Georgia Sex Offenders Sue Over Signs Discouraging Trick-or-Treaters
- Last Halloween, the Butts County Sheriff’s office required signs to be placed outside the homes of sex offenders that read: “Warning! No Trick-or-Treat at this address!”
- Authorities planned to use the same policy this year but are being sued by a group of sex offenders who say the signs violate their rights and are a form of “compelled speech.”
- The group is asking for the policy to end and want compensation for damages including emotional distress.
Sex Offenders File Lawsuit Against Sheriffs
A group of registered sex offenders in Georgia filed a lawsuit against the Butts County Sheriff’s office for posting signs on their homes warning trick or treaters not to visit.
The signs in question read: “Warning! No Trick-or-Treat at this address! A community safety message from Butts County Sheriff Gary Long.”
According to Sheriff Gary Long, the messages were designed to keep kids safe, however, the sex offenders who filed the lawsuit argue they are a violation of their rights to privacy and have likened the policy to “compelled speech,” which violates the First Amendment.
The lawsuit was filed by Christopher Reed, Reginald Holden, and Corey McClendon. The men say some of the signs were put up by county sheriffs but, in other cases, the county’s sex offenders were told they had to either display the signs on their properties or face unspecified trouble.
The Sign Policy
The initiative to display the signs began in 2018 when Long directed deputies to place the warnings in the front yards of over 200 sex offenders registered in the county from Oct. 24- Nov. 2. The sheriff’s office planned to do the same this year, which prompted the lawsuit.
In a Facebook post, Sheriff Long said the signs were first instituted after the cancellation of a local Halloween festival, which resulted in an influx of children going door-to-door. He has also explained that the signs comply with a state law that forbids sex offenders from participating in Halloween.
Other areas in the state, like Monroe and Lamar counties, also use the signs. In Monroe County, if an offender did not want a sign in their yard, they had to wait in the lobby of the local sheriff’s office during trick-or-treat hours last Halloween.
Mark Yurachek, the lead attorney for the men who filed the suit, told Fox 5 Atlanta that the Georgia State Sex Offender Registry does not require offenders to post these signs on their homes, therefore offenders should not be forced by local deputies to display them.
“The law allows the sheriff to put a list of registered sex offenders at his office, at the courthouse, on the internet,” he explained. “It does not allow him to go door-to-door telling people you have a sex offender living next door to you.”
“I’m just not sure that this kind of action makes your kids any safer,” Yurachek continued. “It just makes your constitutional rights less safe.” He also went on to call the deputies’ actions clear examples of trespassing, saying, “They’re coming onto their property and putting the signs on there.”
The suit asks for a trial by jury and asks that the jury award the plaintiffs with compensation for damages including economic harm, emotional distress, and the cost of legal fees. The group is also asking that local authorities are prevented from using the sign policy moving forward.
According to Sheriff Long, the case will be heard by a federal court Thursday to see if the signs can be used this year, but regardless of the outcome, he says his office will do everything within the law to protect the community’s children.
See what others are saying: (Fox News) (The Washington Post) (Fox 5)
White Supremacist Propaganda Reached Record High in 2022, ADL Finds
“We cannot sit idly by as these extremists pollute our communities with their hateful trash,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said.
White supremacist propaganda in the U.S. reached record levels in 2022, according to a report published Wednesday by the Anti-Defamation League’s Center of Extremism.
The ADL found over 6,700 cases of white supremacist propaganda in 2022, which marks a 38% jump from the nearly 4,900 cases the group found in 2021. It also represents the highest number of incidents ever recorded by the ADL.
The propaganda tallied by the anti-hate organization includes the distribution of racist, antisemitic, and homophobic flyers, banners, graffiti, and more. This propaganda has spread substantially since 2018, when the ADL found just over 1,200 incidents.
“There’s no question that white supremacists and antisemites are trying to terrorize and harass Americans with their propaganda,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement. “We cannot sit idly by as these extremists pollute our communities with their hateful trash.”
The report found that there were at least 50 white supremacist groups behind the spread of propaganda in 2022, but 93% of it came from just three groups. One of those groups was also responsible for 43% of the white supremacist events that took place last year.
White supremacist events saw a startling uptick of their own, with the ADL documenting at least 167, a 55% jump from 2021.
Propaganda was found in every U.S. state except for Hawaii, and events were documented in 33 states, most heavily in Massachusetts, California, Ohio, and Florida.
“The sheer volume of white supremacist propaganda distributions we are documenting around the country is alarming and dangerous,” Oren Segal, Vice President of the ADL’s Center on Extremism said in a statement. “Hardly a day goes by without communities being targeted by these coordinated, hateful actions, which are designed to sow anxiety and create fear.”
“We need a whole-of-society approach to combat this activity, including elected officials, community leaders, and people of good faith coming together and condemning this activity forcefully,” Segal continued.
See what others are saying: (Axios) (The Hill) (The New York Times)
Adidas Financial Woes Continue, Company on Track for First Annual Loss in Decades
Adidas has labeled 2023 a “transition year” for the company.
Adidas’ split with musician Kanye West has left the company with financial problems due to surplus Yeezy products, putting the sportswear giant in the position to potentially suffer its first annual loss in over 30 years.
Adidas dropped West last year after he made a series of antisemitic remarks on social media and other broadcasts. His Yeezy line was a staple for Adidas, and the surplus product is due, in part, to the brand’s own decision to continue production during the split.
According to CEO Bjorn Gulden, Adidas continued production of only the items already in the pipeline to prevent thousands of people from losing their jobs. However, that has led to the unfortunate overabundance of Yeezy sneakers and clothes.
On Wednesday, Gulden said that selling the shoes and donating the proceeds makes more sense than giving them away due to the Yeezy resale market — which has reportedly shot up 30% since October.
“If we sell it, I promise that the people who have been hurt by this will also get something good out of this,” Gulden said in a statement to the press.
However, Gulden also said that West is entitled to a portion of the proceeds of the sale of Yeezys per his royalty agreement.
Adidas announced in February that, following its divergence from West, it is facing potential sales losses totaling around $1.2 billion and profit losses of around $500 million.
If it decides to not sell any more Yeezy products, Adidas is facing a projected annual loss of over $700 million.
Outside of West, Adidas has taken several heavy profit blows recently. Its operating profit reportedly fell by 66% last year, a total of more than $700 million. It also pulled out of Russia after the country’s invasion of Ukraine last year, which cost Adidas nearly $60 million dollars. Additionally, China’s “Zero Covid” lockdowns last year caused in part a 36% drop in revenue for Adidas compared to years prior.
As a step towards a solution, Gulden announced that the company is slashing its dividends from 3.30 euros to 0.70 euro cents per share pending shareholder approval.
Adidas has labeled 2023 a “transition year” for the company.
“Adidas has all the ingredients to be successful. But we need to put our focus back on our core: product, consumers, retail partners, and athletes,” Gulden said. “I am convinced that over time we will make Adidas shine again. But we need some time.”
See what others are saying: (The Washington Post) (The New York Times) (CNN)
Immigration Could Be A Solution to Nursing Home Labor Shortages
98% of nursing homes in the United States are experiencing difficulty hiring staff.
The Labor Crisis
A recent National Bureau of Economic Research paper has offered up a solution to the nursing home labor shortage: immigration.
According to a 2022 American Health Care Association survey, six in ten nursing homes are limiting new patients due to staffing issues. The survey also says that 87% of nursing homes have staffing shortages and 98% are experiencing difficulty hiring.
The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) outlined in their paper that increased immigration could help solve the labor shortage in nursing homes. Immigrants make up 19% of nursing home workers.
With every 10% increase in female immigration, nursing assistant hours go up by 0.7% and registered nursing hours go up by 1.1% And with that same immigration increase, short-term hospitalizations of nursing home residents go down by 0.6%.
Additionally, the State Department issued 145% more EB-3 documents, which are employment-based visas, for healthcare workers in the 2022 fiscal year than in 2019, suggesting that more people are coming to the U.S. to work in health care.
However, according to Skilled Nursing News, in August of 2022, the approval process from beginning to end for an RN can take between seven to nine months.
Displeasure about immigration has exploded since Pres. Joe Biden took office in 2021. According to a Gallup study published in February, around 40% of American adults want to see immigration decrease. That is a steep jump from 19% in 2021, and it is the highest the figure has been since 2016.
However, more than half of Democrats still are satisfied with immigration and want to see it increased. But with a divided Congress, the likelihood of any substantial immigration change happening is pretty slim.