- On Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down a case filed by the Trump campaign alleging that Republican observers were forced to stand too far away from ballot counting in Philadelphia. The court argued the 15-18 feet they were given was enough to do their job.
- Separately, Trump’s team also experienced another loss in Michigan after Republicans on the election board in Wayne County reversed an earlier decision to not verify ballots after massive backlash.
- Despite these and other recent losses, the Trump campaign is still moving forward with other highly questionable cases.
- After the Pennsylvania ruling, Trump’s team filed a suit in Nevada asking officials to reverse the will of the people and give the state’s electoral votes to the president.
String of Losses
After numerous legal losses in the last few days alone, President Donald Trump and his campaign are moving forward with new dubious legal challenges aimed at overturning the result of the election.
However, the president’s legal strategy of throwing everything against a wall to see what sticks is not working out too well.
“There have been something like 30 or 40 of these lawsuits filed in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, and so on,” Harvard Law School professor Nicholas Stephanopoulos told CBS News on Monday. “To this point, dozens of defeats have piled up for the Trump campaign.”
Not only have major losses been piling up, but the Trump campaign has also been dropping some cases too because they have next to no chance of standing up in court
Meanwhile, lawyers and even entire law firms that have been bringing these suits for Trump are withdrawing from the legal fights, leaving the campaign scrambling to fill the spaces in key cases with the president’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.
The Trump campaign took yet another hit in the keystone state this week after a series of defeats in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Arizona on Friday.
On Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled 5-2 to strike down a lawsuit brought against Philadelphia’s county election board. In it, the Trump campaign alleged that Republican observers watching ballots being counted in Philadelphia were kept 15-18 feet away from the election workers, which they claimed was too far away to see if there were irregularities in the process.
A lower court denied that request, the campaign appealed it, and an appeals court ruled in their favor on Nov. 5, allowing observers to stand six feet away as long as they abided by COVID-safe guidelines like wearing masks.
The election board then appealed that decision to the state’s Supreme Court, which ultimately upheld the first court’s decision and ruled that Philadelphia’s election protocols were set up with, “careful consideration of how it could best protect the security and privacy of voters’ ballots, as well as safeguard its employees and others who would be present during a pandemic for the pre-canvassing and canvassing process.”
The court also noted that observers were simply directed to observe the process — not audit the ballots for irregularities — and that they were very much able to observe election workers “performing their duties” as required at the safe 15-18 foot distance.
That ruling was also significant because of how it could play into the other lawsuits the campaign has brought in Pennsylvania, which has seen the most single filings of any state.
In fact, at the same time that Pennsylvania’s highest court made that ruling, Giuliani had just finished giving highly unusual opening arguments in a federal court case elsewhere in the state in what marked his first appearance before a judge in decades.
The case that Giuliani was arguing — though at times he appeared confused as to which of the many lawsuits he was talking about — was narrowly focused on whether election officials in Pennsylvania should have given voters the ability to fix issues with their mail-in ballots after submitting them.
Some counties in the state did allow voters to fix the issues, but others did not. The Trump campaign has argued that that is unconstitutional and is attempting to block Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State from certifying the election results.
Or at least, that’ was what they were supposed to be arguing. Instead, in his court appearance Tuesday, Giuliani made a number of wildly baseless claims entirely unrelated to the lawsuit, saying, without any evidence, that there was a massive conspiracy behind former Vice President Joe Biden’s victory.
“It’s a widespread, nationwide voter fraud,” he claimed, accusing local election officials of being part of a “little mafia.”
The president’s lawyer also claimed Republican observers had been prevented from watching the ballot counts, though he later acknowledged that the president’s legal team had dropped that claim in the lawsuit because they knew it would not hold up.
When questioned by U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Brann as to whether Giuliani was bringing new claims of fraud that were not mentioned in the suit at hand, he admitted that it was not a fraud case, but continued to complain about the “fraudulent process.”
“So you are alleging a fraud,” Brann responded, adding such claims would need a higher standard than just baseless suspicion to make a real case.
The Trump campaign also saw another major upset Tuesday, though this one did not stem from a legal case, but rather from a decision made by an election board in Wayne County, Michigan, which is home to Detroit.
There, the two Republican members of the election board, Monica Palmer and William Hartman, refused to certify the election results. They argued that in some precincts in the county, and specifically in Detroit, the number of recorded votes did not line up with the number of voters who were listed as having shown up to vote.
However, many people pushed back heavily against this objection, including the Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and other top officials, who pointed out that most of the discrepancies at the precincts involved a very small number of ballots.
Officials noted that these small blips likely just stemmed from easily explained situations like a voter leaving a long line, or an absentee ballot kicked out of a tabulator because a voter decided to cast their ballot in person.
Benson, who agreed to a comprehensive audit of the Detroit precincts, also specifically said that all the evidence they currently have shows that the election had been run cleanly, that there was no evidence of fraud, and that these discrepancies were just due to clerical errors.
She added that it was irresponsible for the Republicans to refuse to verify these legal votes over such a minor and normal election occurrence.
That point was echoed by other voters, activists, and community members, many of whom pointed to the fact that Palmer even argued at one point that the results should be certified in one of the predominantly white suburbs outside of the majority-Black Detroit, even though it had an even bigger variance in ballots cast to voters who turned out.
Following the massive outcry, Palmer and Hartman reversed their decision and agreed to certify the results.
New Lawsuit in Nevada
Notably, all of campaign’s many recent losses have not stopped team Trump from filing more questionable lawsuits.
Following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday, the campaign filed another lawsuit in Nevada asking that Trump “be declared the winner of the Election in Nevada,” or for the results to at least be annulled so that no winner is certified by the elections board.
In the lawsuit, the campaign claimed, again without evidence, that “fraud and abuse renders the purported results of the Nevada election illegitimate.” Trump’s team also argued in the suit that a signature verification machine in Clark County, the most populous county in Nevada, was flawed, and that poll watchers were denied meaningful access to the ballot counting process.
A Clark County election official pushed back, and said that the Trump campaign inaccurately described both claims.
“On both of these issues, state and federal courts have already rejected their allegations,” the official said.
While the cascade of lawsuits might seem endless, there is an end in sight: Dec. 8.
Also known as the safe harbor deadline, Dec. 8 is the date by which all legal challenges and recounts must be settled and electors must be solidified by states.
Technically, Trump could still file a lawsuit after that, though it would almost certainly be tossed out immediately.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The Los Angeles Times) (CBS News)
Buckingham Palace Asked That a Photoshopped Image of the Queen Be Removed From a Pro-Trump Bus
- Buckingham Palace told BuzzFeed News it had requested that an unofficial “Trump Train” bus remove a photoshopped image it features of Queen Elizabeth II wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat and QAnon broach.
- The owner of the bus, Buddy Hall, told BuzzFeed that he had not heard from the palace but had recently removed the Queen’s image as part of a pre-existing redesign plan.
- While the Queen’s image had appeared on the bus for a year, the Palace only became aware of it after the vehicle recently attended a Florida rally with Representatives Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who are staunch Trump allies.
Buckingham Palace Asks for Removal of Queens Image on Trump Bus
Buckingham Palace has requested that a photoshopped image of Queen Elizabeth II wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat and QAnon broach be removed from an unofficial “Trump Train” bus, according to Buzzfeed News.
The bus was created to support the 2020 re-election of Donald Trump, according to its GoFundMe page, which amassed 16 donors. It has over 6,000 followers on Facebook. The bus now travels the country supporting a 2024 Trump presidential campaign.
BuzzFeed reported that the Queen’s image had been on the bus for over a year, but the Palace only became aware after it recently attended a rally in Florida held by Representatives Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who are staunch Trump allies.
A Palace spokesperson told the outlet that “representations asking for [the photo’s] removal have been made.”
The Palace gave no further comment, but one of the staple duties of the Royal Family is to remain politically neutral.
The photo being used of the Royal Family’s matriarch was taken in 2011. In it, she is wearing a red outfit and one of her signature boater hats, which had the “MAGA” slogan doctored over it. She appears next to a “Women for Trump” sign and above a slogan that reads “Keep on Trumpin.”
The Queen is one of many photoshopped faces that appear on the bus, including an image of Trump’s head attached to the body of “Rocky” protagonist Rocky Balboa and an image of former president Ronald Reagan in a “MAGA” baseball cap. The Mississippi license plate for the bus reads “TRUMP 45.”
Image Taken Down as Part of Pre-Existing Redesign Plans.
The owner of the bus, Buddy Hall, announced on May 1 that he would be taking the wrap off the Trump Train in order to remove the likeness of “TRAITOR PENCE.” He said he plans to replace him with Florida Governor Ron Desantis, conservative commentator Candace Owens, the former president’s son Donald Trump Jr. and his wife Laura, as well as former security advisor Michael Flynn, and Kentucky Senator Rand Paul.
Hall told BuzzFeed News that while he had not heard from the Palace, the Queen’s image was already removed in the redesign process, which was always part of his plan. In a video posted Tuesday to the Trump Train’s Facebook page, her image still appeared on the bus, but the person recording the video claimed the wrap featuring her would be taken down on Thursday. A new photo of the bus has not yet been shared.
The person recording the video also said that this year alone, $30,000 has been spent on upkeep of the bus.
Buckingham Palace is reportedly not the only entity concerned with its image appearing on the bus. The website hosting service GoDaddy.com told HuffPost that it also asked to no longer appear on the Trump Train.
“GoDaddy doesn’t sponsor the bus and we don’t have any advertising relationships with the bus/owner whatsoever,” a spokesperson told HuffPost. “They don’t have permission to use our brand on the bus and we’ve asked them to remove.”
There is no word as to whether or not the GoDaddy.com logo will be on the new redesign of the bus.
BuzzFeed News reached out to representatives for Gaetz and Greene regarding the bus using the Queen’s image. Both thought there was nothing wrong with the situation.
A spokesperson for Gaetz said, “We’re sure Her Majesty has greater concerns.”
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Gaetz told the outlet, “You do know what a meme is right? Isn’t that what Buzzfeed is all about?”
See what others are saying: (BuzzFeed News) (HuffPost) (The Independent)
Liz Cheney Ousted From GOP Leadership Role for Calling Out Trump’s Election Lies
- Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.) was ousted from her leadership post by Republicans on Wednesday due to her repeated criticism of former President Trump and his continued efforts to spread false information about the 2020 election.
- The congresswoman remained defiant in remarks Tuesday night, where she argued Trump was “a threat America has never seen before” who “risks inciting further violence.”
- While many Republicans cheered Cheney’s removal as a key step to unify the party, others condemned the decision and accused GOP leadership of “canceling” her for speaking the truth.
- The move represents perhaps the strongest indication since the Jan. 6 insurrection that the Republican Party will continue to embrace Trump and punish dissenters.
House GOP Removes Cheney From Top Spot
The House GOP voted to remove Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wy.), the number 3 Republican, from her leadership position Wednesday over her refusal to stay silent about former President Donald Trump’s false election claims.
The remarkable removal comes just four months after the former president incited an insurrection, causing major splits in the GOP.
The latest move is arguably the strongest signal that Republicans have decided their party line is unwavering loyalty to Trump, and that they believe his support is needed to win back the House in 2022.
This is not the first time that Republicans tried to oust Cheney from leadership. Earlier this year, Trump loyalists in the chamber held a vote to remove her after she voted to impeach the president for his role in the insurrection.
That attempt failed, largely because Cheney received backing from Republican leadership. This time, however, she did not have the support of Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca.), who began mobilizing to remove the congresswoman last week after she tweeted that the 2020 election “was not stolen.”
“Anyone who claims it was is spreading THE BIG LIE, turning their back on the rule of law, and poisoning our democratic system,” she added.
While Cheney has reiterated this stance many times since January, her latest comment seemed to be the final straw, and on Monday, McCarthy officially announced he was holding a vote on her position in a letter to his conference.
In the letter, which was full of contradictions, McCarthy claimed that the GOP was a “big tent party” of “free thought and debate,” while simultaneously calling for the removal of a leader who broke with Trump, and painting the vote as a necessary step to unify the party.
A majority of the party backed that decision Wednesday morning when McCarthy held a voice vote, making it so that the public will never know exactly how many people voted to remove the congresswoman.
Cheney, for her part, held firm to her beliefs in a defiant speech Tuesday ahead of the anticipated vote, where she continued to condemn Trump’s lies and accused her fellow Republicans of being complicit in undermining Democracy.
“Today we face a threat America has never seen before. A former president, who provoked a violent attack on this capital in an effort to steal the election, has resumed his aggressive effort to convince Americans that the election was stolen from him,” she said.
“He risks inciting further violence. Millions of Americans have been misled by the former president, they have heard only his words, but not the truth, as he continues to undermine our democratic process, sowing seeds of doubt about whether democracy really works at all.”
“This is not about policy. This is not about partisanship. This is about our duty as Americans,” she continued later. “Remaining silent and ignoring the lie emboldens the liar. I will not participate in that. I will not sit back and watch in silence, while others lead our party down a path that abandons the rule of law and joins the former president’s crusade to undermine our democracy.”
Cheney’s parting speech drew boos from some of her colleagues, many of whom cheered her ouster Wednesday.
“Liz Cheney is the GOP of the past,” Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Co.) tweeted. “We are not going back.”
Trump himself also issued a series of statements calling Cheney a “bitter, horrible human being,” and claiming that Republicans “have a great opportunity today to rid themselves of a poor leader, a major Democrat talking point, a warmonger, and a person with absolutely no personality or heart!”
However, many House Republicans condemned the move.
“i predict that the history books of the future will not celebrate,” Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Il.) wrote in a thread “They will say this was the low point of the Republican Party.”
“Liz Cheney was canceled for speaking her mind,” Rep. Ken Buck (R-N.Y.) told reporters.
There has been a similarly mixed reception to Cheney’s anticipated replacement, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), who McCarthy has tapped to fill the position.
Stefanik took office as a moderate cheered for openly defying and condemning Trump. Her role in Congress changed drastically in the fall of 2019, when she became one of the most vocal opponents of his first impeachment, prompting him to tweet, “A new Republican Star is born.”
After that, she booked more TV appearances, campaign donations, and general fame. Her support for the former president grew and she doubled down, spreading his false election claims in 2020.
If she is elected to leadership, as is expected, the top three House Republican leadership positions will all be held by people who voted to not certify President Joe Biden’s win.
Cheney, for her part, has made it clear she does not intend to go anywhere. After Wednesday’s vote, the congresswoman told reporters that she will do “everything” she can “to ensure that the former president never again gets anywhere near the Oval Office.”
“The nation needs a party that is based upon fundamental principles of conservatism, and I am committed and dedicated to ensuring that that’s how this party goes forward, and I plan to lead the fight to do that,” she added.
According to The Washington Post, sources have said that Cheney already spent the last week planning for increased travel and media appearances to promote her case and rally other Republicans behind her.
She likely will not be alone in her endeavors: on Tuesday, The New York Times reported that more than 100 current and former anti-Trump Republicans are preparing to release a letter this week threatening to split from the GOP and create a third party if changes are not made.
See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (The Washington Post) (NPR)
Biden Says Americans Will Lose Unemployment Benefits if They Turn Down “Suitable” Jobs
- President Biden said Monday that out-of-work Americans will lose their enhanced federal unemployment benefits if they turn down a “suitable” job offer.
- The announcement follows a stark jobs report from the Labor Department, which found that just over 260,000 jobs were added in April when nearly 1 million had been projected.
- Republican lawmakers blamed the additional $300 a week in joblessness benefits provided by the federal government, and several Republican-led states have opted out of the programs, arguing that doing so will encourage people to go back to work.
- Biden rejected those arguments, noting that numerous studies disprove that claim. Instead, he said American corporations should do more to entice people to work, such as providing pay raises and COVID safety precautions.
Biden Addresses Benefits as Job Creation Falters
President Joe Biden on Monday ordered the Labor Department to ensure that Americans will lose their enhanced federal unemployment benefits if they do not accept a “suitable” job when offered.
In remarks at the White House, Biden also said he would direct the agency to work jointly with states to reimpose the requirement that people collecting joblessness benefits must show they are actively looking for work.
The comments come just days after the latest jobs report showed far fewer positions created than expected. The Labor Department reported that just 266,000 jobs were added last month, even though economists had predicted it would be about 1 million.
While broad swaths of the U.S. economy are opening up as more Americans get vaccinated, some employers have reported that they are having a hard time finding workers.
Republicans have largely argued that this is because of the additional $300 a week in unemployment benefits Americans are collecting from the last stimulus package.
The Unemployment Debate
In his address, however, Biden hit back on that claim. He said the White House does not “see much evidence” that benefits have deterred people from taking jobs — a fact that is supported by numerous studies on pandemic unemployment benefits. He also argued that corporate America has to do more to encourage people to come back to work.
The president placed responsibility on employers, especially those who have accepted federal relief, to raise their pay, protect their workers from the virus, and help them gain access to vaccinations so out-of-work Americans feel safe going back.
“My expectation is that as the economy comes back, these companies will provide fair wages and safe work environments, and if they do, they’ll find plenty of workers,” he said. “And we’re all going to come out of this together and better than before.”
Some companies have already started to take similar steps, like Chipotle, which announced Monday that it was raising its average wage to $15 an hour to address the labor shortage. However, many big companies will simply wait it out.
Those businesses may not have to wait long because a growing number of Republican-led states have been rejecting the increased federal unemployment money. On Monday, the governors of Alabama and Mississippi joined Montana, South Carolina, and Arkansas and announced their states would be leaving the programs by mid-June. More states are likely to do the same.