Connect with us

U.S.

Trump’s Personal Assistant Abruptly Resigns After Reportedly Disclosing Private Information

Published

on

  • President Donald Trump’s longtime personal assistant Madeleine Westerhout abruptly stepped down on Thursday.
  • Her resignation follows reports of Trump allegedly learning she disclosed private information about his family and the Oval Office in an off-the-record dinner with reporters.
  • Neither Westerhout or the White House have officially commented on her departure.

Westerhout Resigns

President Donald Trump’s personal assistant, Madeleine Westerhout, abruptly resigned Thursday after the president allegedly learned she had shared details about his family during an off-the-record conversation with journalists.

The 29-year-old, who had worked for Trump since he assumed office, also reportedly shared details of Oval Office operations during that same conversation. Both incidents allegedly occurred earlier this month during a dinner in Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, while Trump visited his Bedminster club as part of a working vacation.

According to CBS News, at the dinner, Westerhout also gossiped about broadcast journalists who were seeking to sit down with the president. 

Though the White House has yet to comment on her departure, the New York Times quoted a source who said Westerhout is now a “separated employee” and is barred from returning to the White House. Westerhout has also not made any public comments regarding her departure. 

As Trump’s personal assistant, her office was situated directly in front of the Oval Office in the West Wing, with many media outlets dubbing her a “gatekeeper” to the president. During a farewell event for Sarah Sanders, the Trump Administration’s former press secretary, sources said Westerhout bragged about her role as a gatekeeper.

At the time of her resignation, she was earning $145,000 annually. 

Westerhout’s History with Trump

Westerhout previously worked on Mitt Romney’s 2012 presidential campaign, having taken off the fall semester of her senior year at the College of Charleston to work as an intern.

She is also a former Republican National Committee assistant to Kate Walsh. Walsh later served on Trump’s transition team and accepted the role of White House Deputy Chief of Staff before resigning after two months.

At first, Westerhout was reportedly not in favor of a Trump administration, with Tim Alberta of Politico writing in his book American Carnage that she was so upset on election night in 2016, she cried. It also states Trump had reservations about Westerhout working as part of his staff. Because of this, some White House officials also feared she would be disloyal to the president. 

“She was a spy from day one who sought to use her proximity to the president to curry favor with his detractors,” a former White House official said of her.

A different former White House official rebuked comments about her intentions, saying she had been singled out by long-term members of Trump’s team for her past with the RNC. The same official also denied reports that she cried on election night.

Yet another former official compared her resignation to a “mob hit,” claiming Alberta’s book stoked questions about her loyalty to the president. 

During Trump’s transition, she gained traction from the media for her role in escorting potential administration officials and even Leonardo DiCaprio through Trump Tower.

“The President-elect wanted to make sure all of his meetings were very transparent, so it became a little bit more public than I originally thought it was going to be,” she told CNN in 2016.

Later in her role, she reportedly enjoyed her access to the president, sharing photos of herself at rallies on her private Instagram account or joking that she printed a piece of paper Trump held up during a speech. Trump, in turn, has often called her “my beauty.”

Politico reported that Westerhout, this year, had been working to expand her job to include aspects like foreign travel. One White House staffer claimed she had been acting like a de facto chief of staff and described her recent dinner with reporters in Bedminster as the “final straw.” 

While writing Fire and Fury, journalist Bob Woodward reached out to interview Trump several times but never received the opportunity. Later, speaking with the president, Trump asked him, “Did you speak to Madeleine?” 

Woodward then indicated he had not, to which Trump said, “Madeleine is the key. She’s the secret.”

Hatch Act Violation

In 2018, Westerhout was found to have violated the Hatch Act, along with deputy press secretary Raj Shah, deputy director of communications Jessica Ditto, and three other White House officials. 

The Hatch Act, written into law in 1939, constitutes that federal employees cannot distribute partisan messages on channels of communication used for official government business. That includes social media accounts. 

The violation came from the Office of the Special Counsel to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and found that four of the six staffers — including Westerhout — either tweeted “#MAGA” or “Make America Great Again!” 

The OSC argued that since she and others used the political slogan of Trump in his re-election campaign for 2020, they had violated the act to keep federal employees politically neutral in their jobs.

No action was taken against Westerhout or the five other staffers.

See what others are saying: (BBC) (CNN) (Fox News)

U.S.

AMC Will Set Movie Ticket Prices Based on Seat Locations

Published

on

The decision has faced backlash, but AMC executives claim it will ensure that “guests have more control over their experience.”


Sightline by AMC

AMC, the largest movie theater chain in the U.S., is changing its price metric by charging more at admission for preferred seats and offering value seats at a lower cost. 

The new pricing experiment is called Sightline by AMC, and it offers three different tiers. Value Sightline includes the seats right next to the screen, while Preferred Sightline includes seats that are centered and in the middle of the theater. The average seats, or Standard Sightline, will remain at the normal price of admission. 

“While every seat at AMC delivers an amazing moviegoing experience, we know there are some moviegoers who prioritize their specific seat and others who prioritize value moviegoing,” AMC’s executive vice president and CMO Eliot Hamlisch said to Variety. “Sightline at AMC accommodates both sentiments to help ensure that our guests have more control over their experience, so that every trip to an AMC is a great one.”

However, Sightline will not apply to AMC’s Discount Tuesday deal — every ticket will still be offered at $5 regardless of seat location. Sightline will also only apply to evening shows after 4:00 p.m.

The Reception

The movie theater giant has faced backlash for this new price structure, including from people in the entertainment industry.

“This is absurdly stupid & only creates unnecessary classism,” actor and director Seth Green wrote on Twitter. “AMCTheatres clearly focused on squeezing new profits anywhere possible. Trying to get people back into theaters? Don’t penalize folks with less to spend.” 

Actor Elijah Wood also condemned the change for disproportionately impacting lower-income families.

“The movie theater is and always has been a sacred democratic space for all and this new initiative by AMCTheatres would essentially penalize people for lower income and reward for higher income,” Wood wrote. 

This is not the first time AMC has experimented with its pricing. During the opening weekend of “The Batman” last year, AMC announced it would be charging $1 to $2 more for it compared to other movies playing at the same time. Back in 2019, the chain tested a different pricing initiative, charging more for movies “of the highest appeal” and making less in-demand movies cheaper. 

See what others are saying: (Variety) (Complex) (NowThis

Continue Reading

U.S.

Neo-Nazi Leader Charged in Plot to “Destroy Baltimore” By Attacking Substations — a Growing Trend

Published

on

Experts say that far-right extremist attacks on energy infrastructure have grown significantly in the last few years.


Conspiracy to Attack Maryland Energy Systems

A neo-Nazi leader who was recently released from prison and a woman he met while incarcerated were arrested on Monday for plotting to “completely destroy” the power grid in Baltimore, Maryland.

Special Agent in Charge Thomas J. Sobocinski of the FBI field office in Baltimore said in a press conference that the two had “conspired to inflict maximum harm on the power grid,” by targeting five electrical substations that serve 1.2 million people in central Maryland.

He noted that the pair ”were not just talking, but taking steps to fulfill their threats and further their extremist goals.”

Their plot, however, was foiled by law enforcement before they could put it into action, in large part because both extensively detailed their plans to an FBI informant on encrypted messaging apps.

Sobocinski described their extremist views as “racially or ethnically motivated.”

The neo-Nazi leader is the founder of a small but dangerous group called the Atomwaffen Division, which uses civil disorder and violence because they believe it will help spark a race war in the U.S. — a white supremacist theory known as “accelerationism.”

Authorities say that he previously plotted with his roommates — also members of the group — to attack energy facilities in Florida. Before he could, he was arrested and put in federal prison for possessing bomb-making materials.

During that time, he began to communicate with the woman, who was serving time in a separate facility in Maryland after being charged with robbing multiple convenience stores with a machete.

Authorities point to several pieces of evidence that indicate she too had been radicalized, including a statement she wrote that prosecutors say resembles a manifesto, in which she references Hitler, the Unabomber, and a far-right Norwegian terrorist and stated: “I would sacrifice **everything** for my people.”

The woman’s mother also told The Washington Post that she had become involved with neo-Nazi beliefs in prison, which she has been in and out of since 2006.

A Growing Trend

Federal law enforcement officials have said there is “no indication” the planned attack in Baltimore was connected to other attacks. The plot, however, comes on the heels of similar events.

In early December, there were a series of attacks on substations in North Carolina that were very reminiscent of what the pair in Maryland were plotting. In fact, prosecutors even said the neo-Nazi leader sent the FBI informant a video about that attack. 

While authorities have provided little information on a suspect or motive in North Carolina, it has been reported that they have zeroed in on two possibilities that both center around far-right extremism. 

Around the same time in December, there were also a series of attacks on the grid in the Pacific Northwest.

Researchers and homeland security officials have said that far-right extremists have been increasingly targeting energy infrastructure while operating under the neo-Nazi theory of accelerationism.

According to a study by the program on extremism at George Washington University released in September, white supremacist attempts to target energy systems “dramatically increased in frequency” from 2016 to 2022.

“Since 2019, white supremacist attacks plots against critical infrastructure systems have distinctly increased,” the study found.

Brian Harrell, a former Homeland Security official who oversaw infrastructure protection at the department, told The Post that he saw a noticeable surge in violent extremists talking about carrying out these attacks online.

“When digging into the ‘dark web,’ social media portals and chat rooms, we quickly see that targeting and destroying energy infrastructure is a tactic many extremist groups fantasize about,” he said.

Editor’s Note: At Rogue Rocket, we make it a point to not include the names and pictures of mass murders, suspected mass murderers, or those accused of committing violent crimes who may have been seeking attention or infamy. Therefore, we will not be linking to other sources, as they may contain these details.

Continue Reading

U.S.

College Board Changes AP African American Studies After Backlash From DeSantis Amid Education Culture War

Published

on

As requested by DeSantis, the College Board removed lessons on contemporary topics including Black Lives Matter, queer studies, and reparations.


College Board Rolls Out Curriculum

The College Board, which oversees Advanced Placement high school courses, announced an official curriculum framework for its new, landmark Advanced Placement African American studies on Wednesday.

The announcement, made on the first day of Black History Month, has faced scrutiny for seeming to scale back a number of relevant subjects that Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) and other state education officials had criticized.

In January, DeSantis said that the new course would be banned in Florida unless changes were made, arguing that a draft version of the course was “woke.” 

Education officials claimed that the class, which had been in the making for nearly a decade, violated a recent state law dubbed the Stop WOKE Act. The legislation regulates public school instruction on race by banning critical race theory and any education that describes some groups as oppressed and others as privileged based on race or sex.

Democrats denounced DeSantis’ action as a political stunt and urged the College Board to maintain its principles.

According to reports, many historical topics like slavery largely remain intact from the previous draft. However, important contemporary issues like Black Lives Matter, affirmative action, queer studies, reparations, and intersectionality — all of which Florida leaders objected to — were removed from curriculum requirements and are no longer part of the AP exam.

Instead, those areas of study have been downgraded to be part of a list of options students can pursue for a mandatory research project. The College Board also added a new research project idea to that list that will certainly please the right: “Black conservatism.”

It has additionally been reported that the organization pulled names of multiple Black authors the state education officials had flagged as problematic, including many famous and pioneering Black scholars who wrote about critical race theory, the queer experience, and Black feminism. 

The College Board defended itself against criticism in a press release announcing the changes, claiming that the process of developing the framework “has operated independently from political pressure.”

DeSantis’ Ongoing Culture War

DeSantis’ attempts to influence the national curriculum of an AP course are just his latest in a much broader effort to control what is and is not taught in public schools.

Just one day before the College Board announced the revised course, the governor outlined what The New York Times described as “his most aggressive swing yet at the education establishment.”

Specifically, he proposed a massive overhaul to higher education in the state that would defund and eliminate diversity and equity programs, mandate courses on Western civilization, and reduce tenure protections that are essential to ensure professors have freedom of expression.

Furthermore, the effects of another law DeSantis signed last year are now just beginning to materialize. The policy, which went into effect this July, requires every school book to be age-appropriate, “free of pornography,” and “suited to student needs.” 

To follow those guidelines, school books have to be approved by a certified media specialist who has undergone specific training.

Notably, the law also states that teachers can be charged with third-degree felonies if they “knowingly or unknowingly” give students access to a book that the specialists say is harmful — meaning that they could face up to five years in prison and a $5,000 fine.

Last month, the state education department clarified that the rule does not just apply to school libraries, but also to any books a teacher keeps in their classroom too. 

Multiple outlets reported this week that records they obtained show at least two school districts have now directed teachers to either remove their books or hide them until review to avoid the possibility of going to jail.

See what others are saying: (The New York Times) (The Washington Post) (The Associated Press)

Continue Reading