- The Department of Homeland Security announced Wednesday that New Yorkers will no longer be able to enroll in several Trusted Traveler Programs, including Global Entry, NEXUS, SENTRI, and FAST.
- The DHS says it made this decision because the state’s Green Light Law, which allows undocumented immigrants to get licenses, also blocks DHS groups like ICE and CBP from obtaining New York DMV information.
- DHS says they need this information for a number of reasons, including validating people for Trusted Traveler Programs.
- Many have criticized this move, saying that blocking New Yorkers from these programs will not make travel safer, and could actually put travelers at risk.
DHS Suspends Trusted Traveler Programs
The Department of Homeland Security is suspending New York residents from enrolling in Global Entry and other Trusted Traveler Programs because of a controversial provision in the state’s newly enacted Green Light Law.
The Driver’s License Access and Privacy Act, known as the Green Light Law, was passed in the summer and took effect in December. It allows New Yorkers to apply for a state driver’s license or permit “regardless of their citizenship or lawful states in the United States.” In other words, undocumented immigrants can obtain a driver’s license in the state, making it one of 15 states in the country to allow this.
New York’s Green Light Law has a privacy protection that prevents state DMV information from being shared with agencies that enforce immigration laws, like Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, unless they have a court order.
Because of this part of the law, DHS says it can no longer allow New Yorkers to take part in several Trusted Traveler Programs. These programs give expedited clearance to pre-approved, low-security travelers arriving to the United States. Programs impacted include Global Entry; NEXUS, which is specifically for those traveling from Canada; SENTRI, for those traveling from Canada or Mexico; and FAST, which is for truck drivers.
Acting Secretary for the Department of Homeland Security Chad Wolf made the announcement while speaking to Tucker Carlson on Fox News Wednesday evening.
“Today, we sent a letter to New York indicating that because they took these measures, that New York residents are no longer allowed to enroll in these Trusted Traveler programs,” he told Carlson.
“Over the years, CBP has utilized New York DMV records in several ways to promote national security and to enforce federal customs and immigration laws,” the letter stated. “Having access to New York DMV information has enabled CBP to validate that an individual applying for Trusted Traveler Programs membership qualifies for low-risk status or meets other program requirements.”
The letter also claimed that ICE and other DHS organizations use information from the state’s DMV to combat crime.
“Although DHS would prefer to continue our long-standing cooperative relationship with New York on a variety of these critical homeland security initiatives, this Act and the corresponding lack of security cooperation from the New York DMV requires DHS to take immediate action to ensure DHS’s efforts to protect the Homeland are not compromised,” the letter said.
According to a statement from DHS, this will impact somewhere between 150,000 to 200,000 New Yorkers who use these programs.
DHS’s announcement came one day after President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address, where he spoke of crimes by immigrants in sanctuary cities. Several reports and studies have indicated there is little correlation between violent crime rates and immigrant populations.
The news came as a shock to many and received a lot of criticism. Rich Azzopardi, an adviser for New York Governor Andrew Cuomo condemned the choice when speaking with the New York Times.
“This is obviously political retaliation by the federal government, and we’re going to review our legal options,” Azzopardi said.
Marco Lopez, who was the Chief of Staff at CBP when Global Entry launched, tweeted that it will make airport travel less safe.
Some did support the announcement, though. After Wolf delivered the news to him, Carlson expressed his approval.
“Good for you,” Carlson responded. “That will be a shock to a lot of New Yorkers but I support that completely.”
Others fell in the middle. Rep. Max Rose (R-NY) spoke to Spectrum News saying that while he does not fully support the Green Light Law, he does not agree with DHS’s decision either.
See what others are saying: (Fox News) (New York Times) (Slate)
Wisconsin Police Deny Planting Evidence in Viral Video, Release Their Own Body Cam Footage
The footage police released shows that during a search, officers found a corner tear from a plastic bag inside a backseat passenger’s pocket. An officer then discarded it into the car after determining that it was empty.
Viral Video Appears To Show Officer Planting Evidence
The Caledonia Police Department in Wisconsin has responded to a viral cell phone video that appears to show an officer planting a small plastic baggie inside of a car during a traffic stop.
The now-viral footage was posted to Facebook by a man who goes by GlockBoy Savoo.
The user, who also filmed the clip, wrote in his post’s caption that the officer did this “just to get a reason to search the car” and said the cop didn’t know he was being recorded by the passenger.
Police Shut Down Accusations With Their Own Footage
After that video spread across social media, many were outraged, calling the Caledonia police dirty for seemingly planting evidence. All the outrage eventually prompted the department to announce an investigation Saturday.
Within hours, the department provided an update, claiming that officers didn’t actually plant any evidence or do anything illegal.
Police shared a lengthy summary of events, along with two body camera clips from the incident. That statement explained that the driver of the vehicle was pulled over for going 63 in a 45mph zone.
Two passengers in the backseat who were then spotted without seatbelts were asked to identify themselves and step out of the car. During a search of one passenger’s pockets, an officer pulled out “an empty corner tear” from a plastic baggie.
Police claim the corner tear did not contain any illegal substances, though they said this type of packaging is a common method for holding illegal drugs.
In one body cam clip, an officer can be heard briefly questioning the backseat passenger about the baggie. Then, that piece of plastic gets handed off to different officers who also determined it as empty before the officer in the original viral video discarded it into the back of the car.
The officer can also be seen explaining where the plastic came from to the passenger recording him.
“Aye, bro you just threw that in here!” the front seat passenger says, as heard in his version of the events.
“Yeah, cause it was in his pocket and I don’t want to hold onto it. It’s on their body cam that they took it off of him…I’m telling you where it came from, so. It’s an empty baggie at the moment too, so,” the officer replies.
The department went on to explain that while it would discourage officers from discarding items into a citizen’s car, this footage proves that evidence was not planted.
Authorities also noted that no arrests were made in this incident and the driver was the only one issued a citation for speeding. The statement added that since four officers were present at the scene, police have more than six hours of footage to review but they promised to release the footage in full in the near future.
See what others are saying: (Heavy)(CBS 58) (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
Medical Groups, Local Leaders Push for Healthcare Workers and Public Employees To Get Vaccinated
The move comes as COVID cases have nearly quadrupled in the last month due to the rapid spread of the highly infectious delta variant.
Increased Calls for Mandatory Vaccinations in Certain Sectors
More than 50 of America’s largest medical groups representing millions of healthcare workers issued a statement Monday calling for employers of all health and long-term care providers to require mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations.
The groups, which included the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association, and 55 others, cited contagious new variants — including delta — and low vaccination rates.
“Vaccination is the primary way to put the pandemic behind us and avoid the return of stringent public health measures,” they wrote.
The call to action comes as new COVID cases have almost quadrupled during the month of July, jumping from just around 13,000 infections a day at the beginning of this month to more than 50,000.
While the vast majority of new infections and hospitalizations are among those who have not received the vaccines, many healthcare workers remain unvaccinated. According to data collected by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, over 38% of nursing home staff were not fully vaccinated as of July 11.
An analysis by WebMD and Medscape Medical News found that around 25% of hospital workers who were in contact with patients had not been vaccinated by the end of May when vaccinations became widely available.
In addition to calls for medical professionals to get vaccinated, some local leaders have also begun to impose mandates for public employees as cases continue spiking.
Last month, San Francisco announced that it was requiring all city workers to get vaccinated. Also on Monday, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said that all municipal employees — including police officers and teachers — must either get the jab or agree to weekly testing by the time school starts in September.
Dr. Fauci Says U.S. Officials Are Considering Revising Mask Guidance for Vaccinated People
Numerous top U.S. health officials have applauded efforts by local leaders to mitigate further spread of the coronavirus, including the nation’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who confirmed Sunday that federal officials are actively considering whether to revise federal masking guidelines to recommend that vaccinated Americans wear face coverings in public settings.
In May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said people who are vaccinated do not need to mask in public. Although that was a non-binding recommendation, many states and cities that had not already lifted restrictions on masking began to do so shortly after.
But now, local leaders in areas seeing big spikes have begun reimposing mask mandates — even for those who are vaccinated — including major counties like Los Angeles and St. Louis.
In his remarks Sunday, Fauci also emphasized that, despite claims from many conservatives, those efforts are in line with the federal recommendations, which leave space for local leaders to issue their own rules.
While Fauci and other top U.S. public health officials have encouraged local governments to take action, Republican lawmakers in several states are taking steps to limit the ability of local leaders and public health officials to take certain mitigation measures.
According to the Network for Public Health Law, at least 15 state legislatures have passed or are considering bills to limit the legal authority of public health agencies — and that does not even include unilateral action taken by governors.
Some of the leaders of states suffering the biggest spikes have banned local officials from imposing their own mask mandates, like Arkansas, which has the highest per capita cases in the country right now, as well as Florida, which currently ranks third.
Notably, some of the laws proposed or passed by Republicans could go beyond just preventing local officials from trying to mitigate surges in COVID cases and may have major implications for other public health crises.
For example, according to The Washington Post, a North Dakota law that bans mask mandates applies to other breakouts — even tuberculosis — while a new Montana law also bars the use of quarantine for people who have been exposed to an infectious disease but have not yet tested positive.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (The Guardian)
Couple Slammed Over Slavery-Themed Pre-Wedding Photoshoot
Many have expressed outrage at the duo for trying to romanticize slavery while others were left completely dumbfounded by the entire ordeal.
Photoshoot Goes Viral
A couple has come under fire after sharing images on Instagram from their slavery-themed pre-wedding photoshoot.
The photos show a Black man in shackles looking deeply into his white fiancé’s eyes before she works to releases him.
“1842. Days passed and everything changed, our love got stronger and stronger, he was no longer a slave, he was part of the family,” the post’s caption reads.
To indicate his transition from “slave” to family, a fourth image shows him wearing a long coat and top hat with well-shined shoes, as opposed to the white shirt, trousers, and straw hat he wore in the previous images.
Social Media Users React
It’s not immediately clear who these people are since the social media handle is redacted in the images circulating online.
Still, many have expressed outrage at the duo for trying to romanticize slavery while others were left just completely dumbfounded by this entire ordeal. Some also directed criticism at the photographer who agreed to the shoot, along with the hundreds of Instagram users who liked the original posts.
To see people romanticize this shit is infuriating – these people are too much. There is no such thing as slave consent and the sexual abuse of male slaves was real.— Nurse Elise 🌒 (@EliseRootedMind) July 21, 2021
There were three people there counting the photographer and not one thought should we? And over 1400 people hit the like button? And it’s part 2 like there’s more? I so want to be at the wedding when minister asks if anybody objects.— Randi Pro Democracy (@RandiKinman) July 21, 2021