Connect with us

Business

GameStop and AMC’s Unprecedented Stock Prices, Explained

Published

on

  • Shares of GameStop opened at $350 on Wednesday, a massive increase from $4 share prices last summer.
  • Meanwhile, shares for the theater chain AMC opened at $20, up from a $2 price point it had averaged over the last month. 
  • These swings are a direct result of a rebellion by Reddit users against hedge fund companies like Melvin Capital, which has likely lost millions and has already seen a $2.8 billion bailout from this week’s moves in the stock market. 
  • The stock market’s current volatility has reignited fears that a bubble is forming. It has also stoked discussion around no-fee trading apps, which have radically changed the landscape of how people trade stocks in recent years. 

GameStop and AMC Stocks Surge To Record Highs

Shares of GameStop opened at an unprecedented $350 Wednesday thanks to a coordinated online rebellion against hedge fund companies.

That’s a massive departure from GameStop’s share price of $4 in July.

While the stock had steadily increased in value over the last few months, it skyrocketed on Monday, spiking at $140. The same day, GameStop plummeted to around $70 a share, but by the end of Tuesday, shares had once again soared over the $140 mark. 

GameStop isn’t the only company seeing exceptional gains. Shares of AMC opened at $20 on Wednesday, which is pretty notable considering shares had been at around $2 for the past month. 

Similar spikes have now even bled over into some European stocks.

In fact, trading was so volatile on Wednesday that stocks for companies like GameStop, AMC, and KOSS Corporation were all temporarily suspended multiple times.

What’s Driving These Huge Upticks? 

Two processes are primarily driving GameStop’s stock right now: short-selling and short-squeezing. 

Short-selling occurs when an investor borrows shares of a stock and then immediately sells those shares. This is actually the opposite of how most people invest in the stock market. Usually, a person buys a share hoping that its value will go up; however, with short-selling, investors are betting that the share price will go down. 

For example, say a person borrowed a share that’s $10 and then immediately sold at that price. In essence, they just made $10. 

But it’s not quite that simple: since the share was borrowed, it will need to be paid off at some point. Continuing the example, say the borrower decided to wait until the share price dropped down to $7. In that example, the borrower would make $3 once all was said and done.

Keep in mind that this is just a simplified way of explaining short-selling because, on top of this, short-sellers also have to pay fees until they actually buy their borrowed stock.

Main point: Short-sellers tend to put in a lot more than just $10, meaning it can be a risky investing method, especially if they get short-squeezed.

Short-squeezes occur when a specific stock begins to gain money. Using that last example, say the stock price jumped up to $13 instead of down to $7. Also, for the sake of this example, say the stock price is expected to continue rising. 

A short-seller might then decide to go ahead and buy that stock at $13. Notably, that’s a loss of $3 per share (plus fees), but if the stock continues to climb higher, it keeps them having to shell out — and thus lose — even more. 

Reddit Revolts Against Hedge Fund Short-Sellers

A multitude of short-sellers, including the likes of the hedge fund Melvin Capital, have been betting that stock prices like GameStop and AMC will decrease.

That’s for a number of reasons: the pandemic generally hurting businesses, movie theaters remaining closed, a shift away from hard copies to digital versions of games, etc.

In spite of that, a group of Redditers from the subreddit r/WallStreetBets is now largely driving this unprecedented short-squeeze by buying more and more stocks, forcing short-sellers like Melvin Capital to buy their shares at a loss.

Reuters projects that Melvin Capital has likely lost millions because of this. On Monday, the company also received a $2.75 billion bailout from two billionaire investors in the face of its losses.

As far as why these Redditers are trying to pile on the pressure, there are a few reasons. Superficially, there is a pretty heavy meme component to GameStop and AMC’s volatility. Others simply want to get rich quick.

More notably, however, is the fact that many of them genuinely love GameStop. They want to see it succeed and get back at those betting on its failure.

Connected to that are also arguments like those made by internet entrepreneur Alexis Ohanian, who said, “the public [is] doing what they feel has been done to them by institutions. This is an echo of what we’ve seen social media enable the public to challenge institutions for the last decade.”

“And it’s a perfect storm at a time when lots of people are hurting, interest rates are so low, inescapable student loan debts loom, and every major institution has caught Ls during a /global pandemic/ over the last year. This is something to believe in.”

That said, this opinion has not been shared by everyone.

“Seeing a lot of people laughing about the game stop reddit stock thing and yeah i understand why you might think that’s funny that a hedge fund goes under but what if it was YOUR hedge fund that they were doing it to? not so funny then huh?” reporter Jordan Uhl said on Twitter.

The recent events in the stock market have reignited fears that a bubble (essentially, driving up the value of a stock above its expected value) may be forming. It has also stoked discussion around no-fee trading apps like WeBull and Robinhood, which have radically changed the landscape of how people trade stocks in recent years. 

See what others are saying: (Reuters) (CNBC) (The Wall Street Journal)

Business

Uber Forks Over $19 Million in Fine for Misleading Australian Riders

Published

on

The penalty is just the latest in a string of lawsuits going back years.


Uber Gets Fined

Uber has agreed to pay a $19 million fine after being sued by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission for making false or misleading statements in its app.

The first offense stems from a company policy that allows users to cancel their ride at no cost up to five minutes after the driver has accepted the trip. Despite the terms, between at least December 2017 and September 2021, over two million Australians who wanted to cancel their ride were nevertheless warned that they may be charged a small fee for doing so.

Uber said in a statement that almost all of those users decided to cancel their trips despite the warnings.

The cancellation message has since been changed to: “You won’t be charged a cancellation fee.”

The second offense, occurring between June 2018 and August 2020, involved the company showing customers in Sydney inflated estimates of taxi fares on the app.

The commission said that Uber did not ensure the algorithm used to calculate the prices was accurate, leading to actual fares almost always being higher than estimated ones.

The taxi fare feature was removed in August 2020.

A Troubled Legal History

Uber has been sued for misleading its users or unfairly charging customers in the past.

In 2016, the company paid California-based prosecutors up to $25 million for misleading riders about the safety of its service.

An investigation at the time found that at least 25 of Uber’s approved drivers had serious criminal convictions including identity theft, burglary, child sex offenses and even one murder charge, despite background checks.

In 2017, the company also settled a lawsuit by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for $20 million after it misled drivers about how much money they could earn.

In November 2021, the Justice Department sued the company for allegedly charging disabled customers a wait-time fee even though they needed more time to get in the car, then refused to refund them.

Later the same month, a class-action lawsuit in New York alleged that Uber charged riders a final price higher than the upfront price listed when they ordered the ride.

See what others are saying: (ABC) (NASDAQ) (Los Angeles Times)

Continue Reading

Business

Report Finds That Instagram Promotes Pro-Eating Disorder Content to 20 Million Users, Including Children

Published

on

According to the study, even users hoping to recover were given eating disorder content because they were “still in Instagram’s algorithmically curated bubble.”


Instagram Promotes Eating Disorder Content

Instagram promotes pro-eating disorder content to millions of its users, including children as young as nine-years-old, according to a Thursday report from the child advocacy non-profit group Fairplay.

The report, titled “Designing for Disorder: Instagram’s Pro-eating Disorder Bubble,” studied what it called an eating disorder “bubble,” which consisted of nearly 90,000 accounts that reached 20 million unique users. The average age of the bubble was 19, but researchers found users aged nine- and 10-years-old that followed three or more of these accounts. Roughly one-third of those in the bubble were underage. 

According to Fairplay, Instagram’s parent company Meta derives $2 million in revenue a year from the bubble and another $228 million from those who follow it. 

“In addition to being profitable, this bubble is also undeniably harmful,” the report said. “Algorithms are profiling children and teens to serve them images, memes and videos encouraging restrictive diets and extreme weight loss.”

“Meta’s pro-eating disorder bubble is not an isolated incident nor an awful accident,” it continued. “Rather it is an example of how, without appropriate checks and balances, Meta systematically puts profit ahead of young people’s safety and wellbeing.”

Researchers identified the bubble by first looking at 153 seed accounts with over 1,000 followers that posted content celebrating eating disorders. Some used phrases like “thinspiration” or other slang terms like “ana” and “mia” to refer to specific eating disorders. Others included an underweight body mass index in their bios. 

Those seed accounts alone had roughly 2.3 million collective followers, 1.6 million of which were unique. Of those unique users, researchers looked at how many seed accounts each followed to determine that nearly 90,000 accounts were part of the eating disorder bubble. Those accounts totaled over 28 million followers, 20 million of which were unique.

These pages posted content ranging from memes and photos of extreme thinness to screenshots of progress on calorie counting apps. One user said they were on their third day of eating just 300 calories. 

Others, including children under the age of 13, put their current weights and goal weights in their account bios. Some wrote that they “hate food” or were “starving for perfection.”

Content’s Impact on Children

Fairplay claimed that many of those in the bubble wanted to recover but were essentially trapped in Instagram’s algorithm. 

“Many of the biographies of users in the bubble talk about wanting to or being in recovery, wanting to get ‘better’, to ‘heal’ or being aware of how unwell they were,” the report said. “However, these users are still in Instagram’s algorithmically curated bubble. They will still be feeding content from other accounts in the bubble, including the seed accounts, that normalizes, glamorizes or promotes eating disorders.”

The report also showcased the firsthand account of a 17-year-old eating disorder survivor and activist identified as Kelsey. Kelsey wrote that it was impossible to “imagine a time when the app didn’t have the sort of content that promotes disordered eating behavior.” 

“I felt like my feed was always pushed towards this sort of content from the moment I opened my account,” Kelsey continued.

“That type of content at one point even got so normalized that prominent figures such as the Kardashians and other female and male influencers were openly promoting weight loss supplements and diet suppressors in order to help lose weight.”

Kelsey said Instagram delivered that content without any relevant searches, but posts about body positivity needed to be actively sought out. 

The report concluded by arguing that there needs to be legislation that regulates platforms like Instagram by requiring them to prioritize user safety, particularly for children.

Meta and Instagram have long been accused of disregarding child safety. Last year, a whistleblower unveiled documents that revealed the company knew of the harm it posed to young people, specifically regarding body image. A Meta spokesperson told The Hill that they were unable to address the most recent allegations in Fairplay’s report.

“We’re not able to fully address this report because the authors declined to share it with us, but reports like this often misunderstand that completely removing content related to peoples’ journeys with or recovery from eating disorders can exacerbate difficult moments and cut people off from community,” the spokesperson said.

See what others are saying: (The Hill) (CNet)

Continue Reading

Business

Etsy Sellers Strike Amid Increased Transaction Fees and Mandatory Offsite Advertising

Published

on

“What began as an experiment in marketplace democracy has come to resemble a dictatorial relationship between a faceless tech empire and millions of exploited, majority-women craftspeople,” an Etsy seller wrote in a petition. 


Thousands of Etsy Sellers Shut Down Shops

Roughly 15,000 Etsy sellers are closing up their online shops starting Monday in protest of several grievances they have with the platform, including a new fee increase.

Starting on Monday, transaction fees are getting boosted from 5% to 6.5% on the platform. CEO Josh Silverman sent a memo claiming that this hike will allow the company to “make significant investments in marketing, seller tools, and creating a world-class customer experience,” but sellers have been frustrated by the change. 

“Etsy’s last fee increase was in July 2018. If this new one goes through, our basic fees to use the platform will have more than doubled in less than four years,” seller Kristi Cassidy wrote in a petition calling for a strike. As of Monday morning, over 50,000 Etsy sellers, customers, and employees had signed the petition.

“These basic fees do not include additional fees for Offsite ads – which started during the first wave of the pandemic,” Cassidy continued. 

Offsite ads allow Etsy to advertise sellers’ products on other websites like Google. Sellers who make over $10,000 a year reportedly have no way of opting out of the program and Etsy takes at least 12% of sales generated through the promotions. 

“Etsy fees are an unpredictable expense that can take more than 20% of each transaction,” Cassidy wrote. “We have no control over how these ads are administered, or how much of our money is spent.”

Etsy became a pandemic success story as online shopping rose amid lockdowns. Many turned to the platform to purchase masks and other goods, prompting its stock, sales, and number of sellers to rise. 

“It’s really obnoxious to tell us sellers, ‘Hey, we made record profits last year and we’re gonna celebrate by raising your fees a whole bunch,’” Bella Stander, a maps and guidebooks publisher who sells on Etsy, told the Wall Street Journal.  

What Etsy Sellers Are Demanding

Currently, there are over five million sellers on Etsy. Cassidy hopes that if enough of them unite, the company will have to respond. 

“As individual crafters, makers and small businesspeople, we may be easy for a giant corporation like Etsy to take advantage of,” she wrote. “But as an organized front of people, determined to use our diverse skills and boundless creativity to win ourselves a fairer deal, Etsy won’t have such an easy time shoving us around.”

In the petition’s list of demands, it asks that Etsy cancel the transaction fee increase, allow sellers to opt out of offsite ads, and provide a transparent plan to crack down on resellers who take up space on the platform.

It also demanded that Etsy end its “Star Seller Program,” which impacts how sellers can interact with their buyers.

“Etsy was founded with a vision of ‘keeping commerce human’ by ‘democratizing access to entrepreneurship.’ As a result, people who have been marginalized in traditional retail economies — women, people of color, LGBTQ people, neurodivergent people, etc. — make up a significant proportion of Etsy’s sellers,” Cassidy wrote.

“But as Etsy has strayed further and further from its founding vision over the years, what began as an experiment in marketplace democracy has come to resemble a dictatorial relationship between a faceless tech empire and millions of exploited, majority-women craftspeople.”

In a statement to Yahoo Finance, an Etsy spokesperson claimed that sellers were the company’s “top priority.”

“We are always receptive to seller feedback and, in fact, the new fee structure will enable us to increase our investments in areas outlined in the petition, including marketing, customer support, and removing listings that don’t meet our policies,” the spokesperson said. “We are committed to providing great value for our 5.3 million sellers so they are able to grow their businesses while keeping Etsy a beloved, trusted, and thriving marketplace.”

The strike was a trending topic on Twitter Monday morning. Many sellers took to the social media site to pledge their support to the movement. 

Many sellers are urging buyers to refrain from using the site for the remainder of the week, which is how long the protest is currently scheduled to last.

See what others are saying: (The Wall Street Journal) (Yahoo Finance) (TechCrunch)

Continue Reading