Connect with us


The Pfizer Vaccine Was Shipped with Extra Doses. That’s Both Good News and Normal.



  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that vials of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which began rolling out for emergency use on Monday, were shipped with extra doses.
  • While each vial is meant to contain five full doses, some pharmacists have reported finding vials containing sixth and seventh doses.
  • On Wednesday, the FDA confirmed that these extra doses can be used, expanding the nation’s supply by up to 40%; however, that number will likely be lower because pharmacists threw away hundreds of extra doses prior to the FDA’s approval and because partial doses can’t be mixed.
  • The inclusion of these additional doses is completely normal, as vaccine manufacturers usually overfill their vials in case of human errors such as spills.

Pfizer Vaccine Shipped with Extra Doses

On Wednesday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration cleared the way for pharmacists to use extra doses that are sent in vials for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 

Vials of the vaccine, which began distribution under emergency use authorization on Monday, are only meant to contain five doses; however, many pharmacists across the country have reported receiving vials with an extra or even two extra doses. 

With those extra doses, this theoretically means that the current national supply of 100 million doses could increase by up to 40%. While there will almost undoubtedly be a rise in available doses because of this finding, the actual increase will likely be somewhat lower than that.

That’s partially because before the FDA approved the use of these extra doses, many pharmacists — confused on whether they were allowed to use them — began throwing out hundreds of extra doses. 

Because the vaccine has been approved on an emergency use basis, pharmacists must abide by strict guidelines unless otherwise stated. In other words, if the FDA says there are five doses, pharmacists are only able to distribute five doses.

Since the coronavirus pandemic is an extraordinary situation and the vaccine is in high demand, many pharmacists then reached out to the FDA and Pfizer, asking both if they are able to use the extra doses. That’s when the FDA then signaled its approval to use them. 

Still, both the FDA and Pfizer have said that any leftover vaccine from multiple vials should not be pooled to create a full dose in order to prevent any potential cross-contamination.

That’s because, namely, the Pfizer vaccine must be stored in ultra-cold conditions and doesn’t contain preservatives. Essentially, you don’t want to be potentially mixing vials that were taken out of the freezer at different times.

Companies Sending Vaccines with Extra Doses is 100% Normal

The fact that the Pfizer vaccine contains extra doses is completely normal. Vaccine manufacturers usually overfill their vials in case there are any spills or other kinds of human or mechanical error.

Because of that and concerns raised that the extra doses might be some sort of harmful mistake, multiple public health officials have stressed that this is not a giant error. 

“I think this is more clever pharmacists than something missed by Pfizer,” Former Obama administration health official Andy Slavitt told Politico.

Former FDA Commissioner Dr. David Kessler also said on The Rachel Maddow Show Wednesday that the vials weren’t “mismeasured.”

“It’s not sloppiness,” he added. “It’s the way those vials are designed.”

Bottom line: while extra vaccine is normal, that doesn’t mean this isn’t good news. In fact, it’s great news. 

Twitter to Ban Vaccine Misinformation

Also on Wednesday, Twitter announced that, starting next week, it will begin placing warnings labels on and even removing some tweets that contain debunked claims about COVID-19 vaccines.

Twitter’s move follows both Facebook and YouTube, which have also announced crackdowns on vaccine-related misinformation. 

As far how Twitter will decide whether it’s removing a tweet or simply flagging it, the platform says it will delete outright misinformation, including: 

  • “False claims that suggest immunizations and vaccines are used to intentionally cause harm to or control populations, including statements about vaccines that invoke a deliberate conspiracy;”
  • “False claims which have been widely debunked about the adverse impacts or effects of receiving vaccinations;”
  • And “False claims that COVID-19 is not real or not serious, and therefore that vaccinations are unnecessary;”

Twitter also noted that tweets which could fall into more of a gray area will be given warning labels. For example, that could include someone questioning unproven side effects associated with the vaccine.

See what others are saying: (Politico) (NPR) (The New York Times)


Florida School Says Students Vaccinated Against COVID-19 Must Stay Home for 30 Days



The school falsely claimed that people who have just been vaccinated risk “shedding” the coronavirus and could infect others.

Centner Academy Vaccination Policy

A private school in Florida is now requiring all students who get vaccinated against COVID-19 to quarantine for 30 days before returning to class.

According to the local Miami outlet WSVN, Centner Academy wrote a letter to parents last week describing COVID vaccines as “experimental” and citing anti-vaccine misinformation.

“If you are considering the vaccine for your Centner Academy student(s), we ask that you hold off until the Summer when there will be time for the potential transmission or shedding onto others to decrease,” the letter reportedly stated.

“Because of the potential impact on other students and our school community, vaccinated students will need to stay at home for 30 days post-vaccination for each dose and booster they receive and may return to school after 30 days as long as the student is healthy and symptom-free.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has debunked the false claim that those newly vaccinated against COVID-19 can “shed” the virus.

According to the agency’s COVID myths page, vaccine shedding “can only occur when a vaccine contains a weakened version of the virus,” but “none of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19. This means that a COVID-19 vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19.”

In fact, early research has suggested that vaccinated people are less likely to spread the virus than unvaccinated people.

Beyond that, unvaccinated people are more likely to spread COVID in general because they are much more likely to get the virus than vaccinated people. According to recently published CDC data, as of August, unvaccinated people were six times more likely to get COVID than vaccinated people and 11 times more likely to die from the virus.

Centner Academy Continues Spread of Misinformation

In a statement to The Washington Post Monday, Centner Academy co-founder David Centner doubled down on the school’s new policy, which he described as a “precautionary measure” based on “numerous anecdotal cases that have been in circulation.”

“The school is not opining as to whether unexplained phenomena have a basis in fact, however we prefer to err on the side of caution when making decisions that impact the health of the school community,” he added.

The new rule echoes similar efforts Centner Academy has made that run counter to public health guidance and scientific knowledge.

In April, the school made headlines when its leadership told vaccinated school employees that they were not allowed to be in contact with any students “until more information is known” and encouraged employees to wait until summer to get the jab.

According to The New York Times, the following week, a math and science teacher allegedly told students not to hug their vaccinated parents for more than five seconds.

The outlet also reported that the school’s other co-founder, Leila Centner, discouraged masking, but when state health officials came for routine inspections, teachers said they were directed in a WhatsApp group to put masks on.

See what others are saying: (WSVN) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)

Continue Reading


Katie Couric Says She Edited Ruth Bader Ginsburg Quote About Athletes Kneeling During National Anthem



Couric said she omitted part of a 2016 interview in order to “protect” the justice.

Kate Couric Edited Quote From Justice Ginsburg

In her upcoming book, journalist Katie Couric admitted to editing a quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in 2016 in order to “protect” Ginsberg from potential criticism. 

Couric interviewed the late justice for an article in Yahoo News. During their discussion, she asked Ginsburg about her thoughts on athletes like Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem to protest racial inequality.

“I think it’s really dumb of them,” Ginsburg is quoted saying in the piece. “Would I arrest them for doing it? No. I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it. I would point out how ridiculous it seems to me to do such an act.”

According to The Daily Mail and The New York Post, which obtained advance copies of Couric’s book “Going There,” there was more to Ginsburg’s response. Couric wrote that she omitted a portion where Ginsburg said the form of protest showed a “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life…Which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.

Couric Says She Lost Sleep Making Choice

“As they became older they realize that this was youthful folly,” Ginsberg reportedly continued. “And that’s why education is important.

According to The Daily Mail, Couric wrote that the Supreme Court’s head of public affairs sent an email asking to remove comments about kneeling because Ginsburg had misspoken. Couric reportedly added that she felt a need to “protect” the justice, thinking she may not have understood the question. Couric reached out to her friend, New York Times reporter David Brooks, regarding the matter and he allegedly likewise believed she may have been confused by the subject. 

Couric also wrote that she was a “big RBG fan” and felt her comments were “unworthy of a crusader for equality.” Because she knew the remarks could land Ginsburg in hot water, she said she “lost a lot of sleep” and felt “conflicted” about whether or not to edit them out. 

Couric was trending on Twitter Wednesday and Thursday as people questioned the ethics behind her choice to ultimately cut part of the quote. Some thought the move showed a lack of journalistic integrity while others thought revealing the story now harmed Ginsburg’s legacy.

See what others are saying: (New York Post) (The Daily Mail) (Insider)

Continue Reading


Biden Administration Orders ICE To Halt Workplace Raids



The Department of Homeland Security will now focus on targeting employers who exploit undocumented workers, instead of carrying out raids that dissuade those workers from reporting labor violations.

DHS Reverses Worksite Raid Policy

The Biden administration announced Tuesday that it was ordering Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to stop workplace raids.

The move marks a reversal from Trump administration policies that have been strongly criticized by immigration activists who argue the efforts created fear in immigrant communities and dissuaded them from reporting labor violations or exploitative employment practices.

In addition to stopping the raids, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a memo that the administration will refocus enforcement efforts to instead target “employers who exploit unauthorized workers, conduct illegal activities or impose unsafe working conditions.” 

Mayorkas added that the immigration agencies housed in DHS will have the next 60 days to identify harmful existing policies and come up with new ones that provide better deportation protections for workers who report their employers.

In the Tuesday memo, the secretary argued that shift of focus will “reduce the demand for illegal employment by delivering more severe consequences to exploitative employers” and “increase the willingness of workers to report violations of law by exploitative employers and cooperate in employment and labor standards investigation.”

Labor Market Implications

The new policy comes at a time when the U.S. is experiencing a critical labor shortage, including in many sectors that rely on immigrant labor.

Some companies that use undocumented workers pay them wages that are far below the market rate, which is not only exploitative but also undercuts competitors.

According to Mayorkas, the pivot to employer-based enforcement will help protect American businesses.

“By exploiting undocumented workers and paying them substandard wages, the unscrupulous employers create an unfair labor market,” he said in the memo. “They also unfairly drive down their costs and disadvantage their business competitors who abide by the law.”

It is currently unclear how effective the new efforts will be, but historical precedent does not paint an optimistic picture.

The Biden administration’s efforts closely mirror a similar move by the Obama administration, which attempted to reverse workplace raids authorized under President George W. Bush by targetting those who employ undocumented workers rather than the workers themselves.

That effort, however, still led to thousands of undocumented workers being fired.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (ABC News)

Continue Reading