Zoom Shares Dip After Google Makes Its Video Chatting Competitor Free
- Google said it will soon make its video chatting service, Google Meet, free for all users, a move many see as an attempt to rival Zoom.
- Google Meet emphasized its focus on privacy and security, areas where Zoom has fallen short, noting that it does not allow anonymous users to join meetings and gives hosts control of admitting and denying entry.
- It also won’t enforce 60-minute time caps on its free tier until Sept 30, while Zoom’s free tier limits calls to 40 minutes.
- Zoom saw a 7% dip in shares after the announcement, but many feel its name recognition will help it maintain its place as the top teleconferencing service.
Free Version of Google Meet
Google said Wednesday that it was making its video chatting service, Google Meet, free to consumers, a move that could make it a tougher competitor against the widely-used teleconferencing service, Zoom.
Google Meet was previously only available to paying customers of G Suite, the company’s line of apps including Gmail, Drive, and Docs. Anyone was able to join a video meeting through the service by clicking a shared link, but the meeting had to be created by a user with a G Suite membership.
But soon, a free version of the product will available for all consumers. In a blog post, G Suite president Javier Soltero wrote, “Starting in early May, anyone with an email address can sign up for Meet and enjoy many of the same features available to our business and education users, such as simple scheduling and screen sharing, real-time captions, and layouts that adapt to your preference, including an expanded tiled view.”
Competitor to Zoom
Video chatting has become more and more crucial as the coronavirus pandemic forces non-essential services all over the world to remain closed. Virtual gatherings have not only allowed for social connections with friends and family, but they’ve also been essential for schools and businesses to keep their operations running remotely.
On Tuesday, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said Google Meet is adding 3 million new users a day during the pandemic, up from 2 million new users a day earlier this month. Pichai also said the service has 100 million meeting participants a day.
But despite Google Meet’s success, Zoom has absolutely dominated the video chatting industry. It made a huge leap from 10 million daily users in December to 300 daily users as of now.
Still, Zoom hasn’t been without criticism. The service has been met with complaints regarding its privacy and dating-sharing policies, on top of frustrations over “Zoombombing,” when uninvited guests crash a video session.
It seems like Google may have taken a shot a Zoom about those concerns in its announcement by emphasizing its focus on security. “We’ve invested years in making Meet a secure and reliable video conferencing solution that’s trusted by schools, governments and enterprises around the world,” the company said early on in its blog post.
It stressed that the service was “designed, built and operated to be secure at scale,” with some of its key features including the ability to admit or denying users into conferences and not allowing anonymous users into meetings, among other measures. These features seem to hit exactly the places where Zoom has admitted it’s fallen short.
On top of that, Zoom’s free tier offers free video meetings of up to 100 people, but they’re capped at 40 minutes. Google Meet, by contrast, allows for the same number of people to join a call and limits meeting to 60 minutes; however, the company says it won’t even enforce that rule until after Sept. 30.
Google isn’t the only company striving to reach and surpass Zoom’s success. Last week, Facebook announced Messenger Rooms, a feature that allows video chatting with people though Messenger even if they don’t have a Facebook. Microsoft is also pushing its own video chatting app, Teams.
After Google’s announcement, Zoom reportedly saw a drop in shares by 7% on Wednesday, according to MarketWatch. However, some think that Zoom carries too much name recognition at this point to be booted out of its position at the top of the teleconferencing industry.
According to The New York Times, Google business chief Philipp Schindler was on a video call with thousands of employees last month when someone on the call asked about Zoom’s success. As Schindler replied, his young son reportedly barged into the room and asked if Schindler was on a Zoom call with his workers.
“Mr. Schindler tried correcting him, but the boy went on to say how much he and his friends loved using Zoom,” the newspaper reported.
See what others are saying: (Market Watch) (CNET) (CNN)
TikTok to Require Labels on Manipulated Media, Ban Deepfakes of Children
The social media platform says it wants to embrace the creativity AI can offer while being cautious of the “societal and individual risks” that come with it.
TikTok is rolling out a slew of limitations regarding synthetic deepfake videos, including a ban on deepfake content of children.
In an update on Tuesday, the social media platform said it wants welcome “the creativity that new artificial intelligence and other digital technologies may unlock” while also being careful of the “societal and individual risks” that come with it. To mitigate those risks, TikTok will require users to label manipulated media depicting “realistic scenes.” Users can do so in stickers, captions, or other means that make it clear the video is “synthetic,” “fake,” “not real,” or “altered.”
On top of that, there are new restrictions about who can be the subject of these manipulated videos. TikTok will not allow deepfake media that shows the likeness of a “young person” or any private person, including adults. It is also barring deepfakes that depict adult public figures giving political or commercial endorsements, as well as deepfakes that violate one of the platform’s other rules.
“While we provide more latitude for public figures, we do not want them to be the subject of abuse, or for people to be misled about political or financial issues,” the company’s updated guidelines say.
As TikTok’s policies previously stated, synthetic media that has been edited to mislead audiences about real-world events is also not allowed on the platform.
As far as what kind of deepfake media is allowed on TikTok, the company said videos showing adult public figures in “certain contexts, including artistic and educational content,” get the green light. This can include a video of a celebrity doing a TikTok dance, or a historical figure being depicted in a history lesson.
The rules will be enforced starting April 21. Between now and then, TikTok says it will be training its moderators to better implement the guidelines.
See what others are saying: (The Verge) (The Associated Press) (TechCrunch)
Adidas Financial Woes Continue, Company on Track for First Annual Loss in Decades
Adidas has labeled 2023 a “transition year” for the company.
Adidas’ split with musician Kanye West has left the company with financial problems due to surplus Yeezy products, putting the sportswear giant in the position to potentially suffer its first annual loss in over 30 years.
Adidas dropped West last year after he made a series of antisemitic remarks on social media and other broadcasts. His Yeezy line was a staple for Adidas, and the surplus product is due, in part, to the brand’s own decision to continue production during the split.
According to CEO Bjorn Gulden, Adidas continued production of only the items already in the pipeline to prevent thousands of people from losing their jobs. However, that has led to the unfortunate overabundance of Yeezy sneakers and clothes.
On Wednesday, Gulden said that selling the shoes and donating the proceeds makes more sense than giving them away due to the Yeezy resale market — which has reportedly shot up 30% since October.
“If we sell it, I promise that the people who have been hurt by this will also get something good out of this,” Gulden said in a statement to the press.
However, Gulden also said that West is entitled to a portion of the proceeds of the sale of Yeezys per his royalty agreement.
Adidas announced in February that, following its divergence from West, it is facing potential sales losses totaling around $1.2 billion and profit losses of around $500 million.
If it decides to not sell any more Yeezy products, Adidas is facing a projected annual loss of over $700 million.
Outside of West, Adidas has taken several heavy profit blows recently. Its operating profit reportedly fell by 66% last year, a total of more than $700 million. It also pulled out of Russia after the country’s invasion of Ukraine last year, which cost Adidas nearly $60 million dollars. Additionally, China’s “Zero Covid” lockdowns last year caused in part a 36% drop in revenue for Adidas compared to years prior.
As a step towards a solution, Gulden announced that the company is slashing its dividends from 3.30 euros to 0.70 euro cents per share pending shareholder approval.
Adidas has labeled 2023 a “transition year” for the company.
“Adidas has all the ingredients to be successful. But we need to put our focus back on our core: product, consumers, retail partners, and athletes,” Gulden said. “I am convinced that over time we will make Adidas shine again. But we need some time.”
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNN)
Elon Musk Bashes Disabled Ex-Twitter Employee, Gets Blowback
After Musk claimed the former employee “did no actual work,” the staffer calmly directed passive-aggressive insults right back at the billionaire.
Excuse Me, Do I Still Work Here?
Elon Musk brawled online with a former Twitter employee who didn’t know whether he was fired Tuesday, accusing the staffer of exploiting his disability.
Haraldur “Halli” Thorleifsson, who has muscular dystrophy, joined Twitter in 2021 after it acquired the creative agency he founded: Ueno.
He said on Twitter that he was unable to confirm whether he was still a Twitter employee nine days after being locked out of his work computer, despite reaching out to the head of HR and Musk himself through email.
At the time, Twitter had laid off at least 200 workers, or some 10% of its remaining workforce.
In search of an answer, Thorleifsson tweeted at Musk, who responded with the question: “What work have you been doing?”
After being given permission by Musk to break confidentiality, Thorleifsson listed several of his accomplishments, including leading “design crits to help level up design across the company.”
“Level up from what design to what? Pics or it didn’t happen,” Musk replied.
“We haven’t hired design roles in 4 months. What changes did you make to help with the youths?”
Thorleifsson reminded Musk that he couldn’t access any pictures because he was locked out of his work computer.
Musk stopped replying to the tweets, but hours later he returned to the platform to lob invective at his former employee.
Musk Vs. Halli
“The reality is that this guy (who is independently wealthy) did no actual work, claimed as his excuse that he had a disability that prevented him from typing, yet was simultaneously tweeting up a storm,” Musk tweeted, apparently referring to Thorleifsson. “Can’t say I have a lot of respect for that.”
“But was he fired? No, you can’t be fired if you weren’t working in the first place,” he added.
In a later Twitter thread, Thorleifsson said he could type for one or two hours at a time before his hands cramped, but that in pre-Musk Twitter, that wasn’t a problem because he was a senior director.
He added that despite his crippling disability, he worked hard for years to build Ueno.
“We grew fast and made money,” he said. “I think that’s what you are referring to when you say independently wealthy? That I independently made my money, as opposed to say, inherited an emerald mine.”
Thorleifsson made several more passive-aggressive jabs at Musk.
“I joined at a time when the company was growing fast,” he wrote. “You kind of did the opposite. The company had a fair amount of issues, but then again, most bigger companies do. Or even small companies, like Twitter today.”
Thorleifsson said that immediately following his back-and-forth with Musk, Twitter’s head of HR confirmed that he had indeed been fired from the company.