Connect with us

Entertainment

Lori Loughlin and Mossimo Giannulli Receive Prison Sentences for College Admissions Scam

Published

on

  • Lori Loughlin was sentenced to two months in prison Friday while her husband, Mossimo Giannulli, was sentenced to five months for their role in the massive college admission scheme. 
  • The couple was found to have paid $500,000 to get their daughters, Isabella Rose and Olivia Jade, admitted to USC as fake rowing recruits.
  • The sentences aligned with their plea agreement from May and also include two years of supervised release, community service, and fines. 
  • Both gave statements during their hearings, with Loughlin apologizing and promising to use this as “a catalyst to do good and give back for the rest of my life.”

What Were They Charged With? 

After more than a year of legal proceedings, actress Lori Loughin and fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli were sentenced Friday for their role in the college admissions scandal.

Loughlin and Giannulli were arguably the most high profile figures caught participating in this massive scam that was first announced in March 2019. They were both accused of paying the scheme’s mastermind, William “Rick” Singer, $500,000 to secure their daughters, Isabella Rose and Olivia Jade, spots at the University of Southern California as fake rowing recruits. 

As the cases against them developed, emails, photos, and other documents were uncovered showing just how far they went to create their daughters’ fake athletic portfolios. At one point they even had their daughters pose on rowing machines.

Source: Massachusetts Attorney’s Office

If they had been found guilty of all the conspiracy charges stacked against them, they could have received up to 20 years in prison. The couple maintained their innocence for more than a year, with their defense attorneys saying they thought they were donating to a legitimate business. 

However, the two finally pleaded guilty in May. At that time, they hammered out a plea agreement with prosecutors in exchange for some of the charges being dropped. Loughlin pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud. Giannulli pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, and honest services wire and mail fraud. 

Sentences Handed Down

On Friday, they were both sentenced during virtual court hearings, with Gianulli’s happening first. U.S. District Judge Nathaniel Gorton gave him a five-month prison sentence that includes two years of supervised release, 250 hours of community service, and a $250,000 fine.

Loughlin was given a two-month sentence, with two years of supervised release, 100 hours of community service, and a $150,000 fine.

As far as why Gianulli faced more charges and prison time, according to prosecutors, evidence suggested Giannulli was the more active participant.

In a sentencing memo released last week, prosecutors wrote, “He engaged more frequently with Singer, directed the bribe payments to USC and Singer, and personally confronted his daughter’s high school counselor to prevent the scheme from being discovered, brazenly lying about his daughter’s athletic abilities.” 

“Loughlin took a less active role, but was nonetheless fully complicit, eagerly enlisting Singer a second time for her younger daughter, and coaching her daughter not to ‘say too much’ to her high school’s legitimate college counselor, lest he catch on to their fraud.”

Apologies and Judge’s Remarks

At each of their hearings, both also made statements, with Giannulli saying: “I deeply regret the harm that my actions have caused my daughters, my wife and others.”

“I take full responsibility for my conduct. I’m ready to accept the consequences and move forward with the lessons I’ve learned from this experience.”

Loughlin, for her part, said, “I made an awful decision. I went along with a plan to give my daughters an unfair advantage in the college admissions process.”

“In doing so, I ignored my intuition and allowed myself to be swayed from my moral compass. I thought I was acting out of love for my children, but in reality it only undermined and diminished my daughters’ abilities and accomplishments,” she continued.

“More broadly, and more importantly, I now understand that my decision helped exacerbate existing inequalities in society generally, and the higher education system more specifically. That realization weighs heavily on me.”

She said she wishes she could go back band do things differently but added, “I will do everything in my power to redeem myself and use this experience as a catalyst to do good and give back for the rest of my life. I am truly, profoundly and deeply sorry. I am ready to face the consequences and make amends.”

During sentencing, Judge Gorton reportedly told Loughling that he believed her statement was sincere, but said he was dumbfounded by her choices.

“You have more money than you could need — a fairy-tale life, yet you stand before me a convicted felon, and for what? For the inexplicable desire to grasp even more,” he said.

“To have whatever prestige and instant gratification that comes from being able to show off the admission of your daughters to a preferred university.”

In Giannuli’s hearing, Gorton said: “You are an informed, smart businessman. You certainly knew better.”

“You were not stealing bread to feed your family. You have no excuse for your crime and that makes it all the more blameworthy.”

Still, at Gianulli’s hearing, the judge called the sentencing “sufficient but not greater than necessary under the circumstance.” The sentencing lines up with what they had agreed to at the time of their pleas, which left little wiggle room for the judge to veer off. 

According to reports, both must surrender to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons before 2 p.m. on November 19. 

In all, at least 55 people have been charged in connection with the admissions scheme. Twenty have been sentenced, while more than a dozen others have already pleaded guilty or have agreed to, including coaches, administrators, and test-takers. 

See what others are saying: (Fox News) (CNN) (NPR)

Entertainment

Sydney Sweeney Says There is a “Stigma” Against Actresses Doing Nudity. Other Stars Have Called Out This Double Standard Too.

Published

on

“I’m very proud of my work in Euphoria,” Sweeney said. “I thought it was a great performance. But no one talks about it because I got naked.” 


Sydney Sweeney Talks Nudity Double Standard

“Euphoria” actress Sydney Sweeney said there is a “stigma” against actresses who do nudity on screen.

Sweeney plays Cassie, a high schooler trying to reckon with her relationships with sex and romance. As a result, Sweeney finds herself doing her fair share of scenes involving sex and nudity on the HBO drama. 

“Euphoria” is known for having a copious amount of scenes with naked bodies, but Sweeney told The Independent this week that creator Sam Levinson is open to cutting back when necessary. 

“There are moments where Cassie was supposed to be shirtless and I would tell Sam, ‘I don’t really think that’s necessary here.’ He was like, ‘OK, we don’t need it,’” she told the outlet. “I’ve never felt like Sam has pushed it on me or was trying to get a nude scene into an HBO show. When I didn’t want to do it, he didn’t make me.”

On other sets, she has not felt that level of respect.

“I’ve had experiences where I want to go home and scrub myself completely raw because I feel disgusting,” she said.

But even with her comfort on “Euphoria,” she still believes there is a double standard when it comes to female nudity on television. Sweeney said she did not feel she earned critical attention until her role on “The White Lotus,” where her character has no undressed scenes. She does not think that is a coincidence. 

“With The White Lotus, I felt like people were finally recognising the hard work I’ve been doing. This is something that has bothered me for a while,” Sweeney explained. “I’m very proud of my work in Euphoria. I thought it was a great performance. But no one talks about it because I got naked.” 

“I do The White Lotus and all of a sudden critics are paying attention. People are loving me. They’re going, ‘Oh my God, what’s she doing next?’ I was like, ‘Did you not see that in Euphoria? Did you not see that in The Handmaid’s Tale?’”

She went on to tell The Independent that she believes there is “a stigma against actresses who get naked on screen.” 

“When a guy has a sex scene or shows his body, he still wins awards and gets praise,” she said. “But the moment a girl does it, it’s completely different.”

Women in Hollywood Grapple With Nudity Stigma

Sweeney is far from the first actress to address this issue. Stars have long pointed out that Hollywood treats female nudity and male nudity differently. According to a report from Mount Saint Mary’s, women were three times more likely than men to appear partially or fully nude in films in 2014. 

Even though women are generally more expected to undress for the camera, they still get flack for it. At the 2013 Oscars, host Seth MacFarlane sang a controversial song called “We Saw Your Boobs” where he teased actresses who had gone topless. Numerous actresses have also expressed regret for doing nude scenes, either because they felt uncomfortable or because their nudity was treated as something for audiences to ogle at rather than as an artistic choice. 

Oscar-winner Natalie Portman said she does not like the “misappropriation of” nude scenes. Some of her’s have ended up on porn sites.

“It’s meant to be a dramatic scene and part of a story,” she told MTV in 2011. “That really makes me angry.”

Emelia Clarke has been vocal about her opposition to some of the nudity on “Game of Thrones.” She told the “Armchair Expert” podcast in 2019 that there was a “fuck ton of nudity” early in the show because she was new to the industry and did not know how to refuse. As she gained more confidence, she fought for her right to say no.

“I’m a lot more savvy [now] with what I’m comfortable with, and what I am okay with doing,” Clarke explained. “I’ve had fights on set before where I’m like, ‘No, the sheet stays up,’ and they’re like, ‘You don’t wanna disappoint your ‘Game of Thrones’ fans.’ And I’m like, ‘Fuck you.’”

Even before actresses make their way to set, they can be subject to grotesque remarks after being forced to strip down. While speaking at Elle‘s Women in Hollywood in 2017, Academy Award-winning actress Jennifer Lawrence said she experienced this during an audition.

“A female producer had me do a nude lineup with about five women who were much, much, thinner than me,” she said. “We stood side-by-side with only tape on covering our privates. After that degrading and humiliating lineup, the female producer told me I should use the naked photos of myself as inspiration for my diet.”

When Lawrence tried to tell another producer she thought this was inappropriate, she claims he said that “he didn’t know why everyone thought I was so fat; he thought I was ‘perfectly f*ckable.’”

See what others are saying: (The Independent) (Variety) (Los Angeles Times)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

D.A.R.E. Accuses HBO’s “Euphoria” of Glorifying Drug Use

Published

on

The organization believes the drama series could have “negative consequences on school-age children who today face unparalleled risks and mental health challenges.


D.A.R.E. Slams “Euphoria”

HBO’s “Euphoria” has become synonymous with its explicit depictions of teen sex, violence, and addiction. The substance abuse awareness organization D.A.R.E. condemned the series for its lurid content, arguing that it glorifies drug use. 

While drugs can weasel their way into any aspect of the show at a moment’s notice, the primary storyline around addiction follows Rue, a high schooler who often resists the help she needs to recover. Zendaya won an Emmy for portraying the struggling protagonist in 2020. 

D.A.R.E., also known as Drug Abuse Resistance Education, told TMZ on Wednesday that “Euphoria” is reckless in its handling of such weighted subject matter.  

“Rather than further each parent’s desire to keep their children safe from the potentially horrific consequences of drug abuse and other high-risk behavior, HBO’s television drama, Euphoria, chooses to misguidedly glorify and erroneously depict high school student drug use, addiction, anonymous sex, violence, and other destructive behaviors as common and widespread in today’s world,” a representative for the group told the outlet. 

“It is unfortunate that HBO, social media, television program reviewers, and paid advertising have chosen to refer to the show as ‘groundbreaking,’ rather than recognizing the potential negative consequences on school-age children who today face unparalleled risks and mental health challenges,” the representative continued. 

“Euphoria” Cast and Creator Speak on Heavy Subject Matter

Ahead of the season two premiere, Zendaya warned her followers that much of the content in “Euphoria” is not suitable for all viewers. 

“I know I’ve said this before, but I do want to reiterate to everyone that Euphoria is for mature audiences,” she wrote on Instagram. “This season, maybe more so than the last, is deeply emotional and deals with subject matter that can be triggering and difficult to watch. Please only watch it if you feel comfortable.”

Sam Levinson, the creator of “Euphoria,” has been open about his own experience with addiction. Now over a decade sober, Levinson struggled with substance abuse as a teenager, much like Zendaya’s Rue. He feels a personal connection to the story, and therefore, a responsibility to honestly represent the tribulations of addiction.

“The hardest thing about portraying a drug addict is — there are a lot of cautionary tales, there are a lot of after-school specials — but what I really wanted to get to the core of is the pain and the shame about what you’re doing and you’re inability to get clean despite the havoc and destruction you’re wreaking around you,” Levinson said of the show during the ATX Television Festival in 2019, per Deadline.

Levinson noted that he does have to be “mindful of” the risk of glamorizing drug use “just by the sheer nature of it being on screen.” 

“We have to be authentic about it,” he explained. “If we’re pulling our punches and we’re not showing the relief that drugs can bring it starts to lose its impact. Drugs are not the solution but they can feel like it at times, and that’s what makes them so destructive.”

Drug Use on Euphoria

Still, D.A.R.E. is far from the first group to express concern over the impact “Euphoria” might have on younger viewers. Before the second season debuted earlier this month, the Parents Television and Media Council released a statement warning of the show’s “imminent threat to the health and well-being of children.”

Before each episode of “Euphoria” airs, HBO flashes a warning to alert viewers of the drug abuse, language, violence, nudity, and sex that will appear in the program. The show might be cavalier in the casual and frequent manner it depicts drug use and other dangerous behavior, but more often than not, characters await the consequences of their actions. 

In the most recent episode of “Euphoria,” Rue’s addiction lands her in a visceral screaming match with her sister. The scene underscores the tragic and harsh reality of substance abuse.

While critics push back against the show for a variety of other reasons, they generally praise Rue’s arc, largely thanks to Zendaya’s gripping performance. 

But D.A.R.E. argued that the show goes a bridge too far and offered to meet with HBO to hash out the issues. 

“We would welcome the opportunity for our team, including members of our high school-aged Youth Advocacy Board, to meet with individuals at HBO who are involved with producing Euphoria to present our concerns directly,” D.A.R.E.’s representative told TMZ.

HBO has not publicly responded to the criticisms.

See what others are saying: (TMZ) (Vanity Fair) (Complex)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Neil Young Asks For His Music to Be Removed From Spotify Over Vaccine Misinformation

Published

on

The “Harvest Moon” singer told his representatives that the streaming service “can have Rogan or Young. Not both.” 


Neil Young Wants Music His Off Of Spotify

Musician Neil Young wrote an open letter to his management and record label demanding that his music be taken down from Spotify over concerns about vaccine misinformation. 

The “Heart of Gold” singer initially posted the letter on his website, but it has since been removed. According to Rolling Stone, which reported on the document before it was taken down, Young specifically took issue with podcast host Joe Rogan. 

“I want you to let Spotify know immediately TODAY that I want all my music off their platform,” he wrote. “They can have Rogan or Young. Not both.” 

“The Joe Rogan Experience” is exclusive to Spotify and was the most popular podcast on the platform in 2021. Rogan has regularly received criticism for spreading COVID-19 misinformation that contradicts public health recommendations, specifically when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines. 

Rogan previously said that young people should not worry about getting vaccinated against the coronavirus. He has also regularly cited faulty studies questioning their efficacy and interviewed controversial medical personalities who are known for promoting conspiracy theories about the vaccine. 

Young said he is afraid of the ramifications of these kinds of remarks.

“I am doing this because Spotify is spreading fake information about vaccines – potentially causing death to those who believe the disinformation being spread by them,” the singer wrote. “Please act on this immediately today and keep me informed of the time schedule.”

Concerns About Joe Rogan’s Vaccine Comments

Young’s manager, Frank Gironda, conf​​rimed the authenticity of the letter to The Daily Beast.

“It’s something that’s really important to Neil,” Gironda said.  “He’s very upset about this disinformation. We’re trying to figure this out right now.”

Young is far from the first person to express frustrations over the anti-vax views on the audio streaming service platforms. Earlier this month, a group of doctors and other medical professionals wrote a letter to Spotify urging the company to implement a policy to fight disinformation.

“We are calling on Spotify to take action against the mass-misinformation events which continue to occur on its platform,” the letter said. “With an estimated 11 million listeners per episode, [The Joe Rogan Experience] is the world’s largest podcast and has tremendous influence. Though Spotify has a responsibility to mitigate the spread of misinformation on its platform, the company presently has no misinformation policy.”

“This is not only a scientific or medical concern; it is a sociological issue of devastating proportions and Spotify is responsible for allowing this activity to thrive on its platform,” the expert cautioned. 

Spotify has not made a public statement regarding Young’s letter.

See what others are saying: (Rolling Stone) (The Daily Beast) (The Verge)

Continue Reading