Source: Reuters/ Jay Paul
- In court Tuesday, FBI Special Agent Richard Trask alleged that the militia group that planned to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer also discussed targeting Virginia Governor Ralph Northam.
- Like Whitmer, Northam was potentially targeted because of his aggressive coronavirus lockdown orders earlier this year.
- Northam has directly blamed President Donald Trump for emboldening the group, though White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany defended the president and denounced this claim.
- One Michigan sheriff, Dar Leaf, is facing resignation calls after people also criticized him for emboldening similar groups after he seemingly suggested that the plot against Whitmer wasn’t a “serious thing” or that the plotters were simply making a citizen’s arrest.
Gov. Northam Was Targeted
Virginia Governor Ralph Northam (D) was discussed as a potential target by the same militia group that is accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D), according to the FBI.
That claim is just one of several shocking claims that were laid out in court by FBI special agent Richard Trask on Tuesday.
State and federal agencies have arrested 13 men in connection to the plot against Whimter.
They face a slew charges, including terrorism, conspiracy, and weapons possession. According to prosecutors, their plan involved storming the Michigan State Capitol, trying Whitmer for “treason” in a mock court, and instigating a civil war.
Like Whitmer, Northam was potentially targeted because of the aggressive coronavirus lockdown orders he imposed in his state earlier this year. In both states, those orders restricted much of the economy.
Northam’s restrictions were heavily criticized in April by many conservative groups, including by President Donald Trump, who tweeted, “LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!”
The same day, Trump also tweeted both “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!” and “LIBERATE MINNESOTA!”
Northam’s press secretary, Alena Yarmosky, directly referenced those tweets Tuesday in a statement regarding the news that Northam had been potentially targeted.
“The president regularly encourages violence against those who disagree with him,” she said. “The rhetoric coming out of this White House has serious and potentially dangerous consequences. It must stop.”
However, in a statement to CNN, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany defended Trump.
“President Trump has continually condemned white supremacists and all forms of hate. Governor Whitmer, and now Governor Northam, are sowing division by making these outlandish allegations,” she said. “America stands united against hate and in support of our federal law enforcement who stopped this plot.”
Nonetheless, Wednesday morning, Northam directly launched more criticism against Trump, saying that “these people take their marching orders from individuals like the President.”
“It’s unfortunate and it needs to stop,” he added.
The Plan for Whitmer Potentially Included Murder
Among other allegations laid out by Trask on Tuesday, some members discussed murdering people they described as “tyrants.”
It’s highly likely that the reference was meant to include Whitmer. In fact, during one plotting exercise, the militia group allegedly discussed mugging a pizza delivery worker, stealing their identity, and posing as that delivery person in an attempt to shoot Whitmer.
Another plan included taking Whitmer out on a boat into the middle of Lake Michigan and leaving her stranded by disabling the engine so someone would have to “come rescue” her.
Trask alleged that the men planned to execute their attack on Election Day.
Calls for Michigan Sheriff to Resign
Connected to the militia plot, many are also calling for Dar Leaf, a sheriff in Barry County, Michigan, to resign, with some calling him a protector of terrorists.
Leaf is in hot water over a few different controversies, but most notably, the calls for his resignation came after it was discovered that he once shared a stage with one of the plotters at an anti-lockdown rally on May 18.
For months, Leaf has been outspokenly critical of Whitmer’s stay-at-home orders, even likening them to an unlawful arrest.
Calls for his resignation also come following comments he made defending the militia group.
After it was revealed that these militia members had allegedly planned to kidnap Whitmer and engage in mock court, Leaf told a local TV station: “Well, it’s just a charge. And they say a plot to kidnap, and you got to remember that, are they trying to kidnap? Cause a lot of people are angry with the governor, and they want her arrested, so are they trying to arrest her or was it a kidnap attempt? Cause you can still, in Michigan, if it’s a felony, you can make a felony arrest.”
“I’m hoping that’s more of what it is,” he added. “In fact, these guys are innocent till proven guilty, so I’m not even sure if they had any part of it.”
While Leaf has said that Whitmer deserves the right to be safe, he has openly questioned if the plotters were actually serious in carrying out their plan.
Collectively, those comments have results in fierce backlash.
“As Michigan’s top law enforcement official, let me make this abundantly clear-Persons who are not sworn, licensed members of a law enforcement agency cannot and should not “arrest” government offficials with whom they have disagreements,” Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said. “These comments are dangerous.”
Leaf later walked back his comments, saying that he wasn’t trying to suggest the militia group was planning to make a lawful citizen’s arrest.
“I have a hard time swallowing this was a serious thing,” he still said.
Leaf said Tuesday that he has no plans to resign and argued against the point that he and Trump are enabling terrorists.
He also stated that the militia movement “has been brewing for quite some time,” claiming it is growing because of a gradual loss of rights.
See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (CNN) (MLive)
Jan. 6 Rally Organizers Say They Met With Members of Congress and White House Officials Ahead of Insurrection
Two sources told Rolling Stone that they participated in “dozens” of meetings with “multiple members of Congress” and top White House aides to plan the rallies that proceeded the Jan. 6 insurrection.
Rolling Stone Report
Members of Congress and White House Staffers under former President Donald Trump allegedly helped plan the Jan. 6 protests that took place outside the U.S. Capitol ahead of the insurrection, according to two sources who spoke to Rolling Stone.
According to a report the outlet published Sunday, the two people, identified only as “a rally organizer” and “a planner,” have both “begun communicating with congressional investigators.”
The two told Rolling Stone that they participated in “dozens” of planning briefings ahead of the protests and said that “multiple members of Congress were intimately involved in planning both Trump’s efforts to overturn his election loss and the Jan. 6 events that turned violent.”
“I remember Marjorie Taylor Greene specifically,” the person identified as a rally organizer said. “I remember talking to probably close to a dozen other members at one point or another or their staffs.”
The two also told Rolling Stone that a number of other Congress members were either personally involved in the conversations or had staffers join, including Representatives Paul Gosar (R-Az.), Lauren Boebert (R-Co.), Mo Brooks (R-Al.), Madison Cawthorn (R-N.C.), Andy Biggs (R-Az.), and Louie Gohmert (R-Tx.).
The outlet added that it “separately obtained documentary evidence that both sources were in contact with Gosar and Boebert on Jan. 6,” though it did not go into further detail.
A spokesperson for Greene has denied involvement with planning the protests, but so far, no other members have responded to the report.
Previous Allegations Against Congressmembers Named
This is not the first time allegations have surfaced concerning the involvement of some of the aforementioned congress members regarding rallies that took place ahead of the riot.
As Rolling Stone noted, Gosar, Greene, and Boebert were all listed as speakers at the “Wild Protest” at the Capitol on Jan. 6, which was arranged by “Stop the Steal” organizer Ali Alexander.
Additionally, Alexander said during a now-deleted live stream in January that he personally planned the rally with the help of Gosar, Biggs, and Brooks.
Biggs and Brooks previously denied any involvement in planning the event, though Brooks did speak at a pro-Trump protest on Jan. 6.
Gosar, for his part, has remained quiet for months but tagged Alexander in numerous tweets involving Stop the Steal events leading up to Jan. 6, including one post that appears to be taken at a rally at the Capitol hours before the insurrection.
Notably, the organizer and the planner also told Rolling Stone that Gosar “dangled the possibility of a ‘blanket pardon’ in an unrelated ongoing investigation to encourage them to plan the protests.”
Alleged White House Involvement
Beyond members of Congress, the outlet reported that the sources “also claim they interacted with members of Trump’s team, including former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, who they describe as having had an opportunity to prevent the violence.”
Both reportedly described Meadows “as someone who played a major role in the conversations surrounding the protests.”
The two additionally said Katrina Pierson, who worked for the Trump campaign in both 2016 and 2020, was a key liaison between the organizers of the demonstrations and the White House.
“Katrina was like our go-to girl,” the organizer told the outlet. “She was like our primary advocate.”
According to Rolling Stone, the sources have so far only had informal talks with the House committee investigating the insurrection but are expecting to testify publicly. Both reportedly said they would share “new details about the members’ specific roles” in planning the rallies with congressional investigators.
See what others are saying: (Rolling Stone) (Business Insider) (Forbes)
Jan. 6 Committee Prepares Criminal Charges Against Steve Bannon for Ignoring Subpoena
The move comes after former President Trump told several of his previous aides not to cooperate with the committee’s investigation into the insurrection.
Bannon Refuses to Comply With Subpoena
The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection announced Thursday that it is seeking to hold former White House advisor Steve Bannon in criminal contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena.
The decision marks a significant escalation in the panel’s efforts to force officials under former President Donald Trump’s administration to comply with its probe amid Trump’s growing efforts to obstruct the inquiry.
In recent weeks, the former president has launched a number of attempts to block the panel from getting key documents, testimonies, and other evidence requested by the committee that he claims are protected by executive privilege.
Notably, some of those assertions have been shut down. On Friday, President Joe Biden rejected Trump’s effort to withhold documents relating to the insurrection.
Still, Trump has also directed former officials in his administration not to comply with subpoenas or cooperate with the committee.
That demand came after the panel issued subpoenas ordering depositions from Bannon and three other former officials: Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino, and Pentagon Chief of Staff Kash Patel.
After Trump issued his demand, Bannon’s lawyer announced that he would not obey the subpoena until the panel reached an agreement with Trump or a court ruled on the executive privilege matter.
Many legal experts have questioned whether Bannon, who left the White House in 2017, can claim executive privilege for something that happened when he was not working for the executive.
Panel Intensifies Compliance Efforts
The Thursday decision from the committee is significant because it will likely set up a legal battle and test how much authority the committee can and will exercise in requiring compliance.
It also sets an important precedent for those who have been subpoenaed. While Bannon is the first former official to openly defy the committee, there have been reports that others plan to do the same.
The panel previously said Patel and Meadows were “engaging” with investigators, but on Thursday, several outlets reported that the two — who were supposed to appear before the body on Thursday and Friday respectively — are now expected to be given an extension or continuance.
Sources told reporters that Scavino, who was also asked to testify Friday, has had his deposition postponed because service of his subpoena was delayed.
As far as what happens next for Bannon, the committee will vote to adopt the contempt report next week. Once that is complete, the matter will go before the House for a full vote.
Assuming the Democratic-held House approves the contempt charge, it will then get referred to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia to bring the matter before a grand jury.
See what others are saying: (CNN) (The Washington Post) (Bloomberg)
Senate Votes To Extend Debt Ceiling Until December
The move adds another deadline to Dec. 3, which is also when the federal government is set to shut down unless Congress approves new spending.
Debt Ceiling Raised Temporarily
The Senate voted on Thursday to extend the debt ceiling until December, temporarily averting a fiscal catastrophe.
The move, which followed weeks of stalemate due to Republican objections, came after Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) partially backed down from his blockade and offered a short-term proposal.
After much whipping of votes, 11 Republicans joined Democrats to break the legislative filibuster and move to final approval of the measure. The bill ultimately passed in a vote of 50-48 without any Republican support.
The legislation will now head to the House, where Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said members would be called back from their current recess for a vote on Tuesday.
The White House said President Joe Biden would sign the measure, but urged Congress to pass a longer extension.
“We cannot allow partisan politics to hold our economy hostage, and we can’t allow the routine process of paying our bills to turn into a confidence-shaking political showdown every two years or every two months,’’ White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said in a statement.
Under the current bill, the nation’s borrowing limit will be increased by $480 billion, which the Treasury Department said will cover federal borrowing until around Dec. 3.
The agency had previously warned that it would run out of money by Oct. 18 if Congress failed to act. Such a move would have a chilling impact on the economy, forcing the U.S. to default on its debts and potentially plunging the country into a recession.
Major Hurdles Remain
While the legislation extending the ceiling will certainly offer temporary relief, it sets up another perilous deadline for the first Friday in December, when government funding is also set to expire if Congress does not approve another spending bill.
Regardless of the new deadline, many of the same hurdles lawmakers faced the first time around remain.
Democrats are still struggling to hammer out the final details of Biden’s $3.5 trillion spending agenda, which Republicans have strongly opposed.
Notably, Democratic leaders previously said they could pass the bill through budget reconciliation, which would allow them to approve the measure with 50 votes and no Republican support.
Such a move would require all 50 Senators, but intraparty disputes remain over objections brought by Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Az.), who have been stalling the process for months.
Although disagreements over reconciliation are ongoing among Democrats, McConnell has insisted the party use the obscure procedural process to raise the debt limit. Democrats, however, have balked at the idea, arguing that tying the debt ceiling to reconciliation would set a dangerous precedent.
Despite Republican efforts to connect the limit to Biden’s economic agenda, raising the ceiling is not the same as adopting new spending. Rather, the limit is increased to pay off spending that has already been authorized by previous sessions of Congress and past administrations.
In fact, much of the current debt stems from policies passed by Republicans during the Trump administration, including the 2017 tax overhaul.
As a result, while Democrats have signaled they may make concessions to Manchin and Sinema, they strongly believe that Republicans must join them to increase the debt ceiling to fund projects their party supported.
It is currently unclear when or how the ongoing stalemate will be resolved, or how either party will overcome their fervent objections.