Connect with us

Politics

Trump Has Been Acquitted in His Impeachment Trial. Here’s What It Means.

Published

on

  • The Senate acquitted Donald Trump in a 57-43 vote on Saturday, with seven Republicans joining all 50 Democrats to convict the former president for his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection.
  • The aftermath of the vote highlighted the growing divisions in the Republican party between those who have disavowed Trump, those who believe supporting him is the only way forward, and those who want to strike a balance between both.
  • Despite his acquittal in the Senate, Trump could still be held accountable for his actions as the result of criminal probes by local officials and Congress.
  • “President Trump is still liable for everything he did while in office,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said after voting to acquit Trump. “He didn’t get away with anything yet.” 

Trump Acquitted

Former President Donald Trump was acquitted by the Senate on Saturday for the charges of inciting an insurrection with a vote of 57-43.

Seven Republicans joined all 50 Democrats to vote in favor of conviction: Sens. Mitt Romney (Ut.), Richard Burr (NC.), Bill Cassidy (La.) Susan Collins (Me.), Lisa Murkowski (Ak.), Ben Sasse (Ne.), and Pat Toomey (Pa.)

While the general outcome was to be expected, there has been a large focus on the broader implications for the Republican Party and Trump himself.

Growing Factions in the GOP

The divisions in the GOP have been growing for a while now, but there are three overarching rifts that have been exemplified in the aftermath of the trial.

In one camp, the seven Republican senators voting to convict Trump have effectively distanced themselves from the former president and signaled they do not want him in the party. Those members have already been met with widespread backlash from party leaders and local GOP officials in their states, many of whom likely still want to have the support of the many conservatives who still back Trump.

While several polls have shown that a majority of the country thought that Trump should be convicted and barred from running again, other recent polls indicate that around 70% of Republican voters still strongly support him. Out of the seven Republicans who voted to convict, only Murkowski is up for election in 2022. Both Burr and Toomey are set to retire.

Analysts have said the career risk that comes with abandoning Trump still remains high even though he is not in power anymore, which is why there is also a large group of Republicans who are trying to play both sides.

This second faction includes Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), who followed his “not-guilty” vote with a 20-minute speech where he gave arguably his strongest condemnation of Trump ever.

“There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day,” he said.“The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president, and having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false statements, conspiracy theories and reckless hyperbole which the defeated president kept shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth.” 

McConnell added that Trump did nothing to stop the riot but said that he believed the Senate did not have the constitutional power to remove a president who had left office. McConnell’s balancing act here is a transparent effort to cater to those who have disavowed Trump, while also keeping a hand out for those who still support him.

That effort is due to the fact that the third final major faction of the Republican party is composed of people who think embracing Trump and doubling down is the only way forward for the party.

Following Trump’s acquittal, some people have reaffirmed their commitment to him and his supporters in an even bigger way. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC.), who has flip-flopped in the past, emphasized his support for Trump in a series of interviews over the weekend.

“Donald Trump is the most vibrant member of the Republican Party. The Trump movement is alive and well,” he told “Fox News Sunday” host Chris Wallace. “All I can say is that the most potent force in the Republican Party is President Trump. We need Trump.”

Graham also argued that McConnell had made himself a target for pro-Trump Republicans running ads in 2022 and claimed that Burr’s surprise vote to convict paved the way for Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, to run for the seat he’s leaving North Carolina as a more far-right candidate.

What Now?

As for what happens now that Trump has been acquitted, there are a number of possible avenues that are being pursued

Last week, a District Attorney in Georgia opened an investigation into Trump’s efforts to interfere in the election in the state. Over the weekend, The Washington Post reported that a call Graham made to the state’s top election official is also being investigated as part of that probe.

That is also not where these inquiries will end. While speaking to Senators following Trump’s acquittal Saturday, McConnell indicated that the former president would still be held responsible for his actions.

“President Trump is still liable for everything he did while in office,” he said. “He didn’t get away with anything yet.” 

According to reports, members of both parties have expressed support for a 9/11-style commission to investigate the lead-up to the insurrection. 

While it is unclear if that body would have the power to punish anyone, Sen. Chris Coons (D-De.) told reporters Sunday that a number of his Republican colleagues have expressed support for holding Trump accountable either through a criminal trial or through some other path that would bar him from holding office.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNBC)

Politics

Biden Calls on Congress To Extend Eviction Moratorium

Published

on

The move comes just two days before the federal ban is set to expire.


Eviction Freeze Set To Expire

President Joe Biden asked Congress on Thursday to extend the federal eviction moratorium for another month just two days before the ban was set to expire.

The request follows a Supreme Court decision last month, where the justices ruled the evictions freeze could stay in place until it expired on July 31. That decision was made after a group of landlords sued, arguing that the moratorium was illegal under the public health law the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had relied on to implement it.

While the court did not provide reasons for its ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued a short concurring opinion explaining that although he thought the CDC “exceeded its existing statutory authority,” he voted not to end the program because it was already set to expire in a month.

In a statement Thursday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki cited the Supreme Court decision, as well as the recent surge in COVID cases, as reasons for the decision to call on Congress. 

“Given the recent spread of the delta variant, including among those Americans both most likely to face evictions and lacking vaccinations, President Biden would have strongly supported a decision by the CDC to further extend this eviction moratorium to protect renters at this moment of heightened vulnerability,” she said. 

“Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has made clear that this option is no longer available.”

Delays in Relief Distribution 

The move comes as the administration has struggled to distribute the nearly $47 billion in rental relief funds approved as part of two coronavirus relief packages passed in December and March, respectively.

Nearly seven months after the first round of funding was approved, the Treasury Department has only allocated $3 billion of the reserves, and just 600,000 tenants have been helped under the program.

A total of 7.4 million households are behind on rent according to the most recent data from the Census Bureau. An estimated 3.6 million of those households could face eviction in the next two months if the moratorium expires. 

The distribution problems largely stem from the fact that many states and cities tasked with allocating the fund had no infrastructure to do so, causing the aid to be held up by delays, confusion, and red tape. 

Some states opened portals that were immediately overwhelmed, prompting them to close off applications, while others have faced technical glitches.

According to The Washington Post, just 36 out of more than 400 states, counties, and cities that reported data to the Treasury Department were able to spend even half of the money allotted them by the end of June. Another 49 —  including New York — had not spent any funds at all.

Slim Chances in Congress

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.) urged her colleagues to approve an extension for the freeze Thursday night, calling it “a moral imperative” and arguing that “families must not pay the price” for the slow distribution of aid.

However, Biden’s last-minute call for Congress to act before members leave for their August recess is all but ensured to fail.

While the House Rules Committee took up a measure Thursday night that would extend the moratorium until the end of this year, the only way it could pass in the Senate would be through a procedure called unanimous consent, which can be blocked by a single dissenting vote.

Some Senate Republicans have already rejected the idea.

“There’s no way I’m going to support this. It was a bad idea in the first place,” Senator Patrick Toomey (R-Pa.) told reporters. “Owners have the right to action. They need to have recourse for the nonpayment of rent.”

With the hands of the CDC tied and Congressional action seemingly impossible, the U.S. could be facing an unprecedented evictions crisis Saturday, even though millions of Americans who will now risk losing their homes should have already received rental assistance to avert this exact situation.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (The Associated Press)

Continue Reading

Politics

Mississippi Asks Supreme Court To Overturn Roe v. Wade

Published

on

The Supreme Court’s decision to consider Mississippi’s restrictive abortion ban already has sweeping implications for the precedents set under the landmark reproductive rights ruling, but now the state is asking the high court to go even further.


Mississippi’s Abortion Case

Mississippi filed a brief Thursday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade when it hears the state’s 15-week abortion ban this fall.

After months of deliberation, the high court agreed in May to hear what will be the first abortion case the 6-to-3 conservative majority will decide.

Both a district judge and a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit had ruled that Mississippi could not enforce the 2018 law that banned nearly all abortions at 15 weeks with exceptions for only “severe fetal abnormality,” but not rape and incest.

If the Supreme Court upholds the Mississippi law, it would undo decades of precedent set under Roe in 1973 and upheld under Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, where the court respectively ruled and reaffirmed that states could not ban abortion before the fetus is “viable” and can live outside the womb, which is generally around 24 to 28 weeks.

When the justices decided to hear the case, they said they would specifically examine the question of whether “all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.”

Depending on the scope of their decision on the Mississippi law, the court’s ruling could allow other states to pass much more restrictive abortion bans without the risk of lower courts striking down those laws.

As a result, legal experts have said the case will represent the most significant ruling on reproductive rights since Casey nearly three decades ago, and the Thursday brief raises the stakes even more.

When Mississippi asked the justices to take up its case last June, the state’s attorney general, Lynn Fitch (R), explicitly stated that the petition’s questions “do not require the Court to overturn Roe or Casey.”

But that was before the court’s conservatives solidified their supermajority with the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett — who personally opposes abortion — following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

New Filing Takes Aim at Roe

With the new filing, it appears that Fitch views the high court’s altered makeup as an opportunity to undermine the constitutional framework that has been in place for the better part of the last century.

“The Constitution’s text says nothing about abortion,” Fitch wrote in the brief, arguing that American society has changed so much that the previous rulings need to be reheard.

“Today, adoption is accessible and on a wide scale women attain both professional success and a rich family life, contraceptives are more available and effective, and scientific advances show that an unborn child has taken on the human form and features months before viability,” she added, claiming the power should be left to state lawmakers. 

“Roe and Casey shackle states to a view of the facts that is decades out of date,” she continued. “The national fever on abortion can break only when this Court returns abortion policy to the states.”

The Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents Mississippi’s sole abortion provider in the suit against the state’s law, painted Fitch’s effort as one that will have a chilling effect on abortion rights nationwide.

“Mississippi has stunningly asked the Supreme Court to overturn Roe and every other abortion rights decision in the last five decades,” Nancy Northup, the president and CEO of the group said in a statement Thursday. “Today’s brief reveals the extreme and regressive strategy, not just of this law, but of the avalanche of abortion bans and restrictions that are being passed across the country.”

The Supreme Court has not yet said exactly when during its fall term it will hear oral arguments on the Mississippi case, but a decision is expected to come down by next June or July, as is standard.

An anticipated ruling just months before the 2022 midterms will almost certainly position abortion as a top issue at the ballot box.

See what others are saying:  (The New York Times) (The Washington Post) (Politico)

Continue Reading

Politics

Republicans Boycott Jan. 6 Committee After Pelosi Rejects Two of McCarthy’s Picks

Published

on

The House Minority Leader said that unless House Speaker Pelosi reinstated the two members, Republicans will launch their own investigation into the insurrection.


Pelosi Vetoes Republicans

Republicans are boycotting the select committee to investigate the insurrection after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.) rejected two of the five GOP members Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca.) picked to serve on the panel Wednesday.

In a statement, Pelosi cited the “statements and actions” of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Oh.) and Jim Banks (R-In.), whose nominations she said she was opposing “with respect for the integrity of the investigation.”

Jordan and Banks — both staunch allies of former President Donald Trump — have helped propagate the previous leader’s false election claims, opposed efforts to investigate the insurrection, and voted not to certify the election for President Joe Biden. 

A senior Democratic aide also specifically told The Washington Post that Democrats did not want Jordan on the panel because he reportedly helped Trump strategized how to overturn the election and due to the fact he spoke to the then-president on Jan. 6, meaning there is a possibility he could be called to testify before the very same committee.

The aide also said that Democrats opposed Banks’ selection because of a statement he issued after McCarthy chose him.

In the statement, the representative compared the insurrection to the racial justice protests last summer, implied that the rioters were just normal American’s expressing their political views, and claimed the committee was a political ploy “to justify the Left’s authoritarian agenda.”

Notably, Pelosi did say she would accept McCarthy’s three other nominees — including Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Wi.), who also voted against certifying Biden’s win.

McCarthy Threatens Separate Investigation

McCarthy, however, refused to select new members, and instead opted to remove all his appointees from the would-be bipartisan committee.

In a statement condemning the move, the minority leader said that Pelosi’s action “represents an egregious abuse of power.” 

“Denying the voices of members who have served in the military and law enforcement, as well as leaders of standing committees, has made it undeniable that this panel has lost all legitimacy and credibility and shows the Speaker is more interested in playing politics than seeking the truth,” he said.

“Unless Speaker Pelosi reverses course and seats all five Republican nominees, Republicans will not be party to their sham process and will instead pursue our own investigation of the facts.”

Pelosi defended her decision during a press conference Thursday, where she said that Banks and Jordan were “ridiculous” choices for the panel. 

“When statements are ridiculous and fall into the realm of, ‘You must be kidding,’ there’s no way that they’re going to be on the committee,” she added.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNBC)

Continue Reading