Connect with us

U.S.

Community Responds After 7 Killed in Midland-Odessa Shooting

Published

on

  • Community members in Odessa and Midland, Texas are coming together and speaking out after a shooting Saturday left seven dead and almost two dozen more injured.
  • Students at two rival high schools have put their tensions aside to work together on fundraising for victims and their families.
  • Odessa Police Chief Michael Gerke has also refused to publicly name the gunman in a press conference saying, “I’m not going to give him any notoriety for what he did.”

Community Members Organize Help

Residents in Odessa and Midland, Texas are lending helping hands to one another after a mass shooting on Saturday left seven people dead and over 20 others injured.

On Monday, students from Odessa High School and Permian High School came together to find ways to help the victims of the attack. According to USA Today, nearly 100 students gathered in prayer before discussing ways to plan fundraisers and organizing food donations from local businesses. 

The two high schools have a long-running and well-known rivalry. The tensions between the two even inspired the rivalry depicted in the film and television series Friday Night Lights. 

“The Odessa-Permian rivalry is something crazy,” one former student told USA Today. “We don’t get along. But everyone’s together.”

Local groups are accepting help from the public in other ways. The City of Odessa is taking food donations to help victims and responders but has reached capacity for perishable items. Non-perishable items can still be donated. 

A GoFundMe was set up to help a 17-month-old who was injured in the attack. The page has currently raised over $200,000 to help cover several expenses, including the surgery the child received after a bullet fragment hit her face.

Community Leaders Speak Out

Leaders in the community have also responded to the events. The mayor of Midland, Jerry Morales, spoke at a vigil on Sunday about the unity in the towns. 

“We are devastated by this idiot who hurt our communities,” he said, “but we are one, we are strong together. This idiot will not break our faith.”

When speaking at a press conference, Odessa Police Chief Michael Gerke made headlines when he announced his choice to not name the gunman while speaking in public. 

“You’ll notice that I’m not naming the subject, and there’s a reason for that. I refuse to,” he said. “I’m not going to give him any notoriety for what he did. We’ll provide that information to you, but not on this public space.” 

Texas Politicians Speak Out

Other political leaders in Texas have also made statements and pledged action following the shooting. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott advocated for expedited executions in cases of mass shootings. 

The article he shared in his tweet referenced a Bloomberg report on legislation drafted by the United States Department of Justice that would speed the process up. Right now, there are no details on any legislation plans in Texas. 

On Sunday, Abbott also addressed the gun laws in Texas that took effect one day after the shooting as previously scheduled before the incident. These laws loosen some regulations and allow licensed gun owners to have their weapon in a locked vehicle on school grounds and allow for more armed marshals in schools. They also clarify that licensed gun owners can bring their weapons into places of worship, among other things. 

“Some of these laws were enacted to make our communities safer,” he told reporters. 

A clip of former representative and current presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke addressing the shooting also went viral. In it, the politician spoke about the incident as reports of the attack first broke.

“We’re not sure how many gunmen, we’re not sure how many people have been shot, don’t know how many people have been killed, the condition of those who have survived,” he said. “Don’t know what the motivation is, do not yet know the firearms that were used or how they acquired them. But we do know this is fucked up.” 

O’Rourke also expressed support for a gun buy-back program.

Editor’s Note: At Rogue Rocket, we make it a point to not include the names and pictures of mass murderers or suspected mass murderers who may have been seeking attention or infamy. Therefore, we will not be linking to other sources, as they may contain these details. Instead, we will be linking to donation pages for those impacted by the shootings.

U.S.

How Safe Injections Sites in the U.S. Are Fighting Back Against The Opioid Crisis & Do They Work?

Published

on


America has been hit with a historical opioid crisis. In 2018, more than 31,000 people died from opioid overdoses, which is more than any previous year recorded in American history. Healthcare professionals and public health experts are offering alternatives to the status quo treatments, which leads us to today’s topic: supervised injection facilities (SIF). 

Also known as overdose prevention sites and medically supervised injection centers, SIF’s have been proposed as a solution to combat America’s opioid problem. In these centers, no drugs are supplied to the users—they bring their own and are given clean syringes to prevent bloodborne diseases. Advocates or these sites are saying that they would stop countless fatal overdoses because there would be medical staff on site. Countries like Switzerland, Canada, and Australia have implemented versions of these facilities and so far there has not been any reported fatal overdoses at a SIF in the world. 

While cities like Seattle, San Francisco, New York City, and Philadelphia have all proposed plans to make sites, they have been met with heavy opposition. The federal government opposed these sites because they claim it breaks federal laws and some residents in these cities are against them due to concerns over attracting more crime. In this video, we’ll be focusing on Philadelphia, as it might become the first U.S. city to legally open a supervised injection facility, along with the court case between the non-profit who is trying to establish the SIF and the federal government.

Continue Reading

U.S.

Elon Musk Defends Calling Rescue Diver “Pedo Guy” in Lawsuit

Published

on

  • In court documents, Elon Musk defended a tweet where he called a diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team from a cave a “pedo guy” because it “was a common insult used in South Africa.” 
  • The diver sued Musk for defamation last year after Musk sent an email to BuzzFeed where he referred to the diver as “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old.” 
  • The court documents from the suit, which were made public Monday, also revealed that Musk paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to look into the diver.
  • Musk also said he gave the statement to BuzzFeed based on information provided by the investigator, and because he was concerned the diver could be the next Jeffrey Epstein. 

Court Filings Made Public

Telsa CEO Elon Musk defended calling a rescue diver “pedo guy,” court documents revealed Monday.

Musk originally made the comment in July 2018, after Vernon Unsworth, a British diver who helped rescue the Thai soccer team trapped in a cave last year, gave an interview to CNN where he had some choice things to say about Musk.

Notably, Unsworth said the submarine Musk had designed to rescue the soccer team would not work and that it was just a PR stunt.

Musk responded by calling Unsworth a “pedo guy” in a now-deleted tweet.

Source: Elon Musk

He also sent an email to BuzzFeed reporter Ryan Mac, in which he accused Unsworth of being a “child rapist” who had taken a “child bride who was about 12 years old at the time.”

Source: BuzzFeed

Musk said he thought the email was off the record, but BuzzFeed said they never agreed to that. In September 2018, Unsworth filed a defamation lawsuit against Musk in the Central District of California.

Court filings from the defamation suit against Musk were made public on Monday.

Musk Defends “Pedo Guy” Tweet

In those documents, Musk claimed that referring to Unsworth as “pedo guy” was not a direct accusation of pedophilia.

“‘Pedo guy’ was a common insult used in South Africa when I was growing up,” Musk wrote. “It is synonymous with ‘creepy old man’ and is used to insult a person’s appearance and demeanor, not accuse a person of acts of pedophilia.”

“I did not intend to accuse Mr. Unsworth of engaging in acts of pedophilia,” he continued. “In response to his insults in the CNN interview, I meant to insult him back by expressing my opinion that he seemed like a creepy old man.”

The fact that Musk is arguing he was expressing his opinion is important in this context because under the First Amendment, opinions are usually protected speech and not considered defamatory.

The documents also included Musk’s deposition, where he talks more in-depth about the “pedo guy” tweet.

In the deposition, Musk said he sent BuzzFeed the email because he was worried it could turn into a Jeffrey Epstein situation, referring to the wealthy financier who was accused of sexually assaulting dozens of young women, including many underage girls. 

“What if we have another Jeffrey Epstein on our hands?” he said. “And what if he uses whatever celebrity he gains from this cave rescue to shield his bad deeds? This would be terrible.”

Musk’s Epstein argument might become problematic. First of all, he made the statements to BuzzFeed before the new allegations surfaced, which some have argued proves he just is using current news to frame Unsworth in a certain way, and that he did not actually consider Epstein at all.

That argument is also furthered by the fact that it has been reported that Musk had attended several events with Epstein, all of which were after Epstein pleaded guilty to soliciting prostitution from an underage girl in 2008.

Musk even said he visited Epstein’s house “several years ago.” Epstein also told The New York Times he had advised Musk while Tesla was trying to go public in 2018, though Musk denies those claims.

Private Investigator

Notably, Musk also said in the filings that he paid a private investigator more than $50,000 to investigate Unsworth after receiving an unsolicited email from the PI in August 2018.

In the documents, Musk says that the investigator: “reported that Mr. Unsworth met and began a relationship with his alleged Thai wife when she around twelve years old.”

He also added that the investigator “reported that Mr. Unsworth associated with Europeans who engage in improper sexual conduct in Thailand,” and that he “learned that Mr. Unsworth frequented Pattaya Beach which is well known for prostitution and sex tourism, and that Mr. Unsworth was unpopular at the rescue site because other rescue workers thought that he was ‘creepy.’”

Musk goes on to say this was the basis for the comments he made in his email to BuzzFeed.

“I did not authorize Mr. Mac or BuzzFeed to publish the contents of the email nor did I intend or expect that they would,” he said. “Especially without first independently verifying and confirming its information.”

He later added that he gave the information to Mac “so that BuzzFeed could conduct its own investigation into Mr. Unsworth and corroborate the information.”

Musk’s lawyers even admitted in the court filings that the private investigator’s findings “lacked solid evidence of Mr. Unsworth’s behavior.” 

Following the release of the court documents, Unsworth’s lawyer gave a statement to BuzzFeed condemning the Musk’s defense.

“The motion filed by Elon Musk today is a disgusting and transparent effort to continue falsely smearing Vernon Unsworth without any credible or verified supporting evidence,” the lawyer said.

“Mr. Unsworth’s opposition to Musk’s motion will reveal the whole truth of Musk’s actions and the falsity of his public statements and his motion with respect to Mr. Unsworth will be exposed.”

See what others are saying: (BuzzFeed News) (The Washington Post) (Business Insider)

Continue Reading

U.S.

Controversy, Racism, and Genius Kids?! How One Sperm Bank Changed Everything…

Published

on


The Repository for Germinal Choice is the most controversial sperm bank in U.S. history. While it was operational some people believed this bank was racist and they even compared the companies goals to Nazi eugenic practices. But even though this sperm bank was highly controversial, it also completely changed the sperm bank industry.

So check out our video for the full story on how this controversial sperm bank would go on to shape an entire industry.

Continue Reading