Connect with us


Hong Kong Police Stop Vigils for Tiananmen Square Massacre



Security forces said vigils couldn’t be held due to public gathering restrictions amid the COVID-19 pandemic, though many feel this was an excuse used to curb the freedom of speech around a topic the Communist Party seeks to downplay.

Annual Vigil Disrupted

Demonstrators heading to Hong Kong’s Victoria Park Friday night to mark the June 4 Tiananmen Square Massacre were met with a wall of police and forced to disperse.

The 1989 massacre happened when Chinese students occupied Tiananmen Square in Beijing demanding democracy in the People’s Republic in China. Officially, the Communist Party says around 300 people died, but estimates and leaked documents show just over 10,000 died. In Hong Kong, a vigil for the event has been a staple of civic life for 32 years. Last year marked the first disruption of any kind, with security forces pointing to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic as a reason to ban large public gatherings, but even then some smaller vigils were held with little disturbance.

This year, police announced that they would have 7,000 officers on standby to deal with the planned vigil, once again citing limits around large-scale gatherings due to the pandemic. For many, decreasing infection rates and increased vaccination rates made the bans against public gatherings unnecessary. Activists were quick to accuse security officials of using the restrictions as an excuse to block free speech and introduce Mainland censorship rules regarding the massacre into Hong Kong.

Despite police presence, protesters attempted to attend the park with candles and flowers. The heavy police forces seemed to have worked to dissuade some protesters from arriving, as only hundreds showed up and none were allowed inside; a notable difference to the thousands that normally attend. Those who did make their way to the park were searched by police, sometimes more than once.

By around 8 p.m., police began to tell demonstrators to disperse and return home. In turn, the crowd played protest songs, and it seemed like the event would play out similarly to the protests of 2019. However, police raised flags warning that the crowd was breaking the law and liable to be arrested — the first step in Hong Kong police tactics before violence. As a result, the crowds largely dispersed.

Victoria Park on June 4, 2018 versus June 4, 2020. PHO: AFP/HKFP

Consistently Making a Message

According to Hong Kong Police’s Facebook account, at least four men and two women were arrested on Friday for refusing to leave the area. Concerns have been expressed over whether or not protest figure Alexandra Wong, affectionately known as “Grandma Wong”, 65, was among those arrested. She was spotted at the event despite only being released from jail without charges the day prior.

She was originally arrested on Sunday for attempting to march alone to the China Liaison office with a yellow umbrella and a placard that read: “June 4th Tiananmen lament.”

When asked by the South China Morning Post about her presence at Victoria Park, Wong said, “Perhaps it is possible I will be arrested again. Anyway I must come here, I must. Today is a very big day to remember the June 4th, the students before 32 years ago.”

Even with a ban on the vigil in Victoria Park, people throughout the city still walked around with electronic candles and flowers, placing them on street corners and in the windows of buildings. Other entities also took park, including some businesses. Notably, the U.S. and European Union consulates had candles placed in their windows to remember the victims.

See what others said: (The New York Times) (BBC) (Associated Press)


Apple and Google Remove Navalny Voting App as Russian Elections Kick-Off



The decisions from Apple and Google, which followed weeks of pressure from the Kremlin, mark a continuation in the war between Western tech companies and authoritarian governments.

Voting App Removed From App Stores

Apple and Google removed a tactical voting app designed by allies of jailed Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny from their app stores Friday, bowing to pressure from the Kremlin the same day voting began for the country’s parliamentary elections.

The Smart Voting app aimed to direct opposition voters in each of the country’s 225 districts to select whichever candidate was most likely to defeat competitors from President Vladimir Putin’s United Russia party.

Removal of the app comes as part of the Kremlin’s broader crackdown on the work and allies of Navalny, who was given a prison sentence of two and a half years in February for violating parole for a previous conviction widely believed to be politically motivated.

Russian authorities banned the app in June when the government outlawed Navalny’s movement as an extremist organization.

For weeks, the Russian censorship agency, Roskomnadzor, threatened to fine Apple and Google if they did not remove the app, arguing it was illegal and accusing the two of election interference.

People familiar with the matter told reporters that the tech companies complied with the request after Russian officials threatened to prosecute their employees based in the country.

Response and Backlash

Kremlin authorities welcomed the companies’ decision, which they painted as necessary legal compliance.

“They have met the lawful demands,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters Friday. “This application is prohibited in the territory of our country. Both platforms received relevant notices and it seems they have made the decision consistent with the letter and the spirit of the law.”

Navalny’s allies and digital rights activists condemned Google and Apple for kowtowing to the demands of an authoritarian regime.

“Removing the Navalny app from stores is a shameful act of political censorship,” Ivan Zhdanov, a Navalny aide wrote on Twitter. “Russia’s authoritarian government and propaganda will be thrilled.”

Natalia Krapiva, a digital rights attorney with the Internet freedom group Access Now, told reporters that while it was clear Apple and Google “took this decision under pressure,” the tech companies still “owe the Russian people an explanation.”

Friday’s removals, she argued, have little precedent.

“This is really a new phenomenon to go after the app stores,” Krapiva noted.

Broader Crackdowns on Tech Companies

The move marks a continued escalation in the battle between authoritarian governments and American tech companies fighting to keep their services accessible.

In Russia, Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok have faced throttling and fines in recent weeks for failing to remove calls for protests and other posts expressing dissent that the Kremlin claims are illegal.

In countries like India, Myanmar, and Turkey, authorities have increasingly pressured companies to censor political speech. Last year, Turkey passed a law that gives authorities more power to regulate social media companies. 

The Indian government is also currently in a standoff with Twitter over accusations the company has failed to comply with new internet regulations that experts say limit online speech and privacy.

Now, experts worry Google and Apple’s decision to remove Navalny’s app could encourage Russia and other authoritarian regimes to pressure tech companies by threatening to prosecute their employees.

See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (The Washington Post) (The Associated Press)

Continue Reading


Denmark Moves To Bar Life Prisoners From Starting New Romantic Relationships After Peter Madsen Controversy



While behind bars, the convicted murderer pursued relationships with female admirers, including a 17-year-old girl and a 39-year-old Russian artist who he married in 2020.

Legislation Proposed

Denmark’s government proposed a draft law this week aimed at preventing prison inmates serving life sentences from forming new romantic relationships behind bars. 

If passed, the proposed bill would specifically limit correspondence and visitation rights during the first 10 years of detention to people the prisoner knew before incarceration. It would also ban prisoners from sharing details about their criminal activities on social media or on podcasts. 

Demands for such legislation stemmed from public frustration over Danish inventor Peter Madsen, a 49-year-old who was convicted in 2018 for the 2017 murder of Swedish journalist Kim Wall. According to prosecutors, Madsen sexually assaulted Wall while she was on board his submarine for an interview. He then dismembered her body before the submarine sank in what police said might have been an attempt to destroy evidence.

While incarcerated, Madsen reportedly pursued relationships with female admirers, including a 17-year-old girl named Cammilla Kürstein. Kürstein has admitted that she fell in love with Madsen after exchanging letters and talking on the phone with him over the course of two years.

However, she became jealous in 2020 when he ultimately married 39-year-old Jenny Curpen, a Russian artist living in self-imposed exile in Finland. Curpen has said her communication and visits with Madsen also began in 2018.

What Comes Next?

While Madsen has earned particular heat for pursuing new romance behind bars, he is far from the only incarcerated person to do so.

“We have seen distasteful examples in recent years of prisoners who have committed vile crimes contacting young people in order to gain their sympathy and attention,” Justice Minister Nick Hækkerup said when speaking of the bill.

“This must obviously be stopped,” he continued, arguing that jail should not serve as “dating centres or media platforms to brag about crimes.”

Denmark’s right-wing opposition in parliament has already signaled support for the bill, which was sent to the committee stage on Wednesday. If approved, it is expected to go into effect in January of next year.

Still, human rights experts said they expect challenges to the law. For example, Elo Rytter, of the University of Copenhagen, told the BT newspaper that it would “interfere with prisoners’ right to a private life.” She also said outlawing public statements might “raise questions about censorship.”

See what others are saying:(The Guardian)(The Washington Post)(BBC)

Continue Reading


World Anti-Doping Agency Will Review Cannabis Ban Following Sha’Carri Richardson’s Suspension



Any changes that stem from the review will not take effect until 2023.

Cannabis Ban for Athletes Under Review

The World Anti-Doping Agency announced Tuesday that it will review whether cannabis should stay on its list of prohibited substances.

The move comes three months after the agency’s policies notably prevented U.S. sprinter Sha’Carri Richardson from competing at the Tokyo Olympics.

In July, Richardson was given a 30 days suspension and stripped of her 100-meter win at the U.S. Olympics Trials when THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, was detected in her system. At the time, Richardson admitted that she used marijuana in Oregon, where it is legal, after learning that her biological mother had died.

The runner was ultimately met with an outpouring of support from people who argued that the drug is not a performance enhancer and is legal or decriminalized in multiple U.S. states, as well as in countries around the world.

The anti-doping agency did not specifically mention Richardson in its announcement, but it did say the plan is a response to “requests from a number of stakeholders” in international athletics.

It also said that cannabis will remain banned in 2022, and any changes that stem from the review will not take effect until the following year.

See what others are saying: (NPR)(CBS)(The Hill)

Continue Reading