- Harvey Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years in prison on Wednesday for third-degree rape and a criminal sexual act.
- Weinstein was convicted of the crimes last month but was acquitted of more serious charges that carried a potential life sentence.
- This isn’t the end of Weinstein’s legal battles as he still faces charges in Los Angeles for other sex crimes he allegedly committed.
What Was Weinstein Convicted Of?
Disgraced Hollywood movie mogul Harvey Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years in a New York state prison on Wednesday for his felony sex crimes conviction.
On Feb 25, a Manhattan jury made up of seven men and five women found the 67-year-old guilty of a first-degree criminal sexual act and third-degree rape. The charges were based on testimony from Miriam Haley, a production assistant who said Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in his Lower Manhattan apartment in 2006, and Jessica Mann, a then-aspiring actress who said Weinstein raped her at a Midtown hotel in 2013.
The jury made their decision after a seven-week trial and five days of deliberation, however, they did choose to acquit Weinsten of the most serious charges he faced: two counts of predatory sexual assault, which carried the possibility of a life sentence.
Those charged required the jury to find that he had raped actress Annabella Sciorra’s in the early 1990s at her Gramercy Park apartment, but some jurors ultimately doubted her account and decided against that conviction.
The jury also determined that Weinstein was not guilty of first-degree rape in the 2013 attack against Mann. That charge required the state to prove the use of force or a threat during the incident, so instead, the jury chose to convict him of third-degree rape, which only required prosecutors to prove a lack of consent.
In total, Weinstein faced a 29-year sentence; between five to 25 years for the criminal sex act charge and up to four years in prison for third-degree rape. Prosecutors asked for the maximum or near-maximum sentences, with an order for them to be served concurrently. Meanwhile, defense attorneys asked for him to get the minimum.
Haley and Mann read emotional impact statements ahead of his sentencing with Haley saying, “He violated my trust and my body and my personal right to deny sexual advances.”
“I could only hope whatever sentence, [it’s] long enough for him to acknowledge [what] he has done to me and others.”
For her part, Mann said Weinstein was “completely disconnected from the gravity of the crimes” he had committed against her and other women.
Weinstein also spoke during the hearing, talking in length about his charitable deeds. He at one point also compared the #MeToo movement to people being blacklisted for being communists during the Red Scare and according to Variety, said, “I think men are confused about all of this…this feeling of thousands of men and women who are losing due process, I’m worried about this country.”
He also suggested that he thought his relationships with the women were consensual and that he was “totally confused” by what they described. “We may have different truths, but I have remorse for all of you and for all the men going through this crisis,” he said to his accusers.
“I really feel remorse for this situation. I feel it deeply in my heart. I’m really trying, I’m really trying to be a better person,” he added.
Judge James Burke ultimately handed down a 20-year sentence for the criminal sex act charge and a 3-year sentence for third-degree rape, which are to be served consecutively. He also said Weinstein will be formally registered as a sex offender.
“I will say that although this is a first conviction, it is not a first offense,” Burke said when announcing his decision, adding that there is evidence of incidents of sexual assault against other women.
All six of the women who had given graphic accounts on the witness stand during the trial sat in the front row of the gallery in solidarity. They walked out of the courtroom together after the sentencing, some smiling and some in tears.
Recently Unsealed Court Documents
The sentencing is a major victory for the #MeToo movement, which gained momentum after several women came forward with accusations against Weinstein starting in late 2017. At least 80 women have made accusations against him for varying levels of harassment and assault.
Recently unsealed court documents even showed that weeks after the first accusations were published by The New Yorker and The New York Times, Weinstein desperately reached out to wealthy friends for support, including Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, and Mike Bloomberg.
“I don’t need you to make any public statements — just a private one to my gmail address, saying that you support me getting therapy and the help I need before the board fires me. I’m in a tough spot. Many of the allegations are false, but I need your help with this private letter of support,” he wrote in a letter to the heads of Apple.
“I need your friendship now,” he wrote to Netflix’s Ted Sarandos, asking him to provide a private letter to the Weinstein Company’s board.
The documents also showed how Weinstein dealt with all of the emerging claims against him. According to Variety, Weinstein was contacted in October 2017 by a reporter from the National Enquirer who said they were planning to publish a story reporting that Jennifer Aniston was sexually assaulted by him. Weinstein responded by email: “Jen Aniston should be killed.”
Aniston’s representative has since told Variety that the Enquirer’s claims were false, saying, “Jennifer has not been harassed or assaulted by Harvey.”
Other documents showed that Weinstein compiled a “red flag list” of industry figures who he suspected might be talking about his sexual behavior to the media. That list was sent to his private investigators and included about 70 names like Ben Affleck, Rose McGowan, and several others.
This New York decision does not mark the end of Weinstein’s legal battles by any means. Los Angeles prosecutors filed criminal charges of their own against him earlier this year alleging two incidents of sexual assault over a two-night period in 2013.
See what others are saying: (The Hollywood Reporter) (Fox News) (AP News)
Candace Owens and Logan Paul in Talks to Debate
A spokesperson confirmed to Insider Wednesday that the two have had “productive” conversations about the prospect offline.
Candace Owens Challenges Logan Paul to a Debate
Right-wing commentator Candace Owens and controversial YouTuber Logan Paul are in talks to engage in a political debate. Yes, you read that sentence correctly.
Owens — best known for making false claims about the George Floyd protests, spreading COVID-19 misinformation, and seemingly saying that Adolf Hitler “just wanted to make Germany great” — first challenged Paul to a debate on Friday. It started with her sharing a year-old clip from Paul’s podcast where he spoke about the importance of fighting racism in the United States.
“It is not enough to be ‘not racist.’ You have to be anti-racist,” he said.
“If you’re white, if you look like me, use your privilege,” he added. “And for those who do not think white privilege exists, you are fucking blind.”
Because merely acknowledging the existence of racism appears to go against Owens’ core beliefs, she asked Paul to duke it out with her.
“Logan loves to challenge people in the boxing ring,” she wrote. “I’d like to publicly challenge him to go a few rounds with me in a political debate. @LoganPaul—how about you stop by my show and explain to me how you’re *checks notes* more privileged than me because you’re white and I’m not?”
Spokesperson Confirms The Two Are in Talks
Paul — best known for launching a boxing career and filming a YouTube video that showed a dead body in Japan’s “suicide forest” — said on Tuesday that he was “perplexed” by the offer, but was taking it seriously.
“I started to entertain this action, I ended up speaking with her, and there may be a future where we sit down and have a civil discourse because I think there’s some meat on this bone,” he said during the most recent episode of his “ImPaulsive” podcast.
The internet star acknowledged that Owens’ main arena is politics, while his main arena is being a “fucking idiot” online. Still, he said he does care about these issues and has a “semi-intelligent brain,” so he thinks he could “hold [his] own.”
“Candace Owens, whether you can admit it or not, is a smart person,” Paul continued. “And so I guess I’m just curious because I just fucking fundamentally disagree with her and again, I think there’s room for a conversation.”
A spokesperson for Owens confirmed to Insider on Wednesday that the two had a “productive” offline conversation and said a public political debate between the two is “very likely.”
“Although both of them disagree on a variety of topics, they are both much more interested in learning from one another and think people would benefit from hearing an honest discussion between two parties rather than a ‘gotcha’ moment that might play well for social media,” the spokesperson added.
See what others are saying: (Insider)
Finneas Slams Billie Eilish Troll Account for Attributing Fake Quotes to the Singer
Eilish’s big brother said the account is spreading “relentless lies” and asked that it at least label itself as a satire account.
Troll Account Shares Fake Billie Eilish Quotes
Billie Eilish’s brother and collaborator Finneas took to Twitter Tuesday to address an account that has been sharing fake quotes attributed to his sister.
The account uses the handle @BilliesUpdatess and goes by the name of “Billie Eilish Updates” in its profile. It was created in July of 2021 and as of Wednesday morning, it had amassed a following of 1,100 people. On a quick glance, it looks just like any other update account a fan might make to share news about their favorite celebrity.
@BilliesUpdatess, however, is far from the standard adoring fan page. Of the over 300 tweets it has posted, several include screenshots of forged articles that make it look like Eilish said something either offensive or totally outlandish. One post claims Eilish defended her boyfriend after he was accused of supporting former president Donald Trump.
“At the end of the day, I fucking love him you know?” the phony statement reads. “It doesn’t matter if he made some homophobic comments in the past, people change. If he [Matthew] supports Donald Trump then I don’t care if it makes him happy. I support EVERY decision Mathew has to make, even the ones some of my fans don’t agree with, like maybe some of his icky comments.”
In another sham passage, Eilish says she thinks queerbaiting “is a really good thing!” In several others, the person behind the account comes up with artificial quotes to make it looks like Eilish is feuding with “driver’s license” singer Olivia Rodrigo.
One post with a fake article ended up being retweeted 12,000 times. That tweet included Eilish claiming she longs to be poor.
“When I got rich, I started balling my eyes out,” the fake piece says. “I wanted to be poor so I can relate to most of my fans. I still want to be broke and poor, it looks really fun and cute.”
Finneas Slams Account
As the troll account started to gain traction, Finneas asked that people report and block it to minimize the spread of its “relentless lies.”
On Tuesday, he responded to a fan that tagged him in the @BilliesUpdatess tweet alleging his sister wanted to be poor.
“Fake obviously,” Finneas wrote. “Honestly I just wish they’d label this account satire like the onion or something. I have no problem with a joke as long as people know it’s a joke.”
The account made several jokes about the fact that Finneas was calling it out, but it seems Eilish’s big brother got what he asked for. @BilliesUpdatess added “parody account” to its bio and the account was deleted as of Wednesday afternoon.
Britney Spears’ Attorney Files Petition To Oust Father as Conservator
Spears’ new attorney, Mathew Rosengart, said there are “serious questions” regarding “potential misconduct, including conflicts of interest [and] conservatorship abuse.”
Mathew Rosengart Petitions Court To Remove Jamie Spears
Britney Spears’ attorney, Mathew Rosengart, filed a petition Monday to remove the singer’s father, Jamie Spears, as her financial conservator.
Jamie Spears has served as his daughter’s financial conservator for 13 years. In the filing, Rosengart said the elder Spears “profited handsomely” from the position. He asked that Jamie be replaced with a Certified Public Accountant named Jason Rubin, who Rosengart described as “objectively intelligent” and “highly qualified” for the job.
The petition is 120 pages long and contained scathing remarks about Jamie. Britney has made it clear she wants him removed from the conservatorship, which she wants to be terminated entirely. During a statement in June, she called the situation “abusive” and specifically condemned her father.
“He loved the control to hurt his own daughter 100,000%. He loved it,” she said.
Rosengart has promised to be a stronger advocate for Britney than her previous lawyer, Samuel Ingham, was. He seems to be following through on his word by challenging Jamie’s status as a conservator just weeks after being appointed Britney’s attorney.
“Serious questions abound concerning Mr. Spears’s potential misconduct, including conflicts of interest, conservatorship abuse and the evident dissipation of Ms. Spears’s fortune,” he wrote.
The petition claims that Jamie made at least $2.1 million from Britney’s residency in Las Vegas, snagging a 1.5% cut of gross revenues and merchandise. It also claims that he paid himself $16,000 a month from Britney’s estate, which is $2,000 more than he gave Britney. On top of that, Jamie reportedly took another $2,000 for business purposes.
Rosengart wrote that while it might be common for a manager or agent to make this kind of money, someone in Jamie’s position should not be.
“He is a conservator, and, as a conservator, his role is to be burdened by, rather than benefit from, the conservatorship.”
Britney’s Mother Speaks Out
Both Britney’s personal conservator, Jodi Montgomery, and her mother, Lynne Spears, gave statements in the filings echoing the need for Jamie to be removed from his role. Montgomery emphasized that his departure was necessary for the singer’s welfare.
“It would be best for Ms. Spears’ well-being and mental health that her father stop acting as her conservator,’ she wrote.
Lynne did not hold back on criticizing Jamie, saying Britney’s relationship with her father has “dwindled to nothing but fear and hatred” because of the control he exerts over her. She also claimed that he relied on Britney’s house staff, medical aides, and security team to “inform on and report back to him each and every detail of every action” in his daughter’s life.
“Such scrutiny is exhausting and terrifying, like living in custody,” she said.
This petition does not terminate the conservatorship fully, but Rosengart said that could be something the court has to examine one day further down the line.
“There might well come a time when the court will be called upon to consider whether the conservatorship should be terminated in its entirety and whether — in addition to stripping his daughter of her dignity, autonomy and certain fundamental liberties — Mr. Spears is also guilty of misfeasance or malfeasance warranting the imposition of surcharges, damages or other legal action against him,” Rosengart wrote.