- Demonstrators marched in cities all over the world to call for action to end violence against women and show solidarity for those slain by it.
- The gatherings happened right before the International Day of the Elimination of Violence Against Women, recognized by the United Nations on Nov. 25.
- The Day also kicks off an international campaign against gender-based violence that will last for 16 days.
- These movements put pressure on politicians to take legislative action to address this issue.
Thousands of people across the globe spent the weekend demanding the end of violence against women.
Women dressed in soft pastels—the favorite colors of the murdered victims—trod barefoot along the pavement of Ecatepec, Mexico on Saturday to remember those killed by gender-targeted violent acts. Over 5,000 miles away, in Paris, individuals marched through the city wielding banners and wearing face paint to look like blood, condemning domestic violence. Red shoes lined the streets of Brussels on Sunday, symbolizing victims of femicide.
These movements are only part of a wave of worldwide recognition of the International Day of the Elimination of Violence Against Women, which falls on Nov. 25. The Day was officially recognized by the United Nations to bring attention to the physical and sexual abuse that affects millions of women globally.
“The United Nations is committed to ending all forms of violence against women and girls,” UN Secretary-General António Guterres said in his message to note the Day. “These abuses are among the world’s most horrific, persistent and widespread human rights violations, affecting one in every three women in the world.”
The theme this year is “Orange the World: Generation Equality Stands Against Rape,” because for the next two years, rape will be the focus of the UN’s UNiTe to End Violence Against Women campaign.
International landmarks were turned orange in support.
Nov. 25 also serves as the kick-off date for the international campaign 16 Days of Activism against Gender-Based Violence, coordinated by the Center for Women’s Global Leadership. The campaign concludes on Dec. 10, International Human Rights Day.
The demonstrations called for legal action to be taken in response to gender-based violence, and some officials met these demands.
Amid protests in Rome on Saturday, Italian Economy Minister Roberto Gualtieri tweeted that funding for orphans whose mothers were murdered is ready to be approved.
Gualtieri said the funding—12 million euros—is intended to cover medical expenses, scholarships, and training for these kids. He added that the funding does not make up for the “lost affection” of their mothers.
The United States has been reworking its own legislature that addresses gender-based violence. The Violence Against Women Act was passed in 1994 and has been renewed about every five years, but the most recent version has expired. Many politicians are pushing to reauthorize the law, and it is also undergoing changes to be more inclusive.
The House of Representatives passed a VAWA renewal bill in April, but it is on hold in the Senate. One of the most contentious parts of the bill is the closing of the “boyfriend loophole.” Currently, married men who are convicted of stalking offenses or domestic violence crimes are not legally allowed to buy guns. However, this law does not apply to boyfriends or other non-married partners in intimate relationships.
“At the end of the day, if we don’t get a bill that can realistically pass the House, pass the Senate and be signed into law, then all we have is a bill,” U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst said to the Des Moines Register. “And no survivors are helped by just bills alone. We need real results.”
U.S. presidential candidate Joe Biden has also expressed support for the reauthorization of VAWA. Biden told The Washington Post that overseeing the implementation of the law in 1994 was the “proudest” moment in his career as a Senator, and said that he will make its reauthorization a priority if he wins the election.
See what others are saying: (Forbes) (The Washington Post) (UN News)
200 Children Seeking Asylum in the U.K. Are Missing
The missing include at least 13 children under the age of 16.
Children Missing From Hotels
There are 200 asylum-seeking children missing from government care in the United Kingdom according to the parliamentary undersecretary of state at the Home Office.
When children are seeking asylum in the U.K. alone or separated from their parents, the government puts them up in hotel rooms for temporary accommodation. They have done so since 2021 and have temporarily accommodated 4,600 children in that time. However, Simon Murray, the parliamentary undersecretary of state at the Home Office, said that 200 of the children placed in those hotels are missing, including at least 13 who are under the age of 16.
In response to this information, a collection of more than 100 charities sent a letter to the Prime Minister demanding the end of the procedure of placing kids in hotels over safety concerns. The letter says that these children are at risk of trafficking and exploitation by staying in these hotels alone.
Other officials have echoed these concerns, claiming these hotels are targets for organized crime where people use these vulnerable children for labor or trafficking.
Parliament Calls Incident “Horrific”
Murray told the House of Lords on Monday that despite the media reports, his department does not know of any kidnapping cases, though they are investigating. He went on to say there are many reasons why children go missing.
However, lawmakers were not appeased by Murray’s assurances. In a later debate, one member of Parliament called the missing cases “horrific” and another said that it was “putting children at risk.” The children’s commissioner for England also reportedly chimed in asking for, quote “assurances on the steps being taken to safeguard the children.”
Murray went on to say that the use of hotels for asylum-seeking children will hopefully be phased out as soon as possible but did not give a timeline.
The nonprofit Refugee Council called on the government in a tweet to spare no expense in the location of these missing kids.
See what others are saying: (Washington Post) (The Guardian) (The Telegraph)
100,000 U.K. Nurses Launch Biggest Strike in NHS History
Opposition leader Keir Starmer called the strike “a badge of shame on this government.”
The NHS Grinds to a Halt
Some 100,000 members of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), the United Kingdom’s largest nursing union, launched a historic 12-hour strike Thursday after the government refused to negotiate on higher pay.
The work stoppage, which spans England, Wales, and Northern Ireland, is only the second in the RCN’s 106-year history and the largest the NHS has ever seen. It marks the breaking point for many underpaid nurses and the culmination of a years-long decline in the NHS’s quality of care, put under increasing stress by severe staffing shortages.
Although most NHS staff in England and Wales received a pay rise of around £1,400 this year, worth about 4% on average for nurses, they say it has not kept up with inflation as Britain plunges deeper into a cost-of-living crisis.
When inflation is accounted for, nurses’ pay dropped 1.2% every year from 2010 to 2017, according to the Health Foundation.
Meanwhile, the number of patients waiting for care has reached a record 7.2 million in England, or over one in eight residents, more than double what it was seven years ago.
In July, the cross-party Commons Health and Social Care Select Committee estimated the staffing shortfall could be as high as 50,000 nurses and 12,000 doctors, what one MP called the “greatest workforce crisis in history.”
Many nurses argue that boosting pay will help hospitals recruit more staff.
The RCN demanded a pay raise 5% above the retail rate of inflation, which amounts to a 19% increase, but both Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and the government’s health secretary have claimed that’s not affordable.
During Thursday’s strike, partial staffing continued to remain open for urgent care such as chemotherapy, kidney dialysis, and children’s accident and neonatal units.
Sunak and Starmer Brawl in Parliament
Labor leader Keir Starmer grilled Sunak during Wednesday’s Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on the upcoming strike.
“Tomorrow will be the first-ever nationwide nurse’s strike,” he said. “All the Prime Minister has to do to stop that is to open the door and discuss pay with them. If he did, the whole country would breathe a sigh of relief. Why won’t he?”
“We have consistently spoken to all the unions involved in all the pay disputes that there are,” Sunak replied. “Last year, when everyone else in the public sector had a public sector pay freeze, the nurses received a three-percent pay rise.”
Starmer fired back: “Nurses going on strike is a badge of shame for this government. Instead of showing leadership, he’s playing games with people’s health.”
Sunak called Starmer’s demand that he reopen negotiations with the RCN “just simply a political formula for avoiding taking a position on this issue.”
“If he thinks the strikes are wrong, he should say so,” Sunak said. “If he thinks it’s right that pay demands of nineteen percent are met, then he should say so. What’s weak, Mr. Speaker, is he’s not strong enough to stand up to the union.”
While Starmer has called on Sunak to negotiate with the RCN, he has not explicitly backed the 19% pay raise himself.
Unless the government returns to the bargaining table, the RCN plans to launch a second round of strikes on Dec. 20 to be followed by ambulance strikes that Wednesday and the next.
If the government still refuses to budge, the union said in a statement that nurses will strike for longer periods in more places starting in January, disrupting more health services.
Other industries are also set to see work stoppages this month, including workers on railways, buses, highways, and borders, as well as teachers, postal workers, baggage handlers, and paramedics.
See what others are saying: (BBC) (CNN) (The Guardian)
Fortnite Developer Sued By Parents for Making the Game as “Addictive as Possible”
One child mentioned in the lawsuit played over 7,700 rounds of Fortnite in two years.
Epic Games Sued
A Quebec City judge recently approved a 2019 class-action lawsuit accusing Fortnite developer Epic Games of deliberately making Fortnite addictive.
The parents who brought forward the lawsuit claim their children have become so obsessed with the game that in some cases, they’ve stopped eating, showering, or socializing. The lawsuit claims that these kids have played thousands of games since Fortnite’s release in 2017. In one example, a teenager played over 7,700 games in less than two years.
If the lawsuit succeeds, players addicted to Fortnite living in Quebec since September 2017 could receive compensation. The plaintiff’s attorney, Philippe Caron, reports that over 200 parents outside the lawsuit have reached out to him, saying their child’s well-being has diminished since downloading Fortnite. He told The Washington Post that they are very confident about their case.
Epic Games Responds
“We plan to fight this in court,” Natalie Munoz, a spokesperson for Epic Games said to The Post, “We believe the evidence will show that this case is meritless.”
Munoz also said that Fortnite does allow parents to supervise their child’s playtime and require permission for purchases.
The parents involved in the lawsuit are claiming that they were not aware of the dangers playing Fortnite could pose for their children.
“If she had been informed by the defendants of the risks and dangers associated with the use of FORTNITE,” the lawsuit says of one guardian. “She would have categorically refused to allow the game to be downloaded.”