Connect with us

Entertainment

Christopher Nolan’s “Tenet” Delayed Again, Could Pose Major Implications for Hollywood

Published

on

  • Christopher Nolan’s “Tenet” has been delayed for the third time, but Warner Brothers did not give a new concrete release date for the film this time around.
  • Hollywood has been banking on “Tenet” to be the first major blockbuster to bring audiences back to theaters since the pandemic forced them to close, so its indefinite delay has far-reaching implications.
  • Warner Brothers could potentially release the film overseas before releasing it in the U.S., then open it in safer states first, and stagger the release throughout the country. However, doing so could pose major financial risks.
  • Still, organizations like the National Association of Theater Owners believe new movies need to release no matter how small audiences are right now if the box office wants to have a fighting chance. 

“Tenet” Delayed

Very little is known about Christopher Nolan’s “Tenet.” Its plot has been kept a tightlipped secret and even the names of its lead characters are concealed. Now, its most consequential mystery is its release date. 

“Tenet” was initially supposed to be one of the summer’s biggest blockbusters with a July 17 release date. Coronavirus concerns pushed that back to July 31, then later to August 12. On Monday, Warner Brothers said the $200 million action-thriller is being pushed back even further, but declined to give a concrete date. 

This delay is more than just a bummer for Nolan fans and sci-fi enthusiasts. It increases the already high levels of uncertainty movie theaters are struggling with right now. “Tenet” was going to be the first major blockbuster to hit theaters since the coronavirus pandemic shut moviegoing down. Along with “Mulan,” Hollywood hoped it would bring audiences back to the cinema. Now, theaters only have the hope of “Mulan” to hang onto, and it is almost inevitable that its August 21 release date gets another bump. 

Implications and International Release Potential

Warner Brothers may have to travel off the beaten path when it comes to their release strategy for the Robert Pattinson and John David Washington starring picture. “Tenet” could make its theatrical debut overseas, where the virus is more controlled and where some theaters are open, well before American audiences get the chance to see it. Several countries in Europe and Asia are already letting people back in theaters, and it has been a long time since they had a big new Hollywood film to screen, meaning there could be an international appetite for the film.

“Our goals throughout this process have been to ensure the highest odds of success for our films while also being ready to support our theater partners with new content as soon as they could safely reopen,” Warner Brothers Picture Group chairman Toby Emmerich said in a statement. “We are not treating ‘Tenet’ like a traditional global day-and-date release, and our upcoming marketing and distribution plans will reflect that.”

Many believe that this means the movie will not only release in certain countries first, but perhaps even certain parts of the United States could get it sooner as well. This, however, could present major issues. Cities like Los Angeles and New York, which are the biggest box office contributors in the country, currently do not have public plans for theaters to open back up. It would be a major financial risk to release a film knowing it could not go to those cities. 

Coming from the mind of Nolan, “Tenet” is also bound to have twists and turns that could get easily spoiled if its release date is staggered throughout the world. Some countries or states could give away key details before other audiences even get the chance to see it, something that not only knocks the impact of the film, but the appeal for filmgoers to go to the theaters to see it as well. 

Theater Owners Want to Open

Despite the clear financial risks, John Fithian, the head of the National Association of Theatre Owners, told Variety that studios need to release what they have no matter the circumstances.

“Distributors should stick with their dates and release their movies because there’s no guarantee that more markets will be open later this year,” he said in a Q&A. “Until there’s a vaccine that’s widely available, there will not be 100% of the markets open. Because of that, films should be released in markets where it is safe and legal to release them and that’s about 85% of markets in the U.S. and even more globally. They should release their movies and deal with this new normal.”

Still, releasing films to scattered markets is easier said than done. No studio wants their movie to be the guinea pig that tests how successful a film can be during a pandemic. Warner Brothers would rather see how “Mulan” does before they play “Tenet,” and likewise, Disney would like to see how “Tenet” fairs before it releases “Mulan.”

But someone has to be first, and it all comes down to how studios think they can safely take that jump. Much of this hangs on when theaters open, which is also far from a sure thing. Chains like AMC said they would open in mid-July, but after “Tenet” and “Mulan” moved to August, they went to late July. Now, with California theaters ordered to close, Los Angeles on the verge of another lockdown, case spikes in several states, and “Tenet” delayed once more, it would hardly be surprising if these chains pushed their openings back yet again. Hollywood then ends up in a rampant cycle of theaters delaying their openings based on film release dates, and films then delaying their release dates based on theater openings. 

Fithian told the Los Angeles Times that the consequences of this could be severe. 

“This is existential for the movie theater industry. If we go a year without new movies, it’s over,” he said.

The timing of this pandemic’s hit lines perfectly with the summer box office season, only makes matters worse. According to the Times, this season usually accounts for 40% of ticket sales, and the North American box office will fall around 61% from last year. 

While some movie theaters are open to play classics and drive ins are making something of a comeback, many owners just don’t think this will be sustainable. 

“You can only have so many showings of ‘Jurassic Park’ and ‘Harry Potter.’ At the end of the day, our livelihood is new movies,” Classic Cinemas CEO Chris Johnson told the Times. “We’re going to make sure the new releases are set in stone before we get excited.”

So far, neither Disney nor movie theater chains have made a knee-jerk announcement following the indefinite delay of “Tenet.” This could be an optimistic sign for entertainment, but during this pandemic, last-minute changes have become the norm.

See what others are saying: (Variety) (Los Angeles Times) (IndieWire)

Entertainment

Andrew Tate to Remain in Romanian Detention After Losing Appeal

Published

on

The controversial influencer, accused of sex trafficking and organized crime, has maintained his innocence. 


Appeal Rejected

A Romanian court on Wednesday upheld a judge’s decision to extend influencer Andrew Tate’s arrest another 30 days.

The judge initially tacked the extra time onto his detention on Jan. 20. According to BBC News, the judge cited “the capacity…of the defendants to exercise permanent psychological control over the victims, including by resorting to constant acts of violence”.

Tate appealed that decision alongside his brother and two others, all of whom were arrested as part of an ongoing sex trafficking and organized crime investigation. The court’s Wednesday decision rejected that appeal, meaning Tate and the other accused individuals will remain in custody until at least Feb. 27. 

Investigators claim that Tate lured victims under the guise of a romantic relationship, only to place them under surveillance and force them to make pornographic content. Tate has denied the accusations. 

“You know I’m innocent,” Tate said to reporters Wednesday morning while walking into the courtroom.

“Ask them for evidence and they will give you none,” he added while leaving court. “Because it doesn’t exist. You’ll find out the truth of this case soon.” 

Tate’s Controversial Online Presence

Ever since December his arrest, Tate’s Twitter account has continued to post sometimes cryptic messages about the investigation into him. 

“Would your life be fine without you?” he tweeted on Tuesday, one day before his appeal was rejected. “In Romania. They can steal your life without a trial. They do not need evidence, In this system, innocent men return to ruined lives. My life outside is fine. But for most men, 6 months detained and their whole life will crumble.”

Tate is a controversial online figure famous for spreading violent misogyny to his often young male followers. He has been banned by a number of social media platforms for his drastic remarks, including one where he said rape victims should “bear responsibility” for the assault they endured. 

Tate and his brother recently added high-profile lawyer Tina Glandian to their defense team. Glandian has previously represented celebrities like Chris Brown, Jussie Smollett, and Kesha. 

On Wednesday, she said there is a “lack of evidence against the Tate brothers.”

“So far the system has failed,” she said, via the Associated Press.

See what others are saying: (BBC News) (The Associated Press) (Rolling Stone)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

QTCinderalla Vows to Sue Deepfake Website: “Constant Objectification” is “Exhausting”

Published

on

The streamer said that anyone who chooses to view nonconsensual deepfake porn is “the problem.”


QTCinderella Plans Legal Action

Twitch streamer QTCinderalla said during a Monday stream that she is going to sue the maker of a website that hosts explicit deepfake images of herself and other content creators. 

“I promise you, with every part of my fucking soul, I am going to sue you,” QTCinderella, whose real name is Blaire, said through tears. 

Blaire went live after fellow streamer Atrioc accidentally revealed on Twitch that he had an open tab to a website that hosts deepfake porn. Graphic images of high-profile female streamers were visible his browser, and the website also includes deepfakes of more creators, including Blaire. 

Atrioc apologized for accessing deepfake images on a website that promotes explicit content of his female streaming colleagues. He claimed that he got “morbidly curious” and “clicked something” after falling down an artificial intelligence rabbit hole online. 

“It’s gross,” he said. “It’s gross and I’m sorry.” 

In the past, Blaire has talked about having to pay services thousands of dollars to remove graphic deepfake content that has been posted without her consent. Despite those efforts, it is an issue she still has to deal with on a regular basis. 

“Fuck the fucking Internet,” she said during her Monday stream. “Fuck the constant objectification and exploitation of women, it’s exhausting.”

“Fuck Atrioc for showing it to thousands of people,” she continued. “Fuck the people DMing me pictures of myself from that website.” 

The Objectification of Female Streamers

Blaire said that it “should not be a part of [her] job” to constantly fight for this content to be removed from the Internet, nor should it be her job to deal with the onslaught of harassment that comes with the dissemination of these fabricated images. 

“If you are able to look at women who are not selling themselves or benefiting off of being seen sexually — they’re not benefiting, they’re not selling it, they’re not platforming it themselves — if you are able to look at that, you are the problem,” she said. “You see women as an object.” 

On Twitter, she explained that the repercussions of these deepfakes go far beyond exploitation and violation. 

“The amount of body dysmorphia I’ve experienced since seeing those photos has ruined me,” she said. 

She was far from the only person to call out how invasive it is to post or consume deepfake content of people who did not consent to being depicted in a sexual manner. 

“Stop sexualizing people without their consent,” Pokimane, who is also among the female streamers featured on the site, said. “That’s it, that’s the tweet.”

No one should have themselves be put on a deepfake porn website w/o their consent and it’s fucking disgusting at the men who are making light of this shit. fucking despicable,” another person wrote.

See what others are saying: (Dexerto) (Metro) (The Gamer)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Britney Spears Asks For Privacy After Fans Called Cops to Conduct a Wellness Check on Her

Published

on

Fans said they were concerned after the singer deleted her Instagram account.

EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was updated to include a statement from Britney Spears


Fans Call 911

Britney Spears said her fans “went a little too far” after some called the police to conduct a wellness check on her. 

The fans, many fueled by online conspiracy theories, were concerned about Spears because she deleted her Instagram account. While this is something the singer has done multiple times in the past, her fans thought she had left secret signals in her last post suggesting she needed help.

Some even posted videos of them calling emergency services on TikTok, a platform that is full of conspiracy videos about Spears. 

“I love and adore my fans but this time things went a little too far and my privacy was invaded,” Spears wrote in a statement on Thursday, citing “prank phone calls” that were made to police.

According to Spears, officers did not enter her home because once they got to her gate, they “quickly realized there was no issue and left immediately.”

“This felt like I was being gaslit and bullied once the incident made it to the news and being portrayed once again in a poor and unfair light by the media,” Spears continued. “During this time in my life, I truly hope the public and my fans who I care so much about can respect my privacy moving forward.”

On Wednesday, a spokesperson for Ventura County Sheriff’s Office confirmed to Page Six that the department “did get calls into our dispatch” but added there was no reason to believe that Spears was “in any kind of harm or any kind of danger.”

That spokesperson declined to say if officials contacted Spears or conducted a wellness check, citing privacy and public trust issues.

The Prominence of Britney Spears Conspiracies 

Just over a year has passed since Spears was freed from a highly restrictive conservatorship that controlled her life and finances for 13 years. Throughout the conservatorship, fans tried to use the pop icon’s social media to pick up clues that she was secretly struggling. She did not publicly speak about the conservatorship until the summer of 2021. 

Now that she has her freedom, fans are still reading heavily into her posts. Some believe there are hidden messages in her captions and in the gestures she does while dancing. Others think she is dead, missing, or hiding and that a body double is being used in her posts. Some are so concerned that they are coordinating a mass effort to pressure the Los Angeles Times into investigating Spears’ whereabouts and safety. 

In the last several years, many have reflected on Spears’ early days in the spotlight and the cruel ways she was harassed and targeted by paparazzi, news outlets, and culture at large. Often the punchline to a joke throughout the 2000s, many now sympathize with Spears, who was forced to endure heavy public scrutiny at a young age. Documentaries like “Framing Britney Spears” prompted many to see Spears as a victim of abusive media tactics, not the “crazy” woman tabloids painted her to be. 

Many are now concerned that fans are only going to subject Spears to a new onslaught of harassment by calling the police to her house. Even if the conspiracy theories are technically well-intentioned and often come from a place of concern, some believe they will jumpstart a media frenzy that could harm Spears’ mental well-being.

See what others are saying: (Page Six) (Jezebel) (TMZ)

Continue Reading