- After Georgia Governor Brian Kemp announced that he would reopen businesses like gyms, bowling alleys, and hair salons on Friday, many business owners said they will remain closed anyway.
- Kemp’s decision is the broadest rollback of state stay-at-home orders so far, and he also plans to reopen restaurants and movie theaters on Monday.
- Mayors of some of Georgia’s largest cities have also urged people to continue staying at home, but Kemp’s order renders them powerless to impose local restrictions.
Businesses Divided As Georgia Reopens
Georgia will begin plans to restart its economy on Friday by allowing various types of businesses to reopen, but those plans haven’t set in well for some business owners.
Specifically, the state will begin allowing gyms, bowling alleys, tattoo parlors, barbers, hair and nail salons, and massage therapy businesses to reopen their doors once more. By Monday, a second wave of reopenings will include dine-in restaurants and movie theaters.
While Governor Brian Kemp said those businesses will need to follow social-distancing and sanitation guidelines, this is still the broadest rollback of stay-at-home orders from a state so far.
Because that order was so broad, many small business owners said they’d been caught off-guard and that they weren’t expecting to reopen the state so soon. Some even said they would need more than just a few days to ramp back up.
Other business owners were critical of this move in general, some saying they’d refuse to reopen before health experts said it was safe to do so.
“It’s putting economics before lives,” Diane Fall, owner of Maxim Barbers in suburban Atlanta, told The Wall Street Journal. “[Kemp’s] putting it out there like he’s doing us a favor, but I’d rather be alive than run my business right now.”
In fact, many business owners in Fall’s line of work have argued that people can’t properly socially distance in places like barbershops and nail salons.
Alan Marsh, a pet shop owner, also told the WSJ that even though his revenue is down by a third and he’s lost employees, he will continue to fulfill online and phone orders only. Marsh then went a step further, saying that if he discovered one of his employees had been out to a restaurant or shop, he would take them off the schedule.
That’s not to say Kemp’s order has been met with complete criticism. Many business owners have applauded the move, which will potentially allow them to retain and pay employees. Others have been more cautious about reopening, saying they like the idea, but if businesses mishandle the reopenings, they may have to shut back down.
At Odds with Kemp, Mayors Urge People to Stay Home
Notably, it’s not just business owners who were caught off guard by this decision. The mayors of Savannah, Augusta, and Atlanta have all said that they hadn’t heard about Kemp’s plan until he publicly announced it on Monday.
Like many businesses, those mayors have criticized Kemp’s decision.
“I’m perplexed that we have opened up in this way,” Atlanta mayor Keisha Bottoms told CNN, “and again, I can’t stress enough, I work very well with our governor and I look forward to having a better understanding of his reasoning is, but as I look at the data, and as I talk with our public health officials, I don’t see that it’s based on anything that’s logical.”
Savannah Mayor Van Johnson called the move “reckless, premature and dangerous.”
Despite those criticisms, mayors in Georgia actually now have less power than businesses do when it comes to the decision over whether to reopen or not. That’s because Kemp’s order will be implemented statewide, meaning that local governments can’t overturn or restrict it.
Still, that hasn’t stopped local leaders from continuing to urge people to stay home. In addition to Bottoms and Johnson, the mayors of Augusta and Albany have encouraged people to not go out to stores just yet.
Albany’s mayor, Bo Dorough, said he plans to ask Kemp to make an exception for the city, which has become one of the worst coronavirus hotspots in the country.
Kemp Defends His Decision and Other States Move To Reopen
Kemp has defended his decision, with a spokesman for him saying, “We can’t have shelter-in-place forever and we can’t have how businesses operated last fall, or even a month ago. We have to find a way to a happy medium.”
Even though Georgia is opening the fastest, it’s certainly not the only state that has started to reopen—especially in the South.
Tennessee Governor Bill Lee announced that his state’s stay-at-home order will be lifted at the end of the month and that most businesses will reopen by May 1st.
Ohio is also planning to roll out a gradual reopening on May 1st.
In South Carolina, as of Tuesday, places like beaches and department stores have already reopened at reduced capacity. Like Georgia, there has been some criticism there for opening nonessential businesses so early; however, unlike Georgia, local municipalities can still restrict some reopenings such as beaches.
“I support what South Carolina Governor @henrymcmaster announced yesterday — a small reopening of our state’s economy with a focus on social distancing,” Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on Twitter Tuesday. “I worry that our friends and neighbors in Georgia are going too fast too soon.”
Georgia, South Carolina, and Tennessee all have yet to meet White House guidelines that recommend states should begin a phased reopening only after 14 days of a sustained decrease in coronavirus cases.
See what others are saying: (The Wall Street Journal) (NBC News) (The Atlanta Journal-Constitution)
Derek Chauvin and 3 Others Ex-Officers Indicted on Civil Rights Charges Over George Floyd’s Death
- The Justice Department filed federal criminal charges Friday against Derek Chauvin and three other former Minneapolis police officers after a grand jury indicted them for violating the civil rights of George Floyd.
- The indictment charges Chauvin, J. Alexander Kueng, and Tou Thao for violating Floyd’s right to be free from unreasonable seizure and unreasonable force. All three, as well as Thomas Lane, were also charged with failing to provide medical care to Floyd.
- Chauvin was additionally hit with two counts in a separate indictment, which claims he violated the civil rights of a 14-year-old boy who he allegedly held by the neck and repeatedly beat with a flashlight during a 2017 arrest.
- Chauvin was already convicted last month of murder and manslaughter over Floyd’s death, which Kueng, Lane, and Thao were previously charged for allegedly aiding and abetting.
Former Minneapolis Officers Hit With Federal Charges
A federal grand jury indicted Derek Chauvin and three other former Minneapolis police officers for violating George Floyd’s civil rights during the arrest that lead to his death last summer, the Justice Department announced Friday.
Chauvin, specifically, was charged with violating Floyd’s right to be free from unreasonable seizure and unreasonable force by a police officer. Ex-officers J. Alexander Kueng and Tou Thao were indicted for willfully failing to intervene in Chauvin’s unreasonable use of force.
All three men, as well as former officer Thomas Lane, face charges for failing to provide medical care to Floyd, “thereby acting with deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of harm to Floyd,” according to the indictment.
In a second, separate indictment, Chauvin was hit with two counts of civil rights violations related to the arrest of a 14-year-old boy in September 2017. During that incident, Chauvin allegedly held the boy by the neck and hit him with a flashlight repeatedly.
The announcement, which follows a months-long investigation by the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, comes just over two weeks after Chauvin was found guilty of three state charges of murder and manslaughter in Floyd’s death.
He is currently awaiting his June 25 sentencing in a maximum-security prison.
Kueng, Lane, and Thao all face state charges of aiding and abetting second-degree murder and manslaughter.
Kueng and Lane were the first officers to responded to a call from a convenience store employee who claimed that Floyd used a counterfeit $20 bill. Body camera footage showed Floyd sitting in the car and Lane drawing his gun as the officers ordered him out and handcuffed him.
Floyd can be heard pleading with the officers not to shoot him.
Shortly after, Chauvin and Thao arrived, and the footage shows Chauvin joining the other officers in their attempt to put Floyd into the back of a police car. In the struggle, the officers forced Floyd to the ground, with Chauvin kneeling on his neck while Kueng and Lane held his back and legs.
Meanwhile, in cellphone footage taken at the scene, Thao can be seen ordering bystanders to stay away, and later preventing a Minneapolis firefighter from giving Floyd medical aid.
Their trial is set to begin in late August, and all three are free on bond. The new federal charges, however, will likely be more difficult to prove.
According to legal experts, prosecutors will have to show beyond reasonable doubt that the officers knew that they were depriving Floyd of his constitutional rights but continued to do so anyway.
The high legal standard is also hard to establish, as officers can easily claim they acted out of fear or even poor judgment.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (The Associated Press)
Caitlyn Jenner Says Her Friends Are Fleeing California Because of the Homeless Population
- California gubernatorial candidate Caitlyn Jenner sparked outrage after an interview with Sean Hannity on Wednesday that was filmed from her Malibu airplane hangar.
- “My friends are leaving California,” she said. “My hangar, the guy right across, he was packing up his hangar and I said, ‘Where are you going?’ And he says, ‘I’m moving to Sedona, Arizona. I can’t take it anymore. I can’t walk down the streets and see the homeless.’”
- Many criticized Jenner for sounding out of touch and unsympathetic to real issues in California and suggested that she prioritize helping the homeless population rather than incredibly wealthy state residents.
Caitlyn Jenner’s Remarks
California gubernatorial candidate Caitlyn Jenner sparked outrage on Wednesday after suggesting that wealthy people are fleeing the state because of its homeless population.
Jenner sat down for an interview in her Malibu airplane hangar with Fox News’ Sean Hannity. Jenner is one of the handful of Republicans aiming to unseat current Governor Gavin Newsom in a recall election in the fall. While polls show that most Californians do not support recalling Newsom, the conservative-led movement to do so gained enough signatures to land on the ballot.
“My friends are leaving California,” Jenner claimed during the interview. “My hangar, the guy right across, he was packing up his hangar and I said, ‘where are you going?’ And he says, ‘I’m moving to Sedona, Arizona, I can’t take it anymore. I can’t walk down the streets and see the homeless.’”
“I don’t want to leave,” she continued. “Either I stay and fight, or I get out of here.”
Jenner’s Remarks Prompt Backlash
Her remarks were criticized online by people who thought Jenner sounded unsympathetic and out of touch to the real issues in the state. Many found it hypocritical that Jenner has slammed Newsom for being elite but was so concerned for wealthy people who don’t like having to see unhoused residents on the street.
Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Ca.) called Jenner out on Twitter for seemingly fighting for a small percentage of Californians.
“Unlike you, Dems are focused on the 99% of people who don’t own planes or hangars,” he wrote. “And you know what’s going to help reduce homelessness? The #AmericanRescuePlan, which your party opposed.”
Others suggested she prioritize directly addressing the homeless situation.
“If you don’t like the homeless situation, instead of hiding in your PRIVATE PLANE HANGAR, your campaign should be about helping them,” actress Merrin Dungey said. “They don’t like their situation either. Your lifelong privilege is showing. It’s not a good color.”
Jenner, an Olympic gold medalist and reality star, is one of the most prominent transgender Americans. Because homelessness is such a common issue within the trans community, some were frustrated she was not using her campaign to fix the situation, and rather used it to complain about how it impacted her wealthy friends.
See what others are saying: (The Hill) (Politico) (Washington Post)
Derek Chauvin Seeks New Trial In George Floyd Murder Case
- A lawyer for Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer who was convicted of murdering George Floyd, filed a motion Tuesday for a new trial.
- Among other complaints about Chauvin’s conviction, the attorney cited “prosecutorial and jury misconduct; errors of law at trial; and a verdict that is contrary to law.”
- He also claimed the court “abused its discretion” by not granting a change of venue or sequestering the jury for the duration of the trial, arguing that publicity before and during it threatened its fairness.
- John Stiles, deputy chief of staff for Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, told CNN, “The court has already rejected many of these arguments and the State will vigorously oppose them.”
Derek Chauvin’s Attorney Files Motion for New Trial
Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is officially asking for a new trial, hoping to overturn his conviction for the murder of George Floyd.
His attorney, Eric Nelson, filed court paperwork Tuesday laying out a number of errors he believes were made during Chauvin’s legal proceedings that violated his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. Nelson cited alleged issues, including, “prosecutorial and jury misconduct; errors of law at trial; and a verdict that is contrary to law.”
The filing did not cite any specific examples of jury misconduct, but Nelson also argued that the court “abused its discretion” by not granting a change of venue or sequestering the jury for the duration of the trial.
The court proceedings took place in the same city where Floyd was killed and where protesters drew national attention by calling for justice in his name. As a result, Nelson claimed that publicity before and during the trial threatened its fairness. He also argued that a defense expert witness was intimidated after he testified, but before the jury deliberated.
His filing asks for a hearing to impeach the guilty verdict, in part, on the grounds that the 12 jurors “felt threatened or intimidated, felt race-based pressure during the proceedings, and/or failed to adhere to instructions during deliberations.”
It’s unclear exactly what will come of this request, but John Stiles, deputy chief of staff for Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, told CNN, “The court has already rejected many of these arguments and the State will vigorously oppose them.”
For instance, a judge previously denied Chauvin’s request to move the trial in March, saying, “I don’t think there’s any place in the state of Minnesota that has not been subjected to extreme amounts of publicity on this case.”