House Votes To Remove Majorie Taylor Greene From Committees
- The House voted Thursday to remove Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) from her committee assignments over offensive and violent statements she made and supported in the past.
- This marks the first time in history that a majority party has voted to strip a member of the other party from their assignments. Usually, that decision is made by the leader of the party the lawmaker in question belongs to.
- Democrats moved the motion to the floor after House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca) denounced Greene’s recently uncovered remarks but refused to take action against her.
- While some Republicans believe the vote sets a bad precedent for majority parties removing members of the minority from their committees, Democrats argued that it was necessary to show members their actions have consequences.
House Revokes Greene’s Committee Placements
After hours of debate Thursday, the House voted to remove Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga) from her assignments on the Budget Committee and the Education and Labor Committee for the “conduct she has exhibited.”
Greene made headlines last week after social media posts from 2018 and 2019 were brought to light showing the congresswoman endorsing calls to executive Democrats, promoting dangerous conspiracies, and making racist, anti-Semitic, or otherwise inflammatory remarks.
Greene’s removal marks the first time in history that a majority party has voted on a resolution to strip a member of the other party from their assignments. A decision like that is normally made by the leader of the party the representative is part of.
For example, in 2019, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca) removed then-Representative Steve King (R-Io) from his committees. That decision came after an interview where he questioned why the term “white supremacist” language was offensive.
However, after more than a week of intense pressure from Democrats, McCarthy refused to take action against Greene. In a statement Wednesday, the leader strongly denounced her remarks but also argued she should not face any consequences.
“Past comments from and endorsed by Marjorie Taylor Greene on school shootings, political violence, and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories do not represent the values or beliefs of the House Republican Conference,” he said. “I condemn those comments unequivocally.”
McCarthy went on to claim that he “made this clear to Marjorie” when they met this week. He also argued that she “recognized this in our conversation.”
Greene has taken very little responsibility for her past remarks. While defending herself on the House floor Wednesday, she appeared to pass the blame for her belief in QAnon, saying she regretted that she “was allowed to believe things that weren’t true.” She also argued that “the media is just as guilty as QAnon for promoting lies.”
However, Greene did not apologize for promoting the conspiracies or for her other incendiary and violent remarks. Over the last week, the freshman lawmaker has been actively defiant towards the criticisms of her.
McCarthy, for his part, tried to accused Democrats of “taking the unprecedented step to further their partisan power grab.”
That point was also echoed by other Republicans, who claimed that this would set a bad precedent for majority parties removing members of the minority from their committees. Some even threatening to do the same to Democrats the next time Republicans took the chamber.
Democrats hit back by arguing that removing Greene from her committees was an important precedent to set.
“If that’s the precedent, that people are calling for the assassination of other members of this body, if that’s a disqualifier for serving on a committee, I’m all for it,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) who chairs the Rules Committee, which drafted and approved the resolution. “I’m fine with it and I can live with that. And boy, that shouldn’t even be controversial,” he added.
McGovern also noted that Greene has expressed little regret or willingness to change. He noted that she has been profiting off the scandal and pointing to a tweet where she said she raised over $175,000 and added: “we will not back down. We will never give up.”
An Identity Crisis for the Republican Party
The discussion over precedent, and what it means for the future of a party that has increasingly attracted far-right members, speaks to a much broader issue.
For a while now, Republicans have been struggling to balance the growing divisions in the party largely brought about by Trump and his supporters.
Many analysts would say that the election proved that at least a deciding majority of Republican voters do not support this growing trend towards extremism. However, the people at the top seem to think it is important to give these people a voice because they compose enough of the electorate that they need them to keep themselves in power.
At the same time, party leaders are also still trying not to alienate the largely suburban white voters who helped secure the Democratic takeover.
That balancing act was epitomized on Wednesday. In addition to refusing to take action against Greene, McCarthy also said he supported keeping Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy) in her leadership position after Trump loyalists moved to strip her of her title because she voted in favor of impeaching Trump.
Cheney ultimately came out victorious after a 145 to 61 secret ballot vote, but that is still almost 30% of all the 211 Republicans in the House. Right now, it is unclear how long McCarthy and his party will be able to walk this tightrope, or even if being so mixed will play well among both more moderate and far-right voters.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (NPR) (The New York Times)
Trump Lawyer Notes Indicate Former President May Have Obstructed Justice in Mar-a-Lago Documents Probe
The notes add to a series of recent reports that seem to paint a picture of possible obstruction.
Corcoran’s Notes on Mar-a-Lago
Prosecutors have 50 pages of notes from Donald Trump’s lawyer Evan Corcoran that show the former president was explicitly told he could not keep any more classified documents after he was subpoenaed for their return, according to a new report by The Guardian.
The notes, which were disclosed by three people familiar with the matter, present new evidence that indicates Trump obstructed justice in the investigation into classified documents he improperly kept at his Mar-a-Lago estate.
In June, Corcoran found around 40 classified documents in a storage room at Mar-a-Lago while complying with the initial subpoena. The attorney told the Justice Department that no additional documents were on the property.
In August, however, the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago and discovered about 100 more.
The Guardian’s report is significant because it adds a piece to the puzzle prosecutors are trying to put together: whether Trump obstructed justice when he failed to comply with the subpoena by refusing to return all the documents he had or even trying to hide them intentionally.
As the outlet noted, prosecutors have been “fixated” on Trump’s valet, Walt Nauta, since he told them that the former president directed him to move boxes out of the storage room before and after the subpoena. His actions were also captured on surveillance footage.
The sources familiar with Corcoran’s notes said the pages revealed that both Trump and the Nauta “had unusually detailed knowledge of the botched subpoena response, including where Corcoran intended to search and not search for classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, as well as when Corcoran was actually doing his search.”
At one point, Corcoran allegedly noted how he had told the Nauta about the subpoena prior to his search for the documents because the lawyer needed him to unlock the storage room, showing how closely involved the valet was from the get-go.
Corcoran further stated that Nauta had even offered to help go through the boxes, but the attorney declined. Beyond that, the report also asserted that the notes “suggested to prosecutors that there were times when the storage room might have been left unattended while the search for classified documents was ongoing.”
Adding to the Evidence
If real, Corcoran’s notes are very damning, especially considering other recent reports concerning Trump’s possible efforts to obstruct the documents probe.
A few weeks ago, The New York Times reported that Corcoran had testified before a grand jury that multiple Trump employees told him the Mar-a-Lago storage room was the only place the documents were kept.
“Although Mr. Corcoran testified that Mr. Trump did not personally convey that false information, his testimony hardly absolved the former president,” the outlet reported, referencing people with knowledge of the matter.
“Mr. Corcoran also recounted to the grand jury how Mr. Trump did not tell his lawyers of any other locations where the documents were stored, which may have effectively misled the legal team.”
Additionally, the only reason that Corcoran handed over these notes was that he was under court order to do so. Corcoran had refused to turn the materials over, citing attorney-client privilege.
A federal judge rejected that claim on the grounds that there was reason to believe a lawyer’s advice or services were used to further a crime — meaning prosecutors believed they had enough evidence to prove Trump may have acted criminally.
See what others are saying: (The Guardian) (The New York Times) (Vanity Fair)
Homeless Men Promised Money to Pose as Veterans in Anti-Immigrant Scheme, Sources Allege
New York State Attorney General Letitia James said she is reviewing whether to launch a formal investigation into the ruse.
A story that was spread by right-wing media about homeless veterans getting evicted from their hotel rooms to make way for asylum seekers has turned out to be false, according to numerous sources.
Early this month, New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced a plan to bus some migrants to hotels in neighboring counties, where they would stay for several months.
Orange County and Rockland County filed lawsuits to block the move, and the state supreme court granted both temporary restraining orders, but many migrants had already arrived. To make room for the incoming migrants, one hotel in Orange County forced at least 15 homeless veterans to leave, media reported at the time.
But several homeless men told local outlets they had allegedly been offered payment if they posed as military veterans staying at the hotel.
Sharon Toney-Finch, head of Yerik Israel Toney Foundation (YIT), a nonprofit that houses the homeless, allegedly masterminded the scheme.
Her associates allegedly rounded up 15 homeless men at a shelter and promised them as much as $200 each if they spoke with a local politician about homelessness. But they told reporters that when they met Toney-Finch at a diner, she presented her real plan. They would speak to a local chamber of commerce instead, the men recalled, and if they weren’t comfortable with telling the lie, Toney-Finch instructed them to say they had PTSD and couldn’t speak.
After fulfilling their end of the bargain, however, they said she never paid them the cash they were promised.
Several of them described the ordeal to media outlets, and reporters soon poked more holes in the story.
The Times Union published a copy of a credit card receipt that purportedly showed a payment of more than $37,000 for rooms at the Crossroads Hotel for the unhoused veterans alongside a copy of what appears to be Toney-Finch’s credit card.
But a graphics expert who examined the documents said the receipt appeared to have been “altered with smudges behind the darker type and [had] different fonts,” according to Mid Hudson News.
A hotel manager also told the outlet he could not find any record of the transaction, and there were no veterans at the hotel and nobody was kicked out.
Local Republican state assembly member Brian Maher, who previously reacted to the fake story with outrage, told The Times Union he felt “devastated and disheartened” when he learned that he was duped.
“She alluded to the fact that, ‘Maybe it’s not exactly how I said it was,’” Maher recalled, describing a conversation with Toney-Finch. “This is something I believe hurt a lot of people.”
New York State Attorney General Leticia James is reportedly reviewing the incident to determine if a formal investigation is warranted.
See what others are saying: (The Guardian) (CNN) (The New York Times)
Lawmakers Have 10 Days to Reach Debt Deal: Here’s How Failure Would Impact Americans
In addition to causing massive disruptions to the U.S. economy and global markets, failure to prevent a debt default could seriously harm Social Security and Medicare recipients, veterans, federal workers, and many more Americans.
President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca.) met Monday to discuss ongoing debt ceiling negotiations as the deadline to reach an agreement looms nearer and nearer.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen has repeatedly said that June 1 is the “hard deadline” by which the debt ceiling must be raised to prevent the U.S. from defaulting for the first time in history. Such a failure could trigger a recession and send global markets into complete disarray.
Despite the ticking doomsday clock, Republicans and Democrats have failed to reach any agreement, remaining firm in the lines they have drawn.
Republicans have said they will support any debt deal until Biden agrees to massive spending cuts that would significantly roll back much of his domestic agenda. Biden has refused to cave, and Democratic negotiators instead proposed a plan to freeze but not reduce federal spending in the next fiscal year.
Republicans rejected that plan Friday, abruptly ending negotiations. While talks briefly restarted later the same evening, they stalled again, prompting Biden — who was at a G7 summit in Japan — to cut his trip short and head home to take a hand in the talks.
The president and the House Speaker did seem to express some tentative optimism after sharing a call Sunday where they set the meeting.
In comments to reporters, McCarthy said that Biden: “walked through some of the things that he’s still looking at, he’s hearing from his members; I walked through things I’m looking at. I felt that part was productive. But look — there’s no agreement. We’re still apart.”
Biden also echoed that, telling reporters late Sunday night that the call “went well” — a marked shift from comments he made at the summit over the weekend, where he slammed House Republicans.
“I can’t guarantee that they wouldn’t force a default,” he said at one point. Biden also once again raised the possibility of invoking the 14th Amendment to declare the debt ceiling unconstitutional because of a clause that requires the U.S. to pay its debts.
At the summit, the president asserted that he had the “authority” to take such a step but reiterated that this is a last resort option.
Impacts on the American People
In addition to having a catastrophic effect on the U.S. economy and global markets, failing to reach the debt ceiling would also seriously impact many everyday Americans.
“The most drastic impact might be a pause in regular federal payments to tens of millions of American families, including seniors on Medicare and Social Security and people relying on food stamps,” The Washington Post explained.
Specifically, failure to raise the debt ceiling could delay essential federal payments to tens of millions of Americans who rely on them for their livelihoods. This includes the over 60 million people — mostly seniors — who receive monthly Social Security payments, as well as a similar number of Medicaid recipients.
Those folks would be forced to miss out on the $25 billion in Social Security benefits and $47 billion for Medicare providers the government is scheduled to pay in early June.
The veterans would be affected, as the government is supposed to pay out $12 billion in benefits on June 1 — the same day as the expected default.
Many of the millions of federal employees could also be placed in limbo if the federal government is unable to pay the $4 billion in salaries it needs by June 9. That situation could further harm many essential workers like military personnel, food safety inspectors, and air traffic controllers, among others.