Connect with us


Lil Nas X Responds To Outrage Over New Music Video and Satan Sneakers: “i hope u are mad”



  • Internet users have spent days talking about the music video for Lil Nas X’s new song “Montero (Call Me By Your Name)” and his limited line of Satan-themed sneakers.
  • Fans praised the singer for reclaiming the predominantly Christian narrative that gay people are sinners by embracing Hell in his video, which at one point features him sliding down a stripper pole to give Satan a lap dance.
  • Many conservatives were outraged by his use of imagery regarding Hell and the devil as well as its potential impact on children, including South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, “Kent State gun girl” Kaitlyn Bennet, and political commentator Candace Owens.
  • Lil Nas X reminded people that parents are responsible for what their kids listen to and tweeted, “i spent my entire teenage years hating myself because of the sh*t y’all preached would happen to me because i was gay. so i hope u are mad, stay mad, feel the same anger you teach us to have towards ourselves.”

Lil Nas X Responds To Backlash

Lil Nas X fired back at critics who are slamming the music video for his new song “Montero (Call Me By Your Name)” and the accompanying limited line of Satan shoes he released.

The music video debuted on Friday and has since been viewed 33 million times. In the most talked about part of the video, Lil Nas X slides down a stripper pole into Hell and gives Satan a lap dance. Many people loved it and praised the singer for reclaiming the predominantly Christian narrative that gay people are sinners by embracing Hell in his video. However, others — mostly Christians and conservatives — were offended by the imagery and references to the devil.

Throughout the weekend, many have been tweeting that they are horrified by it. Because the musician’s most famous song “Old Town Road” was so popular with children, many are specifically upset that kids might watch the video and be impacted by it. 

However, Lil Nas X slammed those who thought that he should stay in a PG-lane just because younger people liked “Old Town Road.”

“I literally sing about lean & adultery in old town road,” he wrote on Twitter, adding , “u decided to let your child listen. blame yourself.”

This backlash was something Lil Nas X anticipated as his song and video openly celebrate his sexuality. Prior to releasing the project, he shared a letter he wrote to his 14-year-old self, who was still in the closet with no plans to come out as gay. 

“This [song] will open doors for many other queer people to simply exist,” he wrote. “You see, this is very scary for me, people will be angry, they will say I’m pushing an agenda. But the truth is, I am. The agenda to make people stay the fuck out of other people’s lives and stop dictating who they should be.”

He expanded on this idea as outrage rolled in. 

“I spent my entire teenage years hating myself because of the sh*t y’all preached would happen to me because i was gay, so i hope u are mad, stay mad, feel the same anger you teach us to have towards ourselves,” he said on Twitter.

Outrage Over “Satan Shoes”

In addition to the song and video, people were also outraged by limited edition Satan shoes the singer released with MSCHF. Styled after Nike Air Max 97s, promotions for the sneakers say each of the 666 pairs contain a drop of blood. Nike has denied involvement in the line, which sold out in under a minute on Monday morning. 

As backlash regarding the sneakers began to roll in, Lil Nas X posted a fake apology video on YouTube on Sunday.

“Okay guys, I see everybody’s been talking about this shoe and I just want to come forward and say,” he said before the video cuts to the part of his “Montero” music video where he gives Satan a lap dance. 

The sneakers also landed him in a brief Twitter fight with South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem (R) who slammed the shoes on Twitter.

“Our kids are being told that this kind of product is, not only okay, it’s “exclusive.” But do you know what’s more exclusive? Their God-given eternal soul,” she wrote. 

Lil Nas X responded with, “ur a whole governor and u on here tweeting about some damn shoes. do ur job!”

Noem hit back with a quote from the Bible and Lil Nas X ended their riff by replying with most suggestive lyrics in his song. 

Lil Nas X Spars With Conservative Media Figures

Noem was far from the only conservative figure Lil Nas X called out on Twitter. He called commentator Candance Owns a “flop” after she tweeted about his sneakers and asked, “But we’re convinced it’s white supremacy that’s keeping black America behind. How stupid can we be?”

“You know you did something right when she talks about it,” he added

The musician also sparred with Kaitlin Bennett, known on the Internet as “gun girl” because of a viral photoshoot where she walked around the campus of Kent State University with an assault rifle. 

“It’s [weeks] like these that I’m thankful to be blocked by Lil Nas X,” she wrote on Twitter. 

“I still see ur tweets shitty pants,” Lil Nas X responded, referencing a popular but unproven rumor that Bennett once soiled herself at a party. 

Bennett replied by asking, “Do you still see your dad?” Lil Nas X then said, “yep and i might fuck yours.”

While some thought that was a mic drop-moment, Bennett shared a screenshot of the tweet in an effort to rile up her followers and other conservatives by claiming the singer was threatening to rape her father. 

On Monday, Lil Nas X was still on Twitter addressing the controversy he stirred. 

“We are in a pandemic and y’all are going on day 5 of being mad at a gay n**** who don’t do none but tweet all day,” he wrote. 

See what others are saying: (Slate) (Entertainment Weekly) (The Hill)


Andrew Tate to Remain in Romanian Detention After Losing Appeal



The controversial influencer, accused of sex trafficking and organized crime, has maintained his innocence. 

Appeal Rejected

A Romanian court on Wednesday upheld a judge’s decision to extend influencer Andrew Tate’s arrest another 30 days.

The judge initially tacked the extra time onto his detention on Jan. 20. According to BBC News, the judge cited “the capacity…of the defendants to exercise permanent psychological control over the victims, including by resorting to constant acts of violence”.

Tate appealed that decision alongside his brother and two others, all of whom were arrested as part of an ongoing sex trafficking and organized crime investigation. The court’s Wednesday decision rejected that appeal, meaning Tate and the other accused individuals will remain in custody until at least Feb. 27. 

Investigators claim that Tate lured victims under the guise of a romantic relationship, only to place them under surveillance and force them to make pornographic content. Tate has denied the accusations. 

“You know I’m innocent,” Tate said to reporters Wednesday morning while walking into the courtroom.

“Ask them for evidence and they will give you none,” he added while leaving court. “Because it doesn’t exist. You’ll find out the truth of this case soon.” 

Tate’s Controversial Online Presence

Ever since December his arrest, Tate’s Twitter account has continued to post sometimes cryptic messages about the investigation into him. 

“Would your life be fine without you?” he tweeted on Tuesday, one day before his appeal was rejected. “In Romania. They can steal your life without a trial. They do not need evidence, In this system, innocent men return to ruined lives. My life outside is fine. But for most men, 6 months detained and their whole life will crumble.”

Tate is a controversial online figure famous for spreading violent misogyny to his often young male followers. He has been banned by a number of social media platforms for his drastic remarks, including one where he said rape victims should “bear responsibility” for the assault they endured. 

Tate and his brother recently added high-profile lawyer Tina Glandian to their defense team. Glandian has previously represented celebrities like Chris Brown, Jussie Smollett, and Kesha. 

On Wednesday, she said there is a “lack of evidence against the Tate brothers.”

“So far the system has failed,” she said, via the Associated Press.

See what others are saying: (BBC News) (The Associated Press) (Rolling Stone)

Continue Reading


QTCinderalla Vows to Sue Deepfake Website: “Constant Objectification” is “Exhausting”



The streamer said that anyone who chooses to view nonconsensual deepfake porn is “the problem.”

QTCinderella Plans Legal Action

Twitch streamer QTCinderalla said during a Monday stream that she is going to sue the maker of a website that hosts explicit deepfake images of herself and other content creators. 

“I promise you, with every part of my fucking soul, I am going to sue you,” QTCinderella, whose real name is Blaire, said through tears. 

Blaire went live after fellow streamer Atrioc accidentally revealed on Twitch that he had an open tab to a website that hosts deepfake porn. Graphic images of high-profile female streamers were visible his browser, and the website also includes deepfakes of more creators, including Blaire. 

Atrioc apologized for accessing deepfake images on a website that promotes explicit content of his female streaming colleagues. He claimed that he got “morbidly curious” and “clicked something” after falling down an artificial intelligence rabbit hole online. 

“It’s gross,” he said. “It’s gross and I’m sorry.” 

In the past, Blaire has talked about having to pay services thousands of dollars to remove graphic deepfake content that has been posted without her consent. Despite those efforts, it is an issue she still has to deal with on a regular basis. 

“Fuck the fucking Internet,” she said during her Monday stream. “Fuck the constant objectification and exploitation of women, it’s exhausting.”

“Fuck Atrioc for showing it to thousands of people,” she continued. “Fuck the people DMing me pictures of myself from that website.” 

The Objectification of Female Streamers

Blaire said that it “should not be a part of [her] job” to constantly fight for this content to be removed from the Internet, nor should it be her job to deal with the onslaught of harassment that comes with the dissemination of these fabricated images. 

“If you are able to look at women who are not selling themselves or benefiting off of being seen sexually — they’re not benefiting, they’re not selling it, they’re not platforming it themselves — if you are able to look at that, you are the problem,” she said. “You see women as an object.” 

On Twitter, she explained that the repercussions of these deepfakes go far beyond exploitation and violation. 

“The amount of body dysmorphia I’ve experienced since seeing those photos has ruined me,” she said. 

She was far from the only person to call out how invasive it is to post or consume deepfake content of people who did not consent to being depicted in a sexual manner. 

“Stop sexualizing people without their consent,” Pokimane, who is also among the female streamers featured on the site, said. “That’s it, that’s the tweet.”

No one should have themselves be put on a deepfake porn website w/o their consent and it’s fucking disgusting at the men who are making light of this shit. fucking despicable,” another person wrote.

See what others are saying: (Dexerto) (Metro) (The Gamer)

Continue Reading


Britney Spears Asks For Privacy After Fans Called Cops to Conduct a Wellness Check on Her



Fans said they were concerned after the singer deleted her Instagram account.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was updated to include a statement from Britney Spears

Fans Call 911

Britney Spears said her fans “went a little too far” after some called the police to conduct a wellness check on her. 

The fans, many fueled by online conspiracy theories, were concerned about Spears because she deleted her Instagram account. While this is something the singer has done multiple times in the past, her fans thought she had left secret signals in her last post suggesting she needed help.

Some even posted videos of them calling emergency services on TikTok, a platform that is full of conspiracy videos about Spears. 

“I love and adore my fans but this time things went a little too far and my privacy was invaded,” Spears wrote in a statement on Thursday, citing “prank phone calls” that were made to police.

According to Spears, officers did not enter her home because once they got to her gate, they “quickly realized there was no issue and left immediately.”

“This felt like I was being gaslit and bullied once the incident made it to the news and being portrayed once again in a poor and unfair light by the media,” Spears continued. “During this time in my life, I truly hope the public and my fans who I care so much about can respect my privacy moving forward.”

On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Ventura County Sheriff’s Office confirmed to Page Six that the department “did get calls into our dispatch” but added there was no reason to believe that Spears was “in any kind of harm or any kind of danger.”

That spokesperson declined to say if officials contacted Spears or conducted a wellness check, citing privacy and public trust issues.

The Prominence of Britney Spears Conspiracies 

Just over a year has passed since Spears was freed from a highly restrictive conservatorship that controlled her life and finances for 13 years. Throughout the conservatorship, fans tried to use the pop icon’s social media to pick up clues that she was secretly struggling. She did not publicly speak about the conservatorship until the summer of 2021. 

Now that she has her freedom, fans are still reading heavily into her posts. Some believe there are hidden messages in her captions and in the gestures she does while dancing. Others think she is dead, missing, or hiding and that a body double is being used in her posts. Some are so concerned that they are coordinating a mass effort to pressure the Los Angeles Times into investigating Spears’ whereabouts and safety. 

In the last several years, many have reflected on Spears’ early days in the spotlight and the cruel ways she was harassed and targeted by paparazzi, news outlets, and culture at large. Often the punchline to a joke throughout the 2000s, many now sympathize with Spears, who was forced to endure heavy public scrutiny at a young age. Documentaries like “Framing Britney Spears” prompted many to see Spears as a victim of abusive media tactics, not the “crazy” woman tabloids painted her to be. 

Many are now concerned that fans are only going to subject Spears to a new onslaught of harassment by calling the police to her house. Even if the conspiracy theories are technically well-intentioned and often come from a place of concern, some believe they will jumpstart a media frenzy that could harm Spears’ mental well-being.

See what others are saying: (Page Six) (Jezebel) (TMZ)

Continue Reading