Connect with us

Entertainment

T.I. Addresses Backlash Over Having His Daughter’s Hymen Checked

Published

on

  • Rapper T.I. appeared on the show Red Table Talk to responded to criticism of his previous comments about his daughter’s virginity.
  • Three weeks ago, the rapped faced backlash after saying he goes to the gynecologist with his daughter to make sure her hymen is still intact.
  • In the new interview, he explained that his actions stemmed from a desire to protect his daughter from the dangers of pregnancy, diseases, and heartbreak.
  • He admitted he was not aware of how sensitive the issue was until after the outrage and expressed a willingness to learn more.

Clearing Misconceptions

Nearly three weeks after his discussion about his daughter’s hymen made headlines, rapper T.I. publicly addressed his comments for the first time on a “Red Table Talk” episode released Monday. 

On a now-deleted episode of the “Ladies Like Us” podcast from early November, T.I. said that he accompanies his daughter to the gynecologist to ensure her hymen is still intact. His remarks were met with much criticism from women’s rights activists and people all across the Internet. 

Previous coverage of T.I.’s comments .

On Monday’s episode of the talk show, the rapper told hosts Jada Pinkett Smith and her mother, Adrienne Banfield-Jones, that he was speaking up now to resolve any misconceptions about the way he parents his children, claiming that his intentions were misunderstood. 

“I think all of this surrounds a conversation that I was having in a very joking manner,” he said on the backlash. “From a place of truth, I began to embellish and exaggerate.”

He went on to clarify the details of the gynecologist visits with his daughter, Deyjah Imani Harris.

“Never said I was in any exam room,” he said. “I never said that it was being done present day, as an 18-year old. And I never said that her mother wasn’t present. Her mom was present every time.”

T.I.’s wife, Tameka Harris, also appear with him on the show and chimed in to say that Deyjah Harris was 15 to 16 years old at the time of the visits.

Apology to Daughter Only

T.I. went on to say that while his daughter welcomed his presence at those gynecologist appointments earlier in her life, she did take an issue with him talking about them. He admitted that he was only addressing the comments again now with her permission.

He offered up and apology to her, but not to those who were outraged by his claims. “I’m incredibly apologetic to her for that,” he said. “Not to any of these other strangers or any of these weirdos who just kind of toss lies around for fun.”

Open to Learning

When Pinkett Smith asked T.I. if he understands the sensitivity of the whole situation, he responded, “No, I did not. I understand it now.”

He expressed his confusion and desire to learn more about how to better handle situations of this nature.

“I want to learn from you,” he said to the show’s hosts and his wife. “I want to know what is the purpose and place of a father in this society.” 

T.I. added that he felt like he was being criticized for protecting his daughter.

“I don’t think anybody has a problem with you protecting your daughter,” Pinkett Smith replied. The issue, she said, is the notion of a man controlling his daughter’s virginity.

“I’m not there to protect ‘virginity,’” T.I. said. “I just know that is a big move. Once you make that move there are things that happen that follow. You have to be equipped… awareness is my first line of defense.”

He went on to say that he wants to protect his daughter from all the things that can happen after losing your virginity, like “the dangers of pregnancy, the dangers of diseases, [and] the dangers of having your heart broken.”

T.I. admitted that he only learned how serious and personal the issue was to his daughter after he made his original comments, and that he is glad to have been educated further.

“It’s great for me to have this opportunity, and I think all things happen in life for a reason,” he said. “Every lesson has a purpose and must be dealt with difficulty, but out of care, and out of concern, not out of control.”

“I don’t think that our community, our culture, our generation, can be pushed forward by having comfortable, convenient discussions,” he added. “We have to have tough discussions in order to move forward.”

See what others are saying: (LA Times) (NBC) (Daily Beast)

Entertainment

Disney Eviscerates Scarlett Johansson’s “Black Widow” Lawsuit as “Callous,” but Report Suggests Emma Stone and Emily Blunt May Follow Her Lead

Published

on

“There is no merit whatsoever to this filing,” the company said in an uncharacteristically blunt statement that was heavily criticized online. 


Johansson/Disney Lawsuit Gets Bitter

Disney has described a recent lawsuit from “Black Widow” actress Scarlett Johansson as “sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic,” but Johansson may have just unleashed what is to become an even bigger legal challenge for the House of Mouse. 

At the center of this dispute, Johansson alleges she lost $50 million because Disney opted for a dual streaming/theater release of “Black Widow,” which debuted in theaters and for $30 on Disney+ with Premier Access earlier this month. 

According to Johansson’s suit, her contract with Disney — which was negotiated prior to any hint of a pandemic — stipulated that “Black Widow” would see an exclusive theater release. Notably, the actress also said her contractual bonuses were tied to the movie’s box office performance, which is an extremely common practice with films featuring A-list celebrities.

Of course, when the pandemic hit — like many other industries — movies were upended. Pandemic-related changes meant that despite having an initial release date of May 2020, Marvel fans wouldn’t get a chance to see “Black Widow” for over a year. 

Still, Johansson said she tried to contact Disney to renegotiate her contract prior to the film’s ultimate release, but she claims the company was unresponsive. 

On Thursday, she then filed a complaint with the Los Angeles County Superior Court, with her attorney arguing that “Disney has enjoyed the benefits of having one of Hollywood’s top actresses promote its wholly owned subscription service at no additional cost to Disney, and with the intended effect of taking money out of that actress’ own pocket.”

Later Thursday, Disney claimed that it has “fully complied” with Johansson’s contract and that the streamed release of the film “has significantly enhanced her ability to earn additional compensation on top of the $20M she has received to date.”

“There is no merit whatsoever to this filing,” the company said in its uncharacteristically blunt statement.

Are Emma Stone and Emily Blunt Next?

Speaking of blunt, it was reported Friday that both Emily Blunt and Emma Stone may also file lawsuits against Disney’s dual streaming release of their films. 

In fact, according to an exclusive newsletter run by former Hollywood Reporter Editor Matt Belloni, Stone “is said to be weighing her options” over the dual release of “Cruella” in May. Meanwhile, he suggested Blunt could also take action or speak out following this weekend’s release of “Jungle Cruise.”

Belloni went on to describe Disney as “notoriously difficult to deal with” regarding such matters and claimed that many have simply been waiting for someone powerful enough to speak out. 

Disney Criticized for Its Response

Much of the public perception of the situation has led to overwhelming support for Johansson’s camp. Online, a slew of people lambasted Disney’s response, with many calling it a deflection. 

See what others are saying: (ScreenRant) (Newsweek) (Variety)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Candace Owens and Logan Paul in Talks to Debate

Published

on

A spokesperson confirmed to Insider Wednesday that the two have had “productive” conversations about the prospect offline.


Candace Owens Challenges Logan Paul to a Debate

Right-wing commentator Candace Owens and controversial YouTuber Logan Paul are in talks to engage in a political debate. Yes, you read that sentence correctly. 

Owens — best known for making false claims about the George Floyd protests, spreading COVID-19 misinformation, and seemingly saying that Adolf Hitler “just wanted to make Germany great” — first challenged Paul to a debate on Friday. It started with her sharing a year-old clip from Paul’s podcast where he spoke about the importance of fighting racism in the United States. 

“It is not enough to be ‘not racist.’ You have to be anti-racist,” he said.

“If you’re white, if you look like me, use your privilege,” he added. “And for those who do not think white privilege exists, you are fucking blind.” 

Because merely acknowledging the existence of racism appears to go against Owens’ core beliefs, she asked Paul to duke it out with her. 

“Logan loves to challenge people in the boxing ring,” she wrote. “I’d like to publicly challenge him to go a few rounds with me in a political debate. @LoganPaul—how about you stop by my show and explain to me how you’re *checks notes* more privileged than me because you’re white and I’m not?”

Spokesperson Confirms The Two Are in Talks

Paul  — best known for launching a boxing career and filming a YouTube video that showed a dead body in Japan’s “suicide forest” — said on Tuesday that he was “perplexed” by the offer, but was taking it seriously. 

I started to entertain this action, I ended up speaking with her, and there may be a future where we sit down and have a civil discourse because I think there’s some meat on this bone,” he said during the most recent episode of his “ImPaulsive” podcast. 

The internet star acknowledged that Owens’ main arena is politics, while his main arena is being a “fucking idiot” online. Still, he said he does care about these issues and has a “semi-intelligent brain,” so he thinks he could “hold [his] own.”

“Candace Owens, whether you can admit it or not, is a smart person,” Paul continued. “And so I guess I’m just curious because I just fucking fundamentally disagree with her and again, I think there’s room for a conversation.” 

A spokesperson for Owens confirmed to Insider on Wednesday that the two had a “productive” offline conversation and said a public political debate between the two is “very likely.”

“Although both of them disagree on a variety of topics, they are both much more interested in learning from one another and think people would benefit from hearing an honest discussion between two parties rather than a ‘gotcha’ moment that might play well for social media,” the spokesperson added.

See what others are saying: (Insider)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Finneas Slams Billie Eilish Troll Account for Attributing Fake Quotes to the Singer

Published

on

Eilish’s big brother said the account is spreading “relentless lies” and asked that it at least label itself as a satire account.


Troll Account Shares Fake Billie Eilish Quotes

Billie Eilish’s brother and collaborator Finneas took to Twitter Tuesday to address an account that has been sharing fake quotes attributed to his sister.

The account uses the handle @BilliesUpdatess and goes by the name of “Billie Eilish Updates” in its profile. It was created in July of 2021 and as of Wednesday morning, it had amassed a following of 1,100 people. On a quick glance, it looks just like any other update account a fan might make to share news about their favorite celebrity.

@BilliesUpdatess, however, is far from the standard adoring fan page. Of the over 300 tweets it has posted, several include screenshots of forged articles that make it look like Eilish said something either offensive or totally outlandish. One post claims Eilish defended her boyfriend after he was accused of supporting former president Donald Trump.

“At the end of the day, I fucking love him you know?” the phony statement reads. “It doesn’t matter if he made some homophobic comments in the past, people change. If he [Matthew] supports Donald Trump then I don’t care if it makes him happy. I support EVERY decision Mathew has to make, even the ones some of my fans don’t agree with, like maybe some of his icky comments.”

Screenshot @BilliesUpdatess

In another sham passage, Eilish says she thinks queerbaiting “is a really good thing!” In several others, the person behind the account comes up with artificial quotes to make it looks like Eilish is feuding with “driver’s license” singer Olivia Rodrigo. 

Screenshot @BilliesUpdatess

One post with a fake article ended up being retweeted 12,000 times. That tweet included Eilish claiming she longs to be poor.

Screenshot @BilliesUpdatess

“When I got rich, I started balling my eyes out,” the fake piece says. “I wanted to be poor so I can relate to most of my fans. I still want to be broke and poor, it looks really fun and cute.”

Finneas Slams Account

As the troll account started to gain traction, Finneas asked that people report and block it to minimize the spread of its “relentless lies.”

On Tuesday, he responded to a fan that tagged him in the @BilliesUpdatess tweet alleging his sister wanted to be poor. 

“Fake obviously,” Finneas wrote. “Honestly I just wish they’d label this account satire like the onion or something. I have no problem with a joke as long as people know it’s a joke.”

Screenshot @BilliesUpdatess

The account made several jokes about the fact that Finneas was calling it out, but it seems Eilish’s big brother got what he asked for. @BilliesUpdatess added “parody account” to its bio and the account was deleted as of Wednesday afternoon.

See what others are saying: (NME) (Uproxx) (E! News)

Continue Reading