Connect with us

Business

Internet Reacts to “Fleets,” Tweets that Disappear After 24 Hours

Published

on

  • On Wednesday, Twitter announced that it is testing a new feature in Brazil that allows users to publish content that will disappear after 24 hours. 
  • The temporary posts, called “Fleets,” were created in hopes that users share more of their “fleeting thoughts.” Fleets may be rolled out in other countries later on, depending on how the test goes.  
  • Some are mocking the feature’s name, which matches a brand name enema. Others are disappointed that Twitter is rolling out this change as opposed to others.
  • But some are excited about the new addition and think it is a good idea.

New Feature

Twitter announced on Wednesday that it is testing a new feature that allows content to disappear after 24 hours, similar to the “stories” component across other social media platforms.

The temporary posts — called “fleets” — are text-based but are also able to be accompanied by photos, videos, and GIFs. Fleets can be viewed by tapping on somebody’s profile picture, but they cannot be retweeted. Similar to Instagram stories, any replies or reactions to fleets are sent as direct messages to the creator instead of posted publicly. 

Currently, the test is only available for Twitter users in Brazil. It was introduced there first because it is one of the countries where people talk the most on the platform, according to Twitter’s product manager Mo Al Adham. Depending on how the test goes, it’s possible that fleets will be made available in other countries.

Kayvon Beykpour, the company’s product lead, revealed the rationale behind the new feature in a series of tweets on Wednesday. 

“People often tell us that they don’t feel comfortable Tweeting because Tweets can be seen and replied to by anybody, feel permanent and performative,” Beykpour wrote. 

“We’re hoping that Fleets can help people share the fleeting thoughts that they would have been unlikely to Tweet,”  Beykpour added. “This is a substantial change to Twitter, so we’re excited to learn by testing it (starting with the rollout today in Brazil) and seeing how our customers use it.”

Fleets have the potential to ease users’ worries about what they post online, as old tweets have led people to lose jobs and be publicly slammed, but it’s still unclear exactly how low-risk these posts are. After reaching the end of their 24-hour life cycle, fleets will be kept by Twitter for a limited time in case of any rule violations.

“We’ll maintain a copy of fleets for a limited time after they are deleted to enforce any rule violations and so people can appeal enforcement actions,” Aly Pavela, a communications manager at Twitter, told Wired.

After this review period, Fleets will be deleted from the company’s systems, according to CNN. But this still begs the question of whether the disappearing content can simply be screenshotted and saved in that way, a detail Twitter hasn’t formally addressed yet. 

Internet Reacts

Upon hearing of Twitter’s test, some were quick to crack jokes about the new feature’s name, which happens to match the brand name of a widely-used enema.

“Tw*tter moments are gonna be called fleets? like the enemas? why? cuz it’s shitty??? LOL,” one user wrote.

As Fleet enemas are widely recognized among the LGBTQ community, several users questioned how the new feature’s name was greenlighted.

Twitter was quick to respond to the mockery, and a message from their communications team revealed that they are indeed familiar with the title.

“Yes we know what fleets means. thanks – gay intern,” the team tweeted from their official account.

Others had a more serious response to the temporary posts feature, expressing their disappointment in the company for rolling this out instead of other changes that users have been requesting for years. On Wednesday night, the hashtag #RIPTwitter was trending.

However, some thought the idea was a good one that will boost the company’s success and engagement. 

See what others are saying: (NBC) (CNN) (Wired)

Business

CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart Helped Fuel the Opioid Crisis, Jury Finds

Published

on

While all three chains have vowed to appeal, this ruling is a massive win for plaintiffs who argued that opioid manufacturers and retailers violated “public nuisance” laws when contributing to the opioid epidemic.


Jury Sides Against Retailers

A federal jury in Cleveland agreed Tuesday that CVS Health, Walgreens, and Walmart — three of the country’s biggest pharmacy chains — are responsible for contributing to the opioid crisis in two Ohio counties.

This is the first time that the retail arm of the drug industry has been held accountable for opioid overdoses and deaths. It’s also the first time a jury has been used to decide in a major opioid lawsuit.

Previously, only manufacturers such as Purdue Pharma and Johnson & Johnson faced settlements or penalties, though the latter narrowly escaped $465 million in opioid fines in Oklahoma earlier this month after the state’s Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling. 

Many plaintiffs in thousands of similar lawsuits all across the country are seeing the Ohio jury’s decision as an optimistic sign — especially since most of them are using the same argument. Plaintiffs in Ohio alleged that either opioid manufacturers or retailers violated “public nuisance” laws by ignoring harm caused by opioid abuse that later snowballed into a full-fledged public health crisis. 

Retailers Vow to Appeal

Unsurprisingly, all three chains have promised to appeal Tuesday’s verdict.

There is precedent to think this decision could be overturned. For example, the now-overturned J&J lawsuit first successfully used the public nuisance argument in lower courts, but during an appeal, the Oklahoma Supreme Court thought the plaintiff’s argument was too broad. 

That said, every state has different public nuisance laws, so there may not be a clear-cut answer as to what actually could happen with all these cases. 

Despite a pending appeal, the judge overseeing Tuesday’s Ohio verdict will make a determination on how much these companies must pay after additional hearings in the spring. 

While the retail arm has largely avoided settling up to this point, if this case ultimately does not go their way, it could open the door for future settlements if they decide that route is less costly than going to trial. 

See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (Associated Press) (The Wall Street Journal)

Continue Reading

Business

Biden Authorizes Release of 50 Million Barrels of Oil From U.S. Reserve To Ease Gas Prices

Published

on

Experts believe the release will, at best, provide temporary relief to extremely high gas prices but only if other countries tap into a significant amount of oil from their reserves as well. 


Biden Taps Into Oil Reserves

President Joe Biden authorized the release of 50 million barrels of oil from the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve on Tuesday in an attempt to bring down staggeringly high gas prices.

“American consumers are feeling the impact of elevated gas prices at the pump and in their home heating bills, and American businesses are, too, because oil supply has not kept up with demand as the global economy emerges from the pandemic,” a White House announcement reads. “That’s why President Biden is using every tool available to him to work to lower prices and address the lack of supply.”

As of Tuesday morning, the national average of gas sat at $3.40, according to the American Automobile Association (AAA). While down slightly over the last few days, the national average for November remains the highest it’s been since 2013. 

Despite the announcement, Americans shouldn’t expect to see an immediate drop in gas costs. In fact, gas prices are unlikely to be impacted much in the coming weeks since the government’s reserve only stores crude oil, which will need time to be refined into gasoline. 

Many analysts expect gas from the reserves to start reaching consumers’ pumps around mid-December, but even then, it will likely be used up in around a week. Last year, the U.S. used about 8 million barrels of gas from the reserve a day.

Those two factors are likely major contributors to why this news didn’t do much to calm the oil market. Following the announcement Tuesday, the benchmark oil price in the U.S. — measured by West Texas Intermediate crude futures — actually rose. 

Last week, Biden asked the Federal Trade Commission to look into “mounting evidence of anti-consumer behavior by oil and gas companies” amid rising gas prices. 

Price Concerns Persist

In its announcement, the White House said the U.S. release is being taken “in parallel with other major energy consuming nations, including China, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, and the United Kingdom.” 

A number of analysts cited by various news publications have predicted that this kind of multi-country release is the only chance the U.S. actually has of meaningfully impacting gas prices.

“The bottom line for motorists is this moves the needle — but barely, and maybe not for a very long period of time,” Patrick De Haan, an industry expert at Gas Buddy, explained to The Washington Post. “It’s certainly something, but how much that something is will be contingent on how much the other countries put in.”

It is currently unclear how much oil the other countries plan to release, though Indian officials have said the country will release 5 million barrels from its reserve. 

Efforts could also go south in the long-term if the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) pushes back. It previously warned of a possible response if Biden decided to make this type of release, with the organization arguing that the U.S. has no real justification for needing to tap into its reserve. 

“There’s a threat this could lead to a risk of prices being elevated for longer if OPEC holds back meaningful production increases as a result,” De Haan told The Post. 

Overall, the release of oil is a tricky situation for Biden. He was already facing stacking criticism from Republicans for recent inflation and supply chain bottlenecks. Even now, many have said the release of 50 million barrels isn’t good enough on its own.

On the other side, Democrats like Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) have argued that tapping into the reserve could provide temporary relief.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (Business Insider) (Fox Business)

Continue Reading

Business

Looters Launch Coordinated Attacks on High-End Stores Like Louis Vuitton in Chicago and San Francisco

Published

on

It’s unclear if the multiple attacks in each city are connected, but police have described the events as coordinated and planned. 


Raid on San Francisco’s Union Square

Dozens of individuals looted at least 10 stores in San Francisco’s Union Square on Friday, though that’s far from the only seemingly organized raid that occurred over the weekend.

Cell phone video from the incident shows multiple people running into a Louis Vuitton store and emerging with armfuls of merchandise. KGO-TV reporter Dion Lim shared images of the store picked clean in the aftermath, with its windows shattered. Burberry, Fendi, and YSL were among the other businesses she said looters targeted.

Video shared by Twitter user @CARLITOSGUEY shows San Francisco police officers swarming a Mustang outside of the Louis Vuitton store and beating its windows with their batons. They then pull someone from the passenger’s seat and pin that person to the ground.

At a news conference on Saturday, police told reporters they “were confronting an armed individual” in the Mustang. That vehicle, along with another, has now been seized by the department. Police also said they have so far made eight arrests connected to the incident. 

Police Chief Bill Scott has called the attack “concerted,” saying, “There’s no doubt in my mind that this was not unplanned.”

In total, over $1 million in merchandise was stolen. 

Other San Francisco Raids

Friday’s raid was quickly followed up the next night when around 80 looters ransacked a Nordstrom near San Francisco. All but three thieves managed to evade authorities.

At least two store employees were assaulted during the attack, including one worker who was pepper-sprayed by looters, according to a press release published Sunday by the Walnut Creek Police Department. 

Like the previous raid in Union Square, police described this attack as “clearly a planned event.” 

On Sunday night, yet another raid occurred at a jewelry store in Hayward, which is about 30 miles outside of San Francisco.

As of Monday afternoon, investigators have not been able to confirm whether these attacks are connected, though in recent years — and especially in recent months — they have become increasingly common.

For example, in May, Walgreens said it closed 17 Bay Area stores because of rampant shoplifting. 

“We are exploring every single possible criminal charge related to the conduct,” San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin said Saturday. “We will use every tool in our tool belt.”

Chicago Louis Vuittons Raided 

The attacks in San Francisco follow a similar event that happened in a Louis Vuitton store in the suburbs of Chicago this past Wednesday.

During that heist, a group of 14 seemingly unarmed individuals ran into the store in broad daylight and began stockpiling merchandise sitting on shelves. 

So far, police have not made any arrests; however, they said they have retrieved one of the three vehicles the looters used as getaway cars. 

They also confirmed that no one was injured during the attack but that $120,000 in merchandise was stolen.

See what others are saying: (KGO-TV) (The Washington Post) (NBC News)

Continue Reading