Connect with us

Entertainment

Christopher Nolan’s “Tenet” Delayed Again, Could Pose Major Implications for Hollywood

Published

on

  • Christopher Nolan’s “Tenet” has been delayed for the third time, but Warner Brothers did not give a new concrete release date for the film this time around.
  • Hollywood has been banking on “Tenet” to be the first major blockbuster to bring audiences back to theaters since the pandemic forced them to close, so its indefinite delay has far-reaching implications.
  • Warner Brothers could potentially release the film overseas before releasing it in the U.S., then open it in safer states first, and stagger the release throughout the country. However, doing so could pose major financial risks.
  • Still, organizations like the National Association of Theater Owners believe new movies need to release no matter how small audiences are right now if the box office wants to have a fighting chance. 

“Tenet” Delayed

Very little is known about Christopher Nolan’s “Tenet.” Its plot has been kept a tightlipped secret and even the names of its lead characters are concealed. Now, its most consequential mystery is its release date. 

“Tenet” was initially supposed to be one of the summer’s biggest blockbusters with a July 17 release date. Coronavirus concerns pushed that back to July 31, then later to August 12. On Monday, Warner Brothers said the $200 million action-thriller is being pushed back even further, but declined to give a concrete date. 

This delay is more than just a bummer for Nolan fans and sci-fi enthusiasts. It increases the already high levels of uncertainty movie theaters are struggling with right now. “Tenet” was going to be the first major blockbuster to hit theaters since the coronavirus pandemic shut moviegoing down. Along with “Mulan,” Hollywood hoped it would bring audiences back to the cinema. Now, theaters only have the hope of “Mulan” to hang onto, and it is almost inevitable that its August 21 release date gets another bump. 

Implications and International Release Potential

Warner Brothers may have to travel off the beaten path when it comes to their release strategy for the Robert Pattinson and John David Washington starring picture. “Tenet” could make its theatrical debut overseas, where the virus is more controlled and where some theaters are open, well before American audiences get the chance to see it. Several countries in Europe and Asia are already letting people back in theaters, and it has been a long time since they had a big new Hollywood film to screen, meaning there could be an international appetite for the film.

“Our goals throughout this process have been to ensure the highest odds of success for our films while also being ready to support our theater partners with new content as soon as they could safely reopen,” Warner Brothers Picture Group chairman Toby Emmerich said in a statement. “We are not treating ‘Tenet’ like a traditional global day-and-date release, and our upcoming marketing and distribution plans will reflect that.”

Many believe that this means the movie will not only release in certain countries first, but perhaps even certain parts of the United States could get it sooner as well. This, however, could present major issues. Cities like Los Angeles and New York, which are the biggest box office contributors in the country, currently do not have public plans for theaters to open back up. It would be a major financial risk to release a film knowing it could not go to those cities. 

Coming from the mind of Nolan, “Tenet” is also bound to have twists and turns that could get easily spoiled if its release date is staggered throughout the world. Some countries or states could give away key details before other audiences even get the chance to see it, something that not only knocks the impact of the film, but the appeal for filmgoers to go to the theaters to see it as well. 

Theater Owners Want to Open

Despite the clear financial risks, John Fithian, the head of the National Association of Theatre Owners, told Variety that studios need to release what they have no matter the circumstances.

“Distributors should stick with their dates and release their movies because there’s no guarantee that more markets will be open later this year,” he said in a Q&A. “Until there’s a vaccine that’s widely available, there will not be 100% of the markets open. Because of that, films should be released in markets where it is safe and legal to release them and that’s about 85% of markets in the U.S. and even more globally. They should release their movies and deal with this new normal.”

Still, releasing films to scattered markets is easier said than done. No studio wants their movie to be the guinea pig that tests how successful a film can be during a pandemic. Warner Brothers would rather see how “Mulan” does before they play “Tenet,” and likewise, Disney would like to see how “Tenet” fairs before it releases “Mulan.”

But someone has to be first, and it all comes down to how studios think they can safely take that jump. Much of this hangs on when theaters open, which is also far from a sure thing. Chains like AMC said they would open in mid-July, but after “Tenet” and “Mulan” moved to August, they went to late July. Now, with California theaters ordered to close, Los Angeles on the verge of another lockdown, case spikes in several states, and “Tenet” delayed once more, it would hardly be surprising if these chains pushed their openings back yet again. Hollywood then ends up in a rampant cycle of theaters delaying their openings based on film release dates, and films then delaying their release dates based on theater openings. 

Fithian told the Los Angeles Times that the consequences of this could be severe. 

“This is existential for the movie theater industry. If we go a year without new movies, it’s over,” he said.

The timing of this pandemic’s hit lines perfectly with the summer box office season, only makes matters worse. According to the Times, this season usually accounts for 40% of ticket sales, and the North American box office will fall around 61% from last year. 

While some movie theaters are open to play classics and drive ins are making something of a comeback, many owners just don’t think this will be sustainable. 

“You can only have so many showings of ‘Jurassic Park’ and ‘Harry Potter.’ At the end of the day, our livelihood is new movies,” Classic Cinemas CEO Chris Johnson told the Times. “We’re going to make sure the new releases are set in stone before we get excited.”

So far, neither Disney nor movie theater chains have made a knee-jerk announcement following the indefinite delay of “Tenet.” This could be an optimistic sign for entertainment, but during this pandemic, last-minute changes have become the norm.

See what others are saying: (Variety) (Los Angeles Times) (IndieWire)

Entertainment

Lil Nas X Starts Bail Project Fund After Releasing Prison-Set Video for “Industry Baby”

Published

on

The singer said he is working to address “the disproportionate impact that cash bail has on the black community.


Lil Nas X Starts Bail X Fund

Following the release of his latest single “Industry Baby,” Lil Nas X launched a partnership with The Bail Project that aims to cover bail funds for people across the country. 

The music video for the song took place in the fictional “Montero State Prison,” a reference to the title of his upcoming album and the singer’s real name. While Lil Nas X spent much of his time online promoting the video with memes, he put a pause on the jokes Saturday to announce the Bail X Fund and bring attention to issues regarding incarceration in the United States. 

“On a serious note, I know the pain that incarceration brings to a family,” Lil Nas X tweeted. “And the disproportionate impact that cash bail has on the black community. That’s why I teamed up with @bailproject to create the Bail X Fund.”

The Bail Project aims to eliminate cash bail in the U.S.  It has posted over $47 million in free bail for over 17,000 low-income people across the country. It also provides post-release support and services to those who need them.

“Music is the way I fight for liberation. It’s my act of resistance,” Lil Nas X wrote in a statement on the fund’s website. “But I also know that true freedom requires real change in how the criminal justice system works. Starting with cash bail.”

The Fight to End Cash Bail

According to the Prison Policy Initiative, like many issues within the criminal justice system, cash bail disproportionately harms Black Americans. The group claims that Black and brown defendants are somewhere between 10% to 25% “more likely than white defendants to be detained pretrial or to have to pay money bail.” It also argues that Black men are 50% more likely to be detained pretrial than white defendants, and says Black and brown defendants generally “receive bail amounts that are twice as high as bail set for white defendants – and they are less likely to be able to afford it.”

Lil Nas X said he is “doing something” to address these issues and invited his fans to join him. He hopes that his efforts will encourage other artists to use their platforms to likewise speak about these injustices.

“Ending cash bail is one of the most important civil rights issues of our time,” he wrote. “Donate what you can to the Bail X Fund. Let’s bring people home & let’s fight for freedom and equality.”

A donation tab was attached to the song’s music video, where it says nearly $44,000 has been raised for the Bail X Fund. The video has blown up on YouTube, racking up over 31 million views. It remains the number one trending video in music as of Monday morning. 

The song has likewise found success on Spotify, where it debuted at number two and eventually reached the number one spot.

See what others are saying: (Billboard) (NBC News) (A.V. Club)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Fire at Home Reportedly Owned by Beyoncé and Jay-Z Under Arson Investigation

Published

on

Officials said there were no injuries or evacuations during the fire, which was put out in around two hours.


Fire Breaks Out at Famed Couple’s Reported Residence

A Wednesday fire at a historic home in New Orleans, Louisiana believed to be owned by music titans Beyoncé and Jay-Z is being investigated as a possible arson. 

On Thursday, a New Orleans Police Department spokesperson confirmed to multiple outlets that it had received a tip about a suspicious person in the area. Further details about the suspicious person and the cause of the fire have not been revealed.

Neighbors told local media that there is an unlocked gate on the property that outsiders sometimes use to gain entry.

Officials told The New York Post that it took 22 firefighters over two hours to extinguish the blaze, with no reported injuries or evacuations. The extent of the damage currently remains unclear, but a spokesperson told The Post that given the age of the residence, the situation could have been far more severe. 

“If [the firefighters] didn’t get there when they did, it could have been much worse,” the spokesperson said. “It’s a historic home.”

About the Home

The building was first built in the Garden District neighborhood of the city in the 1920s as a church. It was later used as a ballet school and then became a high-end residence in 2000. Realtor.com says it is currently valued at $3 million.

The home was purchased in 2015 by Sugarcane Parkin LLC. According to The Washington Post, this company has the same registered address as other entities owned by Beyoncé. Sugarcane Parkin is also allegedly managed by Beyoncé’s mother, Celestine Lawson, better known as Tina Knowles.

Representatives for the “Lemonade” singer and her husband have not issued any public statements about the incident, nor have they confirmed that the home is owned by the couple. 

In March of this year, storage units in Los Angeles belonging to Beyonce were burglarized. According to TMZ, over a million dollars of goods were stolen, including expensive dresses and handbags.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Post) (NOLA)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Cleveland’s Baseball Team Changes Name From Indians to Guardians

Published

on

The move marks the team’s first name change since 1915, and it comes after decades of criticism from Native Americans. 


Name Change Announced

Cleveland’s Major League Baseball team said Friday that it will change its name after the 2021 season from the Indians to the Guardians.

The team announced the name change with a just over two-minute video narrated by actor Tom Hanks.

“You see, there’s always been a Cleveland — that’s the best part of our name,” Hanks says in the clip. “And now it’s time to unite as one family, one community, to build the next era for this team and this city.”

This marks the team’s first name change since 1915, and it comes after decades of criticism from Native Americans. 

Despite long-running calls to change racist and offensive team names — including the Washington Redskins — such campaigns did not gain significant momentum until the nationwide racial reckoning that followed the murder of George Floyd.

Why Guardians?

Officials behind the Cleveland team first pledged to change the name last year and previously removed the “Chief Wahoo” logo, a caricature of a Native American character, from its uniforms following the 2018 season.

It toyed with several options before ultimately landing on Guardians, which draws from Cleveland’s architectural history. 

“We are excited to usher in the next era of the deep history of baseball in Cleveland,” team owner and chairman Paul Dolan said in a news release. 

“Cleveland has and always will be the most important part of our identity. Therefore, we wanted a name that strongly represents the pride, resiliency and loyalty of Clevelanders.”

“‘Guardians’ reflects those attributes that define us while drawing on the iconic Guardians of Traffic just outside the ballpark on the Hope Memorial Bridge. It brings to life the pride Clevelanders take in our city and the way we fight together for all who choose to be part of the Cleveland baseball family. While ‘Indians’ will always be a part of our history, our new name will help unify our fans and city as we are all Cleveland Guardians.”

Guardians will be the fifth name in franchise history, joining Blues (1901), Bronchos (1902), Naps (1903-14), and Indians (1915-2021).

See what others are saying:(ESPN)(Axios) (Cleveland)

Continue Reading