Connect with us

Entertainment

Jay-Z and Beyoncé Earn Mixed Reactions After Sitting During Super Bowl National Anthem

Published

on

  • Jay-Z and Beyoncé sat during the national anthem at this year’s Super Bowl, prompting a wave of backlash from conservatives like Tomi Lahren and Charlie Kirk.
  • The move was surprising to some considering Jay-Z’s partnership with the NFL which gives him influence over music events and social justice initiatives – a deal that many saw as a betrayal of Colin Kaepernick. 
  • Kaepernick even reshared a post suggesting that the couple’s choice to sit was hypocritical, meanwhile, supporters called the criticism overblown.

Jay-Z’s Relationship With Kaepernick and the NFL 

Music superstars Jay-Z and Beyoncé are seeing both backlash and support after not standing during the U.S. national anthem at last night’s Super Bowl. 

Footage released by TMZ showed the couple and their daughter, Blue Ivy, seated at Hark Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida during Demi Lovato’s performance of “The Star-Spangled Banner.” 

The clip quickly spread across social media and was considered a surprising move by some given Jay-Z’s recent relationship with the National Football League. 

In 2019, Jay-Z, a co-producer of the halftime show featuring Shakira and Jennifer Lopez, announced that his Roc Nation company had entered a partnership with the NFL.

The deal gave him influence over NFL music events like the halftime show, as well a hand in “Inspire Change,” the NFL’s new initiative concerning “education and economic advancement, police and community relations, and criminal justice reform,” according to the leagues’ promotional materials. The higher purpose of the partnership is to “bring representation of color and try to foster nationwide cultural dialogue,” Roc Nation executives told The New York Times. 

Jay-Z faced immediate backlash at the time of the announcement, especially since he had previously been known for supporting former San Francisco 49er Colin Kaepernick, who sparked controversy for kneeling during the national anthem to protest against police brutality and racism. 

Some saw the rapper’s partnership as a betrayal of Kaepernick, including the former football player’s attorney who described it as crossing “the intellectual picket line.”

Jay-Z addressed the criticism in an interview with The New York Times that was published a day before the big game. In it, he said he could deal with the scruitiny if he is able to use the NFL’s platform to convince white football fans that they should also be concerned about police brutality. “As long as real people are being hurt and marginalized and losing family members, then yes, I can take a couple rounds of negative press,” he explained.

“No one is saying he hasn’t been done wrong. He was done wrong,” Jay-Z continued. “I would understand if it was three months ago. But it was three years ago and someone needs to say, ‘What do we do now?’ Because people are still dying.”

He later described himself and Kaepernick as “two adult men who disagree on the tactic but are marching for the same cause.”

Conservatives Slam Jay-Z and Beyoncé 

After seeing the clip of the couple sitting during the anthem, many people took to social media to express their frustration. Perhaps one of the loudest conservative voices speaking out against Jay-Z and Beyonce was Fox Nation host Tomi Lahren.

Other conservatives expressed similar sentiments on Twitter as well, calling the two “pathetic” and “spoiled brats.” 

Colin Kaepernick Takes Notice 

Even Kaepernick himself, who has refused to watch the Super Bowl and support the NFL, shared a screenshot drawing attention to the couple’s move. The screenshot was of a post made by Miko Grimes, wife of football player Brent Grimes and outspoken critic of the NFL. In her post, she seemed to imply that Jay-Z was being hypocritical by sitting after his partnership with the league by writing, “I thought we were ‘past kneeling’ tho?” over a TMZ headline. 

@Kaepernick7

The “past kneeling” comment is a reference to what Jay-Z said last summer about protesting when defending his NFL deal.

“I think we’ve moved past kneeling. I think it’s time to go into actionable items. I don’t want people to stop protesting at all. Kneeling is a form of protest. I support protests across the board,” he said at the time. “We forget that Colin’s whole thing was to bring attention to social injustice. In that case, this is a success. This is the next phase. There [are] two parts of protesting. You go outside and you protest, and then the company or the individual says, ‘I hear you. What do we do next?’”

Supporters Clap Back at the Outrage 

Despite the criticism, some supporters praised the couple for sitting. Meanwhile, other internet users spoke out against the outrage, suggesting it was overblown.

See what others are saying: (Billboard) (Fox News) (The Hill

Entertainment

Fire at Home Reportedly Owned by Beyoncé and Jay-Z Under Arson Investigation

Published

on

Officials said there were no injuries or evacuations during the fire, which was put out in around two hours.


Fire Breaks Out at Famed Couple’s Reported Residence

A Wednesday fire at a historic home in New Orleans, Louisiana believed to be owned by music titans Beyoncé and Jay-Z is being investigated as a possible arson. 

On Thursday, a New Orleans Police Department spokesperson confirmed to multiple outlets that it had received a tip about a suspicious person in the area. Further details about the suspicious person and the cause of the fire have not been revealed.

Neighbors told local media that there is an unlocked gate on the property that outsiders sometimes use to gain entry.

Officials told The New York Post that it took 22 firefighters over two hours to extinguish the blaze, with no reported injuries or evacuations. The extent of the damage currently remains unclear, but a spokesperson told The Post that given the age of the residence, the situation could have been far more severe. 

“If [the firefighters] didn’t get there when they did, it could have been much worse,” the spokesperson said. “It’s a historic home.”

About the Home

The building was first built in the Garden District neighborhood of the city in the 1920s as a church. It was later used as a ballet school and then became a high-end residence in 2000. Realtor.com says it is currently valued at $3 million.

The home was purchased in 2015 by Sugarcane Parkin LLC. According to The Washington Post, this company has the same registered address as other entities owned by Beyoncé. Sugarcane Parkin is also allegedly managed by Beyoncé’s mother, Celestine Lawson, better known as Tina Knowles.

Representatives for the “Lemonade” singer and her husband have not issued any public statements about the incident, nor have they confirmed that the home is owned by the couple. 

In March of this year, storage units in Los Angeles belonging to Beyonce were burglarized. According to TMZ, over a million dollars of goods were stolen, including expensive dresses and handbags.

See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Post) (NOLA)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Cleveland’s Baseball Team Changes Name From Indians to Guardians

Published

on

The move marks the team’s first name change since 1915, and it comes after decades of criticism from Native Americans. 


Name Change Announced

Cleveland’s Major League Baseball team said Friday that it will change its name after the 2021 season from the Indians to the Guardians.

The team announced the name change with a just over two-minute video narrated by actor Tom Hanks.

“You see, there’s always been a Cleveland — that’s the best part of our name,” Hanks says in the clip. “And now it’s time to unite as one family, one community, to build the next era for this team and this city.”

This marks the team’s first name change since 1915, and it comes after decades of criticism from Native Americans. 

Despite long-running calls to change racist and offensive team names — including the Washington Redskins — such campaigns did not gain significant momentum until the nationwide racial reckoning that followed the murder of George Floyd.

Why Guardians?

Officials behind the Cleveland team first pledged to change the name last year and previously removed the “Chief Wahoo” logo, a caricature of a Native American character, from its uniforms following the 2018 season.

It toyed with several options before ultimately landing on Guardians, which draws from Cleveland’s architectural history. 

“We are excited to usher in the next era of the deep history of baseball in Cleveland,” team owner and chairman Paul Dolan said in a news release. 

“Cleveland has and always will be the most important part of our identity. Therefore, we wanted a name that strongly represents the pride, resiliency and loyalty of Clevelanders.”

“‘Guardians’ reflects those attributes that define us while drawing on the iconic Guardians of Traffic just outside the ballpark on the Hope Memorial Bridge. It brings to life the pride Clevelanders take in our city and the way we fight together for all who choose to be part of the Cleveland baseball family. While ‘Indians’ will always be a part of our history, our new name will help unify our fans and city as we are all Cleveland Guardians.”

Guardians will be the fifth name in franchise history, joining Blues (1901), Bronchos (1902), Naps (1903-14), and Indians (1915-2021).

See what others are saying:(ESPN)(Axios) (Cleveland)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Editor Slams Megyn Kelly for “Bullying” Naomi Osaka

Published

on

Editor M.J. Day said Kelly’s attacks against Osaka are “part of the problem” when it comes to mental health discussions.


Megyn Kelly and Naomi Osaka’s Heated Twitter Exchange

The editor of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue slammed former TV news anchor Megyn Kelly Tuesday for mocking cover model and tennis star Naomi Osaka.

“It’s such bullying and it’s so unnecessary,” editor M.J. Day told People Magazine’s Every Day” podcast. “And [Osaka] did nothing wrong.” 

Osaka made history Monday by becoming the first Haitian and Japanese woman on the cover of the iconic issue. The athlete has been making headlines over the last few months for speaking openly and vulnerably about her mental health. In the spring, she said she was not going to participate in French Open press events because of the toll it takes on her as an introvert who has struggled with depression. She later withdrew from the tournament after that choice sparked backlash and likewise opted out of Wimbledon to take some “personal” time. 

Some — conservative pundits, in particular — slammed Osaka for stepping back from these roles because of her mental health, but still opting to work on other projects, including the release of a Barbie doll, a Netflix docuseries, and a handful of magazine covers. Kelly joined that bandwagon, noting that Osaka has been featured in the likes of Vogue and TIME.

“Seeing as you’re a journalist I would’ve assumed you would take the time to research what the lead times are for magazines, if you did that you would’ve found out I shot all of my covers last year,” Osaka tweeted in response, though she later deleted the post.

“Instead your first reaction is to hop on here and spew negativity, do better Megan.”

M.J. Day Says Kelly is “Part of the Problem” With Mental Health Conversations

Kelly later tweeted that Osaka blocked her on Twitter, lashing out at the tennis champion for that decision as well.

People online have been largely defending Osaka and criticizing Kelly. Many argue that it is unfair for Kelly to attack a young woman who has been vocal about dealing with mental health issues; though it’s a practice the former Fox and NBC host has made a recent habit of, likewise attacking Meghan Markle and her husband Prince Harry.

Day said that remarks like Kelly’s are the reason it is so hard for people to have open and honest conversations about mental health.

“I’m like, ‘You know what, you’re journalists,’” Day added. “How about you do your job and you fact check instead of jumping all over this woman for attention, for ratings, for whatever it is that they’re doing? Which is, by the way, part of the problem. It’s part of the reason why mental health is such an issue.” 

“How about we do our due diligence and make sure we know what the reality of a situation is before we come for people,” Day continued. “It broke my heart to see someone who is really living her life for the betterment of others while also trying to pursue her own passion.”

“Let her live. Let her make decisions for herself that protect her own wellbeing. It’s at no cost to anyone.”

See what others are saying: (People) (Huff Post) (The Hill)

Continue Reading