- Harvey Weinstein was convicted of rape and a criminal sexual act by New York jury Monday but was acquitted on more serious charges.
- Since the ruling, many praised the women who testified in court and applauded the decision.
- Those who spoke out include journalist Ronan Farrow; previous Weinstein accusers Rose McGowan, Rosanna Arquette, and Ashley Judd; and President Donald Trump.
- Weinstein maintains his innocence and was briefly hospitalized for heart palpitations following the verdict. He faces more charges in Los Angeles.
Responses to Weinstein’s Conviction
After disgraced film producer Harvey Weinstein was convicted on charges of rape and a criminal sexual act, many praised his the ‘silence breakers’ who told their stories for speaking out and starting a movement.
On Monday, Weinstein was found guilty on those two charges but was acquitted on a second rape charge, as well as more serious charges of predatory sexual assault. Over 80 women have accused him of sexual assault or harassment and several took to the stands during the trial.
Journalist Ronan Farrow, who broke the story that led to the dozens of accusations in 2018, said this verdict was “the result of the decisions of multiple women to come forward to journalists and to prosecutors at great personal cost and risk.”
Other prominent figures in the MeToo movement who previously accused Weinstein of misconduct also praised the women who testified. Rose McGowan said she was “proud of the brave women” and that she “can finally exhale.
Ashley Judd said the women who testified “walked through traumatic hell” but did a public service in doing so.
Rosanna Arquette echoed that praise and also thanked the jury. She then called for a change in the legal process of reporting these kinds of crimes.
Others also expressed their support for the outcome. Hollywood figures like Judd Apatow, Rosie Perez, Julianne Moore, and Tatum O’Neal all took to Twitter to celebrate the verdict. President Donald Trump also spoke at a press conference saying that the convictions are “a great victory and sends a very strong message.”
“So I was never a fan of Harvey Weinstein as you know,” Trump added before speaking about the producer’s Democratic leanings. “In fact, he said he was going to work hard to defeat me. How did that work out by the way? I’m trying to figure out.”
Weinstein Maintains Innocence
While many applauded the jury’s decision, Weinstein, who faces more charges in Los Angeles, maintained his innocence.
“I’m innocent, I’m innocent, I’m innocent,” he said, according to a statement his lawyer gave to Variety. “How could this happen in America?”
Shortly after the ruling, while Weinstein was set to be transported to jail, he was taken to a nearby hospital. According to his lawyers, he was experiencing chest pains, heart palpitations, and high blood pressure. He reportedly stayed the night and is in good condition now.
Testimonies from Accusers
His ruling comes after a trial that lasted several weeks. Over the course of the trial, several women told their stories in graphic and disturbing testimonies.
Weinstein’s conviction for a criminal sexual act comes from the case of Miriam Haley, a former production assistant. In her testimony, she described what went through her mind the moment she realized she was being sexually assaulted.
“I started weighing up my options in my head, and I thought, okay, I’m not able to get away from him physically,” she said. “So I thought, I thought if I escalate this, if I scream rape, will someone hear me. If I start kicking even harder, will I have a chance to get away from him.”
“And if I do get all the way downstairs, is the driver in on it, will he be there standing guard ready to scoop me up if I get that far?” Haley added. “And I couldn’t even get away from him at all, let alone get out of the apartment. So ultimately after a while, I just checked out and decided to endure it, that was the safest thing for me to do at that point.”
Another testimony came from Jessica Mann, who testified that Weinstein raped her throughout the course of an abusive relationship, which was where the rape conviction stems from. Mann explained what the immediate aftermath of that rape felt like.
“I was scared to look at myself, but I did, and I saw that I had been crying long enough that my eyes were red and swollen at that point,” she said. “But I don’t know when I started to cry.”
She said that shortly after, Weinstein summoned her to speak to her again.
“I’m so sorry about earlier,” Weinstein said, according to Mann. “I just find you so attractive, I couldn’t resist.”
Annabella Sciorra gave testimony as a witness in the trial. While none of the charges against Weinstein pertained to her specifically, she alleges that Weinstein raped her. She said she tried to resist, but after it kept going she said. “I didn’t have very much fight left inside of me at that point.”
“It was just so disgusting that my body started to shake in a way that was very unusual,” she added. “I didn’t really know what was happening, it was like a seizure or something.”
After the verdict came in, Sciorra gave a statement to Variety about the relief that this provides for her.
“My testimony was painful but necessary,” Sciorra said. “We can never regret breaking the silence. For in speaking truth to power we pave the way for a more just culture, free of the scourge of violence against women.”
See what others are saying: (Variety) (Vanity Fair) (Deadline)
Netflix Launches “Fast Laughs,” a TikTok-Like Feed of Funny Clips
- Netflix has created a TikTok-style feature it calls “Fast Laughs,” which is currently only available on its iOS mobile app in select countries.
- Executives described it as a “new full-screen feed of funny clips from a wide variety of Netflix titles, ranging from films and series to our deep bench of stand-up specials.”
- The clips can be shared on social media, and if users stumble across something they want to see more of, they can save that title to watch later or play it immediately.
Netflix Announces “Fast Laughs”
Netflix is now the latest platform to introduce its own TikTok-like feature.
On Thursday, the company announced “Fast Laughs,” which is currently only available on its iOS mobile app in select countries.
It essentially looks like TikTok, but Patrick Flemming, director of product innovation at Netflix, told The Verge it is a “new full-screen feed of funny clips from a wide variety of Netflix titles, ranging from films and series to our deep bench of stand-up specials.”
In its announcement blog post, Netflix said, “You access the feed through your bottom navigation menu by clicking on the Fast Laughs tab. Clips will start playing – when one ends another begins, to keep the laughs coming.“
If a user stumbles across a scene they want to see more of, they can save that title to watch later or play it immediately if they’d like. They can also share the clips individually on Whatsapp, Instagram, Snapchat, and Twitter.
Could It Really Rival TikTok?
Adding this TikTok-style feature may seem surprising since Netflix is a streaming service rather than a social media platform.
However, Netflix’s last few earnings reports have actually referenced TikTok as a major competitor. It’s not because they make the same style of content but instead because people are spending more time on TikTok – which for some means less time on Netflix.
While “Fast Laughs” might not compete with TikTok the way some other copycats hope to, some believe it’s an interesting way to highlight the huge library of content the site offers.
See what others are saying: (The Verge) (Tech Crunch) (USA Today)
Court Sides With Sofia Vergara, Says Ex Cannot Use Embryos Without Permission
- A Los Angeles court sided with actress Sofia Vergara on Tuesday, ruling that her ex-fiance Nick Loeb cannot use their embryos without her consent.
- The court cited a document the former couple had signed agreeing that both parties needed to approve the use of the embryos, arguing that the document could not be void.
- In a response, Loeb appeared to plug his new movie, saying the judge was “clearly influenced by Hollywood, which is a pattern I expose in my upcoming film Roe v. Wade.”
- Loeb had been trying to obtain custody of the embryos for many years and even argued in a Louisiana court that they should be treated as humans with rights, though the case was dismissed.
Court Sides With Sofia Vergara
Los Angeles County Superior Court sided with actress Sofia Vergara Tuesday, ruling that her ex-fiance could not use their embryos without her permission.
Vergara has been involved in a court battle with her ex, Nick Loeb, for several years. The two split in 2014 and had reportedly undergone in vitro fertilization within a year before their break up.
Loeb had been fighting to use those embryos on his own via a surrogate. According to TMZ, he at one point tried to take custody of them through a trust and named the embryos in a lawsuit. He also argued in a Louisiana court that the embryos should be recognized as humans with rights. The court dismissed that case in January and said Loeb was “forum shopping” for a court that might agree with his argument. At the time, his team said he would appeal their decision.
People Magazine obtained court documents from the Los Angeles court’s ruling, which granted Vergara’s request for a permanent injunction preventing Loeb from using the embryos “to create a child without the explicit written permission of the other person.”
Loeb Responds to Ruling
The court cited a document the former couple both signed at a fertility clinic, agreeing that both parties had to approve of any use of the embryos. Loeb tried to argue that he signed it under “duress” but the court still said that their agreement was not voidable based on that defense.
Loeb also tried to argue that he and the Modern Family actress had an “oral agreement” that would allow him to use the embryos on his own terms, but court said there was no “material fact” to support this.
According to People, Loeb issued a statement that plugged his new movie after the ruling. He said the judge “was clearly influenced by Hollywood, which is a pattern I expose in my upcoming film Roe v. Wade.”
“It’s sad that Sofia, a devout Catholic, would intentionally create babies just to kill them,” he continued.
Vergara’s team has not yet issued a statement on the case.
See what others are saying: (TMZ) (People) (Entertainment Tonight)
Chris D’Elia Accused of Soliciting Child Pornography in New Lawsuit
- Comedian Chris D’Elia was sued in California on Tuesday for sexual exploitation and soliciting nude photos from a minor.
- The lawsuit alleges that D’Elia “constructed a manipulative, controlling, and abusive dynamic” in order to get dozens of nude photos from a girl he knew was 17 at the time.
- It also says he invited the minor to his hotel room before one of his shows, where she performed sexual acts at his request.
- D’Elia’s spokesperson denied the accusations, which come just two weeks after D’Elia addressed months-old claims that he had sexually harassed underage women. He claimed sex “controlled” his life and admitted to having “a problem” but maintained all his relationships had been consensual and legal.
Chris D’Elia Accused of Soliciting Child Pornography
A federal lawsuit filed in the Central District of California on Tuesday accuses comedian Chris D’Elia of sexual exploitation and soliciting nude photos from a minor.
The allegations stem from 2014 when Jane Doe, now 24, was just 17-years-old. The lawsuit says D’Elia, who would have been 34 at the time, “constructed a manipulative, controlling, and abusive dynamic” in order to solicit the photos and pressure Doe into sexual encounters.
According to Doe, their interactions began in September of that year when she contacted him on Instagram, thinking he would never reply. D’Elia, however, allegedly responded to her message right away and asked her to come to one of his shows. When she agreed to see him perform at Foxwoods Resort Casino in Connecticut, she says they exchanged information on Snapchat.
Once the two started communicating on Snapchat, the lawsuit claims that the messages D’Elia sent “became sexual very quickly.” He allegedly started to ask for nude photos of her, and if she did not reply, he would persist. While she tried to avoid sending the photos, the lawsuit claims he was “aggressive.” She eventually sent him 5-10 explicit photos before she met him.
According to the lawsuit, when D’Elia came to perform in Connecticut in November, he invited Doe to his room before the show. Because she was nervous about the situation, Doe brought a friend with her, but D’Elia allegedly demanded that the friend leave or else he would not let Doe inside.
Doe’s friend left and the lawsuit claims that D’Elia then began to request sexual favors from Doe within minutes of her arrival. It alleges that the two had sex while D’Elia knew her age. It even adds that during the acts, he repeatedly asked her to tell him she was 17 and still in high school, with him allegedly saying that this was “hot.”
Doe says that he invited her back to his hotel after the show and they had sex again. After this, she says she left feeling “disgusting and defeated.” The lawsuit says this was her first sexual encounter of any kind and she had not even kissed anyone prior to meeting him, leaving her unsure what to think or do in the situation.
Over the following months, the lawsuit claims that D’Elia would limit his communication with Doe as a tactic to pry more photos out of her. It says he would demand she send explicit photos or he would unfollow her on social media until she compiled. The lawsuit says that over the course of six to seven months, she sent him over 100 explicit photos and videos, roughly half of which were taken while she was a minor.
The lawsuit says Doe “suffered significant emotional, physical, and psychological harm as a direct result of Defendant D’Elia’s predatory conduct.”
D’Elia Says He “Has A Problem”
These allegations come nearly nine months after several women accused him of sexual harassment and predatory behavior. Many said they were underage at the time he harassed them.
After months of silence, D’Elia recently addressed those allegations in a 10-minute video on February 19. He apologized and said he had been seeking help.
“I mean sex, it controlled my life,” he said. “It was the focus, my focus, all the time. And I had a problem. I do have a problem.”
However, he denied ever breaking the law in his sexual encounters.
“I stand by the fact that all my relationships have been consensual and legal,” he said.
A spokesperson for the comedian told the Los Angeles Times that the accusations in the lawsuit are false.
“Chris denies these allegations and will vigorously defend against them in court,” they said.
Jane Doe is seeking unspecified damages.