Manchester United Fans Storm Team’s Home Stadium To Protest American Ownership, Postponing Game
- Over a thousand Manchester United fans protested the soccer team’s American ownership Sunday in demonstrations that soon became violent.
- Around 200 fans reportedly forced their way past security and onto the field of the team’s home stadium, postponing a game between United and Liverpool.
- Police are investigating two notable clashes. One incident involved an officer who was slashed along his face, while the second, which was caught on video, seemingly depicts an officer beating a protester laying on the ground.
- The protests followed United’s owners initially signing the team up to compete in the controversial and now-defunct Super League.
Fans Storm Soccer Field
The European Super League may have felt like a fever dream after plans for it came and then suddenly fell apart, but some fans are determined to never experience that nightmare again.
Those efforts came to a head Sunday when around 200 angry fans stormed the field of Old Trafford, the home stadium of Manchester United, to protest the team’s owners, the billionaire Glazer family. Many even held signs reading, ”Love United. Hate Glazer” and “Glazer Out.”
While The New York Times has cited fan opinion of the Glazers as “irredeemably unpopular” and even “parasitic,” Sunday’s protests were specifically a result of the Glazers initially signing Manchester United to the Super League.
The Super League, which was announced on April 18 and suspended just two days later, sought to create a new knockout tournament for Europe’s most elite teams. Six of the twelve teams that immediately signed on were from England’s Premier League; however, fans were not happy with this new league, as many feared it would just be a cash grab and would diminish the value of Europe’s top league.
Fans at Sunday’s protests called for the Glazers, who are American, to be ousted and have ownership of the team be conferred to someone within the United Kingdom.
As the protests unfolded, they held up a scheduled game between Manchester United and Liverpool. In fact, around 200 protesters even blockaded the buses that were meant to take players from their hotel to the stadium, forcing players to be sitting ducks as they watched the demonstrations from inside their rooms.
Meanwhile, at the stadium, around 1,000 protesters reportedly gathered peacefully initially; however, that quickly devolved when fans began breaking through security and forcing themselves onto the pitch. Some reports even suggested that a few fans had breached the team’s changing room at one point.
According to Greater Manchester Police, two officers were injured, with one “sustaining a significant slash wound to his face.” Other reports also show what appears to be an officer repeatedly punching a protester while he’s on the ground.
Fallout From the Protests
As all of this was happening, the Premier League held out from canceling or postponing the game. Instead, the league said the game would simply be delayed.
After several hours of protests, the league conceded defeat and announced that the game would be postponed. Currently, it’s unclear when the match will be rescheduled.
“We understand and respect the strength of feeling but condemn all acts of violence, criminal damage and trespass, especially given the associated Covid-19 breaches,” the league said in a statement. “Fans have many channels by which to make their views known, but the actions of a minority seen today have no justification.”
Manchester United also released an official statement acknowledging fans’ right to “free expression and peaceful protest.”
“However, we regret the disruption to the team and actions which put other fans, staff, and the police in danger,” the club added. “We thank the police for their support and will assist them in any subsequent investigations.”
So far, police have announced they’ve launched investigations into the injured officer and the officer who appears to repeatedly punch a protester.
While the biggest and most violent demonstration yet, this isn’t the first anti-Glazer protest seen in recent weeks. In fact, a couple of weeks ago, nearly two dozen Manchester United fans broke into a training base to call for the Glazers’ oustings.
Monday morning, England’s Football Association announced that it has launched a formal inquiry into the role English Premier teams played while trying to create the Super League.
“Once we have the required information, we will consider what appropriate steps to take,” it said. “Clearly what happened was unacceptable and could have caused great harm to clubs at every level of English football.”
See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (CNN) (ESPN)
Amazon to Pay Over $30 Million for Alexa and Ring Privacy Violations
Privacy violation charges stack up against the tech giant as the FTC partners up with the DOJ.
Amazon Pays Up
Amazon agreed to a $30 million settlement for each of these complaints over complaints alleging that its Alexa and Ring products violated customer privacy.
The Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department accused Amazon of retaining children’s geolocation data as well as the recordings of their conversations with Alexa. Additionally, the FTC brought another complaint against Amazon’s Ring for violating their customers’ privacy and failing to complement basic security measures.
In addition to the accusations of retaining data, the FTC also charges Amazon with deceiving their customers, saying requests from parents to delete their children’s recordings and other data went ignored despite repeated assurances that parents can delete the data at any time.
Amazon says this data was retained to train their Alexa algorithms to better understand children. But their reasoning does not change law. Their actions are still in violation of the federal Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, known as COPPA.
“Amazon’s history of misleading parents, keeping children’s recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents’ deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits,” said Samuel Levine, the director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection in the press release regarding the complaint. “COPPA does not allow companies to keep children’s data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms.”
The Settlement’s Details
The proposed settlement that Amazon agreed to on Wednesday includes a $25 million civil penalty as well as requirements to both delete the data in question and never use voice recordings of adults or children in the development or creation of a product again.
However approval on this settlement is still needed from the federal courts.
Despite agreeing to the settlement, Amazon denies violating COPPA, saying they designed Amazon Kids for parents to have full control and to comply with the law.
In their complaint against Ring, the FTC accused the company of violating their customers’ privacy by allowing countless employees and hundreds of contractors access to the videos from Ring cameras.
Leading to situations like one in 2017, when a Ring employee watched thousands of videos belonging to dozens of female customers, including those in their bedrooms and bathrooms.
Additionally, the FTC says that Ring did not implement basic security protections for years which allowed hackers to take control of their customers’ accounts, cameras, and videos leading to 55,000 US Ring customers facing hacker attacks. In some cases, hackers could access Ring’s two-way functions to harass, insult, and threaten people – including children. The complaint alleges that Ring’s egregious privacy failings lasted for at least 4 years – between at least 2016 to 2020.
Amazon responded to the complaint saying that RIng had addressed the concerns before the FTC even began their inquiry.
The FTC proposed a settlement of $5.8 million in consumer refunds – as well as a demand for Ring to create a privacy and security program. The settlement also awaits federal court approval.
See what others are saying: (New York Times) (Axios) (CNBC)
Right-Wingers Are Turning Against Chick-fil-A
Some have accused the company of joining a woke “cult” after learning of its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiative.
Chick-fil-A Goes “Woke”
Conservatives are condemning Chick-fil-A after learning of the fast food chain’s commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Some have accused the brand of bowing “to the Woke mob.” Others have debated boycotting the chain.
It’s unclear when exactly Chick-fil-A began its DEI campaign, but according to LinkedIn, the current Vice President of DEI, Erick McReynolds, has been working in the department since 2020 before taking on his current role in 2021. It is also unclear why right-wingers on Twitter have just now discovered Chick-fil-A’s DEI website, but many spent a chunk of Tuesday morning lambasting the company for working to promote diversity.
Chick-fil-A’s DEI page is titled “Committed to being Better at Together.”
“Modeling care for others starts in the restaurant, and we are committed to ensuring mutual respect, understanding and dignity everywhere we do business,” McReynolds said in a statement on the website.
Chick-fil-A is no stranger to boycott campaigns, though those efforts usually come from the opposite side of the political aisle. The company, known for its strong Christian ties, has been criticized for donating to groups with anti-LGBTQ missions. As a result, many on the left have refused to eat there, while it has been a haven for those on the right.
Conservatives, however, have become increasingly outraged by DEI initiatives. Chick-fil-A’s website, which only vaguely outlines its DEI efforts, still seems to be enough for the right to change its tune about the brand.
“Even our beloved Chick-Fil-A has fallen to the DEI cult,” one person tweeted. “the same agenda that is turning our beloved military woke.”
“It’s becoming an epidemic that even Christian companies are being strong-armed to participate in,” the tweet continued.
Old Clip of Chairman Resurfaces
Some have also started resurfacing an old clip of Chick-fil-A Chairman Dan Cathy speaking on a panel about racism during the summer of 2020. During the discussion, he talked about repentance and said that if you ever see someone who needs their shoes shined, you should do it. He then walked over to a Black person on the panel, got on his knees, and shined their shoes.
“There’s a time in which we need to have, you know, some personal action here, and maybe we need to give them a hug, too,” Cathy said while shining the shoes.
“I bought about 1,500 of these and I gave them to all our Chick-fil-A operators and staff a number of years ago,” Cathy continued, in reference to his shoe-shining brush. “So, any expressions of a contrite heart, of a sense of humility, a sense of shame, a sense of embarrassment begat with an apologetic heart — I think that’s what our world needs to hear today.”
The clip caused a stir when the events first unfolded, and has prompted a new wave of anger now. Some are accusing Cathy of being “a woke, anti-American, anti-white BLM boot licker” who thinks all white people need to shamefully shine the shoes of Black people to apologize for racism, though that is not what he said.
These boycott calls are just the latest from conservatives who have been on a rampage against any company supporting any social cause they deem as “woke.” Earlier this year, the political right took a stand against Bud Light after it included a trans influencer in a sponsored Instagram post. Just last week, Target and Kohls faced boycotts over items in their Pride Month collections.
See what others are saying: (The Hill) (Rolling Stone) (AL)
Bioré Apologizes For Referencing School Shooting in Mental Health Ad Campaign
“Our tonality was completely inappropriate. We are so sorry,” the skincare brand said.
Video Faces Backlash
The skincare brand Bioré apologized this week for partnering with a school shooting survivor as part of its Mental Health Awareness Month campaign.
“We are committed to continuing our mental health mission, but we promise to do it in a better way,” the company said in an Instagram post on Sunday.
Last week, influencer and recent Michigan State University graduate Cecilee Max-Brown posted a video to TikTok sponsored by Bioré where she discussed the numerous challenges she had faced throughout the year. Among them was a school shooting on her college’s campus, which killed three people in February.
“Life has thrown countless obstacles at me this year, from the school shooting to having no idea what life is going to look like after college,” Max-Brown says in the video. “In honor of mental health awareness month, I’m partnering with Bioré skin care to strip away the stigma of anxiety.
“We want you to get it all out, not only what’s in your pores, but most importantly, what’s on your mind, too,” she continued.
In the 50-second video, Max-Brown went on to discuss more details about her mental health struggles, as well as how “seeing the effects of gun violence firsthand” has impacted her and led to “countless anxiety attacks.”
“I will never forget the feeling of terror that I had walking around campus for weeks in a place I considered home,” she said before closing the video by encouraging her followers to participate in Bioré’s mental health campaign.
The video ignited swift outrage from people who accused Bioré of using a school shooting to sell products. In its apology, the brand admitted the video was misguided.
In the past, Bioré said it has worked with influencers to discuss and reduce mental health stigmas, as the subject is a top priority for its consumers.
“This time, however, we did it the wrong way,” the company said. “We lacked sensitivity around an incredibly serious tragedy, and our tonality was completely inappropriate. We are so sorry.”
Max-Brown also apologized on TikTok, writing that the video was intended to spread awareness, not suggest a product fixed the struggles she has experienced as a result of the shooting.
“I did not mean to desensitize the traumatic event that took place as I know the effects that it has had on me and the Spartan community,” she wrote.
Max-Brown has since removed the initial sponsored video from her account.