Connect with us

U.S.

Fed Up With Unemployment, Thousands Protest Michigan’s Strict Stay-At-Home Orders

Published

on

  • Thousands in Michigan flocked to the city’s capital on Wednesday to protest Governor Gretchen Whitmer’s strict coronavirus emergency order.
  • Whitmer’s order is some of the most drastic in the country as it bans travel between homes, prevents exemptions for workers like landscapers, and severely limits the number of people within grocery stores.
  • While thousands clogged city streets with their vehicles as a form of protest, others ignored social distancing measures by protesting on the steps of the capitol.

Operation Gridlock

Thousands of protesters in Michigan shut down miles of road on Wednesday, concentrating themselves near the capitol building in Lansing. While many maintained social distancing rules by staying in their vehicles, hundreds of others did not. 

The protest—known as Operation Gridlock—was organized after Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer extended the state’s stay-at-home order on April 9.

In that extension, she added several major rules, including:

  • No gatherings of any people who are not part of a single household.
  • No travel to in-state vacation or second homes.
  • Limiting large store to four customers for every 1,000 square feet of floor space. Stores have also been ordered to shut down sections for carpeting, flooring, furniture, gardening, and painting.
  • No using jet skis or motorboats.

While many protesters noted that they believed Whitmer was trying to keep them safe by issuing the order, they nonetheless said they believe it infringes upon their constitutional rights. 

In fact, on Tuesday, four Michigan residents filed a lawsuit against Whitmer, arguing that she was violating their 1st Amendment right to assembly, as well as their 5th Amendment right that says “private property shall not be taken for a public use without just compensation.” Notably, they are trying to get a temporary restraining order to keep Whitmer from enforcing the order. 

At the following day’s protest, at least 200 people broke organizers’ instructions, got out of their cars, and congregated around the steps of Michigan’s capitol building. Many of those people can be seen in photos and videos standing near each other, walking around, and not wearing masks.

According to Whitmer, she saw several people passing out candy to kids with their bare hands.

Some of those protesters also sported firearms. Others waved Confederate flags

Many protesters also carried Trump re-election signs and chanted “Lock her up!” Multiple news outlets also reported that, at times, the protest was reminiscent of a pseudo-Trump rally.

Still, many people said they were protesting because they wanted to return to work. As of Monday, more than a quarter of Michigan’s workforce has filed for unemployment. 

Since Whitmer’s order also bans home-to-home travel, that means that people like landscapers will also find themselves out of a job now. Because of that, many Republican politicians in the state have contended that those workers should get exemptions because they can socially distance while working. Whitmer, however, has refused to grant that exemption.

Others are angry because while Michigan has one of the biggest outbreaks in the country, that outbreak is mainly concentrated in Southeast Michigan and Detroit. Some people—especially small business owners and workers—have argued that there should be regional and industry-based exemptions.

“I don’t think she’s listening to petitions and people who are trying to communicate in a less extreme way that…there are small businesses that are suffering,” greenhouse worker Shelly Vanderwerff told NPR.

“Our community is struggling,” one woman told Reuters. “My husband is on unemployment for the first time in our life, and it’s unwillingly that we’re taking unemployment. We want to go back to work. We have employees. We have paychecks to issue. We have bills to pay. The only stores open are Walmart? That’s ridiculous. That’s why we’re here.”

Of course, others also had different priorities:

“It’s time for our state to be opened up,” another woman told Reuters. “We’re tired of not being able to buy the things that we need, go to the hairdressers, get our hair done. It’s time to open up. The sick are being taken care of.” 

Whitmer Says Protests May Cause Her Order to Be Extended Again

Whitmer has said she considered people who would lose their jobs while she signed the order, but she said she feared the economy would be worse off if she didn’t sign it. She also admitted that while strict—in fact, her order is one of the strictest in the nation—it’s necessary to contain the virus.

Michigan currently has the 4th highest infection rate and 3rd highest death count in the country. As of recording Thursday morning, the state had just under 28,000 cases and about 1,900 deaths.

Upon responding to reporters Wednesday, she also said the protest could inadvertently cause her strict measures to be prolonged. 

“We know that this demonstration is going to come at a cost to people’s health, she said. “We know that when people gather that way without masks… that’s how COVID-19 spreads. And so the sad irony here is that the protest was that they don’t like being in this stay-at-home order, and they may have just created a need to lengthen it, which is something we’re trying to avoid at all costs.”

Later, in an interview with MSNBC Whitmer criticized the protest, saying her executive order was a scapegoat for other issues.

“It wasn’t really about the stay-at-home order at all,” she said. “It was essentially a political rally, a political statement that flies in the face of all of the science, all of the best practices, and the stay at home order that was issued. You know, this looks like a lot of people, and it felt like a lot of people, but in the bigger scheme of things, Michigan is a state of 10 million people, the vast majority of whom are doing the right thing.”

Whitmer then continued criticizing that protest, saying protesters in cars blocked an ambulance from being able to get into a hospital. 

Michigan Sheriffs To Lax Enforcement of Order

On Wednesday,  four county sheriffs oppose her order, saying, “While we understand her desire to protect the public, we question some restrictions that she has imposed as overstepping her executive authority.” 

“As a result, we will not have strict enforcement of these orders,” they added in a joint statement. “We will deal with every case as an individual situation and apply common sense in assessing the apparent violation.” 

There’s also speculation that some businesses might just reopen anyway and pay the fine for doing so. According to Matt Seely, a spokesman for the Michigan Conservative Coalition which organized the protest, “If something isn’t put in place soon, you’ll see in the form of a protest—businesses just opening. Because, truthfully, for the $1,000 fine, most businesses could sustain that fine because they’ll at least be able to make a living.”

While Operation Gridlock is certainly the biggest protest against stay-at-home orders in the United States thus far, it’s actually not the first. 

States like Ohio and North Carolina have also witnessed similar protests. In Kentucky Wednesday, protesters chanted “We want to work!” over Governor Andy Beshear as he was providing coronavirus updates at a news conference.

There are also reports that more protests are planned in states like Texas and Oregon. 

Situations like those will undoubtedly present tricky situations for governors trying to keep people safe by following the advice of health officials, especially as new infections continue to level off and even decline. 

See what others are saying: (CNN) (NPR) (Detroit Free Press)

U.S.

Florida School Says Students Vaccinated Against COVID-19 Must Stay Home for 30 Days

Published

on

The school falsely claimed that people who have just been vaccinated risk “shedding” the coronavirus and could infect others.


Centner Academy Vaccination Policy

A private school in Florida is now requiring all students who get vaccinated against COVID-19 to quarantine for 30 days before returning to class.

According to the local Miami outlet WSVN, Centner Academy wrote a letter to parents last week describing COVID vaccines as “experimental” and citing anti-vaccine misinformation.

“If you are considering the vaccine for your Centner Academy student(s), we ask that you hold off until the Summer when there will be time for the potential transmission or shedding onto others to decrease,” the letter reportedly stated.

“Because of the potential impact on other students and our school community, vaccinated students will need to stay at home for 30 days post-vaccination for each dose and booster they receive and may return to school after 30 days as long as the student is healthy and symptom-free.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has debunked the false claim that those newly vaccinated against COVID-19 can “shed” the virus.

According to the agency’s COVID myths page, vaccine shedding “can only occur when a vaccine contains a weakened version of the virus,” but “none of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19. This means that a COVID-19 vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19.”

In fact, early research has suggested that vaccinated people are less likely to spread the virus than unvaccinated people.

Beyond that, unvaccinated people are more likely to spread COVID in general because they are much more likely to get the virus than vaccinated people. According to recently published CDC data, as of August, unvaccinated people were six times more likely to get COVID than vaccinated people and 11 times more likely to die from the virus.

Centner Academy Continues Spread of Misinformation

In a statement to The Washington Post Monday, Centner Academy co-founder David Centner doubled down on the school’s new policy, which he described as a “precautionary measure” based on “numerous anecdotal cases that have been in circulation.”

“The school is not opining as to whether unexplained phenomena have a basis in fact, however we prefer to err on the side of caution when making decisions that impact the health of the school community,” he added.

The new rule echoes similar efforts Centner Academy has made that run counter to public health guidance and scientific knowledge.

In April, the school made headlines when its leadership told vaccinated school employees that they were not allowed to be in contact with any students “until more information is known” and encouraged employees to wait until summer to get the jab.

According to The New York Times, the following week, a math and science teacher allegedly told students not to hug their vaccinated parents for more than five seconds.

The outlet also reported that the school’s other co-founder, Leila Centner, discouraged masking, but when state health officials came for routine inspections, teachers said they were directed in a WhatsApp group to put masks on.

See what others are saying: (WSVN) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Katie Couric Says She Edited Ruth Bader Ginsburg Quote About Athletes Kneeling During National Anthem

Published

on

Couric said she omitted part of a 2016 interview in order to “protect” the justice.


Kate Couric Edited Quote From Justice Ginsburg

In her upcoming book, journalist Katie Couric admitted to editing a quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in 2016 in order to “protect” Ginsberg from potential criticism. 

Couric interviewed the late justice for an article in Yahoo News. During their discussion, she asked Ginsburg about her thoughts on athletes like Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem to protest racial inequality.

“I think it’s really dumb of them,” Ginsburg is quoted saying in the piece. “Would I arrest them for doing it? No. I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it. I would point out how ridiculous it seems to me to do such an act.”

According to The Daily Mail and The New York Post, which obtained advance copies of Couric’s book “Going There,” there was more to Ginsburg’s response. Couric wrote that she omitted a portion where Ginsburg said the form of protest showed a “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life…Which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.

Couric Says She Lost Sleep Making Choice

“As they became older they realize that this was youthful folly,” Ginsberg reportedly continued. “And that’s why education is important.

According to The Daily Mail, Couric wrote that the Supreme Court’s head of public affairs sent an email asking to remove comments about kneeling because Ginsburg had misspoken. Couric reportedly added that she felt a need to “protect” the justice, thinking she may not have understood the question. Couric reached out to her friend, New York Times reporter David Brooks, regarding the matter and he allegedly likewise believed she may have been confused by the subject. 

Couric also wrote that she was a “big RBG fan” and felt her comments were “unworthy of a crusader for equality.” Because she knew the remarks could land Ginsburg in hot water, she said she “lost a lot of sleep” and felt “conflicted” about whether or not to edit them out. 

Couric was trending on Twitter Wednesday and Thursday as people questioned the ethics behind her choice to ultimately cut part of the quote. Some thought the move showed a lack of journalistic integrity while others thought revealing the story now harmed Ginsburg’s legacy.

See what others are saying: (New York Post) (The Daily Mail) (Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Biden Administration Orders ICE To Halt Workplace Raids

Published

on

The Department of Homeland Security will now focus on targeting employers who exploit undocumented workers, instead of carrying out raids that dissuade those workers from reporting labor violations.


DHS Reverses Worksite Raid Policy

The Biden administration announced Tuesday that it was ordering Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to stop workplace raids.

The move marks a reversal from Trump administration policies that have been strongly criticized by immigration activists who argue the efforts created fear in immigrant communities and dissuaded them from reporting labor violations or exploitative employment practices.

In addition to stopping the raids, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a memo that the administration will refocus enforcement efforts to instead target “employers who exploit unauthorized workers, conduct illegal activities or impose unsafe working conditions.” 

Mayorkas added that the immigration agencies housed in DHS will have the next 60 days to identify harmful existing policies and come up with new ones that provide better deportation protections for workers who report their employers.

In the Tuesday memo, the secretary argued that shift of focus will “reduce the demand for illegal employment by delivering more severe consequences to exploitative employers” and “increase the willingness of workers to report violations of law by exploitative employers and cooperate in employment and labor standards investigation.”

Labor Market Implications

The new policy comes at a time when the U.S. is experiencing a critical labor shortage, including in many sectors that rely on immigrant labor.

Some companies that use undocumented workers pay them wages that are far below the market rate, which is not only exploitative but also undercuts competitors.

According to Mayorkas, the pivot to employer-based enforcement will help protect American businesses.

“By exploiting undocumented workers and paying them substandard wages, the unscrupulous employers create an unfair labor market,” he said in the memo. “They also unfairly drive down their costs and disadvantage their business competitors who abide by the law.”

It is currently unclear how effective the new efforts will be, but historical precedent does not paint an optimistic picture.

The Biden administration’s efforts closely mirror a similar move by the Obama administration, which attempted to reverse workplace raids authorized under President George W. Bush by targetting those who employ undocumented workers rather than the workers themselves.

That effort, however, still led to thousands of undocumented workers being fired.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (ABC News)

Continue Reading