Connect with us

Industry

Bon Appétit’s Editor in Chief Resigns After Brownface Photo Sets Off Discrimination Complaints

Published

on

  • The Editor in Chief of Bon Appétit, Adam Rapoport, resigned after a photo of him in brownface resurfaced, and staff members spoke out about diversity issues at the magazine. 
  • Assistant Editor Sohla El-Waylly said she was underpaid to be an assistant editor to white editors who had less experience than her.
  • She also said that white editors are paid for their video appearances on Bon Appétit’s YouTube Channel, but editors of color are not. 
  • While Bon Appétit has denied the video compensation claim, many Bon Appétit staff members pledged not to film content for the outlet until substantial change are made at the publication.

Editor in Chief Resigns

Bon Appétit’s Editor in Chief Adam Rapoport resigned Monday after a photo of him in brownface resurfaced on Twitter, prompting staff members to speak out against discrimination at the publication. 

“I am stepping down as editor in chief of Bon Appétit to reflect on the work that I need to do as a human being and to allow Bon Appétit to get to a better place,” Rapoport said in a statement on Instagram. “From an extremely ill-conceived Halloween costume 16 years ago to my blind spots as an editor, I’ve not championed an inclusive vision.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/CBMT4rVg0H4/

[The staff and readers] all deserve better. The staff has been working hard to evolve the brand in a positive, more diverse direction,” he added.

A photo of Rapoport in brownface for a halloween costume made its way around Twitter on Monday.

This came a few days after the magazine was called out by Puerto Rican food writer Illyanna Maisonet for not including diverse cuisine, particularly Puerto Rican. She tweeted that a pitch of her’s was rejected and a European inspired dish was instead published. This prompted an online discussion about the magazine’s general lack of diverse recipes, especially after Maisonet shared DMs sent to her by Rapoport, where he said the outlet was sticking to something “accessible.”

Staff Members Speak Out

Bon Appétit, which is owned by Condé Nast, boasts a strong readership in its print and digital magazine and has a strong presence on Youtube. Its channel, where staff members appear in videos testing recipes, has 6 million subscribers.

Once the photo was shared, many Bon Appétit staff members spoke out against Rapoport and shared their stories of discrimination at the company. 

“I am angry and disgusted by the photo of @rapoport in brown face. I have asked for his resignation,” assistant editor Sohla El-Waylly said on her Instagram story. “This is just a symptom of the systematic racism that runs rampant within the Condé Nast as a whole.”

El-Waylly claimed that she is paid $50,000 to be an assistant editor to mainly white editors with less experience than her. She claimed that she is pushed to appear in the popular videos on Bon Appétit’s YouTube channel as a “display of diversity.”

In reality, currently only white ediors are paid for their video appearances. None of the people of color have been compensated,” she claimed. 

A spokesperson for Bon Appétit denied the allegations that people of color were not compensated to the Washington Post.

“It would be inaccurate to report that only white people were paid for video appearances,” she said. “We have a zero-tolerance policy toward discrimination and harassment in any forms. We go to great lengths to ensure that employees are paid fairly, in accordance with their roles and experience, across the entire company.”

Still, many other members of the Bon Appétit staff joined in on condemning Rapoport and sharing their experiences. Contributor Priya Krishna, who often appears on Bon Appétit’s YouTube channel, shared the photo on her Twitter, saying it “erases the work the BIPOC (Black, Indigenous People of Color) on staff have long been doing, behind the scenes.”

Former staff photographer Alex Lau claimed he left the company because of its diversity issues.

“I left BA for multiple reasons, but one of the main reasons was that white leadership refused to make changes that my BIPOC coworkers and I constantly pushed for,” he said on Twitter. 

“What made me want to leave was when I saw that year after year, I was only shooting asian and white chefs,” he continued. “As an asian american, it is NOT enough to shoot asian restaurants and call it a day. Asians are no longer marginalized in the restaurant/food industry, as much as BA would like to think that.”

He claimed he urged the magazine to do pieces on African cuisine, but that they often pushed those suggestions aside by claiming the recipes were complicated and that readers would not want to make them.

YouTube Personalities Vow to Not Make New Content

Personalities from Bon Appétit’s YouTube channel quickly spoke out against the photo as well. 

“I will fight to foster equality and justice in our workplace and recognize that as a white person I have personally benefited from our flawed system,” wrote Senior food editor Molly Baz. “I will do better for all the staffers at Bon Appétit magazine who haven’t had that privilege.”

She then pledged to not appear in any Bon Appétit videos until her BIPOC colleagues received equal pay. She encouraged her other co-workers to join her. 

Many others did, including Alex Delany and Chris Morocco, who shared Baz’s post expressing their support. Claire Saffitz also said she asked the magazine to not air any of the videos she has already made, and said she will not film any more until there is progress made. 

“I also acknowledge my implicit acceptance of the status quo at Bon Appetit Magazine, and therefore my participation in maintaining it,” she wrote. “I am calling for change.”

Other personalities like Andy Baraghani, Carla Lalli Music, and Brad Leone also supported this movement. 

“I want my BIPOC colleagues to know that I support them. Everyone should be fairly compensated and respected for their work,” Leone wrote on Instagram. 

“I am working towards being a better agent for change and hold Condé Nast to the same standard.” he added.

See what others are saying: (Washington Post) (USA Today) (NPR)

Industry

Jake Paul Launches Anti-Bullying Charity

Published

on

The charity, called Boxing Bullies, aims to use the sport to give kids confidence and courage.


Jake Paul Launches Boxing Bullies Foundation

YouTuber Jake Paul — best known as the platform’s boxer, wreckless partier, and general troublemaker — has seemingly launched a non-profit to combat bullying.  

The charity is called Boxing Bullies. According to a mission statement posted on Instagram, it aims to “instill self confidence, leadership, and courage within the youth through the sport of boxing while using our platform, voice, and social media to fight back against bullying.”

If the notion of a Paul-founded anti-bullying charity called “Boxing Bullies” was not already begging to be compared to former First Lady Melania Trump’s “Best Best” initiative, maybe the group’s “Boxing Bullies Commandments” will help connect the dots. Those commandments use an acronym for the word “BOX” to spell out the charity’s golden rules.

Be kind to everyone; Only defend, never initiate; X-out bullying.” 

Paul Hopes To “Inspire” Kids To Stand Up For Themselves

Paul first said he was launching Boxing Bullies during a July 13 interview following a press conference for his upcoming fight against Tyron Woodley.

“I know who I am at the end of the day, which is a good person,” he told reporters. “I’m trying to change this sport, bring more eyeballs. I’m trying to support other fighters, increase fighter pay. I’m starting my charity, I’m launching that in 12 days here called Boxing Bullies and we’re helping to fight against cyberbullying.”

It has not been quite 12 days since the interview, so it’s likely that more information about the organization will be coming soon. Currently, the group has been the most active on Instagram, where it boasts a following of just around 1,200 followers. It has posted once to Twitter, where it has 32 followers; and has a TikTok account that has yet to publish any content. It also has a website, though there is not too much on it as of yet.

On its Instagram, one post introducing Paul as the founder claims the rowdy YouTuber started this charity because he has been on the receiving end of bullying.

Having been a victim of bullying himself, Jake experienced firsthand the impact it has on a person’s life,” the post says. “Jake believes that this is a prevailing issue in society that isn’t talked about enough. Boxing gave Jake the confidence to not care about what others think and he wants to share the sport and the welfare it‘s had on him with as many kids as possible.”

It adds that he hopes his group can“inspire the next generation of kids to be leaders, be athletes, and to fight back against bullying.”

Paul Previously Accused of Being a Bully

While fighting against bullying is a noble cause, it is an ironic project for Paul to start, as he has faced no shortage of bullying accusations. While Paul previously sang about “stopping kids from getting bullied” in the lunchroom, some have alleged he himself was actually a classic high school bully who threw kids’ backpacks into garbage cans. 

This behavior allegedly continued into his adulthood, as a New York Times report from earlier this year claimed he ran his Team 10 house with a culture of toxicity and bullying. Among other things, sources said he involved others in violent pranks, pressured people into doing dangerous stunts, and destroyed peoples’ personal property to make content.

Earlier this year, Paul was also accused of sexual assault, though he denied those allegations.

See what others are saying: (Dexerto)

Continue Reading

Industry

Director Defends Recreating Anthony Bourdain’s Voice With AI in New Documentary

Published

on

The film’s director claims he received permission from Bourdain’s estate and literary agent, but on Thursday, Bourdain’s widow publicly denied ever giving that permission. 


Bourdain’s Voice Recreated

“You are successful, and I am successful, and I’m wondering: Are you happy?” Anthony Bourdain says in a voiceover featured in “Roadrunnner,” a newly released documentary about the late chef — except Bourdain never actually said those words aloud.

Instead, it’s one of three lines in the film, which features frequent voiceovers from Bourdain, that were created through the use of artificial intelligence technology.

That said, the words are Bourdain’s own. In fact, they come from an email Bourdain reportedly wrote to a friend prior to his 2018 suicide. Nonetheless, many have now questioned whether recreating Bourdain’s voice was ethical, especially since documentaries are meant to reflect reality.

Director Defends Use of AI Voice

The film’s director, Academy Award winner Morgan Neville, has defended his use of the synthetic voice, telling Variety that he received permission from Bourdain’s estate and literary agent before inserting the lines into the film. 

“There were a few sentences that Tony wrote that he never spoke aloud,” Neville said. “It was a modern storytelling technique that I used in a few places where I thought it was important to make Tony’s words come alive.” 

Bourdain’s widow — Ottavia Bourdain, who is the executor of his estate — later denied Neville’s claim on Twitter, saying, “I certainly was NOT the one who said Tony would have been cool with that.”

In another interview with GQ, Neville described the process, saying the film’s creators “fed more than ten hours of Tony’s voice into an AI model.”

“The bigger the quantity, the better the result,” he added. “We worked with four companies before settling on the best.”

“If you watch the film,” Neville told The New Yorker, “you probably don’t know what the other lines are that were spoken by the AI, and you’re not going to know. We can have a documentary-ethics panel about it later.” 

The Ethics Debate Isn’t Being Tabled

But many want to have that discussion now.

Boston-based film critic Sean Burns, who gave the film a rare negative review, later criticized it again for its unannounced use of AI, saying he wasn’t aware that Bourdain’s voice had been recreated until after he watched the documentary.  

Meanwhile, The New Yorker’s Helen Rosner wrote that the “seamlessness of the effect is eerie.”

“If it had been a human voice double I think the reaction would be “huh, ok,” but there’s something truly unsettling about the idea of it coming from a computer,” Rosner later tweeted. 

Online, many others have criticized the film’s use of AI, with some labeling it as a “deepfake.”

Others have offered more mixed criticism, saying that while the documentary highlights the need for posthumous AI use to be disclosed, it should not be ruled out altogether. 

“In a world where the living could consent to using AI to reproduce their voices posthumously, and where people were made aware that such a technology was being used, up front and in advance, one could envision that this kind of application might serve useful documentary purposes,” David Leslie, ethics lead at the Alan Turing Institute, told the BBC.

Celebrities Recreated After Death

The posthumous use of celebrity likeness in media is not a new debate. In 2012, a hologram of Tupac took the stage 15 years after his death. In 2014, the Billboard Music Awards brought a hologram of Michael Jackson onstage five years after his death. Meanwhile, the Star Wars franchise digitally recreated actor Peter Cushing in 2016’s “Rogue One,” and unused footage of actress Carrie Fisher was later translated into “The Rise of Skywalker,” though a digital version of Fisher was never used.

In recent years, it has become almost standard for filmmakers to say that they will not create digital versions of characters whose actors die unexpectedly. For example, several months after Chadwick Boseman’s death last year, “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever” executive producer Victoria Alonso confirmed Boseman would not be digitally recreated for his iconic role as King T’Challa.

See what others are saying: (BBC) (Yahoo! News) (Variety)

Continue Reading

Industry

Doctors Want You to Know: Whatever You Do, Don’t Stick Garlic up Your Nose to Try and Relieve Congestion

Published

on

They warn the new TikTok trend could cause even worse problems, such as irritation and swelling. 


TikTok Garlic Nose Trend

In a viral trend that feels eerily similar to the Nutmeg Challenge, doctors are now warning people against participating in a TikTok trend that has users shoving whole cloves of garlic up their noses for 20 to 30 minutes at a time. 

In the videos, creators claim that garlic can relieve sinus congestion, and once they pull the cloves out of their nostrils, an excessive amount of snot comes flowing out of their noses. 

“Since tik tok took it down the first time. THIS IS NOT DANGEROUS. The garlic cleans out your sinuses,” TikTok user hwannah5 said in a June 25 post. 

Source: @hwannah5

Doctors’ Warnings

Doctors are now warning the opposite, saying that there’s no medical proof garlic acts as a decongestant. 

As Dr. Richard Wender of the University of Pennsylvania told Insider, “Evidence is important, and it would be wrong to say that we’ve done extensive research about garlic in noses.”

“But in general, garlic itself and the chemicals of garlic don’t interact much with human tissue,” he added. 

Wender went on to explain that stuffing one’s nose with foreign objects can actually cause irritation and swelling, rather than relief. 

“Yes, it’s true that garlic has some antibacterial properties, which means it may be useful to treat a variety of common ailments,” Dr. Deborah Lee from Dr. Fox Online Pharmacy told Delish. “In one study, those who took garlic supplements for three months had less colds than those who did not. But this is not the same as actively treating a stuffy nose or blocked sinuses. Garlic is not a decongestant, and in fact, may just irritate the lining of the nose and airways and make symptoms worse.”

As far as what’s causing streams of snot to pour out of people’s noses after inserting their garlic plugs, Wender said that may be occurring because the nose produces mucus when irritated. On top of that, the cloves can also block already-existing mucus from flowing. 

Instead, doctors recommend using already-known solutions if you’re feeling congested, such as vapor rubs, antihistamines, over-the-counter saline sprays, and neti pots. 

TikTok user hwannah5 later responded to a doctor’s explanation that the clove blocks create rather than clear mucus, noting that others shouldn’t repeatedly try the blocks. Doctors contend that the trend should not be done at all. 

See what others are saying: (Insider) (Delish) (The Star)

Continue Reading