Connect with us

Entertainment

Charli XCX Slams Claims That Fans Are Abusing Her At Meet and Greets

Published

on

  • Charli XCX fans are being called exploitive and abusive for asking the singer to sign or pose with strange items at meet and greets, including a parent’s ashes and a douche. 
  • Charli dismissed the claims in a post, calling the outrage “2019 fake wokeness” that encourages online harassment.
  • She also slammed journalists for peddling the narrative in opinion pieces without asking for her opinion on the issue. 

Meet and Greet Requests  

Charlie XCX responded Wednesday to claims that her fans have been taking advantage of her at meet and greets by asking her to sign or pose with odd items.

Over the past few weeks, people have shared photos of their strange requests, almost like a new challenge or meme within her fanbase. The trend seems to have started sometime in September when a fan’s tweet went viral showing that Charli had signed a bottle of poppers, a slang term broadly used for alkyl nitrites.  

The requests quickly escalated from there, with a fan later asking Charli to post with his mother’s ashes and another asking her to sign a douche.

When a Twitter user asked if Charli knew what the douche was, the fan said she didn’t. “No..I asked her to hold my poppers to my nose and she politely declined which I respect and so I asked if she would sign this and she was like what is dis hunny.” 

Charli briefly talked about the ashes photo in a recent interview with i-D, saying she was caught off guard by the request. 

This is the thing. The conversation was so quick and normal. It just flowed. First, he was like: ‘Hey! Release “Taxi”, I’m so excited for the show – by the way, my mum passed away’. I said ‘I’m really sorry’, so he said ‘Don’t worry about it, can you just take a picture of you holding her ashes?

It was almost like they were in a poppers bottle. I was like [Charli makes the sound of someone who’s been thrown a baseball with no warning]… and then it happened, and now it’s online. My face is sort of like…. Well, you can see it in my eyes, I’m afraid.”

She then went on to say that she hopes that was a one-time thing, but added: “I love the fans, so they can get away with quite a lot.” Charli also said she loved “Twitter culture,” and enjoyed reading funny comments about the photo.

Fans noted that the comment to i-D came before the douche photo was posted. After that picked up attention, she sent out a cryptic tweet that read, “have some respect.that’s all,” which fans assumed meant she was upset about the photo.

Fans Face Backlash 

For days, fans who asked for the photos received heat from social media users who accused them of crossing boundaries. Meanwhile, Charli received support from those who called their behavior disrespectful. 

One opinion article about the strange asks caught some attention as it suggested that some of her gay male fans specifically treat her with a degree of misogyny, feeling as if they own her. The writer, Jared Richards, criticized her fans for “a lack of respect for Charlotte Aitchison, the person behind the pop-persona,” and accused them of using her as “a prop for their own clout.”

Charli Dismisses Claims 

Charli issued a more detailed response to the issue after seeing all of the backlash against her fans. In a lengthy statement shared on Twitter, Charli noted seeing articles suggesting that fans are abusing and taking advantage of her. She immediately called those accusations “ridiculous and pretentious.” 

“People writing these articles are guilty of exactly the same thing they are accusing fans of: these journalists are using the same images they condemn fans for taking as clickbait to push their ‘think pieces’ on me and my culture as an artist,” she continued.  

The singer went on to call the outrage “2019 fake wokeness” that “does more harm than good and just encourages people to attack and harass one another online.” Charli explained that she doesn’t leave meet and greets thinking about the objects she signed or photos she took, but rather thinks more about the meaningful interactions she has with fans. 

She noted that she does not feel obligated to do anything, and added, “I do not think my fans have been abusive towards me at meet and greets: please stop saying they have been.”

The signer threated to cancel future meet and greats if she continued to see more of this 

“ridiculous narrative” around them. She then directly addressed reporters, saying, “If you’re a journalist– maybe ask me for my opinion before you try and paint me as some kind of helpless damsel.” 

See what others are saying: (Paper) (E! News) (NME

Entertainment

“Don’t Worry Darling” Tops the Box Office Amid Bad Press

Published

on

Audiences are already giving the film higher praise than critics did.


Young Women Flock to “Don’t Worry Darling” 

Weeks of controversies and rumors did not prevent “Don’t Worry Darling” from finding victory at the box office, with the Olivia Wilde-directed thriller debuting at number one over the weekend and raking in $19.2 million. 

Wilde also acted in the mid-century mystery, which starrs Florence Pugh, Harry Styles, Chris Pine, and Gemma Chan.

Women led ticket sales for the picture, comprising 66% of the audience, according to several reports. At least partially due to the appeal of Styles, crowds also skewed young, with over half under the age of 25.

Overseas, the film made over $10 million, bringing its total for the weekend to $30 million. That number is especially impressive since the R-rated drama had a budget of $35 million.

“Don’t Worry Darling” had been plagued with weeks of rumors about behind-the-scenes drama leading up to its release. Among other bouts of gossip, many online speculated that Pugh and Wilde had riffs on set, leading to Pugh’s refusal to promote the project. One report alleged the two got into a screaming match, but sources on set denied it. 

Wilde and Shia LeBeouf, who was originally cast in the picture, also got into a public he-said-she-said about whether he quit the film or was fired. 

The drama hit a boiling point during its premiere at the Venice Film Festival when Twitter users circulated a video they claimed showed Styles spiting on Pine, though both parties have denied that allegation. 

A Film Riddled With Rumors 

Furthering the bad press were the bad reviews. Critics largely panned the film, sticking it with a 38% on Rotten Tomatoes. After this first weekend, moviegoers seem to have a more favorable outlook, as it has a 79% audience score as of Monday. 

Jeff Goldstein, the distribution chief for Warner Bros., told the Associated Press that “the background noise” caused by these controversies “had a neutral impact” on its box office haul. The studio released a statement saying it was pleased with the movie’s earnings. 

Some analysts believe that, if anything, the online gossip and fodder may have aided the film’s box office performance.

In a tweet recapping the weekend’s box office, Paul Dergarabedian, a senior media analyst at Comscore, said the “drama sparked a huge wave of interest.”

See what others are saying: (Associated Press) (Box Office Mojo) (New York Times)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Senators Introduce Legislation Requiring Radios to Pay Royalties to Artists

Published

on

Sen. Padilla argued the bill is necessary to give artists the “dignity and respect they deserve.”


The American Music Fairness Act

Sens. Alex Padilla (D-CA) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) introduced the American Music Fairness Act to the Senate on Thursday, a bill that would require radio stations to pay royalties to performers and rights holders. 

The bill was previously introduced to the House last year. According to a release, the United States is the only democratic country where artists are not compensated for their music’s use on AM or FM radio. While songwriters and publishers receive payment, these stations have never been required to give a slice of the pie to performers and copyright holders. 

On streaming and satellite radio, however, both groups receive royalty payments. 

In a statement, Padilla said it is time the country starts treating “our musical artists with the dignity and respect they deserve for the music they produce and we enjoy every day.”

“California’s artists have played a pivotal role in enriching and diversifying our country’s music scene,” he added. “That is why passing the American Music Fairness Act is so important.”

“From Beale Street to Music Row to the hills of East Tennessee, the Volunteer State’s songwriters have undeniably made their mark,” Blackburn echoed. “Tennessee’s creators deserve to be compensated for their work. This legislation will ensure that they receive fair payment and can keep the great hits coming.”

The American Music Fairness Act would require terrestrial radio broadcasters to pay royalties to music creators when their songs are played. It would also protect smaller stations that either make less than $1.5 million in annual revenue or who have a parent company that makes less than $10 million in annual revenue by letting them play unlimited music for under $500 a year. 

The bill would also require other countries to pay American artists for the use of their work.

Support From Major Music Groups

The legislation is endorsed by a number of groups, including the Recording Academy, SAG-AFTRA, and the American Federation of Musicians. 

If passed, the bill could move a lot of money into the pockets of performers. According to the Recording Academy, when American music gets international airplay, other countries collect royalties for American artists, amounting to around $200 million every year. However, they “never pay those royalties because the U.S. does not reciprocate with our own performance right.”

Fran Drescher, President of SAG-AFTRA, argues that the money belongs to the artists. 

“Broadcast companies profit from advertising sales because of the creative content musicians and singers record. It stands to reason that the performers who create the content deserve to be compensated just as songwriters are now,” Drescher said in a statement. “The reason it’s called the American Music Fairness Act is because the current situation is wholly unfair and it’s up to Congress to make it fair NOW!”

Last year, Representatives Steve Womack (R-AR) and Kathy Castor (D-FL) introduced the Local Radio Freedom Act, a bill with essentially the opposite agenda. It aims to reserve radio’s royalty-free status. The American Music Fairness Act is being viewed as a counter-response to this bill.

See what others are saying: (Variety) (Billboard)

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kanye West Says Catalog Is Potentially Being Sold Without His Permission: “Just Like Taylor Swift”

Published

on

After Swift lost the rights to her life’s work, she took on the endeavor of re-recording her first six albums. 


Kanye’s Catalog Potentially Up For Grabs

Following reports that Kanye West was considering selling his catalog, the artist took to Instagram on Tuesday to claim his work is potentially being sold without his approval.

On Monday, Billboard reported that West had been “quietly and intermittently shopping his publishing catalog.”

While the outlet’s sources did not reveal what price West was aiming for, Billboard estimated that West might be looking at a $175 million valuation for his discography. Some of Billboard’s sources seemingly suggested that West and his team were specifically behind the effort to sell his work, but others claimed the “catalog was never actively shopped” and instead, West had been receiving offers from potential buyers. 

Not long after, several news outlets picked the story up and reported that West was gearing up to sell his catalog. West responded by writing on his Instagram story that this was not the case. 

“Not For Sale”

“Just like Taylor Swift,” he said, referencing music mogul Scooter Braun purchasing Swift’s masters with Big Machine Records without her approval. “My publishing is being put up for my sale without my knowledge. Not for sale.”

Swift referred to the sale of her masters to Braun as her “worst case scenario.” In order to regain ownership of her work, she is in the process of re-recording her first six albums, all of which she originally made under Big Machine. Two have already been released and proved to be wildly commercially successful. 

According to Forbes, it is unclear which of his albums West owns the masters to, if he owns any at all. Because of this, it is unknown what kind of position he would be put in if his catalog, which is currently managed by Sony, was sold.

The status of any potential for his work to be sold became foggier later on Tuesday when West shared screenshots of a text exchange he had. He asked an unidentified person what was happening with the catalog sale, and that person responded by calling it “fake news.”

“Of course every publisher wants to pitch [their] hardest buy, smh,” the text continued. 

West did not further indicate if those texts were meant to clarify that his catalog was, in fact, not up for sale, or just further distance himself from any potential acquisition.

See what others are saying: (Billboard) (Forbes) (Complex)

Continue Reading