Connect with us

Business

Old Navy Store Accused of Hiding Black Workers During ‘Queer Eye’ Taping

Published

on

  • An Old Navy employee said that while Queer Eye was filming in her store, employees of color were told to work in the back while white workers brought in from other stores worked in the front by the cameras.
  • Old Navy said no employees were selected to appear on camera based on race.
  • Netflix said it had nothing to do with Old Navy’s staffing decisions, but noted that an African-American manager did appear on camera. 
  • Cast member Tan France echoed their statement and said he would not have allowed Old Navy to send people of color to the back.

Old Navy Employee Writes Facebook Post

An employee at a Philadelphia Old Navy claimed that workers of color were sent to the back of the store during the taping of an episode for Netflix’s Queer Eye.

Monae Alvarado wrote a Facebook post on Aug. 21, alleging that white employees from nearby stores were brought in to work at the Old Navy in Center City, Philadelphia, the store she usually works at. She said that most of her store’s employees are people of color and added that they worked overnight to get the store ready for filming, only to be hidden later on.

“Today they brought all these workers from other store around the region (West Chester, Mount Pocono, and Deptford NJ) and they were all white,” she wrote. “They had us standing in the back not to be seen while the other workers from another store get to work on our floor like it’s their store. The shade I tell you.”

Alvarado’s post has since received a lot of online attention, with over 2.6 thousand likes and almost as many shares. After it spread its way across the Internet, Alvarado wrote a comment adding more details to her story. 

“I tried to get on the floor a few times but was shooed away,” she said. “I was told to go to the back of the store near the register where most of my co-workers were.”

She added that one employee asked to stay upstairs in the back by the toddler and baby section, while another was sent to the fitting room. 

“The rest of us were just standing in the back with nothing to do,” her comment continued. “They didn’t want us to move around while they were in the store filming. Even if my co-workers don’t mind, Old Navy is supposed to be a company that accepts ethnic diversity and they should show it. Unfortunately pushing their non-white employees out of sight for a white washed TV publicity show is not accepting ethnic diversity but it is just the opposite: prejudice, racism and discrimination.”

Monae was not the only Old Navy employee to say they experienced this. Two others, who chose not to be named, spoke to Philadelphia Magazine. One said they were under the impression they would be on camera once the cameras arrived. 

Another said they “felt the racism” once they were told to go to areas of the store they usually do not work in. 

“It became clear that we weren’t going to be filmed because we hadn’t been asked to sign consent forms,” the employee added. “And they made it a point to keep us as far away from the cameras as possible. Most of the staff and managers at our store location are black.”

Outrage Sparked Online

As this story gained more traction, it sparked online outrage. One user said that whoever is responsible for this “needs to be fired.” 

Another accused the critically acclaimed Netflix show of whitewashing.

Some also called for a boycott of both the show and the store.

Old Navy and ‘Queer Eye’ Respond

Old Navy’s corporate office responded to the incident in a statement to Philadelphia Magazine

“At Old Navy, we celebrate the diversity of our teams and our customers and foster an environment of inclusion and belonging,” the company said. “We were proud to work with The Queer Eye show to film at our store in Philadelphia and to feature our local store manager on camera.”

Old Navy added that it did bring additional employees to the store to make sure everything ran smoothly, as the building was still open to customers during filming. The company said employees were also aware that they could appear in the background of the show.  

These individuals are reflective of our diverse employee population,” the statement continued. “We would never select employees to participate – or not – based on race. That is completely inaccurate and against the values we stand for as a company.”

Netflix gave a statement to NBC 10 where they said they “had no knowledge or influence on Old Navy staffing choices while filming in a Philadelphia-based store this past week.” 

Netflix also said that an African American manager was featured on camera for a styling consultation. 

Tan France, Queer Eye’s fashion expert, also spoke up about the situation in a comment on Alvarado’s post. The comment came from an unverified account, however, France did share it on his Instagram story to confirm that it was him.

“This is Tan,” the comment read. “I don’t know what happened behind the scenes, or overnight, but what i can tell you is that there no way I would ever have allowed production to move POC to the back.”

Tan France’s comment below Monae Alvarado’s post.

“I should also mention that I had one person join me on camera, from Old Navy,” France added. “She was african american. This is the last I will say on this matter.”

According to NBC 10, Alvardo spoke to Old Navy’s HR and the situation is under investigation.

See what others are saying: (NBC 10) (Philadelphia Magazine) (Philadelphia Inquirer)

Business

Nike To Clean and Resell Used Sneakers at a Discounted Price

Published

on

  • At least 15 Nike retail locations in the U.S. are participating in a new program the company calls “Nike Refurbish,” which is aimed at reducing waste.
  • As part of it, Nike will restore shoes with manufacturing flaws, as well as donated or returned shoes, and resell them at a discounted price.
  • Shoes at the end of their wear will be recycled into Nike Grind materials that are used to construct running tracks, gym floors, playgrounds, other Nike products, and more.

Nike Refurbish

Nike announced a new program on Monday called “Nike Refurbish” that will help boost sustainability and reduce waste.

As part of the program, the brand will take donated and returned shoes that are like new or gently used, as well as shoes with cosmetic manufacturing flaws, then clean and restore them to resell at a discounted price. Returned shoes must have been brought back within Nike’s 60-day return period in order for them to be resold. 

Nike employee restoring an eligible pair of sneakers. Source: Nike

All the refurbished shoes will have labeling on the box with information about their condition grade. Plus, they are also covered under Nike’s 60-day return policy. 

Nike Refurbished Footwear Sustainability Initiative | Well+Good
Source: Nike

Nike’s Recycling Efforts

Nike didn’t say what it previously did with returned sneakers in its announcement, but the new plan is part of its wider attempts to recycle materials.

On its website, it markets the initiative as a way for customers to “help keep shoes out of landfills.” and join Nike’s efforts towards, “Zero carbon and zero waste to help protect the future of sport.” 

Shoes that are truly at the end of their wear will be recycled into Nike Grind materials that are then used for tons of other projects, including running tracks, gym floors, playgrounds, outdoor courts, as well as other Nike apparel and footwear.

Nike Grind | Nike Purpose
Nike Grind material that was used to create an outdoor track. Source: Nike

So far, 15 Nike retail locations across the U.S. are confirmed to be participating in this model, but there are plans in place to expand this list over the course of 2021.

See what others are saying: (FOX Business) (Footwear News) (Miami Herald)

Continue Reading

Business

Uber Sees Record Ride Demand But Doesn’t Have Enough Drivers Available

Published

on

  • Demand for Ubers outpaced driver availability in March, according to a Monday statement from Uber.
  • On top of seeing its best-performing month since the beginning of pandemic closures, the company also received more bookings last month than any other month in its entire history.
  • In an attempt to attract more drivers, Uber announced a $250 million, one-time stimulus payment last week to “boost” driver earnings.
  • While Uber said it believes it will turn a profit for 2021, the company could be set back more than $500 million because of a U.K. Supreme Court ruling that gives the country’s drivers minimum wage, holiday pay, and pension.

Uber Posts Record-Setting Growth

Uber announced Monday that its ride requests for the month of March were the highest it has ever recorded in its 12-year history. 

According to a filing with the SEC, last month, the company crossed “a $30 billion annualized Gross Bookings run-rate.” Alongside that, average daily Gross Bookings grew 9% from the previous month. 

Notably, this also marked the company’s best month since March of last year, when pandemic closures began in the U.S.

On top of that, Uber said its delivery business crossed “a $52 billion annualized Gross Bookings run-rate in March, growing more than 150% year-over-year.”

In fact, that demand over the past month was so high that Uber didn’t have enough drivers to meet it.

As vaccination rates increase in the United States, we are observing that consumer demand for Mobility is recovering faster than driver availability, and consumer demand for Delivery continues to exceed courier availability,” the company said.

$250 Million Driver Stimulus

Monday’s filing is in line with another announcement from Uber, which said last week that it is opening up a $250 million driver stimulus to “boost” earnings for drivers. 

“In 2021, there are more riders requesting trips than there are drivers available to give them—making it a great time to be a driver,” the company said at the time. “We want drivers to take advantage of higher earnings now because this is likely a temporary situation.”

“As the recovery continues, we expect more drivers will be hitting the road, which means that over time earnings will come back to pre-Covid levels.”

Can Uber Become Profitable?

In February, Uber reported $6.8 billion in losses for 2020, and for years, many have questioned if its business model is even profitable at all; however, in this latest filing, Uber said it believes it’ll become profitable by the end of 2021.

That said, last month, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom handed drivers a major win by ruling that they need to be reclassified as “workers,” guaranteeing them minimum wage, holiday pay, and pension. 

While big news, the U.K. classifies “workers” and “employees” separately. As a result, U.K. drivers still aren’t granted full benefits. 

The decision will also likely be a setback for Uber, as Bank of America has estimated that it could cost the company more than $500 million. 

Uber’s Vaccine Access Fund

In other Uber news, the company — along with PayPal and Walgreens — has launched a “Vaccine Access Fund.”

Through that fund, customers can donate money that will be used to help people who normally lack transportation get to their vaccination appointment.

Notably, all three companies have said they’ll donate a joint $11 million. 

That’s on top of the $5 million PayPal previously donated, as well as the 10 million free and discounted rides Uber promised to give in December. 

Uber users are able to donate in-app, and PayPal has launched a donation page on its website.

See what others are saying: (The Wall Street Journal) (CNBC) (CNET)

Continue Reading

Business

China Hits Alibaba With $2.8 Billion Antitrust Fine

Published

on

  • Chinese regulators slapped Alibaba with a $2.8 billion fine for monopolistic practices on Saturday, which amounts to 4% of the e-commerce mega-giant’s domestic sales.
  • Regulators accused the company of specifically engaging in a policy known as “choose one out of two,” where Alibaba would penalize sellers who also used other platforms to sell their goods.
  • CEO Daniel Zhang believes the company won’t be negatively affected by the fine, which could have been set as high as 10% of all sales.
  • Despite the fine, the company’s stock rose over 6% by Monday’s closing of the Hong Kong stock exchange.

Dominating the Marketplace

The Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba was hit with a $2.8 billion antitrust fine by Chinese regulators on Saturday for using its dominant position in the market to punish merchants and rivals.

In particular, it engaged in a policy known as “choose one out of two,”  where a seller on Alibaba would be penalized in a variety of ways if they were found to be selling on another platform.

While the $2.8 billion fine seems large, it only accounts for 4% of the company’s domestic sales. The fine could’ve been far worse, as antitrust fines in China can go as high as 10% of the company’s annual sales.

Alibaba has agreed to take the fine, not fight it, and will fully comply with the demands of the regulators. Those demands include three years of “self-examination compliance reports” to ensure the company isn’t engaging in the same practices.

The news comes after the company’s founder, Jack Ma, has been under intense scrutiny from Chinese officials. Ma has not been seen in the public eye for months and his Ant Group, a sister company to Alibaba, is being forced by Chinese regulators as of Monday morning to become a financial holding company; therefore facing much stricter banking regulations.

Clear Sailing From Here

Fortunately for Alibaba, the company has managed to dodge much of the scrutiny Ma faces as he isn’t really involved with the business anymore. Its current leadership also doesn’t think the fine will really affect the company at all. Unlike Ma’s past rhetoric that was dismissive of regulators, CEO Daniel Zhang released a statement on Saturday that struck a conciliatory tone.

“Alibaba would not have achieved our growth without sound government regulation and service, and the critical oversight, tolerance and support from all of our constituencies have been crucial to our development,” he said.

Zhang added Monday morning that he doesn’t expect any negative impacts from the situation, which possibly helped Alibaba’s stock to rise sharply from $223 per share to $241 as of Monday’s closing of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, where the shares are traded.

There are a plethora of reasons that could explain the stock’s rise just after it was the target of a major antitrust fine, but notably, there doesn’t seem to be any more antitrust fines in the pipeline, leading investors to be confident that the worst is behind the company.

See what others are saying: (Investors) (New York Times) (Wall Street Journal)

Continue Reading