Connect with us

Politics

Trump Has Been Acquitted in His Impeachment Trial. Here’s What It Means.

Published

on

  • The Senate acquitted Donald Trump in a 57-43 vote on Saturday, with seven Republicans joining all 50 Democrats to convict the former president for his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection.
  • The aftermath of the vote highlighted the growing divisions in the Republican party between those who have disavowed Trump, those who believe supporting him is the only way forward, and those who want to strike a balance between both.
  • Despite his acquittal in the Senate, Trump could still be held accountable for his actions as the result of criminal probes by local officials and Congress.
  • “President Trump is still liable for everything he did while in office,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said after voting to acquit Trump. “He didn’t get away with anything yet.” 

Trump Acquitted

Former President Donald Trump was acquitted by the Senate on Saturday for the charges of inciting an insurrection with a vote of 57-43.

Seven Republicans joined all 50 Democrats to vote in favor of conviction: Sens. Mitt Romney (Ut.), Richard Burr (NC.), Bill Cassidy (La.) Susan Collins (Me.), Lisa Murkowski (Ak.), Ben Sasse (Ne.), and Pat Toomey (Pa.)

While the general outcome was to be expected, there has been a large focus on the broader implications for the Republican Party and Trump himself.

Growing Factions in the GOP

The divisions in the GOP have been growing for a while now, but there are three overarching rifts that have been exemplified in the aftermath of the trial.

In one camp, the seven Republican senators voting to convict Trump have effectively distanced themselves from the former president and signaled they do not want him in the party. Those members have already been met with widespread backlash from party leaders and local GOP officials in their states, many of whom likely still want to have the support of the many conservatives who still back Trump.

While several polls have shown that a majority of the country thought that Trump should be convicted and barred from running again, other recent polls indicate that around 70% of Republican voters still strongly support him. Out of the seven Republicans who voted to convict, only Murkowski is up for election in 2022. Both Burr and Toomey are set to retire.

Analysts have said the career risk that comes with abandoning Trump still remains high even though he is not in power anymore, which is why there is also a large group of Republicans who are trying to play both sides.

This second faction includes Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who followed his “not-guilty” vote with a 20-minute speech where he gave arguably his strongest condemnation of Trump ever.

“There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day,” he said.“The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president, and having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth.” 

McConnell added that Trump did nothing to stop the riot but said that he believed the Senate did not have the constitutional power to remove a president who had left office. McConnell’s balancing act here is a transparent effort to cater to those who have disavowed Trump, while also keeping a hand out for those who still support him.

That effort is due to the fact that the third final major faction of the Republican party is composed of people who think embracing Trump and doubling down is the only way forward for the party.

Following Trump’s acquittal, some people have reaffirmed their commitment to him and his supporters in an even bigger way. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC.), who has flip-flopped in the past, emphasized his support for Trump in a series of interviews over the weekend.

“Donald Trump is the most vibrant member of the Republican Party. The Trump movement is alive and well,” he told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace. “All I can say is that the most potent force in the Republican Party is President Trump. We need Trump.”

Graham also argued that McConnell had made himself a target for pro-Trump Republicans running ads in 2022 and claimed that Burr’s surprise vote to convict paved the way for Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, to run for the seat he’s leaving North Carolina as a more far-right candidate.

What Now?

As for what happens now that Trump has been acquitted, there are a number of possible avenues that are being pursued

Last week, a District Attorney in Georgia opened an investigation into Trump’s efforts to interfere in the election in the state. Over the weekend, The Washington Post reported that a call Graham made to the state’s top election official is also being investigated as part of that probe.

That is also not where these inquiries will end. While speaking to Senators following Trump’s acquittal Saturday, McConnell indicated that the former president would still be held responsible for his actions.

“President Trump is still liable for everything he did while in office,” he said. “He didn’t get away with anything yet.” 

According to reports, members of both parties have expressed support for a 9/11-style commission to investigate the lead-up to the insurrection. 

While it is unclear if that body would have the power to punish anyone, Sen. Chris Coons (D-De.) told reporters Sunday that a number of his Republican colleagues have expressed support for holding Trump accountable either through a criminal trial or through some other path that would bar him from holding office.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNBC)

Politics

Trump’s DOJ Allegedly Obtained Phone Records of WaPo Reporters Covering Russia Probe

Published

on

  • Former President Trump’s Justice Department secretly obtained phone records from Washington Post journalists covering Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election, the outlet reported Friday.
  • The DOJ seized records of the work, home, and cellphone numbers of three reporters from April 15 to July 31, 2017. Those records included who the calls were with and how long they were, but not what was said.
  • Many journalists and Free Speech activists condemned the action and called on the Biden administration to end the practice of record subpoenas, which are often used by the government to find clues about possible sources and can harm key newsgathering.
  • A DOJ spokesperson defended the previous administration’s actions, arguing that the news media are not the targets of such investigations but rather, “those with access to the national defense information who provided it to the media and thus failed to protect it as lawfully required.”

Washington Post Reporters Subpoenaed

The Washington Post reported Friday that the Justice Department under former President Donald Trump secretly obtained phone records from some of its journalists regarding reporting they did on Russia’s role in the 2016 election.

According to the outlet, the DOJ sent three separate letters dated May 3 and addressed to three former Post journalists to inform them they were “hereby notified that pursuant to legal process the United States Department of Justice received toll records associated with the following telephone numbers for the period from April 15, 2017 to July 31, 2017.” 

The letters, which listed work, home, or cellphone numbers, also stated that prosecutors had gotten a court order to obtain records for the reporters’ work email accounts, but that they did not ultimately not obtain those records.

The phone records, the outlet said, “included the numbers of all the calls made to and from the targeted phone over the specified time period, and how long each call lasted, but do not include what was said in those phone calls.”

“Investigators often hope such records will provide clues about possible sources the reporters were in contact with before a particular story published,” it added.

The Post reported that the letters do not say why the DOJ was seizing the phone records. However, it did note that toward the end of the time period outlined, the three reporters had written a story about classified U.S. intelligence intercepts that indicated then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions had discussed the Trump campaign with Russia’s ambassador to the U.S. when he was a sitting senator in 2016.

The alleged move is significant because it is rare for the DOJ to use subpoenas in order to obtain records of reporters in leak investigations. In fact, the last high-profile seizure of communication records was part of an investigation into a source cited in 2017 reporting that was also about the investigation into Russian election interference.

Also very notably, these subpoenas need to be approved directly by the attorney general. A spokesperson for the DOJ told The Post that the records had been requested in 2020, meaning it would have likely taken place under Attorney General William Barr, who stepped down on Dec. 23.

Response

The allegations immediately drew criticism from First Amendment advocates and journalists, who have long opposed the practice of obtaining these kinds of records, and argued that attempts to identify sources of leaks hurt critical news gathering and reporting.

“We are deeply troubled by this use of government power to seek access to the communications of journalists,” said Cameron Barr, the current acting executive editor of The Post. “The Department of Justice should immediately make clear its reasons for this intrusion into the activities of reporters doing their jobs, an activity protected under the First Amendment.”

Many other journalists also demanded that the Biden administration ensure such practices are not replicated, noting the escalated efforts to subpoena reporters records under both the Trump and Obama administrations.

However, a DOJ spokesperson defended the previous administration’s decision to subpoena The Post reporters in a statement to the outlet.

“While rare, the Department follows the established procedures within its media guidelines policy when seeking legal process to obtain telephone toll records and non-content email records from media members as part of a criminal investigation into unauthorized disclosure of classified information,” the spokesperson said. 

“The targets of these investigations are not the news media recipients but rather those with access to the national defense information who provided it to the media and thus failed to protect it as lawfully required.”

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (Variety) (CNN)

Continue Reading

Politics

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Signs Restrictive Elections Bill Into Law

Published

on

  • Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed a sweeping elections bill into law Thursday that critics say will significantly limit voting access.
  • Among other measures, the bill will impose new restrictions on ballot drop boxes, add barriers to mail-in voting, and limit who can hand out materials to voters at polling locations — a provision many believe will ban the distribution of food and water.
  • While Republicans claim the bill is necessary to provide election security and transparency, Democrats and voting rights advocates argue that it will suppress voters, particularly voters of color.
  • DeSantis also received widespread backlash from critics and the media for taking the unprecedented step of blocking all journalists from attending the signing ceremony for the law, which was broadcasted exclusively on Fox News.

Newest Voting Restrictions Law

Florida became the latest Republican-led state to impose new voting restrictions Thursday when Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) signed a broad elections bill into law.

The new law contains many provisions similar to the dozens of pieces of legislation aimed at restricting voting access that have been proposed and approved in the months following the 2020 election.

Among other measures, the Florida law will:

  • Limit the use of drop boxes and impose new restrictions on where they can be placed.
  • Add more identification requirements for requesting absentee ballots.
  • Require voters to request absentee ballots for each election, rather than getting them automatically through a voting list.
  • Limit who can collect and drop off ballots.
  • Give more power to partisan observers during the ballot-counting process.
  • Expand a current rule that bans outside groups from engaging in actions that could influence voting within a 150-foot radius of a polling place, which voting rights experts say could be used to prohibit people from giving out food and water to voters waiting in line to vote.

On top of that, critics have also said the new law could result in longer lines for both early in-person and Election Day voting. Democrats and voting rights advocates have also argued that this is just a transparent attempt to suppress voters, and specifically voters of color.

Republicans, meanwhile, have claimed the new law is necessary to make elections more secure — claims that were reiterated by DeSantis during the signing ceremony.

“Me signing this bill says, ‘Florida, your vote counts,’” he said. “Your vote is going to be cast with integrity and transparency, and this is a great place for democracy.”

DeSantis Blocks Media From Bill Signing

In addition to backlash against the new law itself, many condemned DeSantis for speaking about transparency but then completely shutting the media out of the signing, which was broadcasted exclusively on Fox News.

Numerous individual reporters and outlets were blocked from accessing the event, including Jay O’Brien, a reporter for the local CBS affiliate, who tweeted that the station was supposed to film pool footage of the event to feed to affiliates nationwide.

“This isn’t a story about the press being locked out of an event,” O’Brien later added. “It’s about Floridians who had their eyes and ears in that room cut off. @GovRonDeSantis signed a law today that will impact ALL Floridians. And only some viewers were allowed to see it. That’s not normal.”

That disbelief was also echoed by other outlets, like The New York Times, which explained that “Giving exclusive access to a cable news network was unusual, if not unprecedented.” 

The Flordia law, which was immediately challenged by civil rights groups in federal court, comes just months after Georgia passed a similar, widely controverisal bill. 

Meanwhile in Texas, Republican leaders are ignoring the pleas of major corporations like Dell, Microsoft, and American Airlines by moving forward with legislation that would make the state one of the toughest to vote in throughout the entire country. That proposal, which has already been passed by the state Senate, could see a full state House vote as early as next week.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CBS News)

Continue Reading

Politics

Biden Administration To Reunite Four Migrant Families Separated Under Trump

Published

on

  • Four migrant families split up under former President Trump’s child separation policy will be reunited this week, Biden administration officials said Sunday.
  • More than 5,500 children were separated from their parents from 2017 to 2018. Around 1,000 families remained separated when Trump left office and over half had not been contacted by the administration.
  • Shortly after taking office in January, President Biden formed the Family Reunification Task Force, which has located at least 200 more parents. The families that will be reunited later this week mark the first that the task force has connected.
  • While immigration advocates applauded the move, they also criticized Biden’s team for not moving faster or pouring adequate resources into reunification efforts.

Four Migrant Families To Reunite

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas announced Sunday that four migrant parents who were separated from their children and deported alone under former President Donald Trump’s controversial family separation policy will be allowed to return to the U.S. and reunite with their kids.

The “zero tolerance” policy, one of Trump’s most notorious actions on immigration, was formally enacted in April 2018 and ended just months later in June after a federal judge forced the administration to stop.

It was later revealed that the administration had actually been regularly separating families throughout much of 2017. According to government documents, over 5,500 children were separated from their parents in 2017 and 2018.

Most of those families were later reunited, but at least 1,000 parents remained separated because a parent had been deported. More than half of those parents — an estimated 645 — still had not been contacted by the time Trump left office.

President Joe Biden has said reuniting families would be a top priority as he begins undoing the complex network of immigration policies set by Trump. This latest move marks the first families that will be reunited through the Family Reunification Task Force, which Biden created shortly after taking office in January.

So far, that task force has managed to find around 200 of the 645 remaining parents and recently reported that it’s looking into 5,600 files from the first few months of the Trump administration that may have evidence of even more separations.

Immigration Advocates Call for More

While immigration advocates and lawyers applauded the move, they also criticized the slow rate of reunification. Some also accused the Biden administration of taking credit for the reunions despite doing very little to facilitate them.

“Despite what Secretary Mayorkas would have the public believe, DHS has done nothing to facilitate the return and reunification of these parents this week, other than to agree to allow them in,” said Carol Anne Donohoe, a managing attorney for the reunification project run by immigrant advocacy organization Al Otro Lado. 

“The only reason these mothers will be standing at the port of entry is because Al Otro Lado negotiated their travel visas with the Mexican government, paid for their airline tickets and arranged for reunification,” she added.

Many advocacy groups have also slammed the Biden administration for not doing enough to plan what happens next for these families. Some have urged them to provide permanent legal status to parents so they cannot be separated from their children again, as well as support services and potential financial compensation.

The parents arriving this week will be allowed to temporarily stay in the country under what’s called humanitarian parole, their long-term immigration status and what happens from here is largely up in the air.

See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (NPR) (NBC News)

Continue Reading