- Beauty YouTuber Jackie Aina created an eyeshadow palette with Anastasia Beverly Hills that includes a shade named “Wiggalese.”
- Critics are calling the name racist and saying that it is a play on the word “wigger,” a term used to describe white people who emulate mannerisms and styles associated with black culture.
- However, fans, the president of ABH, and Aina herself have said that the name is a reference to wigs and wig language.
Backlash Over “Wiggalese”
Beauty YouTuber Jackie Aina released a new eyeshadow palette in collaboration with Anastasia Beverly Hills this week, which some critics are now slamming because of the name of one particular shade.
Aina, who has more than 3.1 million subscribers on her channel, announced the palette on Sunday. Shortly after seeing the full range of colors and shade names, some called out Aina for naming one shade “Wiggalese.”
Outraged viewers argued that the name was another version of the term “wigger,” a slang word used against white people who emulate mannerisms and styles associated with black culture.
One Twitter user said that the term, “is just racist AF when u remove the ‘lese’ from it.” Another called it a slur.
Shame ABH included a word with a slur in it.— Zadidoll (@zadidoll) August 5, 2019
Supporters Defend Aina
Several fans defended the shade name and said that the term is actually just a reference to wigs.
WHERE?!?!? Explain….where????? She is talking about her WIGS!!!!! Explain. Make it make sense— Golden*Heart (@GoldenOnyxHeart) August 5, 2019
In her announcement video, Aina even explained the meaning behind all of her shade names. “So wiggalese is just basically legal jargon but basically the wig equivalent of that,” she said.
Aina then explained that while working with a legal team on the shade names before the launch, she was asked what the name meant and said: “You know the definition of legalese you just take that and apply that to wigs. You know the legalisation of something can be described as the wigilisation of something.”
Claudia Soare, better known as Norvina, the president of Anastasia Beverly Hills and daughter of the brand’s founder, eventually took to Twitter to respond to the accusations of racism.
“Absolutely not,” she wrote. “I would never allow that. It’s about wigs.” Norvina went on to suggest that the idea of Aina including a racist shade name would be ridiculous. “Also why would Jackie name one of her own shades …. nvm.”
Aina is known for being a staunch advocate for better inclusion of people of color in beauty and fashion. She has called out brands for poor shade ranges, lack of diversity in social media campaign or pages, and poor support of black influencers.
While announcing her palette, Aina even said that it was suitable for all skin tones but was especially made for people with medium to dark complections.
After seeing the outrage over the shade name, many of her fans hit back at critics and argued that they were the ones being racist for trying to bash a black influencer and not support her collaboration.
This sparked more outrage from Aina’s critics who spoke out against being labeled as racist. “The fact that I disagree w a lot of things she’s done & said does not make me a racist,” one user wrote.
Others like award-winning makeup artist Kevin James Bennet even argued that Aina should step in and address the name-calling with her followers.
As of now, Aina has not publically addressed the outrage surrounding the shade name.
See what others are saying: (Paper Magazine) (We The Unicorns) (Bustle)
Jake Paul Says He “Can’t Get Cancelled” as a Boxer
The controversial YouTuber opened up about what it has been like to go from online fame to professional boxing.
The New Yorker Profiles Jake Paul
YouTuber and boxer Jake Paul talked about his career switch, reputation, and cancel culture in a profile published Monday in The New Yorker.
While Paul rose to fame as the Internet’s troublemaker, he now spends most of his time in the ring. He told the outlet that one difference between YouTube and boxing is that his often controversial reputation lends better to his new career.
“One thing that is great about being a fighter is, like, you can’t get cancelled,” Paul said. The profile noted that the sport often rewards and even encourages some degree of bad behavior.
“I’m not a saint,” Paul later continued. “I’m also not a bad guy, but I can very easily play the role.”
Paul also said the other difference between his time online and his time in boxing is the level of work. While he says he trains hard, he confessed that there was something more challenging about making regular YouTube content.
“Being an influencer was almost harder than being a boxer,” he told The New Yorker. “You wake up in the morning and you’re, like, Damn, I have to create fifteen minutes of amazing content, and I have twelve hours of sunlight.”
Jake Paul Vs. Tommy Fury
The New Yorker profile came just after it was announced over the weekend Paul will be fighting boxer Tommy Fury in an 8-round cruiserweight fight on Showtime in December.
“It’s time to kiss ur last name and ur family’s boxing legacy goodbye,” Paul tweeted. “DEC 18th I’m changing this wankers name to Tommy Fumbles and celebrating with Tom Brady.”
Both Paul and Fury are undefeated, according to ESPN. Like Paul, Fury has found fame outside of the sport. He has become a reality TV star in the U.K. after appearing on the hit show “Love Island.”
See what others are saying: (The New Yorker) (Dexerto) (ESPN)
Hackers Hit Twitch Again, This Time Replacing Backgrounds With Image of Jeff Bezos
The hack appears to be a form of trolling, though it’s possible that the infiltrators were able to uncover a security flaw while reviewing Twitch’s newly-leaked source code.
Hackers targeted Twitch for a second time this week, but rather than leaking sensitive information, the infiltrators chose to deface the platform on Friday by swapping multiple background images with a photo of former Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos.
According to those who saw the replaced images firsthand, the hack appears to have mostly — and possibly only — affected game directory headers. Though the incident appears to be nothing more than a surface-level prank, as Amazon owns Twitch, it could potentially signal greater security flaws.
For example, it’s possible the hackers could have used leaked internal security data from earlier this week to discover a network vulnerability and sneak into the platform.
The latest jab at the platforms came after Twitch assured its users it has seen “no indication” that their login credentials were stolen during the first hack. Still, concerns have remained regarding the potential for others to now spot cracks in Twitch’s security systems.
It’s also possible the Bezos hack resulted from what’s known as “cache poisoning,” which, in this case, would refer to a more limited form of hacking that allowed the infiltrators to manipulate similar images all at once. If true, the hackers likely would not have been able to access Twitch’s back end.
The photo changes only lasted several hours before being returned to their previous conditions.
First Twitch Hack
Despite suspicions and concerns, it’s unclear whether the Bezos hack is related to the major leak of Twitch’s internal data that was posted to 4chan on Wednesday.
That leak exposed Twitch’s full source code — including its security tools — as well as data on how much Twitch has individually paid every single streamer on the platform since August 2019.
It also revealed Amazon’s at least partially developed plans for a cloud-based gaming library, codenamed Vapor, which would directly compete with the massively popular library known as Steam.
Even though Twitch has said its login credentials appear to be secure, it announced Thursday that it has reset all stream keys “out of an abundance of caution.” Users are still being urged to change their passwords and update or implement two-factor authentication if they haven’t already.
Twitch Blames Server Configuration Error for Hack, Says There’s No Indication That Login Info Leaked
The platform also said full credit card numbers were not reaped by hackers, as that data is stored externally.
Login and Credit Card Info Secure
Twitch released a security update late Wednesday claiming it had seen “no indication” that users’ login credentials were stolen by hackers who leaked the entire platform’s source code earlier in the day.
“Full credit card numbers are not stored by Twitch, so full credit card numbers were not exposed,” the company added in its announcement.
The leaked data, uploaded to 4chan, includes code related to the platform’s security tools, as well as exact totals of how much it has individually paid every single streamer on the platform since August 2019.
Early Thursday, Twitch also announced that it has now reset all stream keys “out of an abundance of caution.” Streamers looking for their new keys can visit a dashboard set up by the platform, though users may need to manually update their software with the new key before being able to stream again depending on what kind of software they use.
As far as what led to the hackers being able to steal the data, Twitch blamed an error in a “server configuration change that was subsequently accessed by a malicious third party,” confirming that the leak was not the work of a current employee who used internal tools.
Will Users Go to Other Streaming Platforms?
While no major creators have said they are leaving Twitch for a different streaming platform because of the hack, many small users have either announced their intention to leave Twitch or have said they are considering such a move.
It’s unclear if the leak, coupled with other ongoing Twitch controversies, will ultimately lead to a significant user exodus, but there’s little doubt that other platforms are ready and willing to leverage this hack in the hopes of attracting new users.
At least one big-name streamer has already done as much, even if largely only presenting the idea as a playful jab rather than with serious intention.
“Pretty crazy day today,” YouTube’s Valkyrae said on a stream Wednesday while referencing a tweet she wrote earlier the day.
“YouTube is looking to sign more streamers,” that tweet reads.
“I mean, they are! … No shade to Twitch… Ah! Well…” Valkyrae said on stream before interrupting herself to note that she was not being paid by YouTube to make her comments.