Connect with us

U.S.

OU Students Protest Against Arrival of Kent State “Gun Girl”

Published

on

  • Kaitlin Bennett, known on the internet as the Kent State Gun Girl, was met by crowds of protesters on Monday when she went to Ohio Unversity’s campus to make a video.
  • Students chanted at her to leave and threw toilet paper at her.
  • According to campus police, water was splashed at her but no arrests were made and no violence broke out. Bennett, however, claims hot coffee was poured on her and said her colleague’s car was vandalized.
  • Bennett eventually left campus but vows to come back. The situation started a large conversation online, with some defending protesters, and some accusing them of bullying.

Bennett Goes to Ohio University

Kaitlin Bennet, known to many on the Internet as the Kent State Gun Girl, was met by crowds of student protesters on Monday when she arrived at Ohio University’s campus.

Bennett, a well-known conservative gun-rights activist, came to the school with the intent to film a video asking students trivia questions about President’s Day. In protest of her presence at the school, students chanted for her to leave and threw toilet paper at her. 

Since her graduation photos depicting her holding a rifle on Kent State University’s campus went viral in 2018, Bennett has been a contentious figure online. She currently makes videos for Liberty Hangout, a controversial Libertarian media outlet. In them, she asks people on the street about hot-button issues like abortion, gender-inclusive bathrooms, and gun rights. With the viral attention these videos often receive also comes criticism and mockery from Twitter users.

Videos shared online of her arrival at Ohio University show students yelling things like “no one likes you” and “where’s your diaper.” The latter is a reference to a likely false online rumor that Bennett once soiled herself at a party.

Many students surrounded Bennett, phones in hand, as she made her way through the school. Bennett posted a video that she took from the inside of a car as she was leaving. In it, students are throwing liquids at the vehicle and blocking it from moving.

“This is what happens when a Trump supporter goes to a college campus,” she wrote before accusing the students of starting a riot, and suggesting that President Donald Trump revoke public funding from the school.

Statements by Bennett and Ohio University Police

According to a statement from Ohio University’s Police Department, no arrests were made and no one was asked to leave the scene aside from moving people to clear public paths. They wrote that Bennett “engaged in Constitutionally protected activity.”

“She drew a large crowd of people, many with opposing viewpoints, who also chose to exercise their first amendment rights,” the statement added.

According to the statement, Bennett did not notify them of her visit. While this is not mandatory, they say it would have helped their staffing levels. The police also rejected her claim that a “riot” took place. 

“Contrary to allegations circulating on social media, the incident did not rise to the level of a riot,” the school’s police wrote. “There was strong language, and allegations of some unknown person[s] in the crowd splashed water, but there were no reported injuries or violence and no one was arrested during the event.”

Bennett, however, was not pleased with the police’s response and claimed hot coffee was dumped on her and that her colleague’s car was vandalized. 

She vowed to return to the school at a later date with “an army of gun owners for an open carry walk through campus.”

On Tuesday, she claimed there were high-level credible threats against her. 

Online Reactions

The incident sparked a large conversation online, with some appalled by the behavior of the protesters at Ohio University. One alumnus said it made them “sick.”

Blaze TV correspondent Elijah Schaffer said fighting against people who disagree with you politically is not the answer.

Conservative actor and producer James Woods called it a display of mob mentality from Democrats. 

Some also encouraged Bennett to still raise her voice, even if people were standing against her. 

On the other side, some thought these protests were exactly what Bennett expected and perhaps even hoped for. One Ohio University student told Athens News that it felt like Bennett “just came here to get this reaction.”

One Twitter user said that “this is the attention [Bennett] ordered.”

Others pointed to her past transphobic and homophobic comments, as well as controversial stances made in the past by Liberty Hangout. They believed these ideas should be met with dissent.

Others believed that it was hypocritical for conservatives to be upset that Bennett was being bullied because Trump is accused of bullying on a regular basis. 

Bennett trended on Twitter Tuesday morning, with many posting memes and jokes about the situation. Some responded to this trend by noting that while they do not see eye to eye with Bennett, attacking her only fuels the fire for her. 

Others thought something should be done about the tweets making fun of her, as it could be seen as a violation of Twitter’s policy. 

Bennett’s name was still a top trending topic by Tuesday afternoon. She has not announced a specific date for her potential return to the Ohio school.

See what others are saying: (Athens News) (USA Today) (Cleveland.com)

U.S.

Katie Couric Says She Edited Ruth Bader Ginsburg Quote About Athletes Kneeling During National Anthem

Published

on

Couric said she omitted part of a 2016 interview in order to “protect” the justice.


Kate Couric Edited Quote From Justice Ginsburg

In her upcoming book, journalist Katie Couric admitted to editing a quote from Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg in 2016 in order to “protect” Ginsberg from potential criticism. 

Couric interviewed the late justice for an article in Yahoo News. During their discussion, she asked Ginsburg about her thoughts on athletes like Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem to protest racial inequality.

“I think it’s really dumb of them,” Ginsburg is quoted saying in the piece. “Would I arrest them for doing it? No. I think it’s dumb and disrespectful. I would have the same answer if you asked me about flag burning. I think it’s a terrible thing to do, but I wouldn’t lock a person up for doing it. I would point out how ridiculous it seems to me to do such an act.”

According to The Daily Mail and The New York Post, which obtained advance copies of Couric’s book “Going There,” there was more to Ginsburg’s response. Couric wrote that she omitted a portion where Ginsburg said the form of protest showed a “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life…Which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.

Couric Says She Lost Sleep Making Choice

“As they became older they realize that this was youthful folly,” Ginsberg reportedly continued. “And that’s why education is important.

According to The Daily Mail, Couric wrote that the Supreme Court’s head of public affairs sent an email asking to remove comments about kneeling because Ginsburg had misspoken. Couric reportedly added that she felt a need to “protect” the justice, thinking she may not have understood the question. Couric reached out to her friend, New York Times reporter David Brooks, regarding the matter and he allegedly likewise believed she may have been confused by the subject. 

Couric also wrote that she was a “big RBG fan” and felt her comments were “unworthy of a crusader for equality.” Because she knew the remarks could land Ginsburg in hot water, she said she “lost a lot of sleep” and felt “conflicted” about whether or not to edit them out. 

Couric was trending on Twitter Wednesday and Thursday as people questioned the ethics behind her choice to ultimately cut part of the quote. Some thought the move showed a lack of journalistic integrity while others thought revealing the story now harmed Ginsburg’s legacy.

See what others are saying: (New York Post) (The Daily Mail) (Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Biden Administration Orders ICE To Halt Workplace Raids

Published

on

The Department of Homeland Security will now focus on targeting employers who exploit undocumented workers, instead of carrying out raids that dissuade those workers from reporting labor violations.


DHS Reverses Worksite Raid Policy

The Biden administration announced Tuesday that it was ordering Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to stop workplace raids.

The move marks a reversal from Trump administration policies that have been strongly criticized by immigration activists who argue the efforts created fear in immigrant communities and dissuaded them from reporting labor violations or exploitative employment practices.

In addition to stopping the raids, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a memo that the administration will refocus enforcement efforts to instead target “employers who exploit unauthorized workers, conduct illegal activities or impose unsafe working conditions.” 

Mayorkas added that the immigration agencies housed in DHS will have the next 60 days to identify harmful existing policies and come up with new ones that provide better deportation protections for workers who report their employers.

In the Tuesday memo, the secretary argued that shift of focus will “reduce the demand for illegal employment by delivering more severe consequences to exploitative employers” and “increase the willingness of workers to report violations of law by exploitative employers and cooperate in employment and labor standards investigation.”

Labor Market Implications

The new policy comes at a time when the U.S. is experiencing a critical labor shortage, including in many sectors that rely on immigrant labor.

Some companies that use undocumented workers pay them wages that are far below the market rate, which is not only exploitative but also undercuts competitors.

According to Mayorkas, the pivot to employer-based enforcement will help protect American businesses.

“By exploiting undocumented workers and paying them substandard wages, the unscrupulous employers create an unfair labor market,” he said in the memo. “They also unfairly drive down their costs and disadvantage their business competitors who abide by the law.”

It is currently unclear how effective the new efforts will be, but historical precedent does not paint an optimistic picture.

The Biden administration’s efforts closely mirror a similar move by the Obama administration, which attempted to reverse workplace raids authorized under President George W. Bush by targetting those who employ undocumented workers rather than the workers themselves.

That effort, however, still led to thousands of undocumented workers being fired.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (ABC News)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Mom Charged for Hosting Secret Teen Parties, Pressuring Kids To Drink and Engage in Sex Acts

Published

on

Investigators said some of the sex acts between teens were non-consensual and at times took place while the mother stood by laughing.


Mother Hit With Dozens of Charges

A California mother is facing 39 criminal charges after hosting a series of illegal parties for her teenage son and his mostly 14- and 15-year-old friends that regularly led to dangerous accidents and sexual assaults.

The mother, 47-year-old Shannon O’Connor, also known as Shannon Bruga, is currently awaiting extradition to Santa Clara County. According to The Mercury News, she was arrested Saturday in Ada County, Idaho, where she has a home in addition to her property in Los Gatos that is currently on the market.

Her criminal charges include 12 felony counts and 10 misdemeanor counts of child endangerment, one count of misdemeanor sexual battery, three counts of misdemeanor child molestation, and 13 misdemeanor counts of providing alcohol to minors.

“It took a lot of brave children to come forward and to untangle this deeply disturbing case,” Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said in a press release regarding the case. “As a parent, I’m shocked. As the DA, I’m determined to hold those adults who endanger children fully accountable to the law and our community.”

What Happened During the Parties?

Investigators claim O’Connor organized the functions, attended by as many as 20 teens, via text message and Snapchat. She would then allegedly supply the teens with alcohol and push them to binge drink, often to the point of illness or unconsciousness.

The harm that resulted from their intoxication included one teen breaking a finger and another almost drowning in a hot tub, among other serious situations.

In another instance, O’Connor let an unlicensed drunk teen drive her car. Her son and another one of his friends then hung off the back while it was moving, which caused the friend to fall, hit his head, and become unconscious for 30 seconds. He was later diagnosed with a concussion after spending the night vomiting.

O’Connor is additionally accused of manipulating and encouraging drunk teens to participate in sex acts with one another, which were sometimes non-consensual or carried out while she watched. In some cases, she allegedly laughed while the sexual acts happened or when assault victims asked her why she didn’t step in to help.

Investigators added that O’Connor required teens who attended her parties to keep them a secret. She’s even accused of helping them sneak out of their homes so she could drive them to her events. Authorities said she was found to have bullied at least one teen who she suspected of breaking the secret.

“Everyone should feel relieved this woman’s not on the street,” the parents of one assault victim told The Mercury News. “She was grooming these kids, setting them up for sexual acts, and she’s a mother and doing this to her own child. … I’ve been racking my brain trying to think what was in it for her.

See what others are saying: (The Mercury News) (ABC 7) (CBS San Francisco)

Continue Reading