- Meghan Markle spoke at a virtual event for The United State of Women and When We All Vote to speak about the importance of voting in the 2020 election.
- While she never mentioned any candidate by name or who she supported, she did reference high stakes and a need for change, prompting some to think she was implying she wanted Trump out of office.
- It is against the rules for royals to speak publicly about their political opinions. Several people, including broadcaster Piers Morgan, called for Meghan’s title to be stripped.
- On the other hand, many defended her, believing her statements were general and nonpartisan. Some also think that because she and Prince Harry have stepped aside from their roles, they should no longer be bound by those kinds of Royal Family rules.
Meghan Markle Speak About Voting
Over the weekend, Meghan Markle joined the growing voices encouraging people to vote in the 2020 Election. Her calls, however, were met with swift backlash online from those who thought she crossed a royal line.
On Friday, the Duchess of Sussex spoke at a virtual event held by the United State of Women and When We All Vote to emphasize how important it is to participate in the upcoming election.
“I think we’re only 75 days away from Election day. And that is so very close and yet there is so much work to be done in that amount of time because we all know what’s at stake this year,” she said. “I know it. I think all of you certainly know it. And if you’re here on this fun event with us then you are just as mobilized and energized to see the change that we all need and deserve.”
While these remarks sound like standard fare in election dialogue, two key words stood out to a few people. While she never says who she is voting for or ever references any candidate by name, her reference to the “stakes” of the election as well as the call for a needed “change” led many to believe she was implying that she wanted President Donald Trump voted out of office. She would be far from the first celebrity to take such a stance, but sharing political opinions is a little more complicated when it comes to royals.
Members of the Royal Family are not allowed to share political opinions. However, where Markle and Prince Harry fit into this rule is unclear. The two stepped away from their duties as senior members of the Royal Family earlier this year, meaning they no longer formally represent the Queen or receive money from the family’s Sovereign Grant.
Still, the two technically retained their titles, His Royal Highness the Duke of Sussex, and Her Royal Highness the Duchess of Sussex. Since they are not working members of the Royal Family, they cannot actively use their HRH title, the part that denotes them as His or Her Royal Highness, but they are still known and referred to as the Duke and Duchess.
Outrage Aimed at Markle
Like most of the centuries-old rules and protocols of the Royal Family, this title jargon makes almost no sense and seems relatively pointless. However, these age-old rules are the bread and butter of the family, and most never dare an attempt to break them. Some think that since Markle and Prince Harry are still the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, they should still be bound by the guidelines banning them from political speech. Many, including television personality Piers Morgan and Conservative London Assembly member David Kurten, called for Markle’s title to be stripped.
Radio host Dan Wootton called the incident a “massive diplomatic embarrassment for the Queen.”
Support Expressed for Markle
On the other side though, many don’t think Markle spoke out of turn. Some thought these rules should no longer apply to her, while others said she was simply encouraging people to vote, not speaking in a partisan manner.
“I understand the need to prevent leaders and notable figures seeking to swing another country’s election, that is fair and proper – but to call Markle’s remarks that is surely stretching the point,” Chris Stevenson wrote in a piece for The Independent.
“It’s not like Trump doesn’t offer his opinion on UK matters every time he is asked, normally in a much more straightforward manner than the Duchess of Sussex did,” he added.
Kate Williams, a history professor who has written books about the Royal Family tweeted out a thread claiming that Markle’s comments were not partisan, and even if they were, she would have been “entirely within her rights.”
“Other royals have talked about elections, matters such as the environment, even written to ministers about policy,” Williams explained. “But #Meghan, who is a US citizen, telling people to take US elections seriously is some sort of terrible scandal.”
“Talking about ‘change’ is NOT partisan!!! Trump voters talk about change – ie more states for him,” she added. “She’d be entirely within her rights to say ‘Go Biden/Harris’. But instead #Meghan simply talks about importance of voting and is being attacked. It’s madness. Racist madness.”
History of Attacks in the Press
Unprompted attacks against Markle in the press have become as steady a British staple as bangers and mash or fish and chips. The Duchess has been superficially slammed for everything from shutting a car door to the way she holds her son. Those attacks have also gotten blatantly racist, with one headline claiming that her family went “from cotton slaves to royalty.”
Some believed the outrage hurled at her voting comments were part of this perpetual cycle of criticism, which one person called “disproportionate” and “worrying.”
Others also wondered why Markle is often the subject of such visceral and constant fury, when Prince Andrew, who has been accused of sexual abuse by a woman who claims she was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein when she was a teenager, does not face these regular attacks. Actress Jameela Jamil responded to a tweet calling Markle’s comments embarrassing by saying the family “may be more embarrassed” by Prince Andrew.
See what others are saying: (Forbes) (Huffington Post) (Harpers Bazaar)
Britney Spears’ Attorney Files Petition To Oust Father as Conservator
Spears’ new attorney, Mathew Rosengart, said there are “serious questions” regarding “potential misconduct, including conflicts of interest [and] conservatorship abuse.”
Mathew Rosengart Petitions Court To Remove Jamie Spears
Britney Spears’ attorney, Mathew Rosengart, filed a petition Monday to remove the singer’s father, Jamie Spears, as her financial conservator.
Jamie Spears has served as his daughter’s financial conservator for 13 years. In the filing, Rosengart said the elder Spears “profited handsomely” from the position. He asked that Jamie be replaced with a Certified Public Accountant named Jason Rubin, who Rosengart described as “objectively intelligent” and “highly qualified” for the job.
The petition is 120 pages long and contained scathing remarks about Jamie. Britney has made it clear she wants him removed from the conservatorship, which she wants to be terminated entirely. During a statement in June, she called the situation “abusive” and specifically condemned her father.
“He loved the control to hurt his own daughter 100,000%. He loved it,” she said.
Rosengart has promised to be a stronger advocate for Britney than her previous lawyer, Samuel Ingham, was. He seems to be following through on his word by challenging Jamie’s status as a conservator just weeks after being appointed Britney’s attorney.
“Serious questions abound concerning Mr. Spears’s potential misconduct, including conflicts of interest, conservatorship abuse and the evident dissipation of Ms. Spears’s fortune,” he wrote.
The petition claims that Jamie made at least $2.1 million from Britney’s residency in Las Vegas, snagging a 1.5% cut of gross revenues and merchandise. It also claims that he paid himself $16,000 a month from Britney’s estate, which is $2,000 more than he gave Britney. On top of that, Jamie reportedly took another $2,000 for business purposes.
Rosengart wrote that while it might be common for a manager or agent to make this kind of money, someone in Jamie’s position should not be.
“He is a conservator, and, as a conservator, his role is to be burdened by, rather than benefit from, the conservatorship.”
Britney’s Mother Speaks Out
Both Britney’s personal conservator, Jodi Montgomery, and her mother, Lynne Spears, gave statements in the filings echoing the need for Jamie to be removed from his role. Montgomery emphasized that his departure was necessary for the singer’s welfare.
“It would be best for Ms. Spears’ well-being and mental health that her father stop acting as her conservator,’ she wrote.
Lynne did not hold back on criticizing Jamie, saying Britney’s relationship with her father has “dwindled to nothing but fear and hatred” because of the control he exerts over her. She also claimed that he relied on Britney’s house staff, medical aides, and security team to “inform on and report back to him each and every detail of every action” in his daughter’s life.
“Such scrutiny is exhausting and terrifying, like living in custody,” she said.
This petition does not terminate the conservatorship fully, but Rosengart said that could be something the court has to examine one day further down the line.
“There might well come a time when the court will be called upon to consider whether the conservatorship should be terminated in its entirety and whether — in addition to stripping his daughter of her dignity, autonomy and certain fundamental liberties — Mr. Spears is also guilty of misfeasance or malfeasance warranting the imposition of surcharges, damages or other legal action against him,” Rosengart wrote.
See what others are saying: (NPR) (NBC News) (New York Times)
Simone Biles Withdraws, Naomi Osaka Ousted in Rough Day at Olympics. Both Cite Heavy Pressure To Perform
Biles pulled out of the women’s gymnastics team final due to a medical issue while Osaka lost in the third round of the women’s singles tennis tournament.
Team USA Takes Silver in Women’s Gymnastics
Olympic gold medalist Simone Biles shocked the world Tuesday after pulling out of the women’s gymnastics team finals at the Tokyo Games due to a medical issue.
She left the competition area with a medical examiner after faltering during her vault performance, which was pretty out of character for Biles, who is the most decorated gymnast of all time. However, she later told NBC’s Today that her withdrawal was not due to a physical injury.
“Physically, I feel good, I’m in shape,” she explained. “Emotionally, that kind of varies on the time and moment. Coming here to the Olympics and being the head star isn’t an easy feat, so we’re just trying to take it one day at a time and we’ll see.”
Biles said she isn’t sure whether she will compete Thursday in the individual all-around competition and is just going to “take it day by day.”
The gymnastics star later talked about not wanting to cost her team a medal or injure herself by performing her dangerous stunts in the wrong headspace.
“It’s just it’s not worth it, especially when you have three amazing athletes that can step up to the plate and do it,” she said, according to The New York Times.
Biles has previously been pretty open about all the pressure she’s been feeling amid the Games, writing in an Instagram post on Sunday, “I truly do feel like I have the weight of the world on my shoulders at times. I know I brush it off and make it seem like pressure doesn’t affect me, but damn sometimes it’s hard hahaha! The Olympics is no joke.”
Russia went on to take gold at the competition while the U.S. took silver, ending more than a decade of American domination in the event. Still, it’s worth noting that Russia’s margin of victory proved no single mistake by the U.S. was to blame for their second-place finish.
According to The Times, it wasn’t just Jordan Chiles’ fall on floor or Biles’ weak vault. “It was a combination of those two mistakes plus Biles’s absence on the other apparatuses plus truly standout performances from Russia on three out of four events.”
Holding that same sentiment, many fans are defending Biles against anyone suggesting she was solely responsible for the team’s missed shot at first place, noting that the country’s strategy to win can’t just be based on expecting her to generate huge margins for them.
Tennis Star Speaks Out After Olympic Loss
Day four of the Games proved to be similarly rough on tennis star Naomi Osaka, who will leave Tokyo without a medal after losing to Marketa Vondrousova of the Czech Republic in the third round of the women’s singles tennis tournament.
Osaka, who represented Japan at the Games, faced high expectations to do well as she is the highest-paid female athlete in the world and the host country’s face of the Games.
“I’m disappointed in every loss, but I feel like this one sucks more than the others,” she said.
“I definitely feel like there was a lot of pressure for this. I think it’s maybe because I haven’t played in the Olympics before and for the first year [it] was a bit much.”
She later added, “I feel like my attitude wasn’t that great because I don’t really know how to cope with that pressure, so that’s the best that I could have done in this situation.”
Osaka has been open about her mental health struggles before, with her citing, among other things, the way speaking with reporters after matches create self-doubt, so one can only imagine what she was feeling with all of the eyes on her at such a huge international event.
Despite the surprising performances from Biles and Osaka, people all over the world are continuing to praise them for being trailblazers in their sports and for being so candid when it comes to topics like mental health.
Lil Nas X Starts Bail Project Fund After Releasing Prison-Set Video for “Industry Baby”
The singer said he is working to address “the disproportionate impact that cash bail has on the black community.“
Lil Nas X Starts Bail X Fund
Following the release of his latest single “Industry Baby,” Lil Nas X launched a partnership with The Bail Project that aims to cover bail funds for people across the country.
The music video for the song took place in the fictional “Montero State Prison,” a reference to the title of his upcoming album and the singer’s real name. While Lil Nas X spent much of his time online promoting the video with memes, he put a pause on the jokes Saturday to announce the Bail X Fund and bring attention to issues regarding incarceration in the United States.
“On a serious note, I know the pain that incarceration brings to a family,” Lil Nas X tweeted. “And the disproportionate impact that cash bail has on the black community. That’s why I teamed up with @bailproject to create the Bail X Fund.”
The Bail Project aims to eliminate cash bail in the U.S. It has posted over $47 million in free bail for over 17,000 low-income people across the country. It also provides post-release support and services to those who need them.
“Music is the way I fight for liberation. It’s my act of resistance,” Lil Nas X wrote in a statement on the fund’s website. “But I also know that true freedom requires real change in how the criminal justice system works. Starting with cash bail.”
The Fight to End Cash Bail
According to the Prison Policy Initiative, like many issues within the criminal justice system, cash bail disproportionately harms Black Americans. The group claims that Black and brown defendants are somewhere between 10% to 25% “more likely than white defendants to be detained pretrial or to have to pay money bail.” It also argues that Black men are 50% more likely to be detained pretrial than white defendants, and says Black and brown defendants generally “receive bail amounts that are twice as high as bail set for white defendants – and they are less likely to be able to afford it.”
Lil Nas X said he is “doing something” to address these issues and invited his fans to join him. He hopes that his efforts will encourage other artists to use their platforms to likewise speak about these injustices.
“Ending cash bail is one of the most important civil rights issues of our time,” he wrote. “Donate what you can to the Bail X Fund. Let’s bring people home & let’s fight for freedom and equality.”
A donation tab was attached to the song’s music video, where it says nearly $44,000 has been raised for the Bail X Fund. The video has blown up on YouTube, racking up over 31 million views. It remains the number one trending video in music as of Monday morning.
The song has likewise found success on Spotify, where it debuted at number two and eventually reached the number one spot.