- YouTuber Cole Carrigan posted a video where he claimed his friend and another woman were sexually assaulted by Austin McBroom, his basketball player friend, and his father.
- McBroom is part of the Ace Family, which has over 17 million subscribers on YouTube.
- Carrigan’s video also included screenshots to show that the women had met with McBroom, along with a photo of blood on the bedsheets after alleged forced penetration, and an anonymous phone call with one of the alleged victims.
- The story prompted #AceFamilyisOverParty to trend on Twitter. McBroom addressed the situation himself online denying the allegations and claiming he is a victim of extortion, defamation, and slander.
Accusations in Video
Family vlogger and patriarch of the Ace Family Austin McBroom, his father, and other acquaintances, have been accused of sexual assault in a new video posted by YouTuber Cole Carrigan.
Carrigan uploaded a 15-minute video titled “The Truth About The Ace Family..” on Monday. He opened by discussing the recent rumors about McBroom cheating on his wife, Catherine Paiz, before saying the allegations go further than just infidelity.
Carrigan claimed that his friend and another woman were assaulted by McBroom and several people he knew. He claimed he was making the video on behalf of them because they signed an NDA and because it is difficult to bring allegations forward against a prominent man.
According to Carrigan, the two girls had been drinking when they went back to their room to change. McBroom, his security guard, father, and two friends followed them back.
“Obviously I don’t have recordings of what went down in the room,” Carrigan said, “but my friend told me that she repeatedly said ‘no’ multiple times over and over to the point where she started crying and begging them to stop. That’s when they forced themselves in her and I will insert the photos of the blood all over the bedsheets in the hotel room right here.”
He included a photo that showed bloodstains on sheets as potential evidence that the intercourse was forced.
He also called his friend so she could tell her story, though she was not named and her voice was distorted to hide her identity. She also said that she and another woman had walked to their room and that the group had followed them there.
She claimed that the guys were being flirty, but she and the other girl were too under the influence to push them off.
She said that one of McBroom’s friends had sex with her without her consent and that McBroom’s father tried to force her to perform oral sex.
“But the next thing I remember is, unfortunately, being on the bed and his NBA player friend was having sex with me,” she said. “I don’t ever remember giving him consent to. The next thing I remember is looking up and Austin’s dad Allen is there and I am seeing him unbuckle his pants, pull down his pants, and pull out his penis in front of my face, basically wanting me to suck his penis.”
She went on to say that around then, the security guard walked in and she went to check in on her friend.
“All of a sudden I hear her yelling ‘no’ and screaming and crying,” she said. “And all of the guys start rushing around the room because my friend is literal hysterical crying and sobbing and she’s just sitting in the shower. Then after that we just got in bed and we were just crying for the rest of the night.”
Carrigan’s video also included several screenshots to show that his friends had met with McBroom. There were screenshots that show McBroom and his father in Miami on June 21, the night before the incident.
There were also screenshots of texts Carrigan claims were sent the following morning. The first was to one of McBroom’s friends, where the girls seemed disinterested in communicating. The video alleges that the two girls had been hiding in their room when they first received the messages.
Another showed one of the girls reaching out to her ex in Miami and beginning to explain the situation.
Carrigan also showed screenshots of his friend allegedly texting McBroom about what girls he wanted to be brought to Miami.
Another screenshot allegedly showed McBroom’s assistant telling Carrigan’s friend to not let the story out because there could be “serious consequences.”
There were also screenshots Carrigan said came from girls who told him they had their own inappropriate interactions with McBroom. In one, it appears someone is accusing McBroom of impregnating them. These allegations are unverified.
The video ended up generating a lot of online chatter, with #AceFamilyIsOverParty trending on Twitter. Many used the hashtag to express their disgust in the story.
More also shared screenshots of their alleged encounters with McBroom.
While some shared them online, others doubted their legitimacy. Paiz tweeted that she did not know who was worse: “The person who photoshops conversations OR the people who believe it?” She accompanied this tweet with what appears to be a fake interaction between her and Kanye West.
Another screenshot that, again, is unverified allegedly came from one of the girls in the story, Leslie. Users said she had posted her side of the story to Instagram before deleting it.
She posted a notes app message where she discusses Carrigan’s video, which she says was made with ill intent, and also identifies the other alleged victim in it as Amanda.
“I feel like this video was made for the wrong reasons and this wasn’t Cole’s story to tell,” she wrote. “Cole even texted me saying we could potentially get paid $100,000 from this following the claim that Drama alert was payed off $500k.”
This refers to Carrigan claiming that Drama Alert’s Keemstar was going to post a video on the topic but was paid $500,000 not to. Keemstar denies this and posted his own video on Tuesday.
Leslie went on to say that McBroom did not rape her and was not to blame.
“I wasn’t aware Amanda or Cole were in contact with drama alert to anonymously run our story,” the alleged post continued. “But I was aware of Cole’s video being made, and I only wanted it to be factual if it was ever going to be posted. I wanted to say that Austin McBroom is not to blame in the situation and did not rape me or anyone. I’m currently handling this situation in my own way. I brought this to social media to address false accusations. This isn’t what I wanted, there’s several sides to every story and this isn’t how I wanted to tell mine.”
The post also included a screenshot of what appears to be a text from Carrigan saying they could be paid $100,000 not to tell the story and that they could all split it.
On Tuesday morning, McBroom responded to the allegations. He shared Leslie’s screenshots and released a statement claiming he was a “victim of extortion, defamation, and slander.”
“I knew this was a cold world but never did I foresee something this disturbing upon me,” he wrote. “Thank you to all of my Ace Family members for all of your concerns and thank you to those who know my character and my heart. I don’t wish this upon anyone and I can only hope that those responsible for this learn from their mistakes and become better people. My family and I dealing with this matter privately and taking legal action. Bullying, extortion, slander and defamation of charterer is something I will not stand for and I can promise that justice will be served.”
See what others are saying: (Newsweek) (Distractify) (Daily Dot)
Twitter Verifies the Wrong Account After Pledging To Improve Its Verification Process
- Twitter issued verifications to a number of large-scale gamers and streamers on Wednesday, including Corpse Husband, whose content has recently seen a massive surge in popularity because of his Among Us plays.
- Still, it left out many other figures, such as Dream and CallMeCarson, who have millions of followers each.
- In a notable blunder, Twitter also accidentally verified the wrong Karl Jacobs. The correct Karl Jacobs, a Twitch streamer with nearly 800,000 followers, was later given verification. Until Thursday afternoon, the incorrect Jacobs retained verification.
- The confusion over this wave of verifications follows Twitter’s recent pledge to relaunch applications for verifications after pausing the program in 2017 when it verified a white supremacist.
Twitter Verifies the Wrong Account
On Wednesday, Twitter verified Twitch streamer Karl Jacobs, who has nearly 800,000 followers on the platform and has frequently appeared in videos with mega-creator Mr.Beast. Or rather, Twitter tried to verify him.
It actually ended up verifying a different Karl Jacobs, the owner of a seemingly random account that only had about 200 followers at the time.
“THEY VERIFIED THE WRONG KARL JACOBS,” streamer Karl Jacobs said in a tweet that was soon followed up by a response from Mr.Beast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson.
“LMAO THATS THE FUNNIEST THING IVE EVER SEEN IN MY LIFE,” Donaldson said.
About 30 minutes later, Jacobs confirmed that Twitter had partially corrected its mistake and verified his account by giving it a blue checkmark. Twitter did not fully rectify their mistake until Thursday afternoon when it finally removed the verification for the account for the random Karl Jacobs.
Jacob’s verification was part of a mass verification of gamers and other streamers on Wednesday. While the platform gave blue checkmarks to a number of top creators (such as fast-growing creator Corpse Husband), it also seemingly skipped over several other major creators with millions of followers each.
Some fans were upset that streamers such as Sykkuno, who has 1.8 million followers on Twitch and almost 750,000 of Twitter, appeared to be ignored in the wave of verifications. They argued that he should already meet Twitter’s standards for being verified, as he’s an account of “public interest.”
Both Corpse Husband and Twitch Streamer Valkyrae also expressed disappointment that Sykkuno wasn’t included.
Other notable creators left out of the fold included CallMeCarson and Dream. On Twitter, both joked about the situation.
CallMeCarson, whose real name is Carson King, currently has over 3 million followers on YouTube. Dream, whose real identity is anonymous, has over 13 million followers. His Minecraft plays on YouTube average tens of millions of views with each upload.
Twitter’s Verification Problem
In 2017, Twitter paused its application-based verification system after it faced backlash for verifying a white supremacist and reported neo-Nazi who had organized the infamous Charlottesville Unite the Right rally. During that rally, counterprotester Heather Heyer was killed after a vehicle rammed into her.
“Verification was meant to authenticate identity & voice but it is interpreted as an endorsement or an indicator of importance,” the Twitter Support account said following backlash. “We recognize that we have created this confusion and need to resolve it. We have paused all general verifications while we work and will report back soon.”
In a quote tweet, CEO Jack Dorsey admitted that “the system is broken and needs to be reconsidered.”
In 2018, Twitter product lead Kayvon Beykpour said the company was shifting focus from updating that verification process to election integrity.
During that announcement, he also addressed confusion that had arisen because, despite the pause of Twitter’s public verification system, some accounts were still actively receiving blue checkmarks.
“Despite that goal,” he said, “we still verify accounts ad hoc when we think it serves the public conversation & is in line with our policy. But this has led to frustration b/c our process remains opaque & inconsistent with our [intended] pause. This is far from ideal & we still intend to fix.”
That likely explains Wednesday’s set of verifications, as well as verifications earlier this year for a number of public health officials who have authority to speak on the COVID-19 pandemic.
When Will Public Verification Come Back?
Despite that application process being missing for three years now, public verification is still expected to come back. In fact, last week, Twitter announced that it expects to re-introduce the feature early next year.
In a draft policy, it said eligible accounts include government entities, companies, brands, nonprofits, news media accounts, activists, and organizers. The list also includes businesses and individuals in entertainment and sports, as well as a more general category listed as “other influential individuals.”
Beykpour added that the company’s “goal is to bring clarity to what verification on Twitter means, the criteria we’ll use for assessing verification, and how to apply.”
Indeed, the draft policy lays out some very specific rules for how to get that oh-so-coveted blue checkmark. For example, one avenue for an actor to receive verification includes obtaining at least five production credits on their IMDB profile.
Qualifying media outlets must also adhere to standards set forth by multiple organizations focusing on ethics in journalism.
Twitter said it will refuse to hand out verifications to any accounts that “have had a 12-hour or 7-day lockout for violating the Twitter Rules in the past six months.”
“You may lose your badge if you change your account name (@handle), if your account becomes inactive or incomplete, or if you are no longer in the position you initially were verified for—such as an elected government official who leaves office—and you do not otherwise meet our criteria for verification,” the draft says.
That clause could potentially leave the door open for Twitter to remove President Donald Trump’s verification once he leaves the White House in January. Since May, Twitter has placed warning labels on a bevy of Trump’s tweets. That fact-checking process ramped up in November as Trump made false claims about election fraud in dozens of tweets.
If Trump continues to tweet false information after his presidency, Twitter may be forced to address that question. In either event that Twitter removes his verification or gives him a special exemption, the company will undoubtedly face criticism.
Twitter said it will publish a finalized version of this policy on Dec. 17, but at least one major question remains: If Twitter has worked for three years to make its verification process transparent, will users have confidence in the platform if it continues to accidentally give verifications — a symbol of authority — to random accounts?
YouTuber Gabi DeMartino Slammed for Selling Naked Childhood Video of Herself on OnlyFans
- Longtime social media influencer Gabi DeMartino was slammed Tuesday for tricking her OnlyFans subscribers into paying $3 for a naked childhood video of herself.
- The locked content was captioned “won’t put my panties on,” prompting fans to assume their purchase would unlock a nude or, at the very least, risqué video of her.
- DeMartino initially accused critics of “reaching,” but later apologized and claimed her account was “NOT a sexual page.”
- Instead, she said she uses it like a “finsta” to post content she would normally share with close friends. However, Insider reported that her previous OnlyFans posts were sexual in nature.
- Though DeMartino says she deactivated her own account, OnlyFans said it terminated her page for breaking its terms of service. Now, many sex workers are concerned about how her actions will hurt adult entertainers who will face blame for something they didn’t and wouldn’t do.
What Did She Do?
OnlyFans said it deactivated a popular influencer’s account on Tuesday after she tricked people into paying for a naked childhood video of herself.
The creator under fire, 25-year-old Gabi DeMartino, is a longtime YouTuber with over 3 million subscribers on her personal channel and 9.6 million on the joint channel she shares with her twin sister. DeMartino also boasts impressive followings on Instagram and Twitter and is perhaps best recognized for her striking resemblance to singer Ariana Grande.
Like other stars and influencers in recent months, DeMartino created an account on OnlyFans, the popular subscription site predominantly used by sex workers because it allows nude and risqué content.
However, DeMartino caused widespread outrage Tuesday after she sent a message to her OnlyFans subscribers that read: “won’t put my panties on.”
That message was accompanied by a 35-second video clip that fans had to pay $3 to unlock. Because of her wording, many assumed that if they paid, they would receive a nude or, at the very least, risqué video of her.
Instead, what fans reportedly ended up getting was a video of her as a toddler lifting up her dress to show herself naked underneath.
Almost immediately, people began slamming DeMartino for duping her fans into essentially buying child pornography. Many also said they were disturbed by what she had done and reported her to OnlyFans.
After seeing the initial backlash, most notably from YouTube drama channels, DeMartino seemed to defend herself.
“Drama channels are trying to make something out of a childhood video of me, that’s hilarious,” she said in a phone call with Insider reporter Kat Tenbarge.
“They’re reaching,” she added.
However, the backlash continued to grow and DeMartino soon changed her tune. When the drama channel known as Spill Sesh demanded the influencer make a statement, she finally did.
“A childhood video of me on the phone sayin ‘Nani says put your panties back on’ and jumping up and down laughing. I’m sorry I didn’t think that one through. period. a home-video i love to share w my friends & i use my OF as a “finsta” page where i share stuff as i would w friends,” She wrote on Twitter.
She expanded on that statement in a follow up post, calling the video a “gooft throwback family moment” that she wanted to share with her fans.
“I am sorry that this wasn’t thought out completely I apologize. The video is down now I am sorry again if this came out wrong,” she continued.
OnlyFans Deactivates Her Account
While some fans accepted her apology, many internet users weren’t having it.
Several people specifically took issue with DeMartino claiming she uses her OnlyFans as a “Finsta,” a private account typically reserved for close friends.
In fact, when she talked to Insider via text message, she said her account “was NOT a sexual page.” However, the outlet noted that DeMartino’s previous OnlyFans posts were sexual in nature.
“DeMartino’s photos and videos on OnlyFans included a video of her boyfriend lying on top of her and kissing her and a picture of him groping her,” Insider reported. “She also posed topless for a “nip slip” image and for one image of her breasts pressed against another woman who was clothed. DeMartino also posted multiple videos of her twerking.“
This information caused many to question her apology further, meanwhile, others continued to take issue with how she marketed the video.
In a now-deleted tweet, DeMartino even addressed her phrasing in the initial message, saying: “I was trolling it was wrong period.”
She’s trying to play it off as just trolling🤢🤢🤢 pic.twitter.com/Y4wtHSJNJv— ✨Z3r0_Art and 777 others✨ (@Z3r0Art) December 1, 2020
DeMartino also told Insider that she took down her OnlyFans page after the outrage, but that too was called into question because OnlyFans issued a statement to several media outlets saying it deactivated her accounting for violating its terms of service.
Still, while her account is now gone, many adult entertainers are frustrated that yet another star is giving OnlyFans a bad name.
“It’s women like her that do this that make people turn to those of us in the adult industry who would never do something like this, and we take the blame for it,” Alana Evans, an adult entertainer and president of the Adult Performers Actors Guild (APAG) told The Daily Beast.
“It’s shocking. Just shocking,” she added.
Evans told the outlet that she reported the page to OnlyFans and encouraged the site to help authorities so that DeMartino is prosecuted. She also said she has contacted the FBI about this situation. However, at this time, it’s unclear if DeMartino will face any serious legal consequences.
See what others are saying: (The Daily Beast) (Insider) (PopBuzz)
Jake Paul Believes COVID-19 Is a Hoax
- Internet star Jake Paul called COVID-19 a hoax, incorrectly compared it to the flu, called 98% of news fake, and doubted medical experts in an interview with The Daily Beast published Wednesday.
- Many online slammed Paul for his misleading and false claims and praised the reporter, Marlow Stern, for repeatedly pushing back against them.
- Readers also pointed to other notable moments in the interview as ones that expose Paul’s true character.
Jake Paul’s Thoughts on the Coronavirus Pandemic
YouTuber Jake Paul is facing major heat online after claiming that COVID-19 is a hoax in an interview with The Daily Beast.
During the interview, the outlet’s Senior Entertainment Editor, Marlow Stern, brought up the fact that Paul has hosted several parties throughout the coronavirus pandemic.
Stern cites a July report from Kat Tenbarge for Insider, which quoted Paul saying at the time, “I personally am not the type of person who’s gonna sit around and not live my life.”
When asked if he still lives by that mindset, Paul essentially explained that he does. “It’s time for us to open up,” he said.
“This is the most detrimental thing to our society. COVID cases are at less than 1 percent, and I think the disease is a hoax,” he added.
Paul went on to compare the virus to the flu, which Stern push back against in an interesting exchange.
Stern: You think the disease is a hoax? It’s killed about 260,000 people so far this year.
Paul: Ugh. Yeah, and so has the flu.
No. The flu has only killed a fraction of that, and we also have a vaccine for the flu.
The flu kills between 20,000 and 70,000 people a year. And we have a mass-produced vaccine for it.
Don’t we have a vaccine for COVID?
Not yet. They’re hopeful we will soon. It’s been approved by the FDA based on early-stage trials but it hasn’t been introduced to the market yet. So they’re hopeful that there will be a vaccine out very soon, although distribution also poses a big problem. But I want to talk about why you think COVID is a “hoax.”
I don’t have to elaborate.
You don’t want to elaborate on that?
[Deep sigh] No.
This section of the interview caught the most heat online, however, at a later point, Paul made more false and misleading claims about the virus, which Stern again corrected.
Paul also suggested he had doubts about the information coming from health professionals, saying: “I don’t think we do know who the health professionals are. People like yourself, or people who go on Twitter and read articles all day, you know, 98 percent of news is fake, so how do we know what’s actually real, and what we’re actually supposed to do?“
Shortly after the article was published, Twitter users and some fellow content creators slammed his remarks.
Other Notable Moments
However, the outrage isn’t solely about his coronavirus comments. In the interview, Paul also refused to comment on several of his past controversies, including the FBI raid on his home and his this use of the n-word.
He also faced criticism for remarks he made about his criminal trespassing and unlawful assembly charges. Those charges came after video appeared to show him participating in a looting at a mall in Scottsdale, Arizona during Black Lives Matter protests over the summer.
“It looked like people in your crew were both shooting fireworks at the mall and also destroying some store windows inside of it. Do you feel you conducted yourself appropriately in that situation?” Stern asked.
“I was merely a reporter simply, like you are in this call, wanting to capture, document, and record what was happening,” Paul responded.
At one point, he even became frustrated that Stern was asking him about his past controversies.
“How does asking about these incidents help you learn more about me?” Paul said. “You didn’t ask me, “Yo, do you have any hobbies?” “What are you like as a person?” “What is your daily routine?” “Do you call your mom?” “Do you have friends?”
“You want me to ask you if you have friends or call your mom?” Stern replied.
“I mean, if you actually wanted to learn more about me, yeah, those are the types of questions you would ask,” Paul explained.
To that, Stern noted that he did spend time asking Paul about his passion for boxing and defended his line of questions as fair.
Because of this, and other notable moments in the piece, many are saying the interview gives a good glimpse and Paul’s true character. Readers have also praised Stern for how he conducted the interview and repeatedly corrected Paul’s dangerous claims.
wow! wow! Mr. Stern, I congrats you on how you handled this interview. I could not believe what I was reading and the statements made by Jake. If it was his team setting it up, what in the world were their goals? To show everyone his true idiotic self. wow!— just nate; part time cowboy, part time catboy (@idlebums) November 25, 2020