Connect with us

U.S.

“OK” Hand Sign, “Bowlcut,” and More Added to ADL Hate Symbol List

Published

on

  • The ADL added 36 new hate symbols to its “Hate on Display” database, including the “OK” hand symbol and “bowlcut” hairstyle which was worn by the shooter in Charleston, South Carolina in 2015. 
  • Many are upset that these seemingly common displays are being classified as hate. 
  • The ADL, however, does note in their list that the symbols must be evaluated in their context because “symbols in this database may be significant to people who are not extreme or racist.”

ADL Adds to “Hate on Display” Database

The Anti-Defamation League has added 36 new entries to its hate symbols list, including the “OK” hand gesture and “bowlcut” hairstyle. 

The organization, which is devoted to fighting anti-Semitism, hate, and other forms of discrimination, said it updated its “Hate on Display” database in a press release on Thursday. The list was created in 2000 to help law enforcement and the public identify potential warnings of extremism. 

Some of their latest additions include logos for hate groups, the practice of burning neo-Nazi symbols, and the Happy Merchant meme, which the group describes as “the most popular anti-Semitic meme among white supremacists.”

However, the “OK” hand gesture and “bowlcut” are the two that have made the most headlines. According to the ADL the use of “OK” as a hate symbol began “as a hoax by members of the website 4chan.”

Online trolls would say that the shape your hands make when signaling “OK” creates a W and a P, symbolizing white power. 

“The OK symbol became a popular trolling tactic,” they added. “By 2019, the symbol was being used in some circles as a sincere expression of white supremacy.”

The suspect who carried out the Christchurch, New Zealand shooting in March, which left 51 people dead, used the sign in a courtroom appearance, the organization’s entry explains. This is one of the most prominant examples of the symbol moving from being a troll tactic to being used in real-world white supremacy. 

Meanwhile, the “bowlcut” refers to the haircut worn by a shooter in Charleston, South Carolina, who killed eight people in a church in 2015.

Those who use the bowlcut image or other ‘bowl’ references admire [him] and call for others to emulate his 2015 mass shooting attack at Emanuel AME Church,” their passage explains. 

What These Classifications Mean

Both the “OK” sign and “bowlcut” are displayed in everyday fashions outside of hate groups. Below their list, the ADL acknowledges that some of their symbols exist outside the realm of hate and must be evaluated in their proper context.

“All the symbols depicted here must be evaluated in the context in which they appear,” they write. “Few symbols represent just one idea or are used exclusively by one group. For example, the Confederate Flag is a symbol that is frequently used by white supremacists but which also has been used by people and groups that are not racist. Similarly, other symbols in this database may be significant to people who are not extreme or racist.” 

As for how they decided on what to add, the ADL said that the newly added symbols were identified by their Center on Extremism. These symbols have been found on sites like 4chan, 8chan, Reddit, Twitter, Facebook and gaming platforms. They also have a presence outside of the web.

“Such symbols have appeared at white supremacist events such as the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville and were painted on the guns used by [the suspected Christchurch shooter],” the ADL explains. 

ADL CEO John Greenblatt said that adding these new symbols allow the world to be fully informed on the potential presence of hate.

“Even as extremists continue to use symbols that may be years or decades old, they regularly create new symbols, memes and slogans to express their hateful sentiments,” he said in a statement. “We believe law enforcement and the public needs to be fully informed about the meaning of these images, which can serve as a first warning sign to the presence of haters in a community or school.”

Reactions Online

The ADL’s new listings created mixed reactions online. Many were shocked that something as common as the “OK” gesture was being classified as a hate symbol. Others took the warning to heart. Cartoonist Terry Moore said this was something artists needed to know about so they don’t “naively put these symbols” in art and send the wrong message.

https://twitter.com/TerryMooreArt/status/1177224738810318850?s=20

Meanwhile, some mocked the situation. Writer for The Blaze, Samantha Sullivan, said bowlcuts are a “terrible look, but damn.”

Editor’s Note: At Rogue Rocket, we make it a point to not include the names and pictures of mass murderers or suspected mass murderers who may have been seeking attention or infamy. Therefore, we will not be linking to other sources, as they may contain these details.

U.S.

Kathy Griffin, Ethan Klein, More Suspended From Twitter Over Elon Musk Impersonations

Published

on

Many have pretended to be Musk in an attempt to highlight the potential issues paid-for verifications could cause on the platform.


Musk Takes on Impersonations

Comedian Kathy Griffin and internet personality Ethan Klein are among the many Twitter users that have been permanently suspended for impersonating the platform’s new CEO, Elon Musk.

Impersonation has long been against Twitter’s rules, but on Sunday, the billionaire took the policy a step further by announcing that “any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying ‘parody’ will be permanently suspended.”

“Previously, we issued a warning before suspension, but now that we are rolling out widespread verification, there will be no warning,” Musk explained. “This will be clearly identified as a condition for signing up to Twitter Blue.”

Musk also said that any user who changes their name will temporarily lose their verification check mark. 

The announcement came as many verified users began mocking Musk by changing their name and photo to match his, then tweeting jokes that were either absurd or out of character for the business mogul. Many did this to protest Musk’s plan to charge an $8 monthly subscription fee that would allow any Twitter user to become verified. 

Klein was one of many who changed his name to “Elon Musk” and made a photo of the CEO his profile image. The podcast host sent out several jokes, including one referencing the increased use of the N-word on the platform since Musk’s takeover, and another referencing Jeffrey Epstein.

“Even though Jeffrey Epstein committed horrible crimes, I do still miss him on nights like this for his warmth and camaraderie. Rest In Peace old Friend,” he wrote. 

His account was quickly banned, but Klein defended himself on TikTok, arguing that both his cover photo and bio labeled his account as “parody” and therefore should be acceptable under Musk’s guidelines. 

“What more do you want from me?” he asked. “Comedy is dead. And Elon Musk dug the grave.” 

Protests of Musk’s Twitter Control

For her part, Griffin likewise tweeted while masquerading as Musk, writing that after “spirited discussion with the females in my life, I’ve decided that voting blue for their choice is only right.”

Musk joked that she was actually “suspended for impersonating a comedian” and added that she can have her account back if she pays for the $8 subscription. Griffin, however, found another way around the ban.

The comedian logged into her late mother’s Twitter account and began using the hashtag #FreeKathy while calling out Musk. 

“Mad Men” actor Rich Sommer and podcaster Griffin Newman have also had their accounts suspended for tweeting as Musk. Other celebrities, including TV producer Shonda Rhimes, musician Sara Bareilles, and model Gigi Hadid have protested Musk’s Twitter reign by leaving the platform altogether.

“For a long time, but especially with its new leadership, it’s becoming more and more of a cesspool of hate & bigotry, and it’s not a place I want to be a part of,” Hadid wrote on Instagram over the weekend. 

See what others are saying: (NBC News) (Variety) (The Verge)

Continue Reading

U.S.

AOC Says Twitter Notifications “Conveniently” Disabled After Criticizing Musk

Published

on

“What’s good? Doesn’t seem very free speechy to me,” she tweeted at the new CEO.


AOC Vs. Elon Musk

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) said several of her Twitter features are “conveniently not working” after feuding with the platform’s new owner, billionaire Elon Musk.

Ocasio-Cortez has never been shy about her views on Musk. After he officially took charge of Twitter last week, the congresswoman began criticizing his new proposals for the social networking site, specifically his plan to charge an $8 subscription fee for verification. 

“Lmao at a billionaire earnestly trying to sell people on the idea that ‘free speech’ is actually a $8/mo subscription plan,” she wrote on Tuesday.

“Your feedback is appreciated, now pay $8,” Musk replied the following day.

Around an hour later, the business mogul sent another tweet appearing to call Ocasio-Cortez out for selling $58 sweatshirts. 

“Proud of this and always will be,” she shot back. “My workers are union, make a living wage, have full healthcare, and aren’t subject to racist treatment in their workplaces. Items are made in USA. Team AOC honors and respects working people. You should try it sometime instead of union-busting.”

In a follow-up tweet, she noted that proceeds go to community organizing programs, including one that tutors students who are falling behind because of COVID-19.

AOC’s Mentions Not Working

On Wednesday evening, just hours after her back-and-forth with Musk, Ocasio-Cortez told her followers that her “Twitter mentions/notifications conveniently aren’t working tonight.”

“I was informed via text that I seem to have gotten under a certain billionaire’s skin,” she added. “Just a reminder that money will never [buy] your way out of insecurity, folks.” 

The issue seemingly continued into Thursday morning when the Democrat tweeted a screenshot of her notifications page, which loaded no results. 

Why should people pay $8 just for their app to get bricked when they say something you don’t like?” she tweeted at Musk. “This is what my app has looked like ever since my tweet upset you yesterday. What’s good? Doesn’t seem very free speechy to me.”

Musk has repeatedly claimed that one of his primary motives to buy Twitter was to protect free speech. Once taking the reigns as CEO, though, he did say he would start a content moderation council and make decisions jointly with them.

See what others are saying: (The Hill) (Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

South Carolina County Votes Against Moving LGBTQ+ Friendly Books Away from Children’s Section

Published

on

Efforts to limit LGBTQ+ content in libraries first began over the summer.


Attempts to Restrict LGBTQ+ Displays

The county council in Greenville County, South Carolina this week voted against discussing a resolution that would move all books “promoting sexuality” to the adult section.

This resolution is the culmination of months of turmoil in Greenville County. In June, libraries in the county removed Pride displays at the direction of library officials. Then in September, the county’s Republican Party executive board passed a resolution to call on the County Council to restrict access to books with LGBTQ+ themes and characters. 

The resolution was proposed by Joe Dill, an outgoing council member, as well as a member of the county’s Republican Party executive board. It proposed the council “officially order that no books or content, including digital copies or online accessible materials, promoting sexuality be allowed in the Children’s Sections of our public libraries.” 

Resolution Rejected

However, the resolution required the council to suspend its regular rules in order to discuss it as it was not submitted to the council via committee. The final vote was 9 to 3 against the suspension of the rules and effectively killed the resolution. 

Those that voted against it viewed the resolution as an overreach.

“We just do not believe that’s our job to get involved in the library’s business,” Council member Ennis Fett said to a local news outlet. “We appoint a board. We can not set a precedent of micromanaging the library board, because if we do that, then, we will be micromanaging all boards and commissions that we appoint.” 

Although the council decided not to get involved, the library still has the final decision to make regarding these books. Their meeting to discuss the matter is scheduled for December 5. 

See what others are saying: (Greenville News) (The Post and Courier) (7 News)

Continue Reading