- A Portland woman named Whitney Rutz auctioned off her “giant ass cinnamon rolls” to friends online, hoping to raise a little bit of money for the Oregon Food Bank.
- But her bidders offered hundreds for the treats and continued to ask for more. The operation later evolved into Rutz saying that for each $500 donated to the food bank, she would bake a roll for local health care workers.
- To keep up with demand, she changed her strategy, auctioning off a roll per day that can be kept or donated to health care workers in the winner’s name.
- As of Wednesday, she’s raised over $30,000 and has delivered over 50 rolls so far.
Auctioning Off Treats
An amateur baker in Portland, Oregon raised over $30,000 for a local food bank by auctioning off what she calls “giant ass cinnamon rolls.”
Whitney Rutz told Oregon Live that she has been self-isolating with her husband, Paul, and 7-year-old daughter, Elsa, since schools closed in March. As a way to try and cheer herself up during such a difficult time, Rutz asked her daughter to help her make a cinnamon roll for their family.
She later posted an Instagram photo of their creation, which ended up being a massive dessert about 12 inches wide and 3 inches deep. Soon after, friends began to comment and ask if she could bake them one too.
“I’m an amateur baker,” Rutz told the news outlet. “The recipe isn’t original.”
That’s when she was inspired to bake another one of her treats in an effort to help her community. This time, she posted a photo calling her dessert a “giant ass cinnamon roll” and actioned it off to the highest bidder. The money earned would then go to the Oregon Food Bank.
Her goal was only about $50, but to Rutz’s surprise, the roll sold for $300. From then on, the requests continued to come in. The losing bidder of her last roll even promised to bid $250 for another.
View this post on Instagram
My heart is SO full!!! My first attempt at auctioning off one of my G I A N T A S S cinnamon rolls to benefit the Oregon Food Bank sold for $300!!! This adorable family received their roll after I dropped it off on their front porch this morning – didn’t even see them/ring the bell. Thank you to everyone who placed bids. Let’s see what we can get for next weekend’s auction!!!
Two others agreed to match any bid on a third roll and the company where they worked offered to match their bid as well.
“That sold for $750,” Rutz explained. “Excuse me, I’m going to start crying.”
She also made her giant rolls for another online auction she ran. “One sold for $285,” she said. “The other was sold and Nike did a three times match. That roll sold for $1,215.”
Officials with the Oregon Food Bank eventually contacted her, curious who was raising money for their organization. “I was just sending donations directly to them on Venmo,” said Rutz told the news outlet.
Donations to Health Care Workers
Rutz’s fundraising efforts evolved once more when a customer told her that she couldn’t eat the giant roll herself since she lives alone. Instead, she asked Rutz to donate the treat to any local health care worker.
From then on, Rutz said that for every $500 donated to the Oregon Food Bank on its website, she would make a giant cinnamon roll for health care workers.
With the help of a friend who is a nurse, she managed to get some of the treats to hospitals, assisted living centers, and paramedics in the area.
According to the news outlet, Rutz has made 55 rolls and nearly 50 were donated to medical workers. By Wednesday, the food bank had raised over $30,000, with more continuing to come in.
Susannah Morgan, the food bank’s CEO, said Rutz’s unique way of showing support is an “amazing example” of people coming together to make a difference in the lives of others.
To keep up with demand, the threshold was increased from $500 to $1,000. Now, Rutz had has switched her approach, auctioning off a roll per day. The winner can choose to accept the roll themselves or donate it to a health care worker in their name.
Portland singer and performance artist Storm Large even caught wind of Rutz’s operation, asking if she could help deliver the goods to health care workers.
When Rutz told Large that a doctor was hoping to get an autographed box from her, Large told Rutz she would “do one better.”
“My daughter and other neighborhood kids had decorated the boxes,” said Rutz. “Storm said she would draw on all the boxes we use to deliver the rolls.”
Rutz plans to continue making rolls as long as donations continue to be given to the food bank.
“At some point, when things open up, the general sadness will end,” she said. “That’s when interest will taper off, and I’ll call it quits.”
“Sometimes you have to create joy and spread it around,” said Rutz. “I don’t know where I’d be emotionally and mentally if didn’t have this project to steer me in such a positive direction.”
See what others are saying: (Oregon Live) (The Takeout) (KGW8)
SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Police in Two Qualified Immunity Cases
The move further solidifies the contentious legal doctrine that protects officers who commit alleged constitutional violations.
SCOTUS Hears Qualified Immunity Cases
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of police in two separate cases involving qualified immunity, the controversial legal doctrine that shields officers accused of violating constitutional rights from lawsuits.
The topic has become a major flashpoint in debates over police reform and curbing police violence since the protests against racial injustice and police brutality in the summer of 2020.
On one side, supporters of qualified immunity claim it is necessary to ensure that police can do their jobs without worrying about frivolous lawsuits.
However, opponents argue that judicial interpretations of the doctrine over time have given police incredibly broad legal immunity for misconduct and use of excessive force. Under a previous Supreme Court ruling, in order for officers to be held liable, plaintiffs have to show that they violated rights “clearly established” by a previous ruling.
In other words, officers cannot be held liable unless there is another case that involves almost identical circumstances.
As a result, many argue the doctrine creates a Catch-22: Officers are shielded from liability because there is no past precedent, but the reason there is no past precedent is because officers are shielded from liability in the first place.
An Ongoing Debate
Critics argue that the two cases the Supreme Court saw Monday illustrate that double bind, as both involved accusations of excessive force commonly levied against police.
In one case, officers used non-lethal bean bag rounds against a suspect and knelt on his back to subdue him. In the other, police shot and killed a suspect after he threatened them with a hammer.
The justices overturned both lower-court rulings without ordering full briefing and argument because of the lack of precedent. The court issued the decisions in unsigned orders with no dissent, signaling they did not even see the cases as close calls.
Advocates for qualified immunity claim the decisions signal that the current Supreme Court is not open to changing qualified immunity, and the most likely path for opponents of the doctrine is legislation.
While Democrats in Congress have made numerous efforts to limit qualified immunity, including most recently in the George Floyd Justice In Policing Act passed by the House earlier this year, all those attempts have been blocked by Republicans.
At the state level, dozens of bills have been killed after heavy lobbying from police unions. As a result, it remains unclear what path proponents for reform have at this juncture.
See what others are saying: (NPR) (The New York Times) (The Washington Post)
Florida School Says Students Vaccinated Against COVID-19 Must Stay Home for 30 Days
The school falsely claimed that people who have just been vaccinated risk “shedding” the coronavirus and could infect others.
Centner Academy Vaccination Policy
A private school in Florida is now requiring all students who get vaccinated against COVID-19 to quarantine for 30 days before returning to class.
According to the local Miami outlet WSVN, Centner Academy wrote a letter to parents last week describing COVID vaccines as “experimental” and citing anti-vaccine misinformation.
“If you are considering the vaccine for your Centner Academy student(s), we ask that you hold off until the Summer when there will be time for the potential transmission or shedding onto others to decrease,” the letter reportedly stated.
“Because of the potential impact on other students and our school community, vaccinated students will need to stay at home for 30 days post-vaccination for each dose and booster they receive and may return to school after 30 days as long as the student is healthy and symptom-free.”
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has debunked the false claim that those newly vaccinated against COVID-19 can “shed” the virus.
According to the agency’s COVID myths page, vaccine shedding “can only occur when a vaccine contains a weakened version of the virus,” but “none of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19. This means that a COVID-19 vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19.”
In fact, early research has suggested that vaccinated people are less likely to spread the virus than unvaccinated people.
Beyond that, unvaccinated people are more likely to spread COVID in general because they are much more likely to get the virus than vaccinated people. According to recently published CDC data, as of August, unvaccinated people were six times more likely to get COVID than vaccinated people and 11 times more likely to die from the virus.
Centner Academy Continues Spread of Misinformation
In a statement to The Washington Post Monday, Centner Academy co-founder David Centner doubled down on the school’s new policy, which he described as a “precautionary measure” based on “numerous anecdotal cases that have been in circulation.”
“The school is not opining as to whether unexplained phenomena have a basis in fact, however we prefer to err on the side of caution when making decisions that impact the health of the school community,” he added.
The new rule echoes similar efforts Centner Academy has made that run counter to public health guidance and scientific knowledge.
In April, the school made headlines when its leadership told vaccinated school employees that they were not allowed to be in contact with any students “until more information is known” and encouraged employees to wait until summer to get the jab.
According to The New York Times, the following week, a math and science teacher allegedly told students not to hug their vaccinated parents for more than five seconds.
The outlet also reported that the school’s other co-founder, Leila Centner, discouraged masking, but when state health officials came for routine inspections, teachers said they were directed in a WhatsApp group to put masks on.
See what others are saying: (WSVN) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)
Katie Couric Says She Edited Ruth Bader Ginsburg Quote About Athletes Kneeling During National Anthem
Couric said she omitted part of a 2016 interview in order to “protect” the justice.
Kate Couric Edited Quote From Justice Ginsburg
In her upcoming book, journalist Katie Couric admitted to editing a quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in 2016 in order to “protect” Ginsberg from potential criticism.
Couric interviewed the late justice for an article in Yahoo News. During their discussion, she asked Ginsburg about her thoughts on athletes like Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem to protest racial inequality.
“I think it’s really dumb of them,” Ginsburg is quoted saying in the piece. “Would I arrest them for doing it? No. I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it. I would point out how ridiculous it seems to me to do such an act.”
According to The Daily Mail and The New York Post, which obtained advance copies of Couric’s book “Going There,” there was more to Ginsburg’s response. Couric wrote that she omitted a portion where Ginsburg said the form of protest showed a “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life…Which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.“
Couric Says She Lost Sleep Making Choice
“As they became older they realize that this was youthful folly,” Ginsberg reportedly continued. “And that’s why education is important.“
According to The Daily Mail, Couric wrote that the Supreme Court’s head of public affairs sent an email asking to remove comments about kneeling because Ginsburg had misspoken. Couric reportedly added that she felt a need to “protect” the justice, thinking she may not have understood the question. Couric reached out to her friend, New York Times reporter David Brooks, regarding the matter and he allegedly likewise believed she may have been confused by the subject.
Couric also wrote that she was a “big RBG fan” and felt her comments were “unworthy of a crusader for equality.” Because she knew the remarks could land Ginsburg in hot water, she said she “lost a lot of sleep” and felt “conflicted” about whether or not to edit them out.
Couric was trending on Twitter Wednesday and Thursday as people questioned the ethics behind her choice to ultimately cut part of the quote. Some thought the move showed a lack of journalistic integrity while others thought revealing the story now harmed Ginsburg’s legacy.