Connect with us

U.S.

Miss Staten Island Banned From St. Patrick’s Day Parade After Coming Out As Bisexual

Published

on

  • The day before her borough’s annual St. Patrick’s Day parade, Miss Staten Island Madison L’Insalata publicly came out as bisexual to several news outlets.
  • She revealed her plan to wear rainbow colors while marching in the parade, especially because the Pride Center of Staten Island was not allowed to march. 
  • Shortly after this news broke, a parade organizer informed L’Insalata that she could not march in Sunday’s event, citing safety concerns as the reason. 
  • The Staten Island St. Patrick’s Day parade organizers have been widely criticized for their exclusivity of LGBTQ groups.
  • Miss Staten Island repped her rainbow gear from the sidelines regardless of her ban.

Banned from Parade

As Staten Islanders held their annual St. Patrick’s Day parade on Sunday, there were several noticeable absences among the marchers—Miss Staten Island and anybody openly representing the LGBTQ community. Madison L’Insalata, who holds the pageant title, was confined to the sidelines after she came out as bisexual. 

L’Insalata, 23, revealed her sexual orientation to The New York Post and the Staten Island Advance over the weekend. She also told the outlets about her plan to wear rainbow gear at the parade as a symbol of LGBTQ pride. Her motives stemmed from the parade organizers’ decision to deny the Pride Center of Staten Island’s from participating in the parade, a rejection that has occurred repeatedly in past years. 

“I thought this might be a good time to really make a statement and take a stand,” L’Insalata told ABC7. “I wanted to announce that I would be marching in the parade with rainbow colors and showing and coming out and saying that I was bi because I wanted people to see the colors.” 

“I wanted there to be discussion and I wanted people to talk, and I wanted to change,” she added.

Shortly after the news outlets published her public coming out on Saturday, L’Insalata received a call from the director of Miss Staten Island Scholarship Pageants, Jim Smith. He had heard from parade organizer Larry Cummings, who said that L’Insalata and another pageant queen who had supported her were not allowed to march. 

“I was stunned by the whole thing,” Smith told CBS New York. “I wasn’t prepared. He just said we’re worried about her safety, like he’s doing us a favor.”  

L’Insalata didn’t fully believe the decision was made for her security. 

“It seems that it might have more to do with me coming out as bi, and my wearing my rainbow scarf that I have here, and them not being okay with that,” L’Insalata told ABC7

The pageant queen wasn’t the only one barred because of her colorful accessories. City Councilman Joseph Borelli (R) said he was physically blocked from marching and told he could not participate due to the rainbow-flag pin he was wearing. 

“They called the police on me,” Borelli told the Staten Island Advance. “I spoke to a sergeant and was not going to make the life of our cops more complicated to prove a point. …I didn’t come with it looking for an argument; my friends handed a pin to me. I really didn’t think it was a big affront to the Irish.”

L’Insalata, for her part, still showed up to wear her rainbow accessories on the side of Sunday’s parade.

“I just realized that even if I wasn’t going to be allowed to march, I could still make a difference,” L’Insalata told the Washington Post. “And I think that I still sparked conversation.”

Criticized For Exclusion

Staten Island’s is the only St. Patrick Day parade in the city that still bans LGBTQ groups from participating. 

“Here’s the deal, it’s a non-sexual identification parade and that’s that, no, they are not marching,” Cummings told the Staten Island Advance earlier this year when asked why the Pride Center was denied.  

“Don’t try to keep asking a million friggin’ questions, OK?” Cummings added when asked further questions on the matter. 

Cummings and the other organizers have faced repeated backlash for their exclusivity. Several politicians refused to participate in the Staten Island parade after the decision to ban the Pride Center was revealed. Other pageant winners in the area boycotted the parade due to the ban.

A petition to remove Cummings from his position emerged over the weekend and had gained over 5,700 signatures by Tuesday morning. L’Insalata, however, doesn’t think this is the best move. 

“A lot of people just want him totally removed, and the thing is, he was trying to shut me and the rest of the LGBTQ community out. He wasn’t trying to have a discussion,” she told NBC. “If I do the same thing, and if other people do the same thing by pushing him out, I don’t think that anything gets accomplished.”

See what others are saying: (CBS) (Washington Post) (NBC)

U.S.

Conservatives Slam Elmo For Getting Vaccinated Against COVID-19 

Published

on

While critics accused the muppet of promoting propaganda, CDC data shows the shots are safe and effective.


Elmo Gets Vaccinated 

Conservative politicians expressed outrage on Twitter after the beloved “Sesame Street” character Elmo revealed he got vaccinated against COVID-19 on Tuesday.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently cleared the way for children between the ages of six months and five years to get vaccinated against the virus. The famous red muppet is three years old, making him finally eligible for the jab. 

In a video shared by “Sesame Street,” Elmo said that he felt “a little pinch, but it was okay.” 

Elmo’s father, Louie, then addressed parents who might be apprehensive about vaccinating their own kids. 

“I had a lot of questions about Elmo getting the COVID vaccine,” he said to the camera. “Was it safe? Was it the right decision? I talked to our pediatrician so I could make the right choice.” 

“I learned that Elmo getting vaccinated is the best way to keep himself, our friends, neighbors, and everyone else healthy and enjoying the things they love,” he continued. 

Republicans Criticize “Sesame Street”

While some praised the video for raising awareness and addressing the concerns parents may have, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tx) quickly lambasted the effort.

“Thanks, Sesame Street for saying parents are allowed to have questions,” Cruz tweeted. “You then have Elmo aggressively advocate for vaccinating children UNDER 5. But you cite ZERO scientific evidence for this.”

Despite Cruz’s claim, the CDC has provided ample resources with information on vaccines for children. 

He was not alone in criticizing the video. Harmeet Dhillon, a committeewoman of the Republican National Committee for California, suggested that Elmo would be taking puberty blockers next. 

Other anti-vaxxers claimed Elmo would get myocarditis and accused “Sesame Street” of promoting propaganda.

COVID-19 vaccines have been proven to be both safe and effective against transmission of the virus, but this is not the first time conservatives have turned their anger against a friendly-looking muppet who opted to get the jab. When Big Bird got vaccinated in November, Cruz and other right-wing figures accused the show of brainwashing kids.

Big Bird’s choice to get vaccinated was not a shocker though, clips dating back to 1972 show him getting immunized against the measles. 

See what others are saying: (CNN) (The Hill) (Market Watch)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Uvalde Puts Police Chief on Leave, Tries to Kick Him Off City Council

Published

on

If Pete Arredondo fails to attend two more consecutive city council meetings, then he may be voted out of office.


Police Chief Faces Public Fury

Uvalde School District Police Chief Pete Arredondo was placed on administrative leave Wednesday following revelations that he and his officers did not engage the shooter at Robb Elementary for over an hour despite having adequate weaponry and protection.

Superintendent Hal Harrell, who made the announcement, did not specify whether the leave is paid or unpaid.

Harrell said in a statement that the school district would have waited for an investigation to conclude before making any personnel decisions, but chose to order the administrative leave because it is uncertain how long the investigation will take.

Lieutenant Mike Hernandez, the second in command at the police department, will assume Arredondo’s duties.

In an interview with The Texas Tribune earlier this month, Arredondo said he did not consider himself in charge during the shooting, but law enforcement records reviewed by the outlet indicate that he gave orders at the scene.

Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw told state senators on Tuesday that some officers wanted to enter the classrooms harboring the shooter but were stopped by their superiors.

He said officer Ruben Ruiz tried to move forward into the hallway after receiving a call from his wife Eva Mireles, a teacher inside one of the classrooms, telling him she had been shot and was bleeding to death.

Ruiz was detained, had his gun taken away, and was escorted off the scene, according to McCraw. Mireles later died of her wounds.

Calls for Arredondo to resign or be fired have persisted.

Emotions Erupt at City Council

Wednesday’s announcement came one day after the Uvalde City Council held a special meeting in which community members and relatives of victims voiced their anger and demanded accountability.

“Who are you protecting?” Asked Jasmine Cazares, sister of Jackie Cazares, a nine-year-old student who was shot. “Not my sister. The parents? No. You’re too busy putting them in handcuffs.”

Much of the anger was directed toward Arredondo, who was not present at the meeting but was elected to the city council on May 7, just over two weeks before the massacre.

“We are having to beg ya’ll to do something to get this man out of our faces,” said the grandmother of Amerie Jo Garza, a 10-year-old victim. “We can’t see that gunman. That gunman got off easy. We can’t take our frustrations out on that gunman. He’s dead. He’s gone. … Ya’ll need to put yourselves in our shoes, and don’t say that none of ya’ll have, because I guarantee you if any of ya’ll were in our shoes, ya’ll would have been pulling every string that ya’ll have to get this man off the council.”

One woman demanded the council refuse to grant Arredondo the leave of absence he had requested, pointing out that if he fails to attend three consecutive meetings the council can vote him out for abandoning his office.

“What you can do right now is not give him, if he requests it, a leave of absence,” she said. “Don’t give him an out. We don’t want him. We want him out.”

After hearing from the residents, the council voted unanimously not to approve the leave of absence.

On Tuesday, Uvalde’s mayor announced that Robb Elementary is set to be demolished, saying no students or teachers should have to return to it after what happened.

We make it a point to not include the names and pictures of those who may have been seeking attention or infamy and will not link out to websites that might contain such information.

Continue Reading

U.S.

Texas Public Safety Director Says Police Response to Uvalde Shooting Was An “Abject Failure”

Published

on

New footage shows officers prepared to engage the shooter one hour before they entered the classroom.


Seventy-Seven Deadly Minutes

Nearly a month after the mass shooting in Uvalde, Texas that killed 19 children and two teachers, evidence has emerged indicating that police were prepared to engage the shooter within minutes of arriving, but chose to wait over an hour.

The shooting at Robb Elementary began at 11:33 a.m., and within three minutes 11 officers are believed to have entered the school, according to surveillance and body camera footage obtained by KVUE and the Austin American Statesman.

District Police Chief Pete Arredondo reportedly called a landline at the police department at 11:40 a.m. for help.

“It’s an emergency right now,” he said. “We have him in the room. He’s got an AR-15. He’s shot a lot… They need to be outside the building prepared because we don’t have firepower right now. It’s all pistols.”

At 11:52 a.m., however, the footage shows multiple officers inside the school armed with at least two rifles and one ballistic shield.

Law enforcement did not enter the adjoined classrooms to engage the shooter until almost an hour later, at 12:50 p.m. During that time, one officer’s daughter was inside the classrooms and another’s wife, a teacher, reportedly called him to say she was bleeding to death.

Thirty minutes before law enforcement entered the classrooms, the footage shows officers had four ballistic shields in the hallway.

Frustrated Cops Want to Go Inside

Some of the officers felt agitated because they were not allowed to enter the classrooms.

One special agent at the Texas Department of Public Safety arrived about 20 minutes after the shooting started, then immediately asked, “Are there still kids in the classrooms?”

“It is unknown at this time,” another officer replied.

“Ya’ll don’t know if there’s kids in there?” The agent shot back. “If there’s kids in there we need to go in there.”

“Whoever is in charge will determine that,” the other officer responded.

According to an earlier account by Arredondo, he and the other officers tried to open the doors to the classrooms, but found them both locked and waited for a master key to arrive. But surveillance footage suggests that they never tried to open the doors, which a top Texas official has confirmed were never actually locked.

One officer has told reporters that within minutes of the police response, there was a Halligan bar, which firefighters use to break down locked doors, on-site, but it was never used.

At a special State Senate committee hearing Monday, Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw called the police response an “abject failure” and “antithetical to everything we’ve learned over the last two decades since the Columbine massacre.”

“The only thing stopping a hallway of dedicated officers from (entering rooms) 111 and 112 was the on-scene commander who decided to place the lives of officers before the lives of children,” he said. “The officers have weapons, the children had none.”

We make it a point to not include the names and pictures of those who may have been seeking attention or infamy and will not link out to websites that might contain such information.

Continue Reading