Connect with us

International

China To Stop Recognizing Special British Passports for Hong Kongers

Published

on

  • China says it will no longer recognize British National (Overseas) Passports (BNO) for Hong Kongers as a valid form of identification both domestically and for travel.
  • The decision comes just before the U.K. is set to give greater opportunities to BNO holders starting Sunday; allowing holders and their dependents to live, work, and study in the U.K. with a path to citizenship.
  • Still, China’s move will likely have little impact on BNO holders, as Hong Kongers don’t use the document for identification domestically or when traveling abroad
  • BNO passports were previously rare, but applications have grown in the last two years, especially after China imposed its controversial National Security Law.

China’s Stance on BNO Passports

Chinese officials announced Friday that the country would no longer recognize British National (Overseas) passports for domestic travel or identification.

These passports are available to Hong Kongers born in the territory prior to 1997 when it was still a British colony.

The decision was made on the eve of a new visa set to start on Sunday that allows BNO holders and their dependents to live, work, and reside in the United Kingdom. After five years, those individuals can apply for permanent residence. Twelve months after that, they can obtain U.K. citizenship.

The U.K. offered the visa as part of what it views as its obligation to Hong Kong. The UK has been extremely critical of China’s imposed 2019 National Security law, which effectively stripped Hong Kongers of many of their civil rights and privileges.

Following that, the government of Prime Minister Boris Johnson renewed efforts to support Hong Kongers, including expanding the rights held by BNO holders, as well as allowing their dependents to benefit from it.

China has been furious with the decision, and beyond saying they will no longer recognize the passport, they also claim that the U.K.’s decision amounts to meddling in Chinese affairs. In the end, Chinese officials claim that the U.K.’s decision last October to expand the BNO effectively broached the 1997 transition agreement.

That agreement said that China controlled and ruled Hong Kong, while the U.K. would continue to support Hong Kongers and ensure their rights were intact.

For the U.K., that agreement was already heavily breached when mainland China began imposing its national security law on Hong Kong against the wishes of most Hong Kongers.

What Does This Mean for Hong Kongers?

China’s decision to stop recognizing BNO passports will lkely have little effect on Hong Konger since they don’t use the document when traveling within China or as a form of identification domestically. When traveling abroad, they use a Hong Kong passport to leave. The BNO is essentially only used when traveling to the U.K.

In a conference Friday, Chinese spokespeople did threaten that the government could take “additional actions,” but what that means is unclear. The British have made efforts to protect Hong Kongers who may be planning on leaving. For instance, the government has created mobile apps so that Hong Kongers can download biometric data and gain access to the visa process, rather having to be seen entering the U.S. visa office in Hong Kong.

Prior to the National Security Law and unrest in Hong Kong, BNO passports were rarely used. That changed dramatically in the last few years, with more people applying for the passports in 2019 and 2020 than in all the years prior.

Source: CNN

Currently, there are roughly 350,000 BNO holders, but around 3,000,000 people are believed to qualify. This means the U.K. could see a dramatic increase in immigration from Hong Kong, which officials hope will bring high-skilled workers and capital into the country.

See What Others Are Saying: (NPR) (WSJ) (SCMP)

International

200 Children Seeking Asylum in the U.K. Are Missing 

Published

on

The missing include at least 13 children under the age of 16. 


Children Missing From Hotels

There are 200 asylum-seeking children missing from government care in the United Kingdom according to the parliamentary undersecretary of state at the Home Office.

When children are seeking asylum in the U.K. alone or separated from their parents, the government puts them up in hotel rooms for temporary accommodation. They have done so since 2021 and have temporarily accommodated 4,600 children in that time. However, Simon Murray, the parliamentary undersecretary of state at the Home Office, said that 200 of the children placed in those hotels are missing, including at least 13 who are under the age of 16.

In response to this information, a collection of more than 100 charities sent a letter to the Prime Minister demanding the end of the procedure of placing kids in hotels over safety concerns. The letter says that these children are at risk of trafficking and exploitation by staying in these hotels alone.

Other officials have echoed these concerns, claiming these hotels are targets for organized crime where people use these vulnerable children for labor or trafficking.

Parliament Calls Incident “Horrific”

Murray told the House of Lords on Monday that despite the media reports, his department does not know of any kidnapping cases, though they are investigating. He went on to say there are many reasons why children go missing. 

However, lawmakers were not appeased by Murray’s assurances. In a later debate, one member of Parliament called the missing cases “horrific” and another said that it was “putting children at risk.”  The children’s commissioner for England also reportedly chimed in asking for, quote “assurances on the steps being taken to safeguard the children.” 

Murray went on to say that the use of hotels for asylum-seeking children will hopefully be phased out as soon as possible but did not give a timeline. 

The nonprofit Refugee Council called on the government in a tweet to spare no expense in the location of these missing kids.

See what others are saying: (Washington Post) (The Guardian) (The Telegraph)

Continue Reading

International

100,000 U.K. Nurses Launch Biggest Strike in NHS History

Published

on

Opposition leader Keir Starmer called the strike “a badge of shame on this government.”


The NHS Grinds to a Halt

Some 100,000 members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), the United Kingdom’s largest nursing union, launched a historic 12-hour strike Thursday after the government refused to negotiate on higher pay.

The work stoppage, which spans England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, is only the second in the RCN’s 106-year history and the largest the NHS has ever seen. It marks the breaking point for many underpaid nurses and the culmination of a years-long decline in the NHS’s quality of care, put under increasing stress by severe staffing shortages.

Although most NHS staff in England and Wales received a pay rise of around £1,400 this year, worth about 4% on average for nurses, they say it has not kept up with inflation as Britain plunges deeper into a cost-of-living crisis.

When inflation is accounted for, nurses’ pay dropped 1.2% every year from 2010 to 2017, according to the Health Foundation.

Meanwhile, the number of patients waiting for care has reached a record 7.2 million in England, or over one in eight residents, more than double what it was seven years ago.

In July, the cross-party Commons Health and Social Care Select Committee estimated the staffing shortfall could be as high as 50,000 nurses and 12,000 doctors, what one MP called the “greatest workforce crisis in history.”

Many nurses argue that boosting pay will help hospitals recruit more staff.

The RCN demanded a pay raise 5% above the retail rate of inflation, which amounts to a 19% increase, but both Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and the government’s health secretary have claimed that’s not affordable.

During Thursday’s strike, partial staffing continued to remain open for urgent care such as chemotherapy, kidney dialysis, and children’s accident and neonatal units.

Sunak and Starmer Brawl in Parliament

Labor leader Keir Starmer grilled Sunak during Wednesday’s Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on the upcoming strike.

“Tomorrow will be the first-ever nationwide nurse’s strike,” he said. “All the Prime Minister has to do to stop that is to open the door and discuss pay with them. If he did, the whole country would breathe a sigh of relief. Why won’t he?”

“We have consistently spoken to all the unions involved in all the pay disputes that there are,” Sunak replied. “Last year, when everyone else in the public sector had a public sector pay freeze, the nurses received a three-percent pay rise.”

Starmer fired back: “Nurses going on strike is a badge of shame for this government. Instead of showing leadership, he’s playing games with people’s health.”

Sunak called Starmer’s demand that he reopen negotiations with the RCN “just simply a political formula for avoiding taking a position on this issue.”

“If he thinks the strikes are wrong, he should say so,” Sunak said. “If he thinks it’s right that pay demands of nineteen percent are met, then he should say so. What’s weak, Mr. Speaker, is he’s not strong enough to stand up to the union.”

While Starmer has called on Sunak to negotiate with the RCN, he has not explicitly backed the 19% pay raise himself.

Unless the government returns to the bargaining table, the RCN plans to launch a second round of strikes on Dec. 20 to be followed by ambulance strikes that Wednesday and the next.

If the government still refuses to budge, the union said in a statement that nurses will strike for longer periods in more places starting in January, disrupting more health services.

Other industries are also set to see work stoppages this month, including workers on railways, buses, highways, and borders, as well as teachers, postal workers, baggage handlers, and paramedics.

See what others are saying: (BBC) (CNN) (The Guardian)

Continue Reading

International

Fortnite Developer Sued By Parents for Making the Game as “Addictive as Possible”

Published

on

One child mentioned in the lawsuit played over 7,700 rounds of Fortnite in two years.


Epic Games Sued 

A Quebec City judge recently approved a 2019 class-action lawsuit accusing Fortnite developer Epic Games of deliberately making Fortnite addictive.

The parents who brought forward the lawsuit claim their children have become so obsessed with the game that in some cases, they’ve stopped eating, showering, or socializing. The lawsuit claims that these kids have played thousands of games since Fortnite’s release in 2017. In one example, a teenager played over 7,700 games in less than two years. 

If the lawsuit succeeds, players addicted to Fortnite living in Quebec since September 2017 could receive compensation. The plaintiff’s attorney, Philippe Caron, reports that over 200 parents outside the lawsuit have reached out to him, saying their child’s well-being has diminished since downloading Fortnite. He told The Washington Post that they are very confident about their case. 

Epic Games Responds

“We plan to fight this in court,” Natalie Munoz, a spokesperson for Epic Games said to The Post, “We believe the evidence will show that this case is meritless.” 

Munoz also said that Fortnite does allow parents to supervise their child’s playtime and require permission for purchases.

The parents involved in the lawsuit are claiming that they were not aware of the dangers playing Fortnite could pose for their children. 

“If she had been informed by the defendants of the risks and dangers associated with the use of FORTNITE,” the lawsuit says of one guardian. “She would have categorically refused to allow the game to be downloaded.” 

See what others are saying: (BBC) (The Washington Post) (Deadline

Continue Reading