- Kaylen Ward, informally known as the “Naked Philanthropist,” tweeted about her idea for aspiring sex workers to live in a house together and be trained on how to succeed in the industry.
- Some responded with criticisms, accusing Ward of trying to organize a pimping or human sex trafficking scheme.
- Ward defended herself in a series of tweets and videos on social media, saying these were not her intentions and that she is only trying to help people in a regulated way.
Naked Philanthropist Slammed
The “Naked Philanthropist,” who first rose to fame when she exchanged her nudes for donations to Australian wildfire relief, has found herself in the midst of a controversy.
Kaylen Ward proposed an idea to the Internet: putting aspiring sex workers together in a house, training them for online success, and filming the process for television and YouTube. However, when some caught wind of the plan, they came back at Ward with accusations of pimping and sex-trafficking.
Ward originally called for interested contenders in a now-deleted tweet.
“I am looking for girls with little to NO only fans or sex work experience who are interested in getting started,” Ward wrote. “You will live in a mansion with approx 15-20 other girls and will be trained on how to be successful on only fans or social media.”
OnlyFans is a social media service where influencers and models can make a commission by potentially selling racy content. Ward also linked to an Instagram page and encouraged people to follow if they want to see which girls get selected for the hypothetical house. The account currently has zero posts.
It didn’t take long for Twitter users to slam Ward for the proposal, calling it dangerous and predatory.
“Unironically hoping the fbi or somebody is keeping tabs on this because this is insanely sketchy/predatory and quite possibly a front for human trafficking,” one person wrote.
Several pointed out that it was suspicious to call for beginners in the industry as these seem like the individuals who would be most vulnerable.
“I also can’t get over the fact that she’s specifically asking for people new to the industry. it just seems weirdly predatory and puts a bad taste in my mouth because a lot of girls will probably see this as an out for whatever situation [they’re] in,” a Twitter user wrote.
i also can’t get over the fact that she’s specifically asking for people new to the industry. it just seems weirdly predatory and puts a bad taste in my mouth because a lot of girls will probably see this as an out for whatever situation there in.— Jippy (@ThatGuyJippy) March 3, 2020
In the wake of the backlash, Ward took down her tweet describing the idea and began posting more messages defending her motives.
The naked philanthropist didn’t stop there. She also released a series of videos on her Twitter page further explaining her idea and defending herself.
“I understand that I didn’t present all the information,” she said. “I’m actually trying to start a legitimate business. I will have [an] HR team, I will have contracts, I will have actual employees, like all the girls will be employees, they will get paid, they will have contracts.”
“Everything is going to be regulated and by the books and I didn’t really know exactly how to express all of that in one tweet,” she added. “I was just trying to start my idea somewhere and get people on board and try to go from there.”
Ward went on to discuss how she was upset about the serious accusations against her and how they are marring her image.
“I’m not saying that I’m perfectly in the right and I will always want to explain myself,” she said. “But it’s really hard to explain yourself when it feels like everybody is attacking you and you’re being canceled for something that is an assumption.”
Throughout the clips, Ward kept returning to the sentiment that she was only trying to help people get a foot in the door of the sex worker industry.
“My idea is not to exploit sex workers,” she said. “I mentioned in the tweet that I was looking for some new girls because constantly on my platform girls are messaging me asking me how they can get started with only fans, where do they begin, how do they get promo.”
Ward even compared her idea to other new influencer developments that have taken off recently, like the L.A. “Hype House” for TikTokers.
“I don’t see why there can’t be the same concept for sex workers, and I don’t see why we can’t all work together to have a common goal and be successful,” she said.
But despite Ward’s lengthy video explanation, people on the Internet continued to accuse her of promoting unsafe practices.
“Trying so hard to make a single tear fall,” one person wrote about Ward’s video. “But has no answers for anyone. This is peak gaslighting behaviour.”
trying so hard to make a single tear fall— adrie (@adrierose_) March 3, 2020
but has no answers for anyone. this is peak gaslighting behaviour. “i’m not upset that you have questions but i can’t believe you would question me. i have never hurt anyone ever.” pic.twitter.com/F1TNW0HOVP
Others argued that regardless of Ward’s expressed intentions, this set up could easily operate as a sex trafficking scheme.
According to Stop The Traffik, a campaign coalition aiming to end human trafficking worldwide, the differences between sex trafficking and sex work can be “almost invisible.” Key factors to consider when trying to distinguish between the two are signs of abuse, if the worker gets to keep the money, and the sanitary conditions of the spaces being used.
Manhattan City Council Candidate Says He’s “Not Ashamed” After BDSM Video Leaks Online
While many applauded the candidate’s response, others suspect the entire ordeal may have been manufactured for publicity.
BDSM Video Leaks
Zack Weiner, a 26-year-old candidate for Manhattan’s City Council, has caught a flood of attention in recent days after responding to a BDSM video of himself that leaked online.
According to the New York Post, which first reported on the leak Saturday, the video was published by an anonymous Twitter account earlier this month.
“My magnificent domme friend played with Upper West Side city council candidate Zack Weiner and I’m the only one who has the footage,” the tweet reportedly read.
The video was flagged to the Post by Weiner’s campaign manager, Joe Gallagher, the news outlet said. The tabloid also claimed it showed Weiner gagged while “subjecting himself to various abuses by a leather-bound woman who pours wax on him and clips his nipples with clothespins.”
The footage was filmed at Parthenon studio in Midtown, which the Post described as known for its high-quality BDSM dungeons, and Weiner actually confirmed the video’s authenticity to the outlet, saying it was filmed at that location in 2019 with a former girlfriend that he met during a Halloween party.
Weiner Says He’s “Not Ashamed”
Weiner took to Twitter on Saturday to address the private video head on.
“Whoops. I didn’t want anyone to see that, but here we are,” he wrote.
“I am not ashamed of the private video circulating of me on Twitter. This was a recreational activity that I did with my friend at the time, for fun. Like many young people, I have grown into a world where some of our most private moments have been documented online.”
“While a few loud voices on Twitter might chastise me for the video, most people see the video for what it is: a distraction. I trust that voters will choose a city council representative based on their policies and their ability to best serve the community,” he continued.
In his comments to the Post, he added, “I am a proud BDSMer. I like BDSM activity.” He also said he had no idea how the footage surfaced, saying “It’s definitely a violation of trust.”
Praise and Suspicions
Many people online have applauded Weiner for refusing to apologize for private consensual acts. One, for example, tweeted, “Yeah – as long as this was between 2 (or more) consenting adults – I don’t care one bit. If this info ALONE would cause you to vote for somebody else, then I am FAR MORE worried about YOUR participation in Government than his!”
In fact, many have said they would vote for him after learning of the video and slammed critics, as well as the tabloid, for “kink-shaming.”
It’s worth noting that the Post’s article described Weiner as someone who “has mostly been a nonentity in the race for the Upper West Side’s 6th District.” It pointed to the fact that he has no endorsements and that his campaign barely raised $10,000 — most of which allegedly came from himself and his campaign manager.
Because of this, along with Gallagher’s contact with the Post, some have speculated that the entire ordeal may have been some kind of stunt manufactured for publicity.
See what others are saying: (New York Post) (Insider) (HITC)
Supreme Court Rejects Third Challenge to Affordable Care Act
In the 7-2 decision, the justices argued the Republican-led states that brought the challenge forth failed to show how the law caused injury and thus had no legal standing.
SCOTUS Issues Opinion on Individual Mandate
The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down the third Republican-led challenge to the Affordable Care Act to ever reach the high court.
The issue at hand was the provision of the law, commonly known as Obamacare, that requires people to either purchase health insurance or pay a tax penalty: the so-called individual mandate.
The individual mandate has been one of the most controversial parts of Obamacare and it has already been before SCOTUS, which upheld the provision in 2012 on the grounds that it amounted to a tax and thus fell under Congress’ taxing power.
However, as part of the sweeping 2017 tax bill, the Republican-held Congress set the penalty for not having health care to $0. As a result, a group of Republican-led states headed by Texas sued, arguing that because their GOP colleagues made the mandate zero dollars, it no longer raised revenues and could not be considered a tax, thus making it unconstitutional.
The states also argued that the individual mandate is such a key part of Obamacare that it could not be separated without getting rid of the entire law.
The Supreme Court, however, rejected that argument in a 7-2 decision, with Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissenting.
Majority Opinion Finds No Injury
In the majority decision, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that the Republican states had no grounds to sue because they could not show how they were harmed by their own colleagues zeroing out the penalty.
“There is no possible government action that is causally connected to the plaintiffs’ injury — the costs of purchasing health insurance,” he wrote, adding that the states “have not demonstrated that an unenforceable mandate will cause their residents to enroll in valuable benefits programs that they would otherwise forgo.”
Breyer also argued that because of this, the court did not need to decide on the broader issue of whether the 2017 tax bill rendered the individual mandate unconstitutional and if that provision could be separated from the ACA.
The highly anticipated decision will officially keep Obamacare as the law of the land, ensuring that the roughly 20 million people enrolled still have health insurance. While there may be other challenges to the law hard-fought by conservatives, this latest ruling sends a key signal about the limits of the Republican efforts to achieve their agenda through the high court, even with the strong conservative majority.
While the court has now struck down challenges to Obamacare three times, Thursday’s decision marked the largest margin of victory of all three challenges to the ACA.
For now, the ACA appears to be fairly insulated from legal challenges, though it will still likely face more. In a tweet following the SCOTUS decision, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) vowed to keep fighting Obamacare, adding that the individual mandate “was unconstitutional when it was enacted and it is still unconstitutional.”
See what others are saying: (Axios) (The Washington Post) (The Associated Press)
Utah Student With Down Syndrome Left Out of Cheer Squad’s Yearbook Photo
The move marks the second time in three years that Morgyn Arnold has been left out of the school’s yearbook. Two years ago, it failed to include her in the class list.
Two Photos Take, One Without Morgyn Arnold
A Utah school has apologized after a student with Down syndrome at Shoreline Junior High was excluded from her cheerleading squad’s yearbook photo.
The squad took two official team portraits this year. The first included 14-year-old Morgyn Arnold, who had been working as the team manager but attended practices and cheered alongside her other teammates at every home game. The second imsgr did not include her and ended up being the photo the school used across social media and in its yearbook.
Arnold was heartbroken by the decision and her family believed it was made because of her disability.
In social media posts about the move, Arnold’s sister, Jordyn Poll, noted that Arnold “spent hours learning dances, showing up to games, and cheering on her school and friends but was left out.”
“I hope that no one ever has to experience the heartbreak that comes when the person they love comes home from school devastated and shows them that they’re not in the picture with their team,” she continued.
According to The Salt Lake Tribune, Poll also said this marked the second time in three years that her sister has been left out of the yearbook. Two years ago, the school failed to include her in the class list.
School Apologizes After Backlash
After Poll’s public call out picked up attention, the school said it was “deeply saddened by the mistake.”
“Apologies have been made to the family, and we sincerely apologize to all others impacted by this error,” it added. “We are continuing to look at what has occurred, and to improve our practice.”
The district issued a similar statement, claiming it was looking into why this occurred to make sure it doesn’t happen again.
But Poll said this isn’t the same response her family received when they initially contacted school administrators. Instead, Poll told the Tribune that an employee at the school “blatantly said they didn’t know what we were expecting of them and there was nothing they could do.”
The school has since contacted them again “to make the situation right.”
Meanwhile, Poll stressed that her sister’s teammates had nothing to do with the decision, defending the girls as amazing friends who have done everything to make Arnold feel included.
In fact, they too were disappointed to see that she was not featured in the image or even named as a member of the team in the yearbook.
Arnold’s family decided to speak up about the issue so that this school and others can improve the ways they interact with and include students with disabilities. Different forms of exclusion happen at schools across the country, and this story has prompted other parents of kids with disabilities to share similar experiences.
This kind of thing happens all the time. I can't count the number of times our son has been excluded, or nearly excluded, from events and pictures and related social activities in his 8 years of school. I know this fury.— David M. Perry (@Lollardfish) June 16, 2021
A staff attorney at the Disability Law Center of Utah told the Tribune that it receives about 4,000 complaints each year. Some complaints stemmed from students with disabilities being separated into other classrooms without their peers. Others include name-calling or not allowing students on a team or in a club.
Thankfully, Arnold has not let this situation bring her down. According to her family, she has already forgiven everyone involved and plans to continue cheering alongside her friends.