Source: Reuters/ Jay Paul
- In court Tuesday, FBI Special Agent Richard Trask alleged that the militia group that planned to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer also discussed targeting Virginia Governor Ralph Northam.
- Like Whitmer, Northam was potentially targeted because of his aggressive coronavirus lockdown orders earlier this year.
- Northam has directly blamed President Donald Trump for emboldening the group, though White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany defended the president and denounced this claim.
- One Michigan sheriff, Dar Leaf, is facing resignation calls after people also criticized him for emboldening similar groups after he seemingly suggested that the plot against Whitmer wasn’t a “serious thing” or that the plotters were simply making a citizen’s arrest.
Gov. Northam Was Targeted
Virginia Governor Ralph Northam (D) was discussed as a potential target by the same militia group that is accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D), according to the FBI.
That claim is just one of several shocking claims that were laid out in court by FBI special agent Richard Trask on Tuesday.
State and federal agencies have arrested 13 men in connection to the plot against Whimter.
They face a slew charges, including terrorism, conspiracy, and weapons possession. According to prosecutors, their plan involved storming the Michigan State Capitol, trying Whitmer for “treason” in a mock court, and instigating a civil war.
Like Whitmer, Northam was potentially targeted because of the aggressive coronavirus lockdown orders he imposed in his state earlier this year. In both states, those orders restricted much of the economy.
Northam’s restrictions were heavily criticized in April by many conservative groups, including by President Donald Trump, who tweeted, “LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!”
The same day, Trump also tweeted both “LIBERATE MICHIGAN!” and “LIBERATE MINNESOTA!”
Northam’s press secretary, Alena Yarmosky, directly referenced those tweets Tuesday in a statement regarding the news that Northam had been potentially targeted.
“The president regularly encourages violence against those who disagree with him,” she said. “The rhetoric coming out of this White House has serious and potentially dangerous consequences. It must stop.”
However, in a statement to CNN, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany defended Trump.
“President Trump has continually condemned white supremacists and all forms of hate. Governor Whitmer, and now Governor Northam, are sowing division by making these outlandish allegations,” she said. “America stands united against hate and in support of our federal law enforcement who stopped this plot.”
Nonetheless, Wednesday morning, Northam directly launched more criticism against Trump, saying that “these people take their marching orders from individuals like the President.”
“It’s unfortunate and it needs to stop,” he added.
The Plan for Whitmer Potentially Included Murder
Among other allegations laid out by Trask on Tuesday, some members discussed murdering people they described as “tyrants.”
It’s highly likely that the reference was meant to include Whitmer. In fact, during one plotting exercise, the militia group allegedly discussed mugging a pizza delivery worker, stealing their identity, and posing as that delivery person in an attempt to shoot Whitmer.
Another plan included taking Whitmer out on a boat into the middle of Lake Michigan and leaving her stranded by disabling the engine so someone would have to “come rescue” her.
Trask alleged that the men planned to execute their attack on Election Day.
Calls for Michigan Sheriff to Resign
Connected to the militia plot, many are also calling for Dar Leaf, a sheriff in Barry County, Michigan, to resign, with some calling him a protector of terrorists.
Leaf is in hot water over a few different controversies, but most notably, the calls for his resignation came after it was discovered that he once shared a stage with one of the plotters at an anti-lockdown rally on May 18.
For months, Leaf has been outspokenly critical of Whitmer’s stay-at-home orders, even likening them to an unlawful arrest.
Calls for his resignation also come following comments he made defending the militia group.
After it was revealed that these militia members had allegedly planned to kidnap Whitmer and engage in mock court, Leaf told a local TV station: “Well, it’s just a charge. And they say a plot to kidnap, and you got to remember that, are they trying to kidnap? Cause a lot of people are angry with the governor, and they want her arrested, so are they trying to arrest her or was it a kidnap attempt? Cause you can still, in Michigan, if it’s a felony, you can make a felony arrest.”
“I’m hoping that’s more of what it is,” he added. “In fact, these guys are innocent till proven guilty, so I’m not even sure if they had any part of it.”
While Leaf has said that Whitmer deserves the right to be safe, he has openly questioned if the plotters were actually serious in carrying out their plan.
Collectively, those comments have results in fierce backlash.
“As Michigan’s top law enforcement official, let me make this abundantly clear-Persons who are not sworn, licensed members of a law enforcement agency cannot and should not “arrest” government offficials with whom they have disagreements,” Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel said. “These comments are dangerous.”
Leaf later walked back his comments, saying that he wasn’t trying to suggest the militia group was planning to make a lawful citizen’s arrest.
“I have a hard time swallowing this was a serious thing,” he still said.
Leaf said Tuesday that he has no plans to resign and argued against the point that he and Trump are enabling terrorists.
He also stated that the militia movement “has been brewing for quite some time,” claiming it is growing because of a gradual loss of rights.
See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (CNN) (MLive)
Feds Investigate Classified Files Found in Biden’s Former Office
The documents reportedly include U.S. intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics such as Ukraine, Iran, and the United Kingdom
What Was in the Files?
President Biden’s legal team discovered about 10 classified files in his former office at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement in Washington D.C., the White House revealed Monday.
The Department of Justice has concluded an initial inquiry into the matter and will determine whether to open a criminal investigation.
According to a source familiar with the matter who spoke to CNN, they include U.S. intelligence memos and briefing materials that covered topics such as Ukraine, Iran, and the United Kingdom.
A source also told CBS News the batch did not contain nuclear secrets and had been contained in a folder in a box with other unclassified papers.
The documents are reportedly from Biden’s time as vice president, but it remains unclear what level of classification they are and how they ended up in his office.
Biden kept an office in the. Penn Biden Center, a think tank about a mile from the White House, between 2017 and 2020, when he was elected president.
On Nov. 2, his lawyers claim, they discovered the documents as they were clearing out the space to vacate it.
They immediately notified the National Archives, which retrieved the files the next morning, according to the White House.
What Happens Next?
Attorney General Merrick Garland must decide whether to open a criminal investigation into Biden’s alleged mishandling of the documents. To that end, he appointed John Lausch Jr., the U.S. attorney in Chicago and a Trump appointee, to conduct an initial inquiry.
Garland reportedly picked him for the role despite him being in a different jurisdiction to avoid appearing partial.
Lausch has reportedly finished the initial part of his inquiry and provided a preliminary report to Garland.
If a criminal investigation is opened, Garland will likely appoint an independent special counsel to lead it.
The case mirrors a similar DoJ special counsel investigation into former President Donald Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified materials and obstruction of efforts to properly retrieve them.
On Nov. 18, Garland appointed Jack Smith to investigate over 300 classified documents found at Trump’s Florida residence, Mar-a-Lago.
Trump resisted multiple National Archives requests for the documents for months leading up to the FBI’s raid on his property, then handed over 15 boxes of files only for even more to be found still at Mar-a-Lago.
“When is the FBI going to raid the many houses of Joe Biden, perhaps even the White House?” Trump wrote on Truth Social Monday. “These documents were definitely not declassified.”
Rep. James Comer (R-KY), the new chairman of the House Oversight Committee, told reporters he will investigate the Biden files.
Republicans have been quick to pounce on the news and compare it to Trump’s classified files, but Democrats have pointed out differences in the small number of documents and Biden’s willingness to cooperate with the National Archives.
The White House has yet to explain why, if the files were first discovered six days before the midterm elections, the White House waited two months to reveal the news to the public.
See what others are saying: (CNN) (The New York Times) (BBC)
Lawmakers Propose Bill to Protect Fertility Treatments Amid Post-Roe Threats
The move comes as a number of states are considering anti-abortion bills that could threaten or ban fertility treatments by redefining embryos or fetuses as “unborn human beings” without exceptions for IVF.
The Right To Build Families Act of 2022
A group of Democratic lawmakers introduced a bill Thursday that would codify the right to use assisted reproductive technologies like in-vitro fertility (IVF) treatments into federal law.
The legislation, dubbed the Right To Build Families Act of 2022, was brought forward by Sens. Tammy Duckworth (D-Il) and Patty Murray (D-Wa.) alongside Rep. Susan Wild (D- Pa.). The measure would bar any limits on seeking or receiving IVF treatments and prohibit regulations on a person’s ability to retain their “reproductive genetic materials.”
The bill would also protect physicians who provide these reproductive services and allow the Justice Department to take civil action against any states that try to limit access to fertility treatments.
The lawmakers argue it is necessary to protect IVF because a number of states have been discussing and proposing legislation that could jeopardize or even ban access to the treatments in the wake of the Roe v. Wade reversal.
“IVF advocates in this country today are publicly telling us, ‘We need this kind of legislation to be able to protect this,’” Murray told HuffPost. “And here we are after the Dobbs decision where states are enacting laws and we have [anti-abortion] advocates who are now starting to talk, especially behind closed doors, about stopping the right for women and men to have IVF procedures done.”
Fertility Treatments Under Treat
The state-level efforts in question are being proposed by Republican lawmakers who wish to further limit abortions by redefining when life begins. Some of the proposals would define embryos or fetuses as “unborn human beings” without exceptions for those that are created through IVF, where an egg is fertilized by a sperm outside the body and then implanted in a uterus.
For example, a bill has already been pre-filed in Virginia for the 2023 legislative session that explicitly says life begins at fertilization and does not have any specific language that exempts embryos made through IVF.
Experts say these kinds of laws are concerning for a number of reasons. In the IVF process, it is typical to fertilize multiple eggs, but some are discarded. If a person becomes pregnant and does not want to keep the rest of their eggs. It is also normal that not all fertilized eggs will be viable, so physicians will get rid of those.
Sometimes doctors will also implant multiple fertilized eggs to increase the likelihood of pregnancy, but that can result in multiple eggs being fertilized. In order to prevent having multiple babies at once and improve the chance of a healthy pregnancy, people can get a fetal reduction and lower the number of fetuses.
All of those actions could become illegal under proposals that do not provide exemptions.
“In my case, I had five fertilized eggs, and we discarded three because they were not viable. That is now potentially manslaughter in some of these states,” said Duckworth, who had both of her daughters using IVF.
“I also have a fertilized egg that’s frozen. My husband and I haven’t decided what we will do with it, but the head of the Texas Right to Life organization that wrote the bounty law for Texas has come out and specifically said he’s going after IVF next, and he wants control of the embryos,” Duckworth added.
In a hearing after Roe was overturned, Murray also raised concerns about “whether parents and providers could be punished if an embryo doesn’t survive being thawed for implantation, or for disposing unused embryos.”
Experts have said that even if anti-abortion laws defining when life begins do provide exceptions, it would be contradictory and confusing, so providers would likely err on the side of caution and not provide services out of fear of prosecution.
“[Abortion bans] are forcing women to stay pregnant against their will and are, at the very same time, threatening Americans’ ability to build a family through services like IVF,” Murray said in a statement to Axios. “It’s hard to comprehend, and it’s just plain wrong.”
The federal legislation to combat these efforts faces an uphill battle. It is unlikely it will be passed in the last few days of lame duck session, and with control of Congress being handed to Republicans come January, movement in the lower chamber will be hard fought.
Duckworth, however, told Axios that she will keep introducing the legislation “until we can get it passed.”
Hundreds of Oath Keepers Claim to Be Current or Former DHS Employees
The revelation came just weeks after the militia’s founder, Stewart Rhodes, was convicted on seditious conspiracy charges for his involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection.
An Agency Crawling With Extremists
Over 300 members of the far-right Oath Keepers militia group claim to be current or former employees at the Department of Homeland Security, the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) reported Monday.
The review appears to be the first significant public examination of the group’s leaked membership list to focus on the DHS.
The agencies implicated include Border Patrol, Coast Guard, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Secret Service.
“I am currently a 20 year Special Agent with the United States Secret Service. I have been on President Clinton and President Bush’s protective detail. I was a member and instructor on the Presidential Protective Division’s Counter Assault Team (CAT),” one person on the list wrote.
POGO stated that the details he provided the Oath Keepers match those he made in a sworn affidavit filed in federal court.
The finding came just weeks after Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes was convicted on seditious conspiracy charges for his involvement in the Jan. 6 insurrection.
“Law enforcement agents who have associations with groups that seek to undermine democratic governance pose a heightened threat because they can compromise probes, misdirecting investigations or leaking confidential investigative information to those groups,” POGO said in its report.
In March, the DHS published an internal study finding that “the Department has significant gaps that have impeded its ability to comprehensively prevent, detect, and respond to potential threats related to domestic violent extremism within DHS.”
Some experts have suggested the DHS may be especially prone to extremist sentiments because of its role in policing immigration. In 2016, the ICE union officially endorsed then-candidate Donald Trump for president, making the first such endorsement in the agency’s history.
The U.S. Government has a White Supremacy Problem
Copious academic research and news reports have shown that far-right extremists have infiltrated local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.
In May, a Reuters investigation found at least 15 self-identified law enforcement trainers and dozens of retired instructors listed in a database of Oath Keepers.
In 2019, Reveal from The Center for Investigative Reporting found that almost 400 current or former law enforcement officials belonged to Confederate, anti-Islam, misogynistic or anti-government militia Facebook groups.
The Pentagon has long struggled with its own extremism problem, which appears to have particularly festered in the wake of the U.S. invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Nearly one in four active-duty service members said in a 2017 Military Times poll that they had observed white nationalism among the troops, and over 40% of non-white service members said the same.
The prevalence of racism in the armed forces is not surprising given that many of the top figures among right-wing extremist groups hailed from the military and those same groups are known to deliberately target disgruntled, returning veterans for recruitment.
Brandon Russell, the founder of the neo-Nazi group AtomWaffen, served in the military, as did George Lincoln Rockwell, commander of the American Nazi Party, Louis Beam, leader of the KKK, and Richard Butler, founder of the Aryan Nation.
In January, NPR reported that one in five people charged in federal or D.C. courts for their involvement in the Capitol insurrection were current or former military service members.