The move comes as COVID cases have nearly quadrupled in the last month due to the rapid spread of the highly infectious delta variant.
Increased Calls for Mandatory Vaccinations in Certain Sectors
More than 50 of America’s largest medical groups representing millions of healthcare workers issued a statement Monday calling for employers of all health and long-term care providers to require mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations.
The groups, which included the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association, and 55 others, cited contagious new variants — including delta — and low vaccination rates.
“Vaccination is the primary way to put the pandemic behind us and avoid the return of stringent public health measures,” they wrote.
The call to action comes as new COVID cases have almost quadrupled during the month of July, jumping from just around 13,000 infections a day at the beginning of this month to more than 50,000.
While the vast majority of new infections and hospitalizations are among those who have not received the vaccines, many healthcare workers remain unvaccinated. According to data collected by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, over 38% of nursing home staff were not fully vaccinated as of July 11.
An analysis by WebMD and Medscape Medical News found that around 25% of hospital workers who were in contact with patients had not been vaccinated by the end of May when vaccinations became widely available.
In addition to calls for medical professionals to get vaccinated, some local leaders have also begun to impose mandates for public employees as cases continue spiking.
Last month, San Francisco announced that it was requiring all city workers to get vaccinated. Also on Monday, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said that all municipal employees — including police officers and teachers — must either get the jab or agree to weekly testing by the time school starts in September.
Dr. Fauci Says U.S. Officials Are Considering Revising Mask Guidance for Vaccinated People
Numerous top U.S. health officials have applauded efforts by local leaders to mitigate further spread of the coronavirus, including the nation’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who confirmed Sunday that federal officials are actively considering whether to revise federal masking guidelines to recommend that vaccinated Americans wear face coverings in public settings.
In May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said people who are vaccinated do not need to mask in public. Although that was a non-binding recommendation, many states and cities that had not already lifted restrictions on masking began to do so shortly after.
But now, local leaders in areas seeing big spikes have begun reimposing mask mandates — even for those who are vaccinated — including major counties like Los Angeles and St. Louis.
In his remarks Sunday, Fauci also emphasized that, despite claims from many conservatives, those efforts are in line with the federal recommendations, which leave space for local leaders to issue their own rules.
While Fauci and other top U.S. public health officials have encouraged local governments to take action, Republican lawmakers in several states are taking steps to limit the ability of local leaders and public health officials to take certain mitigation measures.
According to the Network for Public Health Law, at least 15 state legislatures have passed or are considering bills to limit the legal authority of public health agencies — and that does not even include unilateral action taken by governors.
Some of the leaders of states suffering the biggest spikes have banned local officials from imposing their own mask mandates, like Arkansas, which has the highest per capita cases in the country right now, as well as Florida, which currently ranks third.
Notably, some of the laws proposed or passed by Republicans could go beyond just preventing local officials from trying to mitigate surges in COVID cases and may have major implications for other public health crises.
For example, according to The Washington Post, a North Dakota law that bans mask mandates applies to other breakouts — even tuberculosis — while a new Montana law also bars the use of quarantine for people who have been exposed to an infectious disease but have not yet tested positive.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (The Guardian)
CDC Director Overrules Expert Panel, Says At-Risk Workers Can Get Pfizer Booster
The panel refused to recommend boosters for Americans whose jobs put them at risk of contracting the coronavirus, but the agency’s head rejected that decision.
CDC Issues Pfizer Booster Guidance
In a highly unusual move, the director for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) overruled the agency’s advisory panel late Thursday and recommended Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 booster shot for people at risk of infection due to their jobs.
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky’s decision aligns with a similar determination by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the day earlier.
On Wednesday, the FDA authorized third jabs of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for select Pfizer recipients six months after they completed the two-dose regime.
The authorization applies to people 65 and older and adults ages 18 to 64 that have a high risk of severe illness or whose jobs or institutional exposure “puts them at high risk of serious complications of COVID-19 including severe COVID-19.”
In a statement announcing the move, acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock said the third group includes “health care workers, teachers and day care staff, grocery workers and those in homeless shelters or prisons, among others.”
The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices largely backed the FDA’s authorization in its Thursday decision.
The committee additionally backed third doses for people 50 to 64 who have medical conditions that make them at risk for severe infection. It also said individuals 18 to 49 with underlying medical conditions can assess their own personal risk and obtain a booster if they feel it is needed.
The experts, however, voted 9-6 against recommending the shots for Americans ages 18 to 64 whose jobs put them at increased risk of being exposed to COVID-19.
Walensky agreed with most of the panel’s determination but added the additional recommendation for occupational exposure, explaining that she decided to go against her own advisors in order to bring the CDC more in step with the FDA’s authorization.
“As CDC Director, it is my job to recognize where our actions can have the greatest impact,” Walensky said in a statement.
“I believe we can best serve the nation’s public health needs by providing booster doses for the elderly, those in long-term care facilities, people with underlying medical conditions, and for adults at high risk of disease from occupational and institutional exposures to COVID-19.”
Moderna, J&J Recipients Left Behind — For Now
Walensky added that while the vaccine advisory panel only reviewed data for the Pfizer vaccine, the CDC “will address, with the same sense of urgency, recommendations for the Moderna and J & J vaccines as soon as those data are available.”
There is currently no data on whether it is safe or effective to mix-and-match vaccines made by different companies, and as such, federal guidance encourages people to get boosters from the makers of their original jab.
The CDC has estimated that around 26 million people received their last Pfizer dose at least six months ago.
Around half of those individuals are 65 or older, and is unclear how many more will meet the eligibility requirements for the booster.
Meanwhile, around 23 million Moderna recipients are at least six months past their second vaccine, and about 3.3 million people are at least six months past their Johnson & Johnson jab.
While tens of millions of Pfizer recipients will now be eligible for a third dose, the roughly half of vaccinated Americans who got Moderna and J&J shots will have to wait.
How long that wait will be is uncertain, though federal officials have suggested booster shots for the other two vaccines could be approved in a matter of weeks.
See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (NPR) (The Washington Post)
Chris Cuomo Accused of Sexual Harassment by Former ABC News Boss
News producer Shelley Ross said that while she does not want Cuomo to lose his CNN gig over her accusations, she hopes he holds himself accountable for them in other ways.
Chris Cuomo Accused of Sexual Harassment
CNN anchor Chris Cuomo was accused of sexual harassment by his former ABC boss, Shelley Ross, in a Friday op-ed published in The New York Times.
Ross wrote that the incident between her and Cuomo happened during a farewell party for a colleague in 2005. At the time, she was the executive producer of an ABC entertainment special but was previously the executive producer at “Primetime Live,” where Cuomo was one of several anchors.
“When Mr. Cuomo entered the Upper West Side bar, he walked toward me and greeted me with a strong bear hug while lowering one hand to firmly grab and squeeze the cheek of my buttock,” she wrote in the op-ed.
She claimed that Cuomo said, “I can do this now that you’re no longer my boss.”
She allegedly responded by pushing him away and telling him, “No, you can’t.” She then stepped back to reveal that her husband was sitting behind her, witnessing the interaction, and they left the party shortly after the ordeal.
According to Ross, she received an apology email from Cuomo roughly an hour after the episode. In the subject line, he wrote that he was “ashamed” of his actions, but he opened the message by saying his “hearty greeting was a function of being glad to see [her].”
“christian slater got arrested for a (kind of) similar act (though borne of an alleged negative intent, unlike my own)…and as a husband i can sympathize with not liking to see my wife patted as such,” Cuomo reportedly wrote. “So pass along my apology to your very good and noble husband…and i apologize to you as well, for even putting you in such a position.”
He closed the email by saying he will “remember his lesson” next time, “no matter how happy” he might be to see Ross.
“My question today is the same as it was then: Was he ashamed of what he did, or was he embarrassed because my husband saw it?” Ross wrote, arguing that while Cuomo considers it a “sincere apology,” she has always viewed it as “an attempt to provide himself with legal and moral coverage to evade accountability.”
Shelley Ross Calls for Accountability
Ross wrote that she does not believe the incident was “sexual in nature.” Instead, she understands it as an arrogant display of masculine power.
“Whether he understood it at the time or not, his form of sexual harassment was a hostile act meant to diminish and belittle his female former boss in front of the staff,” she wrote.
Ross’s op-ed comes just over a month after Cuomo’s brother, Andrew Cuomo, resigned as the Governor of New York following a slew of sexual misconduct allegations. Chris Cuomo faced intense criticism for advising the governor throughout the scandal.
When the allegations against his brother were making headlines, Cuomo went on air during “Cuomo Prime Time” to announce he would not be covering the situation, though he said he has “always cared very deeply about these issues and profoundly so.”
Ross questioned how genuine that statement may have been, considering both her interaction with him and his choice to support his brother.
“I am left again wondering about his relationship with truth and accountability,” she wrote. “Has this man always cared ‘deeply’ and ‘profoundly’ about sexual harassment issues? Does he believe enough in accountability to step up and take some meaningful actions?”
When The Times asked Cuomo for a statement regarding the accusation, he said that “As Shelley acknowledges, our interaction was not sexual in nature.”
“It happened 16 years ago in a public setting when she was a top executive at ABC,” he continued. “I apologized to her then, and I meant it.”
Over the last several years, many powerful men have lost their jobs over sexual misconduct claims as the MeToo movement launched a global reckoning with the cultures of harassment that permeate nearly every industry. Ross said she is not looking for Cuomo to be the next person ousted over one of these allegations. Instead, she hopes he will keep his role at CNN and use it to shine a better light on this issue.
She wrote that Cuomo should “journalistically repent” by going on-air “to study the impact of sexism, harassment and gender bias in the workplace, including his own, and then report on it.”
See what others are saying: (New York Times) (Variety) (Associated Press)
U.S. Special Envoy to Haiti Resigns Over “Inhumane” Deportations of Haitians
The top-ranking diplomat described the Biden administration’s approach to Haiti as “deeply flawed” while claiming that his policy recommendations were “ignored and dismissed when not edited to project a narrative different from my own.”
U.S. Special Envoy for Haiti Daniel Foote resigned from his post Wednesday over the Biden administration’s decision to deport thousands of Haitians who have been camped in a Texas border town.
The administration announced the decision last week after the camp amassed more than 14,000 people in a matter of days, sparking widespread outrage as images of the sordid conditions circulated online. Federal officials are also now blocking thousands of other Haitians from entering the country.
Foote announced his resignation, effective immediately, in a scathing letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken that was first reported by PBS.
“I will not be associated with the United States inhumane, counterproductive decision to deport thousands of Haitian refugees and illegal immigrants to Haiti, a country where American officials are confined to secure compounds because of the danger posed by armed gangs in control of daily life,” he wrote in the letter.
“Our policy approach to Haiti remains deeply flawed, and my recommendations have been ignored and dismissed, when not edited to project a narrative different from my own.”
Backlash and Support
The Biden administration responded to Foote’s letter by trying to undermine the diplomat and dispute his claims.
In a written statement to reporters Thursday, State Department spokesperson Ned Price denied that Foote’s suggestions were ignored.
“There have been multiple senior-level policy conversations on Haiti, where all proposals, including those led by Special Envoy Foote, were fully considered in a rigorous and transparent policy process,” he said.
“Some of those proposals were determined to be harmful to our commitment to the promotion of democracy in Haiti and were rejected during the policy process. For him to say his proposals were ignored is simply false.”
Price also condemned the envoy for resigning during “a challenging moment that requires leadership.”
“It is unfortunate that, instead of participating in a solutions-oriented policy process, Special Envoy Foote has both resigned and mischaracterized the circumstances of his resignation,” he continued.
On the other side, at least one top official in Haiti cheered Foote’s remarks.
“This is the first time we see a U.S. diplomat who has decided to go against the will of the U.S. government,” Mathias Pierre, Haiti’s election minister, told The Associated Press. “We salute that.”