Connect with us

Politics

House Votes To Remove Majorie Taylor Greene From Committees

Published

on

  • The House voted Thursday to remove Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) from her committee assignments over offensive and violent statements she made and supported in the past.
  • This marks the first time in history that a majority party has voted to strip a member of the other party from their assignments. Usually, that decision is made by the leader of the party the lawmaker in question belongs to.
  • Democrats moved the motion to the floor after House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca) denounced Greene’s recently uncovered remarks but refused to take action against her.
  • While some Republicans believe the vote sets a bad precedent for majority parties removing members of the minority from their committees, Democrats argued that it was necessary to show members their actions have consequences.

House Revokes Greene’s Committee Placements

After hours of debate Thursday, the House voted to remove Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) from her assignments on the Budget Committee and the Education and Labor Committee for the “conduct she has exhibited.”

Greene made headlines last week after social media posts from 2018 and 2019 were brought to light showing the congresswoman endorsing calls to executive Democrats, promoting dangerous conspiracies, and making racist, anti-Semitic, or otherwise inflammatory remarks.

Greene’s removal marks the first time in history that a majority party has voted on a resolution to strip a member of the other party from their assignments. A decision like that is normally made by the leader of the party the representative is part of.

For example, in 2019, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca) removed then-Representative Steve King (R-Io) from his committees. That decision came after an interview where he questioned why the term “white supremacist” language was offensive.

However, after more than a week of intense pressure from Democrats, McCarthy refused to take action against Greene. In a statement Wednesday, the leader strongly denounced her remarks but also argued she should not face any consequences.

“Past comments from and endorsed by Marjorie Taylor Greene on school shootings, political violence, and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories do not represent the values or beliefs of the House Republican Conference,” he said. “I condemn those comments unequivocally.”

McCarthy went on to claim that he “made this clear to Marjorie” when they met this week. He also argued that she “recognized this in our conversation.”

GOP Response

Greene has taken very little responsibility for her past remarks. While defending herself on the House floor Wednesday, she appeared to pass the blame for her belief in QAnon, saying she regretted that she “was allowed to believe things that weren’t true.” She also argued that “the media is just as guilty as QAnon for promoting lies.”

However, Greene did not apologize for promoting the conspiracies or for her other incendiary and violent remarks. Over the last week, the freshman lawmaker has been actively defiant towards the criticisms of her.

McCarthy, for his part, tried to accused Democrats of “taking the unprecedented step to further their partisan power grab.”

That point was also echoed by other Republicans, who claimed that this would set a bad precedent for majority parties removing members of the minority from their committees. Some even threatening to do the same to Democrats the next time Republicans took the chamber.

Democrats hit back by arguing that removing Greene from her committees was an important precedent to set.

“If that’s the precedent, that people are calling for the assassination of other members of this body, if that’s a disqualifier for serving on a committee, I’m all for it,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) who chairs the Rules Committee, which drafted and approved the resolution. “I’m fine with it and I can live with that. And boy, that shouldn’t even be controversial,” he added.

McGovern also noted that Greene has expressed little regret or willingness to change. He noted that she has been profiting off the scandal and pointing to a tweet where she said she raised over $175,000 and added: “we will not back down. We will never give up.”

An Identity Crisis for the Republican Party

The discussion over precedent, and what it means for the future of a party that has increasingly attracted far-right members, speaks to a much broader issue.

For a while now, Republicans have been struggling to balance the growing divisions in the party largely brought about by Trump and his supporters.

Many analysts would say that the election proved that at least a deciding majority of Republican voters do not support this growing trend towards extremism. However, the people at the top seem to think it is important to give these people a voice because they compose enough of the electorate that they need them to keep themselves in power.

At the same time, party leaders are also still trying not to alienate the largely suburban white voters who helped secure the Democratic takeover.

That balancing act was epitomized on Wednesday. In addition to refusing to take action against Greene, McCarthy also said he supported keeping Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy) in her leadership position after Trump loyalists moved to strip her of her title because she voted in favor of impeaching Trump.

Cheney ultimately came out victorious after a 145 to 61 secret ballot vote, but that is still almost 30% of all the 211 Republicans in the House. Right now, it is unclear how long McCarthy and his party will be able to walk this tightrope, or even if being so mixed will play well among both more moderate and far-right voters.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (NPR) (The New York Times)

Politics

Jan. 6 Committee Prepares Criminal Charges Against Steve Bannon for Ignoring Subpoena

Published

on

The move comes after former President Trump told several of his previous aides not to cooperate with the committee’s investigation into the insurrection.


Bannon Refuses to Comply With Subpoena

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection announced Thursday that it is seeking to hold former White House advisor Steve Bannon in criminal contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena.

The decision marks a significant escalation in the panel’s efforts to force officials under former President Donald Trump’s administration to comply with its probe amid Trump’s growing efforts to obstruct the inquiry.

In recent weeks, the former president has launched a number of attempts to block the panel from getting key documents, testimonies, and other evidence requested by the committee that he claims are protected by executive privilege.

Notably, some of those assertions have been shut down. On Friday, President Joe Biden rejected Trump’s effort to withhold documents relating to the insurrection.

Still, Trump has also directed former officials in his administration not to comply with subpoenas or cooperate with the committee. 

That demand came after the panel issued subpoenas ordering depositions from Bannon and three other former officials: Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino, and Pentagon Chief of Staff Kash Patel.

After Trump issued his demand, Bannon’s lawyer announced that he would not obey the subpoena until the panel reached an agreement with Trump or a court ruled on the executive privilege matter.

Many legal experts have questioned whether Bannon, who left the White House in 2017, can claim executive privilege for something that happened when he was not working for the executive.

Panel Intensifies Compliance Efforts

The Thursday decision from the committee is significant because it will likely set up a legal battle and test how much authority the committee can and will exercise in requiring compliance.

It also sets an important precedent for those who have been subpoenaed. While Bannon is the first former official to openly defy the committee, there have been reports that others plan to do the same. 

The panel previously said Patel and Meadows were “engaging” with investigators, but on Thursday, several outlets reported that the two — who were supposed to appear before the body on Thursday and Friday respectively —  are now expected to be given an extension or continuance.

Sources told reporters that Scavino, who was also asked to testify Friday, has had his deposition postponed because service of his subpoena was delayed.

As far as what happens next for Bannon, the committee will vote to adopt the contempt report next week. Once that is complete, the matter will go before the House for a full vote.  

Assuming the Democratic-held House approves the contempt charge, it will then get referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia to bring the matter before a grand jury.

See what others are saying: (CNN) (The Washington Post) (Bloomberg)

Continue Reading

Politics

Senate Votes To Extend Debt Ceiling Until December

Published

on

The move adds another deadline to Dec. 3, which is also when the federal government is set to shut down unless Congress approves new spending.


Debt Ceiling Raised Temporarily

The Senate voted on Thursday to extend the debt ceiling until December, temporarily averting a fiscal catastrophe.

The move, which followed weeks of stalemate due to Republican objections, came after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) partially backed down from his blockade and offered a short-term proposal.

After much whipping of votes, 11 Republicans joined Democrats to break the legislative filibuster and move to final approval of the measure. The bill ultimately passed in a vote of 50-48 without any Republican support.

The legislation will now head to the House, where Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said members would be called back from their current recess for a vote on Tuesday. 

The White House said President Joe Biden would sign the measure, but urged Congress to pass a longer extension.

“We cannot allow partisan politics to hold our economy hostage, and we can’t allow the routine process of paying our bills to turn into a confidence-shaking political showdown every two years or every two months,’’ White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement.

Under the current bill, the nation’s borrowing limit will be increased by $480 billion, which the Treasury Department said will cover federal borrowing until around Dec. 3.

The agency had previously warned that it would run out of money by Oct. 18 if Congress failed to act. Such a move would have a chilling impact on the economy, forcing the U.S. to default on its debts and potentially plunging the country into a recession. 

Major Hurdles Remain

While the legislation extending the ceiling will certainly offer temporary relief, it sets up another perilous deadline for the first Friday in December, when government funding is also set to expire if Congress does not approve another spending bill.

Regardless of the new deadline, many of the same hurdles lawmakers faced the first time around remain. 

Democrats are still struggling to hammer out the final details of Biden’s $3.5 trillion spending agenda, which Republicans have strongly opposed.

Notably, Democratic leaders previously said they could pass the bill through budget reconciliation, which would allow them to approve the measure with 50 votes and no Republican support.

Such a move would require all 50 Senators, but intraparty disputes remain over objections brought by Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Az.), who have been stalling the process for months.

Although disagreements over reconciliation are ongoing among Democrats, McConnell has insisted the party use the obscure procedural process to raise the debt limit. Democrats, however, have balked at the idea, arguing that tying the debt ceiling to reconciliation would set a dangerous precedent.

Despite Republican efforts to connect the limit to Biden’s economic agenda, raising the ceiling is not the same as adopting new spending. Rather, the limit is increased to pay off spending that has already been authorized by previous sessions of Congress and past administrations.

In fact, much of the current debt stems from policies passed by Republicans during the Trump administration, including the 2017 tax overhaul. 

As a result, while Democrats have signaled they may make concessions to Manchin and Sinema, they strongly believe that Republicans must join them to increase the debt ceiling to fund projects their party supported. 

It is currently unclear when or how the ongoing stalemate will be resolved, or how either party will overcome their fervent objections.

See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (NPR) (The Washington Post)

Continue Reading

Politics

California Makes Universal Voting by Mail Permanent

Published

on

California is now the eighth state to make universal mail-in ballots permanent after it temporarily adopted the policy for elections held amid the COVID-19 pandemic. 


CA Approves Universal Voting by Mail

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed a bill Monday requiring every registered voter in the state to be mailed a ballot at least 29 days before an election, whether they request it or not.

Assembly Bill 37 makes permanent a practice that was temporarily adopted for elections during the COVID-19 pandemic. The law, which officially takes effect in January, also extends the time mail ballots have to arrive at elections offices from three days to seven days after an election. Voters can still choose to cast their vote in person if they prefer.

Supporters of the policy have cheered the move, arguing that proactively sending ballots to registered voters increases turnout.

“Data shows that sending everyone a ballot in the mail provides voters access. And when voters get ballots in the mail, they vote,” the bill’s author, Assemblyman Marc Berman (D-Palo Alto), said during a Senate committee hearing in July.

Meanwhile opponents — mostly Republicans — have long cast doubts about the safety of mail-in voting, despite a lack of evidence to support their claims that it leads to widespread voter fraud. That strategy, however, has also faced notable pushback from some that a lot of Republicans who say it can actually hurt GOP turnout.

Others May Follow

The new legislation probably isn’t too surprising for California, where over 50% of votes cast in general elections have been through mail ballots since 2012, according to The Sacramento Bee. Now, many believe California will be followed by similar legislation from Democrats across the country as more Republican leaders move forward with elections bills that significantly limit voting access.

Newsome signed 10 other measures Monday changing election and campaign procedures, including a bill that would require anyone advocating for or against a candidate to stand farther away from a polling place. Another bill increases penalties for candidates who use campaign funds for personal expenses while a third measure increases reporting requirements for limited liability corporations that engage in campaign activity.

“As states across our country continue to enact undemocratic voter suppression laws, California is increasing voter access, expanding voting options and bolstering elections integrity and transparency,” Newsom said in a statement.

“Last year we took unprecedented steps to ensure all voters had the opportunity to cast a ballot during the pandemic and today we are making those measures permanent after record-breaking participation in the 2020 presidential election.”

The news regarding California came just in time for National Voter Registration day today, giving Americans another reminder to make sure they’re registered in their states. For more information on how to register, visit Vote.gov or any of the other resources linked below.

See what others are saying: (The Hill) (Los Angeles Times) (The Sacramento Bee)

Continue Reading