- A high-school sophomore in Maine was suspended by her school for three days after she posted a note in the girl’s restroom reading, “There’s a rapist in our school and you know who it is.”
- The American Civil Liberties Union then sued the school district for violating the student’s First Amendment rights, with the school arguing that the note was defamation and bullying.
- A judge issued a temporary block of the suspension, saying that the student, 15-year-old Aela Mansmann, was protected under her right to free speech even if “her viewpoint offends the sensibilities of school administrators.”
Posting the Note and Suspension
A judge blocked a teen’s suspension after she posted a rape awareness note in the girls’ restroom at her at high school, citing the student’s right to freedom of speech.
The note in question was posted on Sep. 16 at Cape Elizabeth High School and reads, “There’s a rapist in our school and you know who it is.”
“The public has an interest in knowing that neither she nor any other student who expresses a comparable view in similar fashion will be denied access to school simply because her viewpoint offends the sensibilities of school administrators,” U.S. District Judge Lance Walker said.
The sophomore who posted the note, 15-year-old Aela Mansmann, said she did so because she believed school administrators were overlooking other students’ claims of sexual harassment and assault. In fact, footage of a school board meeting in June later surfaced, showing Mansmann bringing similar concerns directly before administrators.
Soon after posting the note, however, a different student brought it to school administrators. Those administrators then discovered Mansmann had posted the note by reviewing security footage.
While Mansmann’s mother said the school originally told her daughter that she wouldn’t be punished for the incident, after Mansmann went public about the story to the media, she and two other girls were suspended for three days.
School officials said the note constituted bullying and added that if it happened again, the girls could be expelled. Mansmann’s family then appealed that decision, with administrators saying Mansmann could continue to go to school while an investigation was pending.
Principal Jeffrey Shedd said he conducted 47 interviews over three weeks, later calling the girls’ note well-intentioned but also noting that they “made a really bad choice.”
During that investigation, a male student stepped forward and claimed he felt targeted by the note and had been ostracised by classmates. That student then said he’d missed class because of what happened.
Meanwhile, on Oct. 7, about 50 students at the school of 550 walked out in protest of the school’s decision to suspend the three girls.
Some local outlets even reported waves of gossip and fear at the school.
ACLU Sues the School District
On Oct. 13 the American Civil Liberties Union sued the school district on behalf of Mansmann. It argued that the girls had taken a “public stance as an ally for victims and survivors of sexual violence” by using their First Amendment rights.
Specifically, Mansmann lawyers had requested a restraining order that would block the school from suspending her until the incident was resolved.
Mansmann, who has spoken with a variety of media outlets on the issue, has questioned why the school is focusing on her rather than on the accusation of rape.
“I was really surprised that my school took that report and decided to open an investigation into whether or not I’m a bully versus opening an investigation on whether or not this person who self-identified is a perpetrator,” she told Business Insider.
The Cape Elizabeth School District hasn’t commented on how it handled the accusation, but school officials did say they don’t believe there’s a rapist on the campus.
In court, the district argued the note was nothing more than defamation, saying that it wasn’t protected under the First Amendment.
Judge Blocks Temporary Suspension
On Oct. 24, Judge Walker ordered a temporary block to the suspension, saying it would likely be overturned on the grounds of free speech. The judge also said it could be overturned on the basis of Title IX, which is a federal law banning gender discrimination in education.
In his argument, the Walker wrote that the notes was “neither frivolous nor fabricated, took place within the limited confines of the girls’ bathroom, related to a matter of concern to the young women who might enter the bathroom and receive the message, and was not disruptive of school discipline.”
He then said that more information would be necessary to justify punishment and that the school shouldn’t have the right to crack down on topics of social justice in areas of free student communication.
The ACLU hailed the decision, saying it’s a reminder that students “do not check their rights at the schoolhouse gate.”
As far as the school goes, Superintendent Donna Wolfrom said, “We will continue to review and update district policies to align with state law and meet the needs of the district.”
See what others are saying: (WMTV) (The Washington Post) (Bangor Daily News)
Wisconsin Police Deny Planting Evidence in Viral Video, Release Their Own Body Cam Footage
The footage police released shows that during a search, officers found a corner tear from a plastic bag inside a backseat passenger’s pocket. An officer then discarded it into the car after determining that it was empty.
Viral Video Appears To Show Officer Planting Evidence
The Caledonia Police Department in Wisconsin has responded to a viral cell phone video that appears to show an officer planting a small plastic baggie inside of a car during a traffic stop.
The now-viral footage was posted to Facebook by a man who goes by GlockBoy Savoo.
The user, who also filmed the clip, wrote in his post’s caption that the officer did this “just to get a reason to search the car” and said the cop didn’t know he was being recorded by the passenger.
Police Shut Down Accusations With Their Own Footage
After that video spread across social media, many were outraged, calling the Caledonia police dirty for seemingly planting evidence. All the outrage eventually prompted the department to announce an investigation Saturday.
Within hours, the department provided an update, claiming that officers didn’t actually plant any evidence or do anything illegal.
Police shared a lengthy summary of events, along with two body camera clips from the incident. That statement explained that the driver of the vehicle was pulled over for going 63 in a 45mph zone.
Two passengers in the backseat who were then spotted without seatbelts were asked to identify themselves and step out of the car. During a search of one passenger’s pockets, an officer pulled out “an empty corner tear” from a plastic baggie.
Police claim the corner tear did not contain any illegal substances, though they said this type of packaging is a common method for holding illegal drugs.
In one body cam clip, an officer can be heard briefly questioning the backseat passenger about the baggie. Then, that piece of plastic gets handed off to different officers who also determined it as empty before the officer in the original viral video discarded it into the back of the car.
The officer can also be seen explaining where the plastic came from to the passenger recording him.
“Aye, bro you just threw that in here!” the front seat passenger says, as heard in his version of the events.
“Yeah, cause it was in his pocket and I don’t want to hold onto it. It’s on their body cam that they took it off of him…I’m telling you where it came from, so. It’s an empty baggie at the moment too, so,” the officer replies.
The department went on to explain that while it would discourage officers from discarding items into a citizen’s car, this footage proves that evidence was not planted.
Authorities also noted that no arrests were made in this incident and the driver was the only one issued a citation for speeding. The statement added that since four officers were present at the scene, police have more than six hours of footage to review but they promised to release the footage in full in the near future.
See what others are saying: (Heavy)(CBS 58) (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)
Medical Groups, Local Leaders Push for Healthcare Workers and Public Employees To Get Vaccinated
The move comes as COVID cases have nearly quadrupled in the last month due to the rapid spread of the highly infectious delta variant.
Increased Calls for Mandatory Vaccinations in Certain Sectors
More than 50 of America’s largest medical groups representing millions of healthcare workers issued a statement Monday calling for employers of all health and long-term care providers to require mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations.
The groups, which included the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association, and 55 others, cited contagious new variants — including delta — and low vaccination rates.
“Vaccination is the primary way to put the pandemic behind us and avoid the return of stringent public health measures,” they wrote.
The call to action comes as new COVID cases have almost quadrupled during the month of July, jumping from just around 13,000 infections a day at the beginning of this month to more than 50,000.
While the vast majority of new infections and hospitalizations are among those who have not received the vaccines, many healthcare workers remain unvaccinated. According to data collected by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, over 38% of nursing home staff were not fully vaccinated as of July 11.
An analysis by WebMD and Medscape Medical News found that around 25% of hospital workers who were in contact with patients had not been vaccinated by the end of May when vaccinations became widely available.
In addition to calls for medical professionals to get vaccinated, some local leaders have also begun to impose mandates for public employees as cases continue spiking.
Last month, San Francisco announced that it was requiring all city workers to get vaccinated. Also on Monday, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio said that all municipal employees — including police officers and teachers — must either get the jab or agree to weekly testing by the time school starts in September.
Dr. Fauci Says U.S. Officials Are Considering Revising Mask Guidance for Vaccinated People
Numerous top U.S. health officials have applauded efforts by local leaders to mitigate further spread of the coronavirus, including the nation’s top infectious disease expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who confirmed Sunday that federal officials are actively considering whether to revise federal masking guidelines to recommend that vaccinated Americans wear face coverings in public settings.
In May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said people who are vaccinated do not need to mask in public. Although that was a non-binding recommendation, many states and cities that had not already lifted restrictions on masking began to do so shortly after.
But now, local leaders in areas seeing big spikes have begun reimposing mask mandates — even for those who are vaccinated — including major counties like Los Angeles and St. Louis.
In his remarks Sunday, Fauci also emphasized that, despite claims from many conservatives, those efforts are in line with the federal recommendations, which leave space for local leaders to issue their own rules.
While Fauci and other top U.S. public health officials have encouraged local governments to take action, Republican lawmakers in several states are taking steps to limit the ability of local leaders and public health officials to take certain mitigation measures.
According to the Network for Public Health Law, at least 15 state legislatures have passed or are considering bills to limit the legal authority of public health agencies — and that does not even include unilateral action taken by governors.
Some of the leaders of states suffering the biggest spikes have banned local officials from imposing their own mask mandates, like Arkansas, which has the highest per capita cases in the country right now, as well as Florida, which currently ranks third.
Notably, some of the laws proposed or passed by Republicans could go beyond just preventing local officials from trying to mitigate surges in COVID cases and may have major implications for other public health crises.
For example, according to The Washington Post, a North Dakota law that bans mask mandates applies to other breakouts — even tuberculosis — while a new Montana law also bars the use of quarantine for people who have been exposed to an infectious disease but have not yet tested positive.
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (The Guardian)
Couple Slammed Over Slavery-Themed Pre-Wedding Photoshoot
Many have expressed outrage at the duo for trying to romanticize slavery while others were left completely dumbfounded by the entire ordeal.
Photoshoot Goes Viral
A couple has come under fire after sharing images on Instagram from their slavery-themed pre-wedding photoshoot.
The photos show a Black man in shackles looking deeply into his white fiancé’s eyes before she works to releases him.
“1842. Days passed and everything changed, our love got stronger and stronger, he was no longer a slave, he was part of the family,” the post’s caption reads.
To indicate his transition from “slave” to family, a fourth image shows him wearing a long coat and top hat with well-shined shoes, as opposed to the white shirt, trousers, and straw hat he wore in the previous images.
Social Media Users React
It’s not immediately clear who these people are since the social media handle is redacted in the images circulating online.
Still, many have expressed outrage at the duo for trying to romanticize slavery while others were left just completely dumbfounded by this entire ordeal. Some also directed criticism at the photographer who agreed to the shoot, along with the hundreds of Instagram users who liked the original posts.
To see people romanticize this shit is infuriating – these people are too much. There is no such thing as slave consent and the sexual abuse of male slaves was real.— Nurse Elise 🌒 (@EliseRootedMind) July 21, 2021
There were three people there counting the photographer and not one thought should we? And over 1400 people hit the like button? And it’s part 2 like there’s more? I so want to be at the wedding when minister asks if anybody objects.— Randi Pro Democracy (@RandiKinman) July 21, 2021