- Pete Davidson fans were required to sign a $1 million nondisclosure agreement before attending his recent stand-up comedy shows.
- The contract states that attendees cannot “discuss any details of the show… or your experiences at this event,” including on social media platforms.
- Ticket holders who chose not to sign the NDA were not allowed into the shows but were given full refunds.
- The contract received backlash online, with some calling the comedian overbearing and others accusing him of not wanting to face possible criticism over jokes.
NDA Sent to Ticket Holders Prior to Shows
Saturday Night Live star Pete Davidson has been requiring fans to sign nondisclosure agreements prior to attending his recent live comedy performances. The contract states that a $1 million fine must be paid if any of the terms are broken.
The NDA was brought into the public spotlight after one ticket holder, Stacy Young, posted screenshots of the alleged contract to Facebook.
“In short, by signing this agreement, you are agreeing not to discuss any details of the show you are about to watch or your experiences at this event, period,” the screenshot of the document read. “This includes blogs, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and any/all other social media or online outlets.”
The contract adds that if anyone is “unable or unwilling” to sign the agreement, they will not be granted entrance into the show and will receive a full refund instead. Young chose to take this route.
“I didn’t want to sign it because it was basically saying that I wasn’t able to comment on it or have an opinion,” she told Variety.
Another condition of the contract was agreeing to allow Davidson’s team the “right to confiscate (including seize and destroy the contents of) cell phones, cameras, PDAs and any and all other infringing devices” brought into the venue without permission.
NDA Doled Out at Multiple Shows
Young received the NDA prior to Davidson’s Nov. 27 show at Sydney Goldstein Theater in San Francisco. Weeks earlier, another fan posted to Twitter that they had to sign an NDA before attending Davidson’s Nov. 8 show at the Varsity Theater in Minneapolis.
Attendees of Davidson’s Nov. 30 show at Chicago’s Vic Theater were also required to sign the NDA, according to Variety.
The news of Davidson’s NDA spurred backlash across the internet. Some accused the contract of being oppressive while others said he was avoiding facing potential criticism over his jokes.
Hey #PeteDavidson, China called & they want their NDA toting, pansy-assed, Orwellian paranoia back. Also, Dear world, #ParanoidPete ain’t that funny, there I said it. It isn’t art if the masses aren’t allowed to have an opinion. Thankfully I haven’t wasted money on this chump.— The Angry Bear (@iratusursi) November 28, 2019
Pete wants to do WHAT. Also great way of saying “my jokes will be at the expense of others but I want no repercussions.” pic.twitter.com/SM9tuicnQK— Deep-State Dolan (@reyley_D51) December 1, 2019
Davidson has not publicly commented on the nondisclosure agreements.
See what others are saying: (Variety) (New York Post) (Entertainment Weekly)
Fire at Home Reportedly Owned by Beyoncé and Jay-Z Under Arson Investigation
Officials said there were no injuries or evacuations during the fire, which was put out in around two hours.
Fire Breaks Out at Famed Couple’s Reported Residence
A Wednesday fire at a historic home in New Orleans, Louisiana believed to be owned by music titans Beyoncé and Jay-Z is being investigated as a possible arson.
On Thursday, a New Orleans Police Department spokesperson confirmed to multiple outlets that it had received a tip about a suspicious person in the area. Further details about the suspicious person and the cause of the fire have not been revealed.
Neighbors told local media that there is an unlocked gate on the property that outsiders sometimes use to gain entry.
Officials told The New York Post that it took 22 firefighters over two hours to extinguish the blaze, with no reported injuries or evacuations. The extent of the damage currently remains unclear, but a spokesperson told The Post that given the age of the residence, the situation could have been far more severe.
“If [the firefighters] didn’t get there when they did, it could have been much worse,” the spokesperson said. “It’s a historic home.”
About the Home
The building was first built in the Garden District neighborhood of the city in the 1920s as a church. It was later used as a ballet school and then became a high-end residence in 2000. Realtor.com says it is currently valued at $3 million.
The home was purchased in 2015 by Sugarcane Parkin LLC. According to The Washington Post, this company has the same registered address as other entities owned by Beyoncé. Sugarcane Parkin is also allegedly managed by Beyoncé’s mother, Celestine Lawson, better known as Tina Knowles.
Representatives for the “Lemonade” singer and her husband have not issued any public statements about the incident, nor have they confirmed that the home is owned by the couple.
In March of this year, storage units in Los Angeles belonging to Beyonce were burglarized. According to TMZ, over a million dollars of goods were stolen, including expensive dresses and handbags.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Post) (NOLA)
Cleveland’s Baseball Team Changes Name From Indians to Guardians
The move marks the team’s first name change since 1915, and it comes after decades of criticism from Native Americans.
Name Change Announced
Cleveland’s Major League Baseball team said Friday that it will change its name after the 2021 season from the Indians to the Guardians.
The team announced the name change with a just over two-minute video narrated by actor Tom Hanks.
“You see, there’s always been a Cleveland — that’s the best part of our name,” Hanks says in the clip. “And now it’s time to unite as one family, one community, to build the next era for this team and this city.”
This marks the team’s first name change since 1915, and it comes after decades of criticism from Native Americans.
Despite long-running calls to change racist and offensive team names — including the Washington Redskins — such campaigns did not gain significant momentum until the nationwide racial reckoning that followed the murder of George Floyd.
Officials behind the Cleveland team first pledged to change the name last year and previously removed the “Chief Wahoo” logo, a caricature of a Native American character, from its uniforms following the 2018 season.
It toyed with several options before ultimately landing on Guardians, which draws from Cleveland’s architectural history.
“We are excited to usher in the next era of the deep history of baseball in Cleveland,” team owner and chairman Paul Dolan said in a news release.
“Cleveland has and always will be the most important part of our identity. Therefore, we wanted a name that strongly represents the pride, resiliency and loyalty of Clevelanders.”
“‘Guardians’ reflects those attributes that define us while drawing on the iconic Guardians of Traffic just outside the ballpark on the Hope Memorial Bridge. It brings to life the pride Clevelanders take in our city and the way we fight together for all who choose to be part of the Cleveland baseball family. While ‘Indians’ will always be a part of our history, our new name will help unify our fans and city as we are all Cleveland Guardians.”
Guardians will be the fifth name in franchise history, joining Blues (1901), Bronchos (1902), Naps (1903-14), and Indians (1915-2021).
Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Editor Slams Megyn Kelly for “Bullying” Naomi Osaka
Editor M.J. Day said Kelly’s attacks against Osaka are “part of the problem” when it comes to mental health discussions.
Megyn Kelly and Naomi Osaka’s Heated Twitter Exchange
The editor of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue slammed former TV news anchor Megyn Kelly Tuesday for mocking cover model and tennis star Naomi Osaka.
“It’s such bullying and it’s so unnecessary,” editor M.J. Day told People Magazine’s “Every Day” podcast. “And [Osaka] did nothing wrong.”
Osaka made history Monday by becoming the first Haitian and Japanese woman on the cover of the iconic issue. The athlete has been making headlines over the last few months for speaking openly and vulnerably about her mental health. In the spring, she said she was not going to participate in French Open press events because of the toll it takes on her as an introvert who has struggled with depression. She later withdrew from the tournament after that choice sparked backlash and likewise opted out of Wimbledon to take some “personal” time.
Some — conservative pundits, in particular — slammed Osaka for stepping back from these roles because of her mental health, but still opting to work on other projects, including the release of a Barbie doll, a Netflix docuseries, and a handful of magazine covers. Kelly joined that bandwagon, noting that Osaka has been featured in the likes of Vogue and TIME.
“Seeing as you’re a journalist I would’ve assumed you would take the time to research what the lead times are for magazines, if you did that you would’ve found out I shot all of my covers last year,” Osaka tweeted in response, though she later deleted the post.
“Instead your first reaction is to hop on here and spew negativity, do better Megan.”
M.J. Day Says Kelly is “Part of the Problem” With Mental Health Conversations
Kelly later tweeted that Osaka blocked her on Twitter, lashing out at the tennis champion for that decision as well.
People online have been largely defending Osaka and criticizing Kelly. Many argue that it is unfair for Kelly to attack a young woman who has been vocal about dealing with mental health issues; though it’s a practice the former Fox and NBC host has made a recent habit of, likewise attacking Meghan Markle and her husband Prince Harry.
Day said that remarks like Kelly’s are the reason it is so hard for people to have open and honest conversations about mental health.
“I’m like, ‘You know what, you’re journalists,’” Day added. “How about you do your job and you fact check instead of jumping all over this woman for attention, for ratings, for whatever it is that they’re doing? Which is, by the way, part of the problem. It’s part of the reason why mental health is such an issue.”
“How about we do our due diligence and make sure we know what the reality of a situation is before we come for people,” Day continued. “It broke my heart to see someone who is really living her life for the betterment of others while also trying to pursue her own passion.”
“Let her live. Let her make decisions for herself that protect her own wellbeing. It’s at no cost to anyone.”