Connect with us

U.S.

IRS Sent Over $1 Billion in Stimulus Checks to Deceased Americans

Published

on

  • A report from the Government Accountability Office said that the IRS and Treasury Department gave $1.4 billion in stimulus checks to deceased people.
  • Several checks have also been issued to incarcerated Americans, and the IRS is requesting that those be returned, though many are questioning their authority to do this because the CARES Act never specifically stated that incarcerated people were ineligible.
  • This comes amid debate over a potential second round of stimulus checks, which President Donald Trump has reportedly said he supports.
  • However, not everyone in his circle agrees with him. In May, the House passed the HEROES Act, which would give a second round of checks out, but many believe Republicans in the Senate will not be interested.

Checks Go to Deceased Americans 

As many Americans say they still haven’t received their stimulus checks, a Government Accountability Office report revealed Thursday that around $1.4 billion dollars in stimulus payments made their way to deceased Americans

The GAO’s report claimed that by April 30, 1.1 million payments totaling the hefty $1.4 billion had been sent. The Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department typically use data like death records from the Social Security Administration to prevent fraud, but allegedly did not use death records to stop payments when they started sending the first batches of checks.

“[The] IRS working group charged with administering the payments first raised questions with Treasury officials about payments to decedents in late March as Congress was drafting legislation,” the GAO report said.

“IRS counsel subsequently determined that IRS did not have the legal authority to deny payments to those who filed a return for 2019, even if they were deceased at the time of payment.” 

Back in March, Congress passed the CARES Act to boost the country and its economy as it first began to grapple with the coronavirus pandemic. As part of the legislation, individuals with an income under $75,000 would receive a $1,200 check. Married couples who filed their taxes together and had a combined income under $150,000 would receive $2,400 and $500 for each eligible child.

The IRS’s website says that checks issued to someone who has died should be returned, however, they do not have a plan in place to ensure all these checks come back to them.

Checks Issued to Incarcerated People

These are not the only checks that may have been sent in error. The IRS is looking to get back stimulus money it sent to incarcerated Americans. It is unclear exactly how much many has been sent to inmates. According to TIME, The Kansas Department of Correction has intercepted over $200,000 so far, while Idaho and Montana combined have intercepted around $90,000. Not all states are releasing that data, though. 

Whether or not the IRS can legally demand to get that money back is subject to debate. The IRS claims that incarcerated people are not eligible for stimulus checks, saying it is being consistent with Social Security policies. However, others believe that inmates should be eligible because the CARES Act did not specifically exclude incarcerated people in its language. 

“I think it’s really disingenuous of the IRS,” tax attorney Kelly Erb told TIME. “It’s not a rule just because the IRS puts it on the website. In fact, the IRS actually says that stuff on its website isn’t legal authority. So there’s no actual rule — it’s just guidance — and that guidance can change at any time.”

On top of this, while substantial amounts of checks have made their way to unintended places, as of June 8, 35 million stimulus checks had yet to be issued. As for why many checks are sitting in limbo, in some cases the IRS is struggling to obtain peoples’ information. A large population of Americans living outside of the U.S. are also waiting to receive their payments. 

Possibility of Second Check

All of this comes as talks for a second round of stimulus checks are on the table, though far from set in stone. President Donald Trump has stated his support for them, per a Tuesday report by the Washington Post. According to the Post, Trump sees them as not just beneficial to the economy, but also to his reelection efforts come November.

Others in his circle have been less eager. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin has stated that any upcoming stimulus efforts should focus more on jobs. White House Economic Advisor Larry Kudlow told Fox Business that whatever comes next should “target those folks who lost their jobs and are most in need,” rather than all Americans. 

The odds of all Americans receiving another check are still unknown. In May, when the House passed a $3 trillion coronavirus relief bill called the HEROES act. That legislation included money for state, local and tribal governments, as well as hazard pay for workers, money for testing and more. It also included another round of direct payments to individuals of up to $6,000 per family, in some cases focused on including those who may have been excluded from the first payments. 

Those payments would again be $1,200 checks with the same income threshold, but this time around dependents would also get a $1,200 check. However, the Senate still needs to look it over, and Republicans are not as interested in the HEROES Act as Democrats are. The White House previously threatened to veto it.

The Senate is expected to start discussing what another stimulus package would look like in July. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said last month that he anticipates that this upcoming stimulus package will be the last. He also has generally opposed the HEROES Act, as well as extending the extra $600 those on unemployment are receiving, which is set to expire in July. 

See what others are saying: (NPR) (Forbes) (NBC)

U.S.

Derek Chauvin and 3 Others Ex-Officers Indicted on Civil Rights Charges Over George Floyd’s Death

Published

on

  • The Justice Department filed federal criminal charges Friday against Derek Chauvin and three other former Minneapolis police officers after a grand jury indicted them for violating the civil rights of George Floyd.
  • The indictment charges Chauvin, J. Alexander Kueng, and Tou Thao for violating Floyd’s right to be free from unreasonable seizure and unreasonable force. All three, as well as Thomas Lane, were also charged with failing to provide medical care to Floyd. 
  • Chauvin was additionally hit with two counts in a separate indictment, which claims he violated the civil rights of a 14-year-old boy who he allegedly held by the neck and repeatedly beat with a flashlight during a 2017 arrest.
  • Chauvin was already convicted last month of murder and manslaughter over Floyd’s death, which Kueng, Lane, and Thao were previously charged for allegedly aiding and abetting.

Former Minneapolis Officers Hit With Federal Charges

A federal grand jury indicted Derek Chauvin and three other former Minneapolis police officers for violating George Floyd’s civil rights during the arrest that lead to his death last summer, the Justice Department announced Friday.

Chauvin, specifically, was charged with violating Floyd’s right to be free from unreasonable seizure and unreasonable force by a police officer. Ex-officers J. Alexander Kueng and Tou Thao were indicted for willfully failing to intervene in Chauvin’s unreasonable use of force.

All three men, as well as former officer Thomas Lane, face charges for failing to provide medical care to Floyd, “thereby acting with deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of harm to Floyd,” according to the indictment.

In a second, separate indictment, Chauvin was hit with two counts of civil rights violations related to the arrest of a 14-year-old boy in September 2017. During that incident, Chauvin allegedly held the boy by the neck and hit him with a flashlight repeatedly.

The announcement, which follows a months-long investigation by the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, comes just over two weeks after Chauvin was found guilty of three state charges of murder and manslaughter in Floyd’s death.

He is currently awaiting his June 25 sentencing in a maximum-security prison.

State-Level Charges

Kueng, Lane, and Thao all face state charges of aiding and abetting second-degree murder and manslaughter.

Kueng and Lane were the first officers to responded to a call from a convenience store employee who claimed that Floyd used a counterfeit $20 bill. Body camera footage showed Floyd sitting in the car and Lane drawing his gun as the officers ordered him out and handcuffed him. 

Floyd can be heard pleading with the officers not to shoot him.

Shortly after, Chauvin and Thao arrived, and the footage shows Chauvin joining the other officers in their attempt to put Floyd into the back of a police car. In the struggle, the officers forced Floyd to the ground, with Chauvin kneeling on his neck while Kueng and Lane held his back and legs. 

Meanwhile, in cellphone footage taken at the scene, Thao can be seen ordering bystanders to stay away, and later preventing a Minneapolis firefighter from giving Floyd medical aid.

Their trial is set to begin in late August, and all three are free on bond. The new federal charges, however, will likely be more difficult to prove.

According to legal experts, prosecutors will have to show beyond reasonable doubt that the officers knew that they were depriving Floyd of his constitutional rights but continued to do so anyway.

The high legal standard is also hard to establish, as officers can easily claim they acted out of fear or even poor judgment.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (The Associated Press)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Caitlyn Jenner Says Her Friends Are Fleeing California Because of the Homeless Population

Published

on

  • California gubernatorial candidate Caitlyn Jenner sparked outrage after an interview with Sean Hannity on Wednesday that was filmed from her Malibu airplane hangar. 
  • “My friends are leaving California,” she said. “My hangar, the guy right across, he was packing up his hangar and I said, ‘Where are you going?’ And he says, ‘I’m moving to Sedona, Arizona. I can’t take it anymore. I can’t walk down the streets and see the homeless.’”
  • Many criticized Jenner for sounding out of touch and unsympathetic to real issues in California and suggested that she prioritize helping the homeless population rather than incredibly wealthy state residents.

Caitlyn Jenner’s Remarks

California gubernatorial candidate Caitlyn Jenner sparked outrage on Wednesday after suggesting that wealthy people are fleeing the state because of its homeless population.

Jenner sat down for an interview in her Malibu airplane hangar with Fox News’ Sean Hannity. Jenner is one of the handful of Republicans aiming to unseat current Governor Gavin Newsom in a recall election in the fall. While polls show that most Californians do not support recalling Newsom, the conservative-led movement to do so gained enough signatures to land on the ballot.

“My friends are leaving California,” Jenner claimed during the interview. “My hangar, the guy right across, he was packing up his hangar and I said, ‘where are you going?’ And he says, ‘I’m moving to Sedona, Arizona, I can’t take it anymore. I can’t walk down the streets and see the homeless.’” 

“I don’t want to leave,” she continued. “Either I stay and fight, or I get out of here.”

Jenner’s Remarks Prompt Backlash

Her remarks were criticized online by people who thought Jenner sounded unsympathetic and out of touch to the real issues in the state. Many found it hypocritical that Jenner has slammed Newsom for being elite but was so concerned for wealthy people who don’t like having to see unhoused residents on the street.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Ca.) called Jenner out on Twitter for seemingly fighting for a small percentage of Californians. 

Unlike you, Dems are focused on the 99% of people who don’t own planes or hangars,” he wrote. “And you know what’s going to help reduce homelessness? The #AmericanRescuePlan, which your party opposed.”

Others suggested she prioritize directly addressing the homeless situation.

“If you don’t like the homeless situation, instead of hiding in your PRIVATE PLANE HANGAR, your campaign should be about helping them,” actress Merrin Dungey said. “They don’t like their situation either. Your lifelong privilege is showing. It’s not a good color.”

Jenner, an Olympic gold medalist and reality star, is one of the most prominent transgender Americans. Because homelessness is such a common issue within the trans community, some were frustrated she was not using her campaign to fix the situation, and rather used it to complain about how it impacted her wealthy friends. 

See what others are saying: (The Hill) (Politico) (Washington Post)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Derek Chauvin Seeks New Trial In George Floyd Murder Case

Published

on

  • A lawyer for Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer who was convicted of murdering George Floyd, filed a motion Tuesday for a new trial.
  • Among other complaints about Chauvin’s conviction, the attorney cited “prosecutorial and jury misconduct; errors of law at trial; and a verdict that is contrary to law.”
  • He also claimed the court “abused its discretion” by not granting a change of venue or sequestering the jury for the duration of the trial, arguing that publicity before and during it threatened its fairness. 
  • John Stiles, deputy chief of staff for Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, told CNN, “The court has already rejected many of these arguments and the State will vigorously oppose them.”

Derek Chauvin’s Attorney Files Motion for New Trial

Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is officially asking for a new trial, hoping to overturn his conviction for the murder of George Floyd.

His attorney, Eric Nelson, filed court paperwork Tuesday laying out a number of errors he believes were made during Chauvin’s legal proceedings that violated his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. Nelson cited alleged issues, including, “prosecutorial and jury misconduct; errors of law at trial; and a verdict that is contrary to law.”

The filing did not cite any specific examples of jury misconduct, but Nelson also argued that the court “abused its discretion” by not granting a change of venue or sequestering the jury for the duration of the trial.

The court proceedings took place in the same city where Floyd was killed and where protesters drew national attention by calling for justice in his name. As a result, Nelson claimed that publicity before and during the trial threatened its fairness. He also argued that a defense expert witness was intimidated after he testified, but before the jury deliberated.

His filing asks for a hearing to impeach the guilty verdict, in part, on the grounds that the 12 jurors “felt threatened or intimidated, felt race-based pressure during the proceedings, and/or failed to adhere to instructions during deliberations.”

It’s unclear exactly what will come of this request, but John Stiles, deputy chief of staff for Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, told CNN, “The court has already rejected many of these arguments and the State will vigorously oppose them.”

For instance, a judge previously denied Chauvin’s request to move the trial in March, saying, “I don’t think there’s any place in the state of Minnesota that has not been subjected to extreme amounts of publicity on this case.”

See what others are saying: (CNN) (NPR) (CBS)

Continue Reading