. She previously dated the co-owner of FaZe Clan, FaZe Banks.
According to The Post, FaZe Clan is valued at around $300 million.
“If Faze Clan simply abided by its promise to compensate her, Alissa would not have had to sue Faze Clan,” Butler’s attorney, Bryan Freedman, said to The Post.
FaZe Clan defended itself in a statement to the outlet, saying it “denies generally and specifically each and every allegation contained in the Complaint.”
FaZe Clan CEO Lee Trink also sent an email to The Post claiming that the matter will likely be resolved.
“Stories get created out of any disagreement or dispute, big or small,” he wrote. “On this particular matter we’re in close communication and confident it’ll be resolved amicably.”
It is unclear how much Butler is seeking in her suit.