Photo source: The New York Times
- Georgia began its early voting period Monday, and at many locations, lines quickly stacked. Some people even reported waiting more than eight hours to cast their votes.
- While many have since called those lines evidence of voter suppression in Georgia, a number of election officials have said the lines are actually evidence of voter enthusiasm.
- In fact, Georgia’s Secretary of State estimated that nearly 127,000 voted on Monday, shattering the previous single-day record of 90,000.
- Still, others have said that while the lines clearly show voter enthusiasm, there is a larger problem that must be addressed if people are having to wait hours on end to vote.
Georgia Polls Open to Long Lines
Georgia began its early voting period Monday with massive lines that resulted in some people waiting for more than eight hours to cast their ballots.
Altanta-based news outlet WSB-TV reported that at some locations, people were still waiting in line well past 10 p.m. In fact, lines were so long that people even brought their own lawn chairs to sit in.
“It doesn’t matter how long it takes, we will stand in line to vote,” voter Viola Hardy told a local reporter. “So I think that’s the most important part. We’re voting like our life depends on it.”
This is the voter. Her name is Viola Hardy. She got in line at 6:20am. She was still in line to vote at 11:15am. pic.twitter.com/dbcHcIRrf8— Andy Pierrotti (@AndyPierrotti) October 12, 2020
While Hardy was able to wait in line for more than five hours, many others weren’t. A woman by the name of Elizabeth Brownlie told BuzzFeed News that she had to leave after an hour and a half of standing in line because she had an appointment to go to.
“For me, it’s very, very, very important and [it was] disheartening… to have that experience,” Brownlie said. “Voting should not be this difficult.”
Voter Suppression or Voter Enthusiasm?
One video tweeted by former Senator Claire McCaskill (R-Mo.) showed people lined up more than a street away at one voting center.
“This is a picture of voter suppression,” McCaskill said. “Why do Americans have to wait in lines this long?”
McCaskill was far from the only person accusing Georgia of engaging in voter suppression.
“What’s happening in Georgia should upset us all,” one person tweeted. “There is NO REASON people should wait hours in line to vote. Pure voter suppression.”
Despite cries of voter suppression, Georgia’s voter turnout on Monday was unprecedented. In fact, according to the secretary of state, nearly 127,000 Georgians cast their votes, up from the previous single-day record of about 90,000 voters.
In an interview with a WSB-TV reporter, one election official essentially compared the voting lines to lines when a new iPhone goes on sale. Many others have agreed, pushing against the claims of voter suppression.
“So much voter suppression happened in Georgia yesterday that almost 37,000 more people voted than any other early voting day!!” one person sarcastically tweeted. “Someone should be arrested for this travesty of justice!”
Others have also referenced the fact that Georgia allows any registered voter to request an absentee ballot.
Alongside that, a number of experts have questioned if the long lines are truly evidence of voter suppression. That includes David Becker, executive director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research, who told BuzzFeed News, “I’d be concerned if I didn’t see long lines.”
“We’re 22 days away from the election,” he said. “Anyone who sees a long line and does not have the time to wait can come back tomorrow.”
Becker called long lines for early voting a sign of voter enthusiasm, saying that each person who votes early is one less person who could potentially be stuck waiting to vote on Election Day.
Long Lines Are Still a Fundamental Problem
A full explanation may be more complicated than either just voter suppression or enthusiasm.
“Some of this is voter enthusiasm,” Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, saying on Twitter. “But this is just not acceptable in a modern day democracy. We need restoration of the [Voting Rights Act] & officials who’ll provide more voting opportunities during a pandemic.”
Essentially, Clarke is making the argument that while there was a record-breaking turnout, if people are still finding themselves in situations where they’re having to wait hours on end just to vote — with some people having to leave before they could even cast their vote — then there is still an underlying, fundamental problem that needs to be addressed.
Some have wondered how many of those people who couldn’t vote on Monday will actually return to try to vote again.
Others have wondered how many voters will wait until Election Day to vote. That itself could lead to similar delays like those that were seen on Monday.
Glitches, Paper Ballots, and Other Unexpected Holdups
Part of the reason lines were so long in some places Monday wasn’t just because of the sheer number of people turning out to vote.
It was also reportedly because of technical glitches that delayed voting. For example, at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, lines came to a stop when check-in tablets started giving voters error messages.
Instead of issuing emergency paper ballots, poll workers and tech support staff held up lines to fix the tablets.
The same day, a federal judge in Georgia rejected an effort to require higher numbers of emergency paper ballots at Georgia polling places, ruling that the request “invites the court to plunge into the task of advising election officials on precise details of election administration.”
Election officials do still have the option to provide more backups if they want to.
In addition to glitches and questions about the role of paper ballots, lines were also held up Monday by people who had originally requested mail-in ballots, now showing up to vote in-person instead.
“That slows things down because they have to cancel that one in order to vote in-person so there’s more steps,” Cobb County Elections Director Janine Eveler said.
One man who spoke with BuzzFeed News said he switched from voting by mail because he was concerned about potential delays and President Donald Trump’s attacks on the U.S. Postal Service.
See what others are saying: (Atlanta Journal-Constitution) (WSB Channel 2) (BuzzFeed News)
Mississippi Asks Supreme Court To Overturn Roe v. Wade
The Supreme Court’s decision to consider Mississippi’s restrictive abortion ban already has sweeping implications for the precedents set under the landmark reproductive rights ruling, but now the state is asking the high court to go even further.
Mississippi’s Abortion Case
Mississippi filed a brief Thursday asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade when it hears the state’s 15-week abortion ban this fall.
After months of deliberation, the high court agreed in May to hear what will be the first abortion case the 6-to-3 conservative majority will decide.
Both a district judge and a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit had ruled that Mississippi could not enforce the 2018 law that banned nearly all abortions at 15 weeks with exceptions for only “severe fetal abnormality,” but not rape and incest.
If the Supreme Court upholds the Mississippi law, it would undo decades of precedent set under Roe in 1973 and upheld under Planned Parenthood v. Casey in 1992, where the court respectively ruled and reaffirmed that states could not ban abortion before the fetus is “viable” and can live outside the womb, which is generally around 24 to 28 weeks.
When the justices decided to hear the case, they said they would specifically examine the question of whether “all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.”
Depending on the scope of their decision on the Mississippi law, the court’s ruling could allow other states to pass much more restrictive abortion bans without the risk of lower courts striking down those laws.
As a result, legal experts have said the case will represent the most significant ruling on reproductive rights since Casey nearly three decades ago, and the Thursday brief raises the stakes even more.
When Mississippi asked the justices to take up its case last June, the state’s attorney general, Lynn Fitch (R), explicitly stated that the petition’s questions “do not require the Court to overturn Roe or Casey.”
But that was before the court’s conservatives solidified their supermajority with the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett — who personally opposes abortion — following the death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
New Filing Takes Aim at Roe
With the new filing, it appears that Fitch views the high court’s altered makeup as an opportunity to undermine the constitutional framework that has been in place for the better part of the last century.
“The Constitution’s text says nothing about abortion,” Fitch wrote in the brief, arguing that American society has changed so much that the previous rulings need to be reheard.
“Today, adoption is accessible and on a wide scale women attain both professional success and a rich family life, contraceptives are more available and effective, and scientific advances show that an unborn child has taken on the human form and features months before viability,” she added, claiming the power should be left to state lawmakers.
“Roe and Casey shackle states to a view of the facts that is decades out of date,” she continued. “The national fever on abortion can break only when this Court returns abortion policy to the states.”
The Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents Mississippi’s sole abortion provider in the suit against the state’s law, painted Fitch’s effort as one that will have a chilling effect on abortion rights nationwide.
“Mississippi has stunningly asked the Supreme Court to overturn Roe and every other abortion rights decision in the last five decades,” Nancy Northup, the president and CEO of the group said in a statement Thursday. “Today’s brief reveals the extreme and regressive strategy, not just of this law, but of the avalanche of abortion bans and restrictions that are being passed across the country.”
The Supreme Court has not yet said exactly when during its fall term it will hear oral arguments on the Mississippi case, but a decision is expected to come down by next June or July, as is standard.
An anticipated ruling just months before the 2022 midterms will almost certainly position abortion as a top issue at the ballot box.
See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (The Washington Post) (Politico)
Republicans Boycott Jan. 6 Committee After Pelosi Rejects Two of McCarthy’s Picks
The House Minority Leader said that unless House Speaker Pelosi reinstated the two members, Republicans will launch their own investigation into the insurrection.
Pelosi Vetoes Republicans
Republicans are boycotting the select committee to investigate the insurrection after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca.) rejected two of the five GOP members Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Ca.) picked to serve on the panel Wednesday.
In a statement, Pelosi cited the “statements and actions” of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Oh.) and Jim Banks (R-In.), whose nominations she said she was opposing “with respect for the integrity of the investigation.”
Jordan and Banks — both staunch allies of former President Donald Trump — have helped propagate the previous leader’s false election claims, opposed efforts to investigate the insurrection, and voted not to certify the election for President Joe Biden.
A senior Democratic aide also specifically told The Washington Post that Democrats did not want Jordan on the panel because he reportedly helped Trump strategized how to overturn the election and due to the fact he spoke to the then-president on Jan. 6, meaning there is a possibility he could be called to testify before the very same committee.
The aide also said that Democrats opposed Banks’ selection because of a statement he issued after McCarthy chose him.
In the statement, the representative compared the insurrection to the racial justice protests last summer, implied that the rioters were just normal American’s expressing their political views, and claimed the committee was a political ploy “to justify the Left’s authoritarian agenda.”
Notably, Pelosi did say she would accept McCarthy’s three other nominees — including Rep. Troy Nehls (R-Wi.), who also voted against certifying Biden’s win.
McCarthy Threatens Separate Investigation
McCarthy, however, refused to select new members, and instead opted to remove all his appointees from the would-be bipartisan committee.
In a statement condemning the move, the minority leader said that Pelosi’s action “represents an egregious abuse of power.”
“Denying the voices of members who have served in the military and law enforcement, as well as leaders of standing committees, has made it undeniable that this panel has lost all legitimacy and credibility and shows the Speaker is more interested in playing politics than seeking the truth,” he said.
“Unless Speaker Pelosi reverses course and seats all five Republican nominees, Republicans will not be party to their sham process and will instead pursue our own investigation of the facts.”
Pelosi defended her decision during a press conference Thursday, where she said that Banks and Jordan were “ridiculous” choices for the panel.
“When statements are ridiculous and fall into the realm of, ‘You must be kidding,’ there’s no way that they’re going to be on the committee,” she added.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNBC)
More Republican Are Pushing COVID Vaccinations, But the Party Remains Divided on Its Messaging
The renewed effort to encourage vaccination comes as the surge in COVID cases caused by the delta variant continues to disproportionately impact Republican-led states with low vaccination rates.
GOP Leaders Ramps Up Vaccination Push
In recent days, more Republican leaders and prominent conservatives have ramped up efforts to encourage members of their party to get vaccinated against COVID-19 as the U.S. continues to see massive surges from the delta variant.
Some, like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), have been pushing Americans to get vaccinated for months — a call he reiterated again on Tuesday. Many others, however, have been reticent to do the same until recently.
Most notable on that list is Rep. Steve Scalise (La.), the no. 2 Republican in House leadership, who just got his first dose over the weekend after resisting vaccination, claiming he had antibodies from previously contracting COVID. Scalise explained he changed his mind because of delta and encouraged others to do the same.
“There shouldn’t be any hesitancy over whether or not it’s safe and effective,” he said.
The top leader is set to continue pushing that advice. Earlier this week, the GOP Doctors Caucus announced that it would hold a news conference Thursday alongside Scalise and the third-ranking House Republican, Rep. Elise Stefanik (N.Y.), to encourage vaccination.
Rank and File Republicans Continue To Cast Doubt, Spread Misinformation
There are still plenty of Republicans working to undermine the renewed push to get their party vaccinated.
While many have painted vaccination as a matter of freedom of choice, others have sought to downplay the virus. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, whose state currently accounts for 40% of all new COVID cases, dismissed the spikes as the result of a “seasonal virus” on Monday.
Rep. Barry Loudermilk — who has had COVID twice — echoed that in a statement to reporters on Tuesday, where he argued that COVID is just something everyone has to live with.
“This is something we deal with in our lives on a daily basis; ever since I’ve been born, there’s sicknesses, there’s flu, there’s different diseases,” he said.
Some members of the GOP have used their positions of power to actively fight against vaccination. That includes Sen. Ron Johnson (Wi.), who has openly said he is not vaccinated. He has also been widely condemned for promoting unproven treatments and false information about vaccines during interviews and congressional hearings.
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), who has repeatedly refused to share her vaccination status, has also drawn ire for sharing misinformation and continually comparing COVID prevention efforts to the Holocaust.
Greene was temporarily suspended from Twitter earlier this week for sharing false information on Monday, but she continued to utilize her spotlight to spread misinformation about vaccine-related deaths and side effects during a press conference the following day.
While those who downplay the coronavirus and spread false information about vaccinations are certainly not representative of the entire Republican Party, they are some of the most visible.
Greene and many of her counterparts who push anti-vaccine narratives have frequently been accused of acting in inflammatory ways to get more press — a strategy that more often than not tends to work in their favor.
As a result, Republicans who want to encourage people to get the jabs will have their work cut out for them. Even many of those who have not openly expressed skepticism themselves have still let it flourish in the party for so long by not publicly pushing back against claims from members who sow disinformation.
The GOP’s broader failure to unify around a singular message on vaccines shows clearly among the party’s base.
According to a recent Washington Post-ABC News, poll 86% of Democrats have received at least one shot, but just 45% of Republicans have done the same. While just 6% of Democrats say they are not likely to get the vaccine, 47% of Republicans said they probably will not, and 38% said they definitely will not.
Meanwhile, Republican-led states with low vaccination rates are suffering the most from the new spike in cases and the rapid spread of the delta variant.
Arkansas, which has one of the lowest vaccination rates in the country at just 35%, is currently reporting the highest per-capita cases in the U.S. Hospitalizations have gone up 85% in the state in the last two weeks, placing some hospital systems on the brink of collapse — a problem also faced by parts of Missouri, which has the third-highest COVID cases nationwide.