Connect with us

U.S.

Feds Prepare to Deploy in Chicago as Oregon AG Sues Over Civil Rights Violations, Citing Kidnapping-Style Detainments

Published

on

  • The Chicago Tribune reported Monday that the Department of Homeland Security is planning to deploy roughly 150 federal agents in Chicago, Illinois this week, though the specifics of their duties is still unknown. 
  • The move comes after federal agents were deployed in Portland, Oregon, where they continually clashed with demonstrators protesting against racial inequality and police brutality.
  • There have also been reports of unmarked police detaining people in similarly unmarked vehicles. Because of that, Oregon’s attorney general has filed a lawsuit against the action.

DHS Presence in Chicago 

The Department of Homeland Security is planning to send around 150 federal agents into Chicago this week, according to The Chicago Tribune.

If true, the move would follow federal agents’ presence in Portland, Oregon, a city that has been the subject of nonstop massive protests for nearly two months. Those agents were first deployed following a June 26 executive order from President Donald Trump that seeks to protect federal monuments, statues, and memorials.

In Chicago, the scope of DHS is currently unknown. According to an anonymous Immigration and Customs Enforcement official, that deployment will include ICE agents; however, that official said those agents would not be involved in immigration or deportation matters as part of the deployment. 

Like Portland, Chicago has also been a grounds for massive protests since late May when George Floyd died in police custody. It’s also possible that federal agents won’t stop with just Portland or Chicago. 

In a leaked memo dated from July 16, DHS said, “Moving forward, if this type of response is going to be the norm, specialized training and standardized equipment should be deployed to responding agencies.” 

Oregon AG Files Lawsuit Alleging Civil Rights Violations 

On Friday, the Oregon Department of Justice announced in a letter that state Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum would soon be filing a lawsuit in response to accusations that people were being taken off the streets and put into vans by unmarked police officers.

The Oregon DOJ alleges that “federal authorities overstepp[ed] their powers and injur[ed] or threaten[ed] peaceful protesters on the streets of Downtown Portland.”

Later that same day, Rosenblum confirmed that she had filed that lawsuit. Notably, it was filed against a number of agencies, including DHS, Customs and Border Protection, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the Federal Protection Service. The lawsuit also lists 10 unidentified individuals as defendants.

“On information and belief, John Does 1-10 are employed by the United States government in a law enforcement capacity,” the lawsuit states. “They have made it impossible for them to be individually identified by carrying out law enforcement actions without wearing any identifying information, even so much as the agency that employs them.” 

Overall, Rosenblum accuses these agencies of engaging in unlawful law enforcement tactics that threaten the civil rights of people in Oregon.

“Federal law enforcement officers including John Does 1-10 have been using unmarked vehicles to drive around downtown Portland, detain protesters, and place them into the officers’ unmarked vehicles, removing them from public without either arresting them or stating the basis for an arrest, since at least Tuesday, July 14,” the lawsuit alleges. 

Specifically, the lawsuit references Mark Pettibone, a man who spoke to The Washington Post after claiming to have been confronted by men dressed in camouflage who then pushed him into an unmarked van on July 15. Pettibone was reportedly taken to the Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse where he was read his Miranda rights. 

Despite this, Pettibone has maintained that he was never told why he was arrested and that after he refused to speak to police without the presence of a lawyer, he was released without any paperwork, citation, or record of his arrest.

According to The Post, U.S. Customs and Border Protection later took responsibility for Pettibone’s detainment. 

The lawsuit goes on to allege that other citizens beside Pettibone have also been detained “without warning or explanation, without a warrant, and without providing any way to determine who is directing this action.” 

The lawsuit argues that these agencies are injuring citizens by taking away their ability to determine whether or not they’re being kidnapped or arrested. For example, if a person is kidnapped, they are legally allowed to engage in self-defense; however, if that person is arrested by police, they could be charged with resisting arrest for the same action. 

That’s why Rosenblum is asking for federal agents to be required to identify themselves and their agency before making an arrest. She is also asking for those agents to be required to give an explanation as to why they’re detaining someone for an arrest.

In addition to this lawsuit, the Oregon DOJ is also seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent federal authorities from unlawfully detaining people in the state.

Also on Friday, the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon filed a separate lawsuit against DHS and the U.S. Marshals Service in an attempt to block federal law enforcement from dispersing, arresting, threatening to arrest, or using physical force against journalists and legal observers.

“This is a fight to save our democracy,” Kelly Simon, the interim legal director of Oregon’s ACLU, said. “Under the direction of the Trump administration, federal agents are terrorizing the community, risking lives, and brutally attacking protesters demonstrating against police brutality. These federal agents must be stopped and removed from our city.”

The Legality of Federal Occupation

DHS was formed after the September 11, 2001, attacks, and since then, its job has mainly been to handle national security threats from abroad, as well as border security. Since Trump took office, it has largely carried out his immigration policies. 

However, with Portland, its presence has been more focused on law-and-order. 

For example, some of the agents deployed in Portland are part of a group known as BORTAC, Border Patrol’s equivalent of a SWAT team. Notably, it’s a highly trained group that is normally tasked with investigating drug smuggling organizations, as opposed to protesters in cities. As a result, city and state officials have raised questions about whether it’s overstepping local law enforcement.

“I don’t have authority to order federal officers to do things,” Portland’s Deputy Police Chief Chris Davis said. “It does complicate things for us.”

For his part, Trump has argued that he sent in federal agents because Portland police have failed to adequately respond to the protests. Despite that, the leaked internal DHS memo from Thursday states that those federal officers haven’t been trained in riot control or mass demonstrations.

A DHS spokesperson said on Sunday that the missions of these federal agents were “aligned with their appropriate training,” and that officers received “additional training for their deployment in the city” to assist the Federal Protective Service.

Still, that hasn’t convinced Democrats. In fact, Sunday, several House Democrats penned a letter to the inspectors general of the DOJ and DHS. In it, they called for an investigation “into the use of federal law enforcement agencies by the attorney general and the acting secretary of homeland security to suppress first amendment protected activities in Washington DC, Portland and other communities across the United States.”

Since then, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has denounced the Trump administration’s use of federal agents in Portland, saying, “We cannot give up liberty for security.”

See what others are saying: (The Chicago Tribune) (The Washington Post) (AP News)

U.S.

Florida School Says Students Vaccinated Against COVID-19 Must Stay Home for 30 Days

Published

on

The school falsely claimed that people who have just been vaccinated risk “shedding” the coronavirus and could infect others.


Centner Academy Vaccination Policy

A private school in Florida is now requiring all students who get vaccinated against COVID-19 to quarantine for 30 days before returning to class.

According to the local Miami outlet WSVN, Centner Academy wrote a letter to parents last week describing COVID vaccines as “experimental” and citing anti-vaccine misinformation.

“If you are considering the vaccine for your Centner Academy student(s), we ask that you hold off until the Summer when there will be time for the potential transmission or shedding onto others to decrease,” the letter reportedly stated.

“Because of the potential impact on other students and our school community, vaccinated students will need to stay at home for 30 days post-vaccination for each dose and booster they receive and may return to school after 30 days as long as the student is healthy and symptom-free.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has debunked the false claim that those newly vaccinated against COVID-19 can “shed” the virus.

According to the agency’s COVID myths page, vaccine shedding “can only occur when a vaccine contains a weakened version of the virus,” but “none of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19. This means that a COVID-19 vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19.”

In fact, early research has suggested that vaccinated people are less likely to spread the virus than unvaccinated people.

Beyond that, unvaccinated people are more likely to spread COVID in general because they are much more likely to get the virus than vaccinated people. According to recently published CDC data, as of August, unvaccinated people were six times more likely to get COVID than vaccinated people and 11 times more likely to die from the virus.

Centner Academy Continues Spread of Misinformation

In a statement to The Washington Post Monday, Centner Academy co-founder David Centner doubled down on the school’s new policy, which he described as a “precautionary measure” based on “numerous anecdotal cases that have been in circulation.”

“The school is not opining as to whether unexplained phenomena have a basis in fact, however we prefer to err on the side of caution when making decisions that impact the health of the school community,” he added.

The new rule echoes similar efforts Centner Academy has made that run counter to public health guidance and scientific knowledge.

In April, the school made headlines when its leadership told vaccinated school employees that they were not allowed to be in contact with any students “until more information is known” and encouraged employees to wait until summer to get the jab.

According to The New York Times, the following week, a math and science teacher allegedly told students not to hug their vaccinated parents for more than five seconds.

The outlet also reported that the school’s other co-founder, Leila Centner, discouraged masking, but when state health officials came for routine inspections, teachers said they were directed in a WhatsApp group to put masks on.

See what others are saying: (WSVN) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Katie Couric Says She Edited Ruth Bader Ginsburg Quote About Athletes Kneeling During National Anthem

Published

on

Couric said she omitted part of a 2016 interview in order to “protect” the justice.


Kate Couric Edited Quote From Justice Ginsburg

In her upcoming book, journalist Katie Couric admitted to editing a quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in 2016 in order to “protect” Ginsberg from potential criticism. 

Couric interviewed the late justice for an article in Yahoo News. During their discussion, she asked Ginsburg about her thoughts on athletes like Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem to protest racial inequality.

“I think it’s really dumb of them,” Ginsburg is quoted saying in the piece. “Would I arrest them for doing it? No. I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it. I would point out how ridiculous it seems to me to do such an act.”

According to The Daily Mail and The New York Post, which obtained advance copies of Couric’s book “Going There,” there was more to Ginsburg’s response. Couric wrote that she omitted a portion where Ginsburg said the form of protest showed a “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life…Which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.

Couric Says She Lost Sleep Making Choice

“As they became older they realize that this was youthful folly,” Ginsberg reportedly continued. “And that’s why education is important.

According to The Daily Mail, Couric wrote that the Supreme Court’s head of public affairs sent an email asking to remove comments about kneeling because Ginsburg had misspoken. Couric reportedly added that she felt a need to “protect” the justice, thinking she may not have understood the question. Couric reached out to her friend, New York Times reporter David Brooks, regarding the matter and he allegedly likewise believed she may have been confused by the subject. 

Couric also wrote that she was a “big RBG fan” and felt her comments were “unworthy of a crusader for equality.” Because she knew the remarks could land Ginsburg in hot water, she said she “lost a lot of sleep” and felt “conflicted” about whether or not to edit them out. 

Couric was trending on Twitter Wednesday and Thursday as people questioned the ethics behind her choice to ultimately cut part of the quote. Some thought the move showed a lack of journalistic integrity while others thought revealing the story now harmed Ginsburg’s legacy.

See what others are saying: (New York Post) (The Daily Mail) (Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Biden Administration Orders ICE To Halt Workplace Raids

Published

on

The Department of Homeland Security will now focus on targeting employers who exploit undocumented workers, instead of carrying out raids that dissuade those workers from reporting labor violations.


DHS Reverses Worksite Raid Policy

The Biden administration announced Tuesday that it was ordering Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to stop workplace raids.

The move marks a reversal from Trump administration policies that have been strongly criticized by immigration activists who argue the efforts created fear in immigrant communities and dissuaded them from reporting labor violations or exploitative employment practices.

In addition to stopping the raids, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a memo that the administration will refocus enforcement efforts to instead target “employers who exploit unauthorized workers, conduct illegal activities or impose unsafe working conditions.” 

Mayorkas added that the immigration agencies housed in DHS will have the next 60 days to identify harmful existing policies and come up with new ones that provide better deportation protections for workers who report their employers.

In the Tuesday memo, the secretary argued that shift of focus will “reduce the demand for illegal employment by delivering more severe consequences to exploitative employers” and “increase the willingness of workers to report violations of law by exploitative employers and cooperate in employment and labor standards investigation.”

Labor Market Implications

The new policy comes at a time when the U.S. is experiencing a critical labor shortage, including in many sectors that rely on immigrant labor.

Some companies that use undocumented workers pay them wages that are far below the market rate, which is not only exploitative but also undercuts competitors.

According to Mayorkas, the pivot to employer-based enforcement will help protect American businesses.

“By exploiting undocumented workers and paying them substandard wages, the unscrupulous employers create an unfair labor market,” he said in the memo. “They also unfairly drive down their costs and disadvantage their business competitors who abide by the law.”

It is currently unclear how effective the new efforts will be, but historical precedent does not paint an optimistic picture.

The Biden administration’s efforts closely mirror a similar move by the Obama administration, which attempted to reverse workplace raids authorized under President George W. Bush by targetting those who employ undocumented workers rather than the workers themselves.

That effort, however, still led to thousands of undocumented workers being fired.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (ABC News)

Continue Reading