Connect with us


Key Takeaways From Day 2 of Trump’s Impeachment Trial



  • The second day of Donald Trump’s impeachment trial focused entirely on the prosecution, which argued that the former president spent months riling up his supporters with false claims and calls for violence.
  • House impeachment managers also showed never-before-seen security footage that illustrated how close the mob came to lawmakers.
  • One of the most notable clips showed Officer Eugene Goodman, who was hailed as a hero for guiding a mob away from the Senate chambers, stopping Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Ut.) from entering an area seized by rioters.
  • The prosecution will conclude its case Wednesday, and Trump’s lawyers will then have 16 hours to present their defense.

Unseen Security Footage Shows Mob’s Proximity to Lawmakers

During the second day of former President Donald Trump impeachment trial, House impeachment managers laid out their case tying Trump to the Jan. 6 insurrection

The most notable information to come from the day came in the form of never-before-seen security footage the prosecutors played. That footage showed just how close some of the nation’s top leaders came to the pro-Trump mob.

One of the most jarring clips portrayed former Vice President Mike Pence and his family being raced to evacuate, which was shown alongside footage of the mob shouting “hang Mike Pence!”

“As the rioters reached the top of the stairs, they were within 100 feet of where the vice president was sheltering with his family,” said House manager Stacey Plaskett, the Delegate from the Virgin Islands. “They were just feet away from one of the doors to this chamber, where many of you remained at that time.” 

The managers also showed other disturbing footage, including a video of Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY.) heading down one hallway then quickly being directed by law enforcement officials to running the opposite way.

Officer Goodman Saved Sen. Romney From Entering Occupied Area

One widely talked about clip involved Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Ut.) and Officer Eugene Goodman, who was widely praised for guiding a mob away from the Senate chambers so senators could evacuate.

In the previously unseen security video, Goodman is seen running past Romney, who was headed in the direction of the rioters, telling him to go the other way. The clip was taken just moments before Goodman confronted the mob, which was just a floor below looking for the Senate chamber.

Romney, for his part, said that he had never seen that footage and had no idea how close he had been to the mob.

“It tears at your heart and brings tears to your eyes,” he said. “That was overwhelmingly distressing and emotional.”

“I was very fortunate indeed that Officer Goodman was there to get me in the right direction,” he added. “I look forward to thanking him when I next see him.”

Prosecutors Connect the Dots

In addition to the videos, the House managers spent much of their time connecting Trump to the scenes of violence by outlining the timeline of events leading up to the insurrection.

They noted that he had been spreading false election claims since the spring, claiming the only way he would lose is if the election was rigged. They also argued that he had knowingly encouraged his supporters to take matters into their own hands, pointing out instances where his rhetoric encouraged or supported violence.

One example the prosecutors pointed to was when Trump told the Proud Boys to “stand back and stand by” during a presidential debate. They also noted that when Trump supporters surrounded a campaign bus for Joe Biden in Texas and caused a car accident, Trump endorsed the violence and tweeted “These patriots did nothing wrong.”

The managers went on to detail all Trump’s attempts to overturn the election, saying he first filed dozens of lawsuits, but when that did not work he went on to pressure and directly threaten election officials. When all that failed, they argued, violence was his last option, and he turned to his supporters who he had been stirring up for months.

Trump then planned and promoted the Stop the Steal rally, calling it “wild.” On the day of the event, he explicitly told the crowd: “If you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

Once the mob took over, Trump refused for hours and tell the rioters to stop. Instead, the prosecutors alleged, he just incited them further by telling him he loved them.

What To Look for on Day 3

Thursday will be the last day for the prosecution to argue their case, and the House managers will have another eight hours to conclude why the senate should convict Trump.

After that, Trump’s lawyers will get 16 hours to present their defense. People close to the matter have said they will argue that Trump’s remarks are protected under the First Amendment and do not meet the legal definition of incitement.

On Thursday, sources told CNN that Trump’s defense team will not use their full 16 hours and will finish their arguments in one day.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (PBS NewsHour)


Biden Calls on Congress To Extend Eviction Moratorium



The move comes just two days before the federal ban is set to expire.

Eviction Freeze Set To Expire

President Joe Biden asked Congress on Thursday to extend the federal eviction moratorium for another month just two days before the ban was set to expire.

The request follows a Supreme Court decision last month, where the justices ruled the evictions freeze could stay in place until it expired on July 31. That decision was made after a group of landlords sued, arguing that the moratorium was illegal under the public health law the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had relied on to implement it.

While the court did not provide reasons for its ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh issued a short concurring opinion explaining that although he thought the CDC “exceeded its existing statutory authority,” he voted not to end the program because it was already set to expire in a month.

In a statement Thursday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki cited the Supreme Court decision, as well as the recent surge in COVID cases, as reasons for the decision to call on Congress. 

“Given the recent spread of the delta variant, including among those Americans both most likely to face evictions and lacking vaccinations, President Biden would have strongly supported a decision by the CDC to further extend this eviction moratorium to protect renters at this moment of heightened vulnerability,” she said. 

“Unfortunately, the Supreme Court has made clear that this option is no longer available.”

Delays in Relief Distribution 

The move comes as the administration has struggled to distribute the nearly $47 billion in rental relief funds approved as part of two coronavirus relief packages passed in December and March, respectively.

Nearly seven months after the first round of funding was approved, the Treasury Department has only allocated $3 billion of the reserves, and just 600,000 tenants have been helped under the program.

A total of 7.4 million households are behind on rent according to the most recent data from the Census Bureau. An estimated 3.6 million of those households could face eviction in the next two months if the moratorium expires. 

The distribution problems largely stem from the fact that many states and cities tasked with allocating the fund had no infrastructure to do so, causing the aid to be held up by delays, confusion, and red tape. 

Some states opened portals that were immediately overwhelmed, prompting them to close off applications, while others have faced technical glitches.

According to The Washington Post, just 36 out of more than 400 states, counties, and cities that reported data to the Treasury Department were able to spend even half of the money allotted them by the end of June. Another 49 —  including New York — had not spent any funds at all.

Slim Chances in Congress

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.) urged her colleagues to approve an extension for the freeze Thursday night, calling it “a moral imperative” and arguing that “families must not pay the price” for the slow distribution of aid.

However, Biden’s last-minute call for Congress to act before members leave for their August recess is all but ensured to fail.

While the House Rules Committee took up a measure Thursday night that would extend the moratorium until the end of this year, the only way it could pass in the Senate would be through a procedure called unanimous consent, which can be blocked by a single dissenting vote.

Some Senate Republicans have already rejected the idea.

“There’s no way I’m going to support this. It was a bad idea in the first place,” Senator Patrick Toomey (R-Pa.) told reporters. “Owners have the right to action. They need to have recourse for the nonpayment of rent.”

With the hands of the CDC tied and Congressional action seemingly impossible, the U.S. could be facing an unprecedented evictions crisis Saturday, even though millions of Americans who will now risk losing their homes should have already received rental assistance to avert this exact situation.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (The Associated Press)

Continue Reading


Mississippi Asks Supreme Court To Overturn Roe v. Wade



The Supreme Court’s decision to consider Mississippi’s restrictive abortion ban already has sweeping implications for the precedents set under the landmark reproductive rights ruling, but now the state is asking the high court to go even further.

Mississippi’s Abortion Case

Mississippi filed a brief Thursday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade when it hears the state’s 15-week abortion ban this fall.

After months of deliberation, the high court agreed in May to hear what will be the first abortion case the 6-to-3 conservative majority will decide.

Both a district judge and a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit had ruled that Mississippi could not enforce the 2018 law that banned nearly all abortions at 15 weeks with exceptions for only “severe fetal abnormality,” but not rape and incest.

If the Supreme Court upholds the Mississippi law, it would undo decades of precedent set under Roe in 1973 and upheld under Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, where the court respectively ruled and reaffirmed that states could not ban abortion before the fetus is “viable” and can live outside the womb, which is generally around 24 to 28 weeks.

When the justices decided to hear the case, they said they would specifically examine the question of whether “all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.”

Depending on the scope of their decision on the Mississippi law, the court’s ruling could allow other states to pass much more restrictive abortion bans without the risk of lower courts striking down those laws.

As a result, legal experts have said the case will represent the most significant ruling on reproductive rights since Casey nearly three decades ago, and the Thursday brief raises the stakes even more.

When Mississippi asked the justices to take up its case last June, the state’s attorney general, Lynn Fitch (R), explicitly stated that the petition’s questions “do not require the Court to overturn Roe or Casey.”

But that was before the court’s conservatives solidified their supermajority with the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett — who personally opposes abortion — following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

New Filing Takes Aim at Roe

With the new filing, it appears that Fitch views the high court’s altered makeup as an opportunity to undermine the constitutional framework that has been in place for the better part of the last century.

“The Constitution’s text says nothing about abortion,” Fitch wrote in the brief, arguing that American society has changed so much that the previous rulings need to be reheard.

“Today, adoption is accessible and on a wide scale women attain both professional success and a rich family life, contraceptives are more available and effective, and scientific advances show that an unborn child has taken on the human form and features months before viability,” she added, claiming the power should be left to state lawmakers. 

“Roe and Casey shackle states to a view of the facts that is decades out of date,” she continued. “The national fever on abortion can break only when this Court returns abortion policy to the states.”

The Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents Mississippi’s sole abortion provider in the suit against the state’s law, painted Fitch’s effort as one that will have a chilling effect on abortion rights nationwide.

“Mississippi has stunningly asked the Supreme Court to overturn Roe and every other abortion rights decision in the last five decades,” Nancy Northup, the president and CEO of the group said in a statement Thursday. “Today’s brief reveals the extreme and regressive strategy, not just of this law, but of the avalanche of abortion bans and restrictions that are being passed across the country.”

The Supreme Court has not yet said exactly when during its fall term it will hear oral arguments on the Mississippi case, but a decision is expected to come down by next June or July, as is standard.

An anticipated ruling just months before the 2022 midterms will almost certainly position abortion as a top issue at the ballot box.

See what others are saying:  (The New York Times) (The Washington Post) (Politico)

Continue Reading


Republicans Boycott Jan. 6 Committee After Pelosi Rejects Two of McCarthy’s Picks



The House Minority Leader said that unless House Speaker Pelosi reinstated the two members, Republicans will launch their own investigation into the insurrection.

Pelosi Vetoes Republicans

Republicans are boycotting the select committee to investigate the insurrection after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.) rejected two of the five GOP members Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca.) picked to serve on the panel Wednesday.

In a statement, Pelosi cited the “statements and actions” of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Oh.) and Jim Banks (R-In.), whose nominations she said she was opposing “with respect for the integrity of the investigation.”

Jordan and Banks — both staunch allies of former President Donald Trump — have helped propagate the previous leader’s false election claims, opposed efforts to investigate the insurrection, and voted not to certify the election for President Joe Biden. 

A senior Democratic aide also specifically told The Washington Post that Democrats did not want Jordan on the panel because he reportedly helped Trump strategized how to overturn the election and due to the fact he spoke to the then-president on Jan. 6, meaning there is a possibility he could be called to testify before the very same committee.

The aide also said that Democrats opposed Banks’ selection because of a statement he issued after McCarthy chose him.

In the statement, the representative compared the insurrection to the racial justice protests last summer, implied that the rioters were just normal American’s expressing their political views, and claimed the committee was a political ploy “to justify the Left’s authoritarian agenda.”

Notably, Pelosi did say she would accept McCarthy’s three other nominees — including Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Wi.), who also voted against certifying Biden’s win.

McCarthy Threatens Separate Investigation

McCarthy, however, refused to select new members, and instead opted to remove all his appointees from the would-be bipartisan committee.

In a statement condemning the move, the minority leader said that Pelosi’s action “represents an egregious abuse of power.” 

“Denying the voices of members who have served in the military and law enforcement, as well as leaders of standing committees, has made it undeniable that this panel has lost all legitimacy and credibility and shows the Speaker is more interested in playing politics than seeking the truth,” he said.

“Unless Speaker Pelosi reverses course and seats all five Republican nominees, Republicans will not be party to their sham process and will instead pursue our own investigation of the facts.”

Pelosi defended her decision during a press conference Thursday, where she said that Banks and Jordan were “ridiculous” choices for the panel. 

“When statements are ridiculous and fall into the realm of, ‘You must be kidding,’ there’s no way that they’re going to be on the committee,” she added.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNBC)

Continue Reading